Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

The Future of Distance Education

50,283 views

Published on

A presentation made to Camousn College, May 3, 2007

Published in: Technology, Education
  • very nice presentation
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • great set of e-learning and distance education:) thank you very much
    kirsi
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here

The Future of Distance Education

  1. Distance Education: Past, Present and Future - Mark Bullen
  2. Main Points <ul><li>History is important </li></ul><ul><li>DE practice has not changed much in last 10 years </li></ul><ul><li>DE appears poised to undergo radical changes </li></ul><ul><li>Assumptions </li></ul>
  3. Looking to the Past <ul><li>History helps inform the future </li></ul><ul><li>Much of what we think is new is not </li></ul>
  4. Looking to the Past <ul><li>John Dewey (1859-1952) </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Jean Piaget (1896-1980) </li></ul></ul>Constructivism
  5. Looking to the Past <ul><li>Learner-centered education </li></ul>Socrates Confucius
  6. Looking to the Past <ul><li>E-learning </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Has its roots in distance education </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dates back to the 1700s correspondence education </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Audiovisual devices - early 1900s </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Educational television - 1960s </li></ul></ul>
  7. E-Learning
  8. History: Pre-Internet <ul><li>Early online learning </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Computer-mediated Communication (CMC) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Collaboration, knowledge construction </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Many-to-many communication, time and place independence </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Asynchronous text-based communication as a facilitator of collaboration, knowledge construction </li></ul></ul></ul>
  9. History: The Internet Era- Web 1.0 <ul><li>Internet, course management systems (CMS) changed our understanding of online learning </li></ul><ul><li>CMS not about communication, collaboration, knowledge construction </li></ul><ul><li>CMS about efficient distribution of content </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Teacher-centered </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Internet as a delivery mechanism </li></ul></ul>
  10. History: The Internet Era - Web 2.0 <ul><li>A return to the pre-Internet era? </li></ul><ul><li>Architecture of presentation </li></ul><ul><li>Architecture of participation </li></ul>
  11. History: The Internet Era - Web 2.0 <ul><li>Harnessing the potential of easy to use tools </li></ul><ul><li>Facilitating collaboration, production </li></ul><ul><li>Web 2.0 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>User-generated content </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Power of the crowd </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Data on an epic scale </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Architecture of participation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Network effects </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Openness </li></ul></ul>
  12. E-Learning Today
  13. E-Learning 10 years ago
  14. Education in the New Millenium
  15. Current Tools & Technology
  16. Current Tools & Technology <ul><li>CMS tools </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Content management and formatting </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Assignment submission </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Asynchronous discussion </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Synchronous chat </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Voice tools </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Internal e-mail </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Grade book </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Student management and tracking </li></ul></ul>
  17. Current Tools & Technology <ul><li>Dominant instructional design model </li></ul><ul><ul><li>information transmission supported by asynchronous online “discussion” </li></ul></ul>
  18. Current Tools & Technology <ul><li>Social software </li></ul>
  19. Blogs
  20. Wikis
  21. Social Bookmarking
  22. Virtual Worlds
  23. Virtual Worlds
  24. …..casting
  25. Synchronous Communication Tools <ul><li>Elluminate Live </li></ul><ul><li>Instant messaging </li></ul>
  26. Current Tools & Technology <ul><li>But Are these tools changing the dominant instructional design paradigm? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Online delivery remains primarily text-based, information delivery </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Constructivist, collaborative, online knowledge building community is rare </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Technology still largely being used to replicate earlier modes of teaching - the electronic classroom </li></ul></ul>
  27. The Future
  28. The Future <ul><li>Radical change or status quo? </li></ul><ul><li>Technology is changing </li></ul><ul><li>Learners are changing…we think </li></ul>
  29. Technology Changes <ul><li>Web 2.0 </li></ul><ul><li>User-generated content </li></ul><ul><li>Power of the crowd </li></ul><ul><li>Data on an epic scale </li></ul><ul><li>Architecture of participation </li></ul><ul><li>Network effects </li></ul><ul><li>Openness </li></ul>
  30. Learner Changes <ul><li>Net generation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Born between 1982-1991 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Never know life without the Internet </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Characteristics </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Digitally literate </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Connected </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Impatient </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Experiential </li></ul></ul>
  31. Learner Changes <ul><li>Characterstics of Net generation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Social </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Team players </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Need for structure </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Visual and kinesthic </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Need for interactivity </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Community minded </li></ul></ul>
  32. Learner Changes <ul><li>Net generation learners like: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Challenges </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Opportunities to create and innovate </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Immediacy, feedback </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Clearly-defined tasks </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Technology </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Collaboration, teamwork </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Respected as equals </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Challenge assumptions </li></ul></ul>
  33. Learner Changes <ul><li>How accurate is this portrayal? </li></ul><ul><li>Different social and technological context </li></ul><ul><li>BCIT research </li></ul>
  34. Learning 2.0 <ul><li>Focus on learning processes </li></ul><ul><li>Focus on communication & interaction </li></ul><ul><li>Co-developed with learners & instructors shaping the design </li></ul><ul><li>Customized/personalized </li></ul><ul><li>Cooperatively-activated </li></ul><ul><li>Evolving </li></ul><ul><li>Knowledge & understanding </li></ul><ul><li>Learner paced </li></ul>
  35. Learning 2.0 <ul><li>Collaborative: one to many, many to many </li></ul><ul><li>Contribute, tag and share </li></ul><ul><li>Demonstrations and prototypes </li></ul><ul><li>Negotiated and contracted </li></ul><ul><li>Feedback rich </li></ul>
  36. Technology 2.0 <ul><li>Less reliance on enterprise solutions </li></ul><ul><li>The web as platform </li></ul><ul><li>Easy to use, free, often open, tools </li></ul>
  37.  
  38. Personal Learning Environments “ A facility for an individual to access, aggregate, configure and manipulate digital artifacts of their ongoing learning experiences.” - Ron Lubensky http://members.optusnet.com.au/rlubensky/2006/12/present-and-future-of-personal-learning.html
  39. Need for Caution <ul><li>One size does NOT fit all </li></ul><ul><li>BCIT TEK Initiative experience </li></ul><ul><li>University, liberal arts perspective </li></ul><ul><li>Formal vs. informal learning </li></ul><ul><li>Credentials will continue to drive most formal learning </li></ul>
  40. Concluding Comments <ul><li>Not much change in 10 years </li></ul><ul><li>Change is inevitable </li></ul><ul><li>Changing technology, changing learners </li></ul><ul><li>Heterogeneity of learners </li></ul><ul><li>Check assumptions </li></ul><ul><li>Technology potential not always realized </li></ul><ul><li>Need evidence-based understanding of the”new learner” </li></ul>
  41. References <ul><li>Bates, A.W. (2000). Managing Technological Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. </li></ul><ul><li>Bereiter, C. & Scardamelia, M. Catching the Third Wave. Queen's Education Letter, Issue #2: Integrating ICT in Teaching and Learning </li></ul><ul><li>Bullen, M. & Janes, D. (Eds.)(2007). Making the Transition to E-Learning: Strategies and Issues. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing. </li></ul><ul><li>Oblinger, D.G. & Oblinger, J.L. (2005). Educating the Net Generation. Available at http://www.educause.edu/EducatingtheNetGeneration/ </li></ul><ul><li>Sinclair, G., McClarin, M. & Griffin, M.J. (2006). E-Learning and Beyond. Discussion paper prepared as part of the Campus 2020 process for the Ministry of Advance Education. </li></ul><ul><li>Zemsky , R. & Massy, W.F. (2004). Thwarted Innovation: What Happened to E-learning and Why. The Learning Alliance. </li></ul>
  42. For Further Information <ul><li>Mark Bullen </li></ul><ul><ul><li>[email_address] </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>http://www.markbullen.ca </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>http://www.bcit.ca/ltc </li></ul></ul>

×