Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Pros and Cons of Fluorescent Tube Lights Bulbs


Published on

Check out this article for more pros and cons of CFL (fluorescent tube lights) Light Bulbs.

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Pros and Cons of Fluorescent Tube Lights Bulbs

  1. 1. Pros and Cons of CFLs /post/65598283451 CFLs (and fluorescent tube lights) are lit by an electric current that is sent through a tube containing argon and a small of amount of mercury gases. This in turn generates an invisible ultraviolet light, which then stimulates a fluorescent coating on the inside of the tube, producing visible light. PROS: Longevity - With an average lifespan of approximately 10,000 to 15,000 hours, a CFL bulb lasts about ten times longer than an incandescent bulb—which means they need to be replaced less often, making them convenient for those hardto- reach light fixtures and lamps. Efficiency - “CFLs are about four times more efficient than the equivalent wattage of incandescent bulbs,” says Naomi Miller, the senior lighting engineer at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Portland, OR. “So if you take the wattage of the CFL and multiply it by four, that equals the incandescent bulb you would replace. So, for example, a 15W CFL is roughly equivalent in light output to a 60W incandescent bulb.” According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), if every household in America replaced just one incandescent bulb with a CFL, the energy saved would be enough to light 3 million homes and prevent greenhouse gas emissions from the equivalent of 800,000 cars. Price - CFLs have dropped dramatically in price since they were first introduced to the market in the 1980s. They still cost a little more than incandescents; however, they will pay for themselves after a year or two of use (see box at left). Because they last so much longer than incandescents, you will continue to see savings on your energy bills throughout the life of the bulb. CONS: Mercury concerns - Many people are concerned about the mercury in CFLs, and with good cause: mercury is a neurotoxicant. The amount in a CFL bulb, however, is smaller than the tip of a pencil. Widespread use of CFL bulbs instead of incandescents will actually reduce the amount of mercury released into the atmosphere, since the main source of mercury emissions are smokestacks from fossil fuel burning power plants, according to the EPA. CFLs pose little risk to your family if they break, but proper clean- up is important (see below). Some usage limitations - CFLs are not dimmable, and they are not efficient in recessed lighting, where they waste about half of the energy they produce. To maximiz e their efficiency, avoid exposing them to extreme temperatures. The Bot t om Line: Many experts view CFLs as a placeholder for LED lights, because LEDs are even more efficient. Currently, CFLs come in more shapes and siz es than LEDs, but with ever- improving technology, many scientists think LEDs will be competitive within two to three years. For the time being, CFLs are the best replacement for incandescent bulbs in most situations; just make sure they are disposed of properly at the end of their life cycle.