Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Food and Diet: How Can Economics Contribute to Better Outcomes?

555 views

Published on

Seminar to Goettingen Global Food RTG, September 19, 2013. An overview of U.S. anti-obesity policies and the lessons for countries now going through the dietary transition.

Published in: Economy & Finance, Technology
  • Get access to 16,000 woodworking plans, Download 50 FREE Plans... ➤➤ http://tinyurl.com/y3hc8gpw
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Get access to 16,000 woodworking plans, Download 50 FREE Plans... ■■■ http://ishbv.com/tedsplans/pdf
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • how to lose weight in a week without exercise ♥♥♥ https://tinyurl.com/bkfitness4u
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • 90% Women get a slim Body by using Venus Factor and see the result with in a week. What is The Venus Factor? The Venus Factor is the first and only weight loss plan designed to dramatically increase female metabolism and bring out the sexy goddess in you by delivering fast, long term, enjoyable fat loss without restricting the foods you crave most. Download program https://youtu.be/zWDkvU9SWEQ
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

Food and Diet: How Can Economics Contribute to Better Outcomes?

  1. 1. Food And Diet: How Can Economics Contribute to Improved Outcomes? Laurian Unnevehr Senior Research Fellow, IFPRI Professor Emerita, University of Illinois Presentation to the Global Food Scholars RTG Program Goettingen University September 19, 2013
  2. 2. Introduction • Rising rates of obesity and associated medical costs bring policy debate • “Food environment” approach has driven policy debate • Economists have much to offer but are late to debate • Lessons from high income countries for developing countries
  3. 3. Do we have an “Obeso-genic” Food Environment? Illustration by Meredith Nelson
  4. 4. Three Economic Perspectives • Health Economics: Value of improved health and extended life is large • Neo-classical Economics: Seeks market failure and weighs benefits against costs • Behavioral Economics: Altruistic paternalism to “nudge” people towards better decisions
  5. 5. Overview • Costs and causes of obesity • Public health policy recommendations • Economic evidence and research needs – Prices – Information – Access – Standards
  6. 6. THE COSTS OF DIET RELATED DISEASE How much does rising obesity cost?
  7. 7. U.S. Body Mass Index Distribution is Shifting Up
  8. 8. Rising U.S. Childhood Obesity 0 5 10 15 20 25 All 2-5 yrs 6-11 yrs 12-19 yrs 1980 2000 2008 % of children
  9. 9. U.S. Obesity and Overweight Direct Costs • Healthcare direct costs estimated at $210 billion in 2008$ – Half are paid through Medicare or Medicaid – One-fifth of total health care costs • Combined dynamic of rising health care costs and chronic disease incidence is theme – $550 billion by 2030 Sources: Cawley and Meyerhoefer, 2012; Finkelstein et al., 2012
  10. 10. Global Burden • 1.5 billion people overweight or obese • WHO estimates deaths from overnutrition exceed those from undernutrition • Diet related disease has a global cost estimated at $1.4 billion Source: WHO, World Economic Forum and Harvard School of Public Health, 2011
  11. 11. CAUSES OF OBESITY What are the causes and what do they suggest about interventions?
  12. 12. Why are We Getting Fatter? Official Reasons from the U.S. Surgeon General • Eating too many calories and not getting enough physical activity. • Body weight is the result of genes, metabolism, behavior, environment, cu lture, and socioeconomic status • Behavior and environment play a large role causing people to be overweight and obese.
  13. 13. U.S. Calorie Intake Increased 20% over 20 years 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 U.S. per capita loss-adjusted food availability: Total Daily Calories Source: USDA/ERS 2,195 2,717
  14. 14. Meat, Eggs, and Nuts Dairy Fruit Vegetables Flour and Cereal Products Added Fats and Oils and Dairy Fats Caloric Sweeteners Less than HALF the recommended amount TWICE the recommended amount U.S. Percent of Daily Calories from Different Food Groups Source: USDA/ERS
  15. 15. Food Away from Home 1980 2005 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Percent Calories Every meal away from home adds 134 calories compared with a meal at home. Sources: USDA/ERS from NHANES data; Todd et al. (2010) Food Away From Home Fast Food
  16. 16. Food Market Development Follows Same Path Highest Income Other High Income Middle Income Low Income Share of food expenditures in modern retail outlets 77 60 58 32 Share of food expenditures for packaged food 52 33 40 26 Source: Regmi, Takeshima, and Unnevehr, ERS, 2008.
  17. 17. 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 CaloricIntake(Kcal/Person/Day) % Adults Overweight (BMI ≥ 25) % Overweight Adults Follows Caloric Intake Per Capita Across Countries High Income Middle Income Low Income Sources: FAO; WHO Indonesia Egypt Zambia Nicaragua
  18. 18. Summary: Obesity Causes • Obesity rates are increasing • Energy imbalance is a simple explanation – Too many calories – Too little activity – Many structural reinforcements • But difference in country paths suggests much we do not understand
  19. 19. PROPOSED POLICIES What are the recommendations for action from the public health community?
  20. 20. What are the Proposed Solutions? Major Reports • National Academies 2012 • World Bank 2011 • OECD 2010 • World Economic Forum 2011 Common Themes • Nutrition labels • Advertising controls • Public information • Regulation of school / workplace meals • Tax unhealthy/ subsidize healthy foods
  21. 21. US National Academies Childhood Obesity Report 2009 • Attract supermarkets to underserved neighborhoods • Calorie labeling in chain restaurants • Nutrition standards for foods served to children • Tax to discourage foods of little value • Media campaign Now Federal Policy
  22. 22. Michelle Obama’s “Let’s Move” campaign • Four Pillars – Physical Activity – Healthy Choices – Healthier Schools – Access to Affordable Healthy Food
  23. 23. What is the Economic Evidence for Interventions? • Prices of foods • Information in restaurants • Access to retail outlets • Standards in school lunch Influence individual choice Influence choice architecture
  24. 24. FOOD PRICES How do consumers respond to changes in food prices?
  25. 25. Tax and Subsidy Policies • Some U.S. states tax soda – 13 states have tax of 5-7% • SNAP (Food Stamp) Healthy Incentives – SNAP experiment shows 30% price incentive leads to 25% increase in F&V consumption • Danish fat tax – Flat rate of $1.29 per lb of saturated fat
  26. 26. Soda 10% price drop 20% tax5% more consumed 16% less consumed Sources: Dong and Lin (2009); Andreyeva et al. (2010); Dharmasena and Capps (2012) Very modest effects on calories or weight. Fruits and Vegetables Evidence: Demand Simulations
  27. 27. Evidence: Simulations of Alternative Tax Policies Tax Inputs Rather than Products • Tax sweeteners at processing stage or tax sweet products at retail • Input tax consumer surplus loss is 1/5 that from retail tax Tax Calories rather than Foods • Tax on calories more efficient way to address obesity than either sugar or fat tax or F&V subsidy • Net social gain with reduction in health care costs Source: Miao, Beghin, and Jensen, 2011 Source: Okrent and Alston, 2012
  28. 28. Evidence: Prices Explain Health Outcomes • Recent studies suggest that relative prices explain variation in weight and disease outcomes
  29. 29. Dark Green Vegetables Price Percent Above Starchy Vegetables Higher prices for vegetables increases diabetes incidence and medical expenditures (Meyerhoefer and Leibtag 2010) Green Vegetables Relative Price to Starchy Vegetables Varies Across U.S. Source: USDA/ERS
  30. 30. Low-fat milk cheaper than soda in some US regions Source: USDA/ERS Higher prices for soda lead to reduced BMI in children. (Wendt and Todd 2011) Price of low-fat milk relative to soda
  31. 31. International Examples of Long Run Price Impacts on Diets • Real pulse prices rising over time in India associated with lower consumption of pulses for all income groups (Kadiyala, 2011) • Lower real prices for edible oils after WTO accession in China associated with greater energy density in diets and higher calorie consumption (Ng et al., 2008) • Countries with lower food prices have faster increase in obesity (Huffman et al)
  32. 32. Research Needs • How do prices shape long run demand? • What would reduce the relative prices of healthy alternatives? • Could agricultural research investments be altered to support healthy diets?
  33. 33. INFORMATION How will consumers respond to new calorie information in restaurants?
  34. 34. Nutrition Labels • US packaged food mandatory since 1993 • EU guidelines • Private sector symbols
  35. 35. Calories on Menu Policies • Some U.S. cities • Affordable Care Act mandate • FDA proposed rule in 2011 – Chain restaurants with 20+ locations – Menus to have calories; reference to daily intake – Benefits exceed costs even if limited use by consumers
  36. 36. Evidence: Consumer Response to Menu Calorie Labels • Only modest calorie reductions • “Framing”, defaults, and type of signal matter • Can alter competitive position in market • Results echo those for food product labels Sources: Downs et al. (2009); Bollinger et al. (2011); Nelson and McCluskey (2010); Ellison, et al. (2011)
  37. 37. Evidence: Information Influences Supply • Mandatory labeling motivates food producers to change product formulation – Trans fat label in 2006 led to rapid substitutions in major brands – Benefits all consumers whether they read the label or not – CDC reports reduction in trans fat in blood in 2009 • Menu labels likely to lead to reformulation in restaurant offerings Sources: Golan and Unnevehr 2009; CDC 2012.
  38. 38. International Label Practices Need Improvement • Access to Nutrition Index rates multi-national food companies for their nutrition practices in developing countries • Companies score lowest on labeling practices out of all categories rated – Companies do not disclose sufficient detail about their policies on labeling or on health and nutrition claims. – Few companies commit to follow Codex guidance on the use of health and nutrition claims in markets where the use of such claims is not regulated. – Many companies with international operations do not apply their policies globally. Source: http://www.accesstonutrition.org/labeling
  39. 39. Research Needs • How will consumers and firms respond to new disclosure requirements in high income countries? • How would stricter enforcement of labeling norms in emerging markets shape food offerings?
  40. 40. ACCESS What is the role of food access and the local food environment in food choices and health outcomes?
  41. 41. Policy to Address Access • Local efforts – Philadelphia: Tax incentives for new grocery stores – Los Angeles: Limits on new fast food outlets in low income neighborhoods • U.S. farm bill funds ($400 M) to improve access
  42. 42. Evidence: Food Access • 4% of US population at risk of inadequate access (ERS 2009) • Fast food access close to schools increases child obesity (Currie 2010) • Retailer commitments to Let’s Move initiative
  43. 43. Spatial Retail Access and Diet Quality in Developing Countries • Indonesian households that spend more at modern outlets more likely to increase fresh fruit, fresh vegetables, oils, sweets and processed snacks. (Toiba et al., 2011) • Benin households with better market access tend to have greater diet diversity but also more overweight adults (Bellon and Ntandou, 2012) • Access costs influence Chinese dietary diversity (Liu et al., 2013)
  44. 44. Research Needs • What determines food retailer decisions about locations? About quality and scope of healthy foods offered? • How does access shape purchases? For what kinds of households is access important?
  45. 45. STANDARDS Will changes in standards for school lunch programs succeed in changing children’s diets?
  46. 46. Policies for School Lunch Standards • 22 million children in USDA school lunch program • New U.S. school lunch standards in Jan 2012 • 13 EU countries have school lunch standards New standards increase fruits, vegs, whole grains and low fat milk; reduce sodium and saturated fat.
  47. 47. Evidence: School Lunch Standards • Longstanding evidence regarding benefits for student performance • Mixed evidence about role of school lunch in childhood obesity • Healthier lunches may cost 5 to 7% more Sources: Meyerhoefer and Yang (2011); Newman, et. al (2009); Newman, 2011.
  48. 48. Behavioral Cues Show Potential Experiments conducted by Cornell researchers reveal behavioral psychology can be used to encourage children to eat more healthy food. Source: Wansink, Just, and McKendry, Lunch Line Redesign, New York Times Op-Chart, 2010.
  49. 49. Home Grown School Feeding Programs • Promote healthy school meals sourced from local farmers. Seen as “win-win” for nutrition and market development. • Ghana program evaluation underway (Imperial College/IFPRI) • Will the old questions have different answers?
  50. 50. Research Needs • Does offering healthier school meals change children’s overall diet quality? Will it change their long run eating habits? • How does institutional demand for healthier foods influence the overall food supply?
  51. 51. CONCLUSIONS What evidence does economic research provide?
  52. 52. Expected Policy Impacts • Access, information, standards interventions: – Likely modest positive effects on energy imbalance – Likely benefits > costs • Limitations for addressing obesity are clear, so further debate on appropriate public role
  53. 53. Three Economic Perspectives • Health Economics: Current trends project high potential value of improving diet • Neo-classical Economics: Can be more efficient in achieving any target; benefits and limits to price & information policies • Behavioral Economics: Choice architecture approach suggests new interventions but scope unclear
  54. 54. Economists Needed to Answer Important Questions • How ag / food system contributes to health outcomes – How to reduce relative prices of healthy foods – Ag research portfolio to support better diets, more nutritious food • Understanding firm behavior – Product offerings– space and quality – Opportunities, limits for self-regulation • New data expands our abilities
  55. 55. Lessons for Countries Passing Through the Dietary Transition? • All economic and structural forces point towards the same path for diet and health. – But understanding international variation could inform policy • Limited impact of current recommended policies provides little guidance. • Potential to “nudge” early: – Relative prices and market development for nutrient- dense foods. – Regulation of labels to international norms. – Avoid in-kind transfers that encourage calories over diet quality.
  56. 56. Illustration by Meredith Nelson
  57. 57. Is this a healthy food environment? Illustration by Meredith Nelson
  58. 58. THANK YOU! Drawn from: Unnevehr, L. J. “Food and Health: Can Economics Contribute to Improved Outcomes?”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(2), 2013, 220-227. AAEA Fellows Address, 2012.

×