Assessment

412 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
412
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Assessment

  1. 1. St. Thomas University EEX 501 2006 Spring Term A1 Oral Presentation of Assessment
  2. 2. Woodcock-Munoz Language Survey- -Revised Report of Language Proficiency Testing English
  3. 3. Name: Doe, John Date of Birth: 09/05/1997 Age: 8 years, 5 months Date of Testing: 02/01/06
  4. 4. TESTS ADMINISTED John was administered a set of tests from the Woodcock-Munoz Language Survey- - Revised (WMLS-R) English Form A
  5. 5. LANGUAGE EXPOSURE AND USE QUESTIONNAIR <ul><li>John was born in the United States. </li></ul><ul><li>John’s first language was Spanish. At home, he speaks Spanish 100% of the time. Others in his home speak Spanish 100% of the time. In informal social situations John speaks English 100% of the time. In the classroom John’s primary language is English 100% of the time in the general education classroom. </li></ul>
  6. 6. Language Exposure Con. <ul><li>John has been in a bilingual education program receiving English and Spanish instructions since pre kindergarten. He has been exposed to academic instructions in English at school for 4 years. He has been exposed to academic instructions in Spanish S at school for 4 years. </li></ul>
  7. 7. TEST SESSION OBSERVATIONS <ul><li>John’s conversational proficiency seemed very advanced for a child of his age. He was exceptionally cooperative through the examination; his activity level was typical for his age and grade. He appeared at ease attentive to the task. He appeared confident and self assured through the examination. He responded promptly, but was careful doing so. He generally persisted with difficult task typical of his age and grade. </li></ul>
  8. 8. ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY TESTING <ul><li>Woodcock-Munoz Language Survey, English Form A </li></ul><ul><li>Norms based on grade 2.9 </li></ul><ul><li>TABLE OF SCORES </li></ul>
  9. 9. Test Result <ul><li>Test/Clusters Raw GE AE </li></ul><ul><li>Picture Vocabulary 39 8-11 3.2 </li></ul><ul><li>Verbal Analogies 18 8-11 3.8 </li></ul><ul><li>Letter-Word Identification 59 13-7 8.0 </li></ul><ul><li>Dictation 50 16-4 10.2 </li></ul><ul><li>Understanding Directions 9 9-0 3.6 </li></ul><ul><li>Story Recall 13 6.1 K-9 </li></ul><ul><li>Passage Comprehension 21 9-8 4.4 </li></ul>
  10. 10. Woodcock-Munoz Language Survey- - Revised Report of Language Proficiency Testing Results English <ul><li>Name: Doe, John </li></ul><ul><li>Date of Birth: 09/05/1997 </li></ul><ul><li>Age: 8 years, 5 months </li></ul><ul><li>Date of Testing: 02/01/06 </li></ul>
  11. 11. Test 1: Picture Vocabulary <ul><li>John achieved raw score of 31. He received an age equivalent score of 8-11 and a grade equivalent score of 3.2. This places him on age level in his score. John’s grade expected score is 3 months lower then his expected grade equivalent score. John will need interventions that would strengthen this area. </li></ul>
  12. 12. Test 2: Verbal Analogies <ul><li>John received a raw score of 18. He received an age equivalent score o f 8-11and a grade equivalent of 3.8. This places him on age level in his scores. John’s grade expected score is 3 months higher then other students in his grade level. </li></ul>
  13. 13. Test 3: Letter Word Identification <ul><li>John achieved a raw score of 59. An age equivalent score of 13-7 and a grade equivalent score of 8.0. This shows that John is scoring much higher than an average child of his age and grade. In fact, John is working in Letter Word Identification 5 grades above his grade level. This is one of John’s stronger areas. </li></ul>
  14. 14. Test 4: Dictation <ul><li>John achieved a raw score of 50. He received an age equivalent of 16-4 and a grade equivalent score of 10.7 which is 10th grade 7th month. This shows that </li></ul><ul><li>John is working in dictation as a child that is in the 10th grade after seven months. This is by fare John’s strongest area. </li></ul>
  15. 15. Test 5: Understanding Directions <ul><li>John achieved a raw score of 9, an age equivalent score of 9 years a grade equivalent score of 3.6. This places John just around grade level. He understands direction typically as a child of his age and grade level. He is just slightly above the average student his age. </li></ul>
  16. 16. Test 6: Story Recall <ul><li>John achieved a raw score of 13, an age equivalent score of 6-1 and a grade equivalent score of K.9. This places John’s performance as that of a child between the age of 1 to 6 years of age and a grade equivalent to that of a child in kindergarten for 9 months. This is by far John’s weakest area. This report gives me the information which shows John’s needs for interventions that would strengthen this area. </li></ul>
  17. 17. Test 7: Passage Comprehension <ul><li>John achieved a raw score of 21, an age equivalent score of 9-8 and a grade equivalent score of 4.4. This places John one year above the average child his age. </li></ul>
  18. 18. Report of Language Proficiency Testing page 2 Doe, John February 1st, 2006
  19. 19. <ul><li>Reading measures letter and word identification skills and the ability to comprehend written passages while reading. John demonstrates advanced English reading ability (AE level 13-7). His performance is as an average child in the 8th grade. Reading task on grade level will be too easy for John. He will benefit more from an advances reading curriculum. </li></ul>
  20. 20. <ul><li>Writing measures spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and word usage. John demonstrates advanced English writing ability he is performing as a child in the 10 grade seven months grade level reading will be very easy for John. In fact I will consider John for gifted in this area. </li></ul>
  21. 21. <ul><li>Listening measures listening ability, comprehension, and linguistic competency. John demonstrates the listening ability of a child between the age of 6-1 and the age of a child K.9. His performance is far below average for a child his age. However, his performance in understanding directions is as that of a child his age. This shows a significant variability in his listening performance. </li></ul>

×