Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Internet portals in the Baltic States: legal issues


Published on

2005.10.15 pranešimas VU KF konferencijoje

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Internet portals in the Baltic States: legal issues

  1. 1. Internet portals in theBaltic States: legalissues Liutauras Ulevičius Mykolas Romeris University Vilnius – October 15th, 2005
  2. 2. The ProblemInternet has matured into a commodityInternet portals have gained dailyaudiences throughout the Baltic StatesSocial relations intensify on the virtualarenaOld legal rules does not fit for a newsituation
  3. 3. The SolutionExpert analysis Analysis of theIdentification of “the situation in theweakest links” marketLegal procedures to Owners and chiefupdate existing editors of theregulation internet portals Daily legal issues
  4. 4. The Methodology• Ist phase:  Legal review, data (expert opinions) from the market leaders  The most common issues• IInd phase:  Questionnaires  Statistical analysis
  5. 5. Ist phaseExpertise in-place “Media law” (LT) “” (LT-FIN-..) juudid ahju / Olev Hannula (EE)Legal regulation analysis (systematic)Legal comparison
  6. 6. Expertise in-place (I)“Media law” by Liudvika Meškauskaitė Internet media (incl. Internet portals) are “means of mass communication” (liet. visuomenės informavimo priemonės) Content control is not in line with the Constitution due to the wrong legal form (according to the Convention human rights should be regulated by law)
  7. 7. Expertise in-place (II)“” Internet media are nor regulated by the Law of Mass communication Two separate regimes:  The law of Mass communication  The Police law and governmental content control order
  8. 8. Expertise in-place (III)Olev Hannula vs. Estonian society Competition of principles:  Free speech (a right to comment)  Public order, no racism Olevs appeal failed Race vs. Nation (“arab” comment case)
  9. 9. Legal regulation analysis Draft law on Mass communication (Press law)  Subject responsible for a legal act  Paradigm of “mean of mass communication in information society” (liet. informacinės visuomenės informavimo priemonė) LV intiatives  Draft law, internet media chapter excluded
  10. 10. Expert opinionsDelfi editors LT – generaly supports draft law LV – oposes draft law, sugests to add user created content (UCC) issues EE – no special law for, editors LT – mostly concerned with intellectual property issues (e.g. deep linking), UCC
  11. 11. Conclusions (Ist phase)The most common issues to be dealtwith: A right to comment A responsible subject (author vs. editor/owner) Legal mechanism – Press law, Police law, etc.
  12. 12. Thank You! Liutauras Ulevičius Mykolas Romeris University iutas@mruni. t, +370-686-08820