References chapter 2 july 7


Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

References chapter 2 july 7

  1. 1. References Bednnett, S, & Kalish, N. (2006). The Case against homework: how homework is hurting our children and what can we do about it. New York: Crown Publishers. Bempechat, J. (2004). The Motivational benefits of homework: a social-cognitive perspective. Theory into Practice, 43(3), 189-196. Bonham, S, Beichner, R, & Deardorff, D. (2001). Online homework: does it make a difference?. The Physics teacher, 30, 293-296. Bonham, S, Deardorff, D, & Beichner, R. (2003). A Comparison of student performance using web and paper-based homework in college-level physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1050-1071. Bonham, S, Titus, A, Beichner, R, & Martin, L. (2000). Education research using web- based assessment systems. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(1), 282-299. Bryan, T, Burstein, K, & Bryan, J. (2004). Improving homework comletion and academic performance; lessons from special education. Theory into Practice, 43(3), 213-219. Cole, R, & Todd, J. (2003). Effects of web-based multimedia homework with immediate rich feedback on student learning in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(11), 1338-1343. Conner, C.D. (2004) Teacher attitudes toward the assignment of homework. Tennessee State University, Dissertation Cooper, H, Robinson, J, & Patall, E. (2006). Does Homework improve academic achievement? a synthesis of reserach, 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1-62.
  2. 2. Corno, L. (2000). Looking at homework differently. The Elementary School Journal, 100 (5), 529-548 Coutts, P.M. (2004). Meanings of homework and implications for practice. Theory into Practice, 43(3), 182-188. DeBell, M., and Chapman, C. (2006). Computer and Internet Use by Students in 2003 (NCES 2006–065). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Hong, E, Milgram, R, & Rowell, L. (2004). Homework motivation and preferences: a learner-centered homework approach. Theory into Practice, 43(3), 197-204. Kohn, A. (2006). The Homework myth; why our kids get too much of a bad thing. Philadelphia, PA: De Capo Press. Kohn, A. (2006). Abusing research; the study of homework and other examples. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(1), Kralovec, E, & Buell, J. (2001). End homework now. Educational Leadership, 58(7), 39- 42. Landing-Corretjer, G. (2009)Listen to me! An exploration of the students’ voices regarding homework. Doctoral Study, Walden University. Latto-Auld, I. (2005). The use of a student-implements intervention to decrease homework problems in elementary school students. Dissertation. MI. ProQuest Information and Learning Company. Marzano, R, & Pickering , D. (2007). The Case for and against homework. Educational Leadership, 64(6), 74-79.
  3. 3. Mendicino, M, Razzaq, L, & Heffernan, N. (2009). A Comparison of traditional homework to computer-supported homework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 331-358. Noguera, P.A. (2007). How Listening to students can help schools to improve. Theory into Practice, 46(3), 205-211. Pritchard, Morote, World Conference on E-learning in Corporate, Government, HealthCare, and Higher Education, E-Learn 2002: Reliable Assessment with Cybertutor, a Web-Based Homework Tutor Roth, V, Ivanchenko, V, & Record, N. (2008). Evaluating stuedent response to webwork, a web-based homework delivery and grading system. Computers & Education, 50, 1462-1482. Salend, S, Duhaney, D, Anderson, D, & Gottschalk, C. (2004). Using the Internet to improve homework communication and completion. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 36(3), 64-75. Schuster, N. (2009). The Impact of Homework and Homework Preferences in Ninth Grade Geography. University of Wisconsin-LaCrosse. Strom, P, Strom, R, Wing, C, & Beckert, T. (2009). Adolescent learning and the internet implications for school leadership and student engagement in learning. NASSP Bulletin, 93(2), 111-121. Trautwein, U. & Koller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement-still such a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 115-145
  4. 4. Van Voorhis, F. (2003). Interactive homework in middle school: effects on family involvement and science achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(6) 323-338 Van Voorhis, F. (2004). Reflecting on the homework ritual: assignments and designs. Theory into Practice, 43(3), 205-212. Whipp, J. (2003). Scaffolding critical reflection in online discussions. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 321-333. Xu, J. (2009). School location, student achievement, and homework management reported by middle school students. The School Community Journal, 19(2), 27-43.