•Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2016). To what extent does the Leiden manifesto also apply to
altmetrics? A discussion of the manifesto against the background of research into altmetrics. Online
Information Review, 40(4):529-543.
•Busby, L. (2016). Intimdated by a number. The Serials Librarian, 71:1, 9-13.
•Dhiman, A.K., (2015). Bibliometrics to altmetrics: Changing trends in assessing research impact.
DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 35(4); 310-315.
•Galligan, F. & Dyas-Correia, S. (2013). Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Serials Review,
•Michalek, Andrea, et al. (2014). Analyze this: Altmetrics and your collection. Statistics and
collection development. Against the grain, 4/2014: 80-81.
•Mock, Emily. (2017) “Problems with Collection Usage Statitstics.” University at Albany Libraries
internal memorandum, May 25, 2017.
•Rathmel,A., & Currie, L. (2015). “Big Deals” and squeaky wheels: Taking stock of your stats. The
Serials Librarian, 68:26-37.
•Roemer, R.C, & Borchadt, R. (2015). Issues, controversies and opportunities for altmetrics. Library
Technology Reports, 20-30.
•Sumlewtiz, G., et al. (2013). ROI or bust: A glimpse into how librarians, publishers, and agents
create value for survival. The Serials Librarian, 64:216-223.
•Vaughan, L., et al, (2017). Investigating disciplinary differences in the relationships between
citations and downloads. Scientometrics, 111:1533-1545.