Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
ACORN-REDECOM: Internet Governance Models Put to a Test Alejandro Pisanty and Pablo Hinojosa September, 2009
Contents <ul><li>What is  an Internet Governance model? </li></ul><ul><li>What makes an IG model  efficient ? </li></ul><u...
Internet governance model <ul><li>Air:  Shared principles, norms and rules </li></ul><ul><li>Land:  Organizational incarna...
Efficiency criteria <ul><li>Effectiveness vs. Efficiency </li></ul><ul><li>Efficiency criteria (examples): </li></ul><ul><...
Legitimacy <ul><li>Meta-legal frameworks  </li></ul><ul><li>Self-contained corporate governance </li></ul><ul><li>Legitima...
Representation <ul><li>Identification of key stake-holders </li></ul><ul><li>Openness does not guarantee representation  <...
How about developing countries? <ul><li>Does universal access produce conscious and active netizens? </li></ul><ul><li>Loc...
Instigator in 5 parts… <ul><li>Definition </li></ul><ul><ul><li>What is an Internet governance model? </li></ul></ul><ul><...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Internet Governance Models Put to a Test

4,000 views

Published on

http://www.acorn-redecom.org/program.html

Published in: News & Politics

Internet Governance Models Put to a Test

  1. 1. ACORN-REDECOM: Internet Governance Models Put to a Test Alejandro Pisanty and Pablo Hinojosa September, 2009
  2. 2. Contents <ul><li>What is an Internet Governance model? </li></ul><ul><li>What makes an IG model efficient ? </li></ul><ul><li>What makes an IG model legitimate ? </li></ul><ul><li>Are all stakeholders represented ? </li></ul><ul><li>Engagement of developing countries </li></ul>
  3. 3. Internet governance model <ul><li>Air: Shared principles, norms and rules </li></ul><ul><li>Land: Organizational incarnation of the above </li></ul><ul><li>Fire: Multi-stakeholder system </li></ul>
  4. 4. Efficiency criteria <ul><li>Effectiveness vs. Efficiency </li></ul><ul><li>Efficiency criteria (examples): </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Transaction costs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Time to develop a policy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Level of participation and representation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Level of use of voluntary efforts from the community </li></ul></ul>
  5. 5. Legitimacy <ul><li>Meta-legal frameworks </li></ul><ul><li>Self-contained corporate governance </li></ul><ul><li>Legitimacy flows “bottom-up” </li></ul><ul><li>International </li></ul>
  6. 6. Representation <ul><li>Identification of key stake-holders </li></ul><ul><li>Openness does not guarantee representation </li></ul><ul><li>Sustainable representation: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>There is interest but no resources for participation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>There is interest but different than influencing bottom-up processes </li></ul></ul>
  7. 7. How about developing countries? <ul><li>Does universal access produce conscious and active netizens? </li></ul><ul><li>Local Internet communities: bottom-up? </li></ul><ul><li>Decision-making with uninformed governments </li></ul><ul><li>Coordination without representation </li></ul>
  8. 8. Instigator in 5 parts… <ul><li>Definition </li></ul><ul><ul><li>What is an Internet governance model? </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Efficiency </li></ul><ul><ul><li>As a parameter for evaluating IG models </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Legitimacy </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Self-contained corporate governance </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Representation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Openness does not guarantee representation </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Developing world </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Physical and conceptual limitations </li></ul></ul>

×