Web Preservation in a Web 2.0 Environment


Published on

Slides for a talk on "Web Preservation in a Web 2.0 Environment" given by Brian Kelly, UKOLN at a Web site preservation workshop at the UKOLN IWMW 2008 event.
See http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2008/sessions/guy/

Published in: Education, Business
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Web Preservation in a Web 2.0 Environment

  1. Web Preservation in a Web 2.0 Environment Brian Kelly UKOLN University of Bath Bath, UK Email [email_address] UKOLN is supported by: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2008/ About This Talk Will use of Web 2.0 services lead to new preservation concerns? And how should we respond to these new challenges? This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 licence (but note caveat) Resources bookmarked using ‘ iwmw2008 ' tag
  2. Is Web 2.0 Different? <ul><li>How does Web site preservation differ for Web 2.0: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Use of 3 rd party services </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Emphasis on collaboration and communication, rather than access to resources </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>More complex IPR issues </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Richer diversity of services </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Let’s look at: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Case study 1 - wikis </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Case study 2 – blogs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Case study 3 – reusing data </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Case study 4 – comms tools (disposable data) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Case study 5 – recording events </li></ul></ul>Web 2.0
  3. Group Exercises <ul><li>Speed exercises: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>You will be given an example to consider. Give an initial response, in a single sentence (or word) in less than a minute! </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Small group exercise: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>In small groups chose an example of interest. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Give a more considered response to the preservation challenges </li></ul></ul>Web 2.0
  4. Case Study 1: A Public Wiki <ul><li>WetPaint wiki used to support various workshops </li></ul><ul><li>Approaches taken: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Open access to all prior to & during event (to minimise barriers to creating content) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Access restricted to WetPaint users after event </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Access later restricted to event organisers </li></ul></ul>Web 2.0 Many aspects of Web site curation are to do with implementing such best practices, rather than implementing technical solutions See JISC PoWR blog post
  5. Case Study 1: A Public Wiki <ul><li>WetPaint provides an option for backing up data. </li></ul><ul><li>A zipped file of the pages can be saved for storing on a locally managed service. </li></ul>Web 2.0 There are limitations in this particular service (poor quality HTML, internal links don’t work, …) But this does illustrate an approach which can be taken.
  6. Case Study 2: Blog Migration <ul><li>How might you migrate the contents of a blog (e.g. you’re leaving college)? </li></ul><ul><li>This question was raised by Casey Leaver, shortly before leaving Warwick University </li></ul>Web 2.0
  7. Case Study 2: Blog Migration <ul><li>She migrated her blog from blogs at Warwick Univ to Wordpress </li></ul>Web 2.0 Note, though, that not all data was transferred (e.g. title, but not contents) so there’s a need to check transfer mechanisms
  8. Case Study 2: Blog Migration <ul><li>A backup of UK Web Focus blog is available on Vox: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Manual migration of new posts every few weeks </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Only migrates text </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Doesn’t migrate images, embedded videos, internal links, comments, … </li></ul></ul>Web 2.0 Migration of blogs, wikis, etc. is not currently an easy task  But advice is available
  9. Case Study 3: Reusing Data <ul><li>Blog post in Facebook. Possible concerns: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>It’s not sustainable </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>You’ve given ownership to Facebook </li></ul></ul>Web 2.0 <ul><li>Response: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The post is managed in WordPress; Fb displays copy (to new audience) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Fb don’t claim ownership – they claim rights to make money (e.g. through ads) </li></ul></ul>
  10. Case Study 4: Disposable Data <ul><li>Twitter – example of a micro-blogging application </li></ul><ul><li>Facebook status messages is another related example </li></ul>Web 2.0 <ul><li>Issues: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Will Twitter be sustain-able over a long period? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What will happen to the data? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What about the IPR for ‘tweets’? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What about institutional uses? </li></ul></ul>
  11. Case Study 4: Disposable Data <ul><li>Many twitterers regard their tweets as disposal </li></ul><ul><li>I tend to use Twitter as a ‘virtual water cooler’ – sharing gossip, jokes and occasional work-related information with (mainly) people I know </li></ul>Web 2.0 You could make use of clients which manage your tweets (e.g. treat like email) But you should develop your policies first, prior to exploring technologies
  12. Case Study 4: Disposable Data <ul><li>Skype (or your preferred VoIP application) are growing in popularity </li></ul>Web 2.0 <ul><li>Issues: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Is the digital data (the call) preserved? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>What about the video and the IM chats? </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Possible Responses: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Am I bovvered? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>I didn’t bother with analogue phones, why should I worry now? </li></ul></ul>
  13. Case Study 5: Digitized Talks <ul><li>Seminar on Open Science given at UKOLN in Feb 2008. </li></ul><ul><li>Video clip of opening 10 mins taken & uploaded to YouTube </li></ul><ul><li>Issues: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Privacy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Quality </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Benefits </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Long term access </li></ul></ul>Benefits identified – now how do we seek to deploy recordings of seminars, conferences, etc. on a more systematic basis? This is work in progress – but see IWMW 2007 videos
  14. Case Study 6: Slideshare <ul><li>What happens to your slides if Slideshare disappears? </li></ul><ul><li>My approach: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Master copy held on managed environment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Info on master on title slide and metadata </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>CC licence & download available – many copies </li></ul></ul>
  15. Case Study 7: Social Networks <ul><li>University of Wales, Newport and University of Bradford have set up Ning networks for supporting their students: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Bradford: Closed (Bradford email address needed to access) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Newport: Open Intended for students about to arrive at institution </li></ul></ul>What does preservation mean in this context? Answers to this question will be left as an exercise for the participants  http://newstudents.newport.ac.uk/
  16. Role Of The Internet Archive <ul><li>Can we leave everything to the Internet Archive? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Has role to play in Web 1.0 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Seems to archive some public blogs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>May not access images or other embedded content </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Still has limitations (cf. UCE/BCU) </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Can’t (currently) access Facebook pages, for example </li></ul>Web 2.0
  17. Role Of The Internet Archive <ul><li>The Open University has a presence in Facebook. </li></ul><ul><li>In June 2008: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>7,551 fans </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>983 wall posts </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>82 discussion topics </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Is anyone: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Recording the history? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Curating the data </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Managing possible risks? </li></ul></ul>Web 2.0
  18. The Research Challenges <ul><li>Some thoughts: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Preservation of Web sites in known to be difficult </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Additional difficulties in a Web 2.0 world </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Complexities include technical challenges and business issues </li></ul></ul><ul><li>However: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Is avoiding Web 2.0 a realistic answer? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>There may be some simple processes which may help </li></ul></ul>Web 2.0
  19. Accessibility & Preservation <ul><li>The parallels: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>We can’t release xxx: it breaks accessibility guidelines; we’ll be sued </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The xxx service provides benefits to many – we’ll see what reasonable adjustments are needed to enhance access </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Approaches needed: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Clarification of the purpose of the service </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Risk assessment of loss of service / record of service / record of look-and-feel </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Documented policy </li></ul></ul>
  20. Questions