Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Shared decision making: Changing the relationship between doctor and patient

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Upcoming SlideShare
Shared Decision Making
Shared Decision Making
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 46 Ad

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Viewers also liked (13)

Advertisement

Similar to Shared decision making: Changing the relationship between doctor and patient (20)

More from Markus Oei (19)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

Shared decision making: Changing the relationship between doctor and patient

  1. 1. SHARED DECISION MAKING: CHANGING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DOCTOR & PATIENT MARKUS OEI SANDRA VAN DULMEN GLYN ELWYN TON DRENTHEN PAULINE DE HEER MARLEEN VLEMING & SUSANNE SUZOR-VAN ZWICHT
  2. 2. PLAY 1 (THE “OLD FASHIONED WAY”)
  3. 3. PROGRAM Part 1: Why Shared Decision Making and what is it? Part 2: What resources and eHealth tools do we need? Part 3: How can we use it in clinical practice?
  4. 4. PART 1: SHARED DECISION MAKING WHAT AND WHY? SANDRA VAN DULMEN GLYNN ELWYN
  5. 5. E-HEALTH EXAMPLE 1
  6. 6. SDM in context Prof. dr. Sandra van Dulmen eHealth week 2016 Amsterdam
  7. 7. Imagine having to make preference sensitive treatment decisions • Depression • COPD
  8. 8. Prerequisites for three-talk model Patient - Understanding - Participation - Role in decision-making Physician - Attitude - Tailoring - Patient experiences Interaction - Time - Values, preferences and emotions - Respect
  9. 9. Web-based decision support tools - Video Zorgkeuzelab - Decision support tools enhance patient involvement1 and force - Physicians to attend to patient values and preferences - Patients to think about their values and preferences - Decision support tools1 - Increase knowledge and risk perception - Decrease decisional conflict - As a result, better adherence and quality of life2 and less invasive tests3 1 Van Weert et al, 2016 2 Stacey et al, 2008 3 Knops et al, 2013
  10. 10. Meanwhile in daily clinical practice…. -Many patients have no idea that they have a choice -Medical arguments weight more in decision- making than patient preferences -Physicians do not inquire about their values and preferences in 1/5 of the visits -30% of patients want their physician to make the decision, especially when being seriously ill, even then…
  11. 11. PART 2: SHARED DECISION MAKING WHAT DO WE NEED? TON DRENTHEN PAULINE DE HEER MARKUS OEI
  12. 12. PLAY 2 “COMMON PRACTISE” SDM
  13. 13. Decision aids as an integrated part of a website with evidence-/guideline-based information on health and disease Ton Drenthen, PhD Dept. Prevention and Patient education Dutch College of GPs Amsterdam, June 9, 2016
  14. 14. • Founded in 1956 • 90% of GPs is member of NHG (>11.000 members) • Mission: support and improve evidence-based general practice • One of the activities: supporting GPs in patient education Dutch College of General Practitioners (NHG)
  15. 15. Use of • 75% of Dutch GPs use it in their consultation • 60.000-90.000 visits a day
  16. 16. Example: decision aid
  17. 17. Effect Thuisarts.nl at doctor’s visit Did visit GPDid not visit GP Huisarts & Wetenschap mei 2015
  18. 18. Future • Addition with specialist medical information • More decision aids and option grids • Multimedia: more videos and images • Extension to eHealth platform: – Making appointments – Linking patient records – Etc.
  19. 19. t.drenthen@nhg.org
  20. 20. Improving information availability for patients The role of the government Pauline de Heer eHealth week, 9 June 2016
  21. 21. 24 National Health Care Institute (Zorginstituut Nederland in Dutch) Main tasks: • Coverage of the Health Insurance Act and Long-Term Care Act • Risk adjustment for Health Insurance companies • Facilitating good health care and quality improvement • Reviewing health care professions and education, and future needs
  22. 22. 25 Health Care Quality: facilitating good health care • Contributes to good health care by helping – parties involved to continually improve health care quality – patients find their way to good-quality care • Makes quality transparent – Care-providers measure the outcomes of care, based on quality standard – Health Care Quality programme publishes quality information › public database with open data › kiesBeter.nl for patients
  23. 23. 26 Website kiesBeter.nl (chooseBetter) Aim: Providing user-friendly access to information on good health care in the Netherlands Providing access: referring where possible, otherwise offer information ourselves Focus on good health care: • What is good health care? • Where can I find good health care? (quality of health care providers) + • Where can I find other trustworthy information? Currently 175 pages on diseases and 10 guides to health care themes Currently information on 2,000 health care organisations within 7 sectors Currently links to more than 2,000 guidelines, websites, option grids, etc.
  24. 24. 27
  25. 25. 28 Other activities to help patients get good information • Support and cooperate with (patient) organisations to improve and share their patient information • Public database with open data on quality of health care • All KiesBeter pages are shared with Betrouwbare Bron and Inforium
  26. 26. Bringing the information to the patient: the missing link
  27. 27. Focus shift : to doctor-patiënt Information Decision aids App(lication)s Shared Database Doctor Patiënt But everybody uses email! (80-100%) Acceptance: Personal health record 0-10 % Health portal 0-10% Apps ??
  28. 28. Features and acceptance • Very easy to use (for doctor and patiënt ) • Privacy issues solved • accepted by hospital security officers, privacy experts and organizations • Acceptance by patiënts: over 80% (92% in our clinic) • Patiënts love it • Rating over 8 • Several nominations/ awards
  29. 29. PART 3: SHARED DECISION MAKING IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
  30. 30. Shared decision making: Here and now Dr. Marleen Vleming, MD, PhD, ENT-surgeon Dr. Markus Oei, MD, PhD, ENT-surgeon
  31. 31. Results • High patient satisfaction • Patients choose more conservatively • 25% less operations
  32. 32. SHARED DATABASE OF MEDICAL INFORMATION AND DECISION AIDS TRANSMURAL, REGIONAL, STANDARD PATIENT INFORMATION TOOL MAY 2016-APRIL 2017 PROJECT CHIP- CONNECTED HEALTH INFORMATION PLATFORM: PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER
  33. 33. PARTNERS
  34. 34. CITY OF ALMERE 8TH LARGEST CITY IN THE NETHERLANDS POPULATION 200.000 START IMPLEMENTATION JUNE 2016 • 50% OF THE GENERAL PRACTITIONERS • 80% PHARMACIES • 25% PHYSIOTHERAPISTS • 30% FLEVOZIEKENHUIS (HOSPITAL) • OTHER HEALTH DISCIPLINES • SCALE-UP OTHER REGIONS
  35. 35. SHARED DATABASE • NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS: DECISION AIDS AND RELIABLE HEALTH INFORMATION • GOVERNMENTAL • MEDICAL • NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS • PATIENT ORGANIZATIONS • LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS: LOCAL INFORMATION • FLEVOZIEKENHUIS (HOSPITAL) • ALMERE CARE GROUP (HOME PHYSICIANS, PHARMACISTS, PHYSIOTHERAPISTS) • OTHER PROFESSIONALS • HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: SHARE ACCESS TO HEALTH INFORMATION AND DECISION AIDS
  36. 36. WHAT’S IN IT FOR THE PATIENT? • TAILORED INFORMATION FOR MORE GRIP AND UNDERSTANDING OF HIS DISEASE AND TREATMENT OPTIONS • A PATIENT INFORMATION RECORD (NOT PHR) IN HIS OWN MAILBOX, APPLICATION OR APP • PATIENT IS THE CORE (OWNER) • CAN DECIDE TO SHARE, DELETE, STORE ALL RECEIVED INFORMATION • IT’S FREE! • TRANSMURAL USAGE • MEDICAL INFORMATION/DECISION AIDS SENT BY ALL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS/ORGANIZATIONS • COÖRDINATED INFORMATION • GATEWAY TO MEDICAL APPS, APPLICATIONS, PORTALS, PERSONAL HEALTH RECORDS (PHR)
  37. 37. CONNECTED HEALTH INFORMATION PLATFORM MAY 2016-APRIL 2017
  38. 38. WRAP-UP
  39. 39. TAKE HOME MESSAGES (1) • SHARED DECISION MAKING • REQUIRES A CHANGE IN ATTITUDE FROM PATIENT AND DOCTOR • IS ETHICAL • IMPROVES QUALITY OF HEALTH
  40. 40. TAKE HOME MESSAGE (2) • SHARED DECISION MAKING • NEEDS RELIABLE, REPEATABLE, UNDERSTANDABLE CONTENT AND DECISION AIDS • NEEDS SUPPORT FROM ALL HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS AND GOVERNMENT • NEEDS TO REACH THE PATIENT
  41. 41. SHARED DECISION MAKING = SHARED HEALTH CARE • SHARED ATTITUDE • SHARED EFFORT • SHARED CONTENT • SHARED RESOURCES • SHARED TOOLS • SHARED RESPONSIBILITY
  42. 42. MISSION • NEW TECHNOLOGIES COME WITH GREAT OPPORTUNITIES, BUT ALSO WITH THE RISK OF PRESENTING PEOPLE WITH AN OVERLOAD OF INFORMATION. WE TOGETHER HAVE TO DESIGN SUPPORTING MATERIALS AND METHODS IN A SUCH A WAY THAT SHARED DECISION-MAKING IS TRULY SUPPORTED.
  43. 43. REPEAT AND SHARE THIS SESSION? •INFORIUM.EU OR INFORIUM.NL • CODE: EHW2016 • YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS (DON’T WORRY ABOUT PRIVACY, IT IS NOT STORED)

×