The Open Science Agenda in Europe: Policy convergence & diversity of approaches
The Open Science Agenda in Europe:
Policy convergence & diversity of approaches
Susan Reilly
Executive Director
SPARC More, March 6th
@skreilly
Overview
Introduction to LIBER
Open Science in Europe: how did we get here?
Highlights
Open Science Cloud
Copyright reform
Open access
What is LIBER?
A pan-European membership organisation
representing 420+ research libraries from
across Europe
Mission to create an information
infrastructure that enables research in LIBER
institutions to be world class
Council of Europe
European Commission
• H2020 Open Data
Pilot
• Digital Single Market
• Open Science Cloud
• Development of open
science agenda
• Importance of skills,
infra
Open Science in Europe
European Parliament
• Copyright legislation
• H2020 funding
Science in Transition: from Science 2.0
to Open Science
EU consultation on Science 2.0 (July-
September 2014)
498 responses and 27 position statements
43% of respondents chose “Open Science” as
their preferred term out of 6 terms
Areas for Policy Intervention
Open Access & Copyright
Citizen Science
Researchers’ Careers
Peer Review & Research Evaluation
New Metrics
Other: Funding, Skills, Infra
Convergence: The Digital Single
Market Strategy (May 2015)
Online access for consumers and business across
Europe
Fit for purpose copyright framework
Maximising the growth potential of the digital economy
Build a data economy
Interoperability and standardisation
Inclusive e-society
Digital skills
Convergence: Open Science Cloud
(OSC)
“a trusted environment for hosting and
processing research data to support EU
science in its global leading role”
H2020 Open Data Pilot
Proliferation of Infrastructure
Need for Interoperability
Drive for Knowledge transfer
LIBER on the OSC
“Open & Community Driven”
http://libereurope.eu/blog/2015/11/04/an-open-and-community-driven-
open-science-cloud
Not sufficient to provide infrastructure
Skills and training
Local support
Incentivise Open Science
Commons
Convergence: Copyright
Recognition that copyright needs to be modernised to
support Open Science and the Digital Single Market
European Commission to publish proposals for
copyright reform in June 2016
TDM
Cross Border
Copyright & TDM
• TDM potentially worth 5.3 billion euro a year to European
research budget (2%)
• Knock-on effect would be a minimum of 32.5 billion euro
increase in GDP
• Increased capacity of digital technology
• Licences don’t scale and infringe
academic freedom
Elsevier TDM Policy
• Access through API only
• Text only- no images, tables
• Research must register details
• Click-through licence
• Terms can change any time
• Reproducibility of results
1. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WAS NOT
DESIGNED TO REGULATE THE FREE
FLOW OF FACTS, DATA AND IDEAS,
BUT HAS AS A KEY OBJECTIVE THE
PROMOTION OF RESEARCH ACTIVITY
7. Where research funders or other bodies require, and
where authors wish, research outputs to be made available
under specific licences, these should typically be CC-BY for
publications and CC0 for research data.
8. Every university, research organisation, research funder
and commercial business should ensure that their policies
advocate content mining as a research methodology which
has the potential to transform the way research is
performed. The growth of open access and open data has
been, and will continue to be, a key enabler of content
mining.
Divergence: Open Access
Communication From The Commission To The
European Parliament, The Council, The European
Economic And Social Committee And The Committee
Of The Regions (2012)
Policies for open access to scientific articles and data in place in all
members states by 2014
60% of publically funded scientific articles available open access by
2016
Various approaches in place
Legislation to enable green OA e.g. Spain, Italy, Germany
Funder/Government mandates e.g.UK & NL
Extra funding for gold
Off-setting agreements
Open Access
OpenAire Open Access Publishing Pilot
New focus on “fair open access”
Concerns over cost of open access: “Christmas is
over!”
LIBER was one of those respondents. In fact we released a statement recognising the importance of open science and calling on the Commission to support 5 key enablers of open science: policy and leadership (roadmaps for open data, coordination of clear policy), advocacy and recognition (promoting open science and recognising contributions, law reform to address contradiction in copyright law, infrastructure (particularly interoperability), roles and skills (training, education, involvement of stakeholders).
It will foster best practices of global data findability and accessibility (FAIR data), help researchers get their data skills recognised and rewarded (careers, altmetrics); help address issues of access and copyright (IPR) and data subject privacy; allow easier replicability of results and limit data wastage e.g. of clinical trial data (research integrity); contribute to clarification of the funding model for data generation and preservation, reducing rent-seeking and priming the market for innovative research services e.g. advanced TDM (new business models).
The free flow of information and ideas is an essential human right4. It is a catalyst for the production of human knowledge, which underpins welfare and prosperity. Societies around the world have chosen to protect certain limited rights in intellectual property as incentives both to innovation and the dissemination of knowledge. Intellectual property law was never intended to cover facts, ideas and pure data. However the modern application of intellectual property law is increasingly becoming an obstacle to knowledge creation and dissemination that use even these most simple building blocks of knowledge.
In some countries, copyright law5 in particular has been interpreted to restrict the ability to apply computer reading and analysis to otherwise legally-available content. Other legislative frameworks such as patent law and database law may have a similar impact. When intellectual property law allows content to be read and analysed manually by humans but not by their machines, it has failed its original purposes.
The free flow of information and ideas is an essential human right4. It is a catalyst for the production of human knowledge, which underpins welfare and prosperity. Societies around the world have chosen to protect certain limited rights in intellectual property as incentives both to innovation and the dissemination of knowledge. Intellectual property law was never intended to cover facts, ideas and pure data. However the modern application of intellectual property law is increasingly becoming an obstacle to knowledge creation and dissemination that use even these most simple building blocks of knowledge.
In some countries, copyright law5 in particular has been interpreted to restrict the ability to apply computer reading and analysis to otherwise legally-available content. Other legislative frameworks such as patent law and database law may have a similar impact. When intellectual property law allows content to be read and analysed manually by humans but not by their machines, it has failed its original purposes.