Getting it right the first time

891 views

Published on

Slide show for participants at the NLN Writing Retreat

Published in: Career, Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
891
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
161
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
6
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Getting it right the first time

  1. 1. GETTING ITRIGHT THEFIRST TIME Final Steps in Manuscript Submission and…BeyondNLN Writing Retreat * Baltimore, MD * December 2011
  2. 2. YOU’VE DONE YOUR DUE DILIGENCE And written a draft. Then end is in sight…NLN Writing Retreat * Baltimore, MD * December 2011
  3. 3. THE FINAL • Information for Authors is just that…information. Go back and double-check:CHECKLIST – Length – Format: spacing, margins, font – References: format, number – Abstract: number of words, format (structured or not) – Title page: format, information to include – Tables: on separate page or embedded, how many – Figures: format, legends, separate page or file – Copyright transfer form – Permission(s) to use copyrighted information
  4. 4. REFERENCES • Verify that all information is correct – Pubmed single citation matcher is a quick way to do this • Include issue numbers • Include DOI numbers if available • Make sure that they are formatted according to the style of the journal
  5. 5. COPYRIGHT • Needs to be signed by all authorsTRANSFER • CIN Policy: manuscript not sent for review until the CTS is on fileFORM • CIN: Okay to fax the form; can also scan and save as a PDF • With this form, you are transferring copyright of the article to the publisher – If you want to make copies for future use, will need to obtain permission – May be able to have a copyright exception for specific material, such as an illustration of a conceptual model that you have developed • If you have written the paper on work time, may need to check regarding who should sign the form (generally more of an issue for nurses who work in hospitals, not academia)
  6. 6. PERMISSION • If you include previously copyrighted material, will need to obtain permission for its use – Figures, illustrations, tables, research instruments • Write to the copyright holder for permission— this will usually be the publisher • A fee may be charged for the permission – Ask who will be responsible to pay; it is usually the author – May range from $25 to $500 or more • Need to include the permission with your submission • “Fair Use”: may quote up to 10% of a document before you need to ask for permission – Always need permission for poetry and song lyrics
  7. 7. THE • Most (all?) journals have an online processSUBMISSION • Give yourself time: a few hoursPROCESS – It may not take that long but it is better not to be rushed and stressed • Review the requirements first to determine what you need to submit and in what format – For CIN: required: separate title page, manuscript file, and copyright transfer form – Optional: cover letter, figures, tables • Authors must register at the site to submit • For Editorial Manager journals: user database is not shared so must complete registration process for different journals.
  8. 8. WHEN A • CIN Process (and I suspect this is prettyMANUSCRIPT universal)IS RECEIVED – Technical check to make sure all required elements have been submitted and manuscript is in correct format • Manuscript may be returned for revision (or worse, rejected) if it does not meet journal standards – Sent for peer review to two or three reviewers • This process may take 6 to 8 weeks – When peer review process is complete, editor makes decision
  9. 9. PEER REVIEW • Most journals: three reviewers; may be up to six • Selected for expertise in content, research, statistics, methods • Blinded process – Double blind – Author(s) blinded to reviewers – Not blinded at all • Reviewers are asked to comment on content and not act as copy editors • Reviewer comments are sent to author(s) as written
  10. 10. EDITORIAL • RejectDECISION – Not suitable for the journal – “Bad” science – CIN: invitation to resubmit after a complete re-write • Accept – Go celebrate! • Revise – Most common
  11. 11. REVISIONS • Revise and re-submit for re-review by peer reviewers • Revise and re-submit for review by the editor • Tentatively accept pending revisions and approval by the editor
  12. 12. MAKING • Sort out the comments from reviewers – Which are the same?REVISIONS – Which are different? – Are there any that contradict each other? • Attend to each comment – Make the revision or, if not, why not? • Write a document in which you enumerate the comments and respond to each one – Do not include identifying information on this as it may go back to the peer reviewers – It’s fine to say, “Thank you for this helpful comment” once or twice but not a dozen times! • Follow journal guidelines for how to indicate you have made revisions: track changes, comments, or a separate letter
  13. 13. DURING THE • Don’t get discouraged—makingREVISION changes is easier than writing the firstPROCESS draft! • Don’t take the comments personally— they are intended to help you improve your manuscript, not make you feel like a bad person • Don’t withdraw your manuscript and submit it somewhere else! • Meet requested deadlines. If that’s not possible, ask for an extension.
  14. 14. AFTER • Manuscript will go into production—may be several months awayACCEPTANCE – Keep the editorial office informed of any address changes • You will receive “page proofs” (usually a PDF) and be asked to make corrections – AQ—author query: things you need to respond to – Last chance to update information (essential only) – No re-writing at this point – Will have a short turnaround: 48 to 72 hours • For the future – Save your acceptance letter for your tenure file (editorial office may not be able to provide this to you) – Start thinking about your next article!
  15. 15. LESLIE’S • The famously formatted revisionFAVORITE • The “Love, Mary” letterWACKY • The drunk author who screamed atSTORIES Leslie after rejection • The irate author who accused Leslie of “thwarting science” (moral: don’t argue with a rejection letter) • Withdrawal of a manuscript at the eleventh hour • “Because you didn’t respond to my query letter, I didn’t receive a grant.”
  16. 16. HEARD JUST • “I’ve got the first draft of my manuscriptTHE OTHER almost written. I think I’m going to send it to Nursing Research.”DAY (IN MY • “I was at a conference last month.OFFICE) Someone told me aim high and suggested I send it to JAMA.” • “I used phenomenology as a method which is really rare in nursing. Not many people are doing that.” • “I’ve heard if you do a post-doc with ‘Dr. Famous Person,’ she insists on being first author on all manuscripts.” • “In my dossier to the tenure committee, I said I’ll have four manuscripts published by next spring.”
  17. 17. TIME FORYOURQUESTIONS

×