Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Collection Directions: some reflections on the future of library stewardship

Keynote presentation at Boston Library Consortium Annual Networking Day, Boston College, 3 June 2014

  • Be the first to comment

Collection Directions: some reflections on the future of library stewardship

  1. 1. Some reflections on libraries and stewardship of the scholarly record Constance Malpas Program Officer, OCLC Research 3 June 2014, Boston College BLC Networking Day Collection Directions 1
  2. 2. Inside-out Outside-in
  3. 3. 3 Collection Directions: Academic Libraries
  4. 4. Low Stewardship High Stewardship In few collections In many collections Collections Grid Research & Learning Materials Open Web ResourcesPurchased Materials Licensed E-Resources Special Collections Local Digitization Licensed Purchased Outside-in Inside-out Dempsey & Childress, OCLC Research
  5. 5. Institutional Needs – Academic Libraries: Current situation vs. 5 years from now Low Stewardship High Stewardship In few collections In many collections Licensed Purchased Key Trends: • increased reliance on group provisioning of print and licensed content • more integration of freely available web-based content • special collections focus on institutional mission, reputation • growing attention to teaching/learning materials; limited library capacity
  6. 6. Institutional Needs – Research Libraries: Current situation vs. 5 years from now Low Stewardship High Stewardship In few collections In many collections Licensed Purchased Key Trends: • strategic realignment around purchasing/licensing ‘collections as services’ • redirection of investment toward reputation management, research support • emphasis on effective disclosure of distinctive assets: special collections, research data, expertise
  7. 7. A landscape in transition • Fragmentation in higher education sector (elite, convenience, ‘squeezed middle’) will drive changes in academic libraries – increased differentiation in portfolio of collections and services • Shared infrastructure enabling transition from local- to group-scale management of purchased and licensed content • Institutional capacity to redirect resources from commodity collections toward distinctive services will depend on availability of appropriate cooperative infrastructure 7
  8. 8. 8 Collective collection: print books
  9. 9. 9 31% 90% North American Print Book Landscape, January 2011 US libraries hold 90% of titles in North American print book collection
  10. 10. 10 North American Mega-regions 12 zones of highly integrated economic activity • Does distribution of library resource align with distribution of economic activity? • What are the implications for stewardship of North American print book collections?
  11. 11. 11 Relative size of regional print book collections (2011) 92% of North American print book collection concentrated in 12 mega-regions
  12. 12. 12 Inventory continues to grow in all regions Median +3% between 2011 and 2013 +4% growth in Bos-Wash
  13. 13. 13 • Largest mega-regional print book resource in North America • 27.9M print book titles; 56% of North American print book resource • 199.6M library holdings; 22% of North American print book inventory • Avg. 7 in-region library holdings per title • 75% of titles held by <5 libraries in region* • 33% of titles are unique to region* Bos-Wash print book collection (2013) *based on 2011 data
  14. 14. 14 Bos-Wash Coverage of other Regional Collections (2011) Bos-Wash regional resource duplicates 65-95% of print book titles in other regions …next largest regional collection can duplicate just 50% of Bos-Wash collection
  15. 15. 15 Bos-Wash Institutional Infrastructure (2011) • >4000 holding libraries • Top 5 libraries account for 15-34% of titles (each) Academic libraries account for >70% of regional inventory
  16. 16. Group-scale: Boston Library Consortium 16
  17. 17. 17 17 libraries Liberal arts colleges, professional schools, research institutions, state library . . . • all affiliates of FCLD print journal archive • many (all?) participating in Eastern Academic Scholars Trust Right scale for stewardship is…small consortium? Large, loose confederation?
  18. 18. 18 Largest print book collection in BLC is >100X greater than smallest collection
  19. 19. 19 Median BLC member ‘coverage’ of Bos-Wash collection is 2% ‘coverage requires cooperation’
  20. 20. 20 Median NERL member ‘coverage’ of Bos-Wash collection is 5% ‘coverage requires cooperation’
  21. 21. At every scale… 21 ChiPitts 58% SoCal 47% Charlanta 67% coverage requires collaboration regional coverage
  22. 22. >266M library holdings in WorldCat Shared Print Collections • Cooperative stewardship of aggregate print resource • Part of broader trend toward ‘group-scale’ library operations • >30 active shared print groups in North America • 9 major groups registering shared print holdings in WorldCat 22 Shared Print Titles in WorldCat April 2014
  23. 23. 23 Boston College Williams College U Mass Amherst Median duplication 23% as of May 2013
  24. 24. Stewardship of the Evolving Scholarly Record 24
  25. 25. 25 Format transition: Print-centric to digital, networked Boundaries blurring: Articles/monographs, but also research data, computer models, video, blogs, visualizations, conference posters & presentations, pre-prints, etc. Stakeholder roles reconfiguring: New paths for the scholarly communication ‘supply chain’ Scholarly record
  26. 26. Stewardship of the scholarly record 26 Create Fix Use Collect Factors impacting stewardship … • Increasing volume of content • Increasing diversity/complexity of content • Increasing distribution of custodial responsibility  ‘local copies’ of scholarly record are increasingly partial  discovery and management are increasingly fragmented  coherence of scholarly record is reduced
  27. 27. Questions for academic library consortia • Is available cooperative infrastructure adequate to support deeper collaboration around collections management, custodial care of scholarly record? • Do existing consortia represent the right mix of stakeholders for collaborative stewardship arrangements? • How can consortial efforts ‘scale up’ to meet system-wide stewardship needs? What mechanisms are needed to federate group-scale approaches? 27
  28. 28. Thanks for your attention. ©2014 OCLC. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Suggested attribution: “This work uses content from [presentation title] © OCLC, used under a Creative Commons Attribution license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/” malpasc@oclc.org @ConstanceM 28

    Be the first to comment

    Login to see the comments

  • gchilton

    Oct. 15, 2016
  • wonox

    Sep. 5, 2017

Keynote presentation at Boston Library Consortium Annual Networking Day, Boston College, 3 June 2014

Views

Total views

1,243

On Slideshare

0

From embeds

0

Number of embeds

49

Actions

Downloads

13

Shares

0

Comments

0

Likes

2

×