Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

What is Judicial Review Sprott Lab Rels June 16 2012


Published on

Presentation for Labour Relations Course, Sprott School of Business, Carleton University June 16 2012

Published in: Design, Education
  • Be the first to comment

What is Judicial Review Sprott Lab Rels June 16 2012

  1. 1. Prof. L. Garib Saturday, June 16th 2012MCP013 Labour RelationsSprott School of Business Carleton University
  2. 2. Judicial ReviewWhat is Judicial Review?When Does It Apply?Grounds for Judicial ReviewHow does It Work?
  3. 3. Definition of Judicial ReviewReview of an administrative decision by the courtsReviews the process of the decisionIt’s a narrow power of the court Court reviews the entire decision- making process, including the findings of fact and of law
  4. 4. What is Judicial Review?Court does not concern itself with the wisdom of the arbitrator/adjudicator/decision maker’s decision.Court does not “re-hear” or “re- try” the case on its merits.
  5. 5. Court’s only concern:Did the arbitrator or labour board properly exercise its authority ?E.g.: Exceed jurisdiction under the statute or collective agreement? Was the decision unreasonable ? Correct in law (under statute, procedural fairness)
  6. 6. Judicial Review is NOT an Appeal An appeal is a review of a case on its merits Merits concern the issues of the case – the heart of the dispute Merits include assessing the facts and the arguments in favour or against the parties Appeals are NOT about the decision making process – Judicial Reviews ARE
  7. 7. When Is Judicial Review Used?The losing party can seek JR if they believe that the arbitrator or board: Made an error in FACT - on the record that was before him/her at the time of their decision Made an error in LAW; interpreted the law incorrectly; went beyond their authority; was biased; didn’t allow one side to be heard
  8. 8. When Is Judicial Review Used? When a decision involves a vital or novel principle in law that hasn’t been tested yet. When it involves an important issue of public policy.
  9. 9. What are Grounds for Judicial Review?1. Was there a procedural error? Decision makers must be procedurally fair Was there a “fair” hearing? Were the parties given a right to be “heard”? Was the decision maker neutral or unbiased?
  10. 10. What are Grounds for JR?2.) Did the arbitrator exceed his/her jurisdiction under statute or the terms of the collective agreement? E.g. made an order or finding not permitted. E.g. Dealt with subject matter not in jurisdiction – about non-unionized workers, not involving labour relations matters
  11. 11. How Does Judicial Review Work ? Either Party can apply for judicial review It’s in the form of a Court Application – before Provincial or Federal Court Set out alleged grounds and desired remedy Timelines set in statute – usually must make application within 30 days
  12. 12. How Does Judicial Review Work ? No New Evidence can be introduced. No New Issues can be introduced.*It’s NOT a Re-hearing of the case!*Courts will not impose their decision over that of the arbitrator unless there is a reviewable error – an unreasonable decision or a decision incorrect in law
  13. 13. Available Remedies1. Quash or set aside the award in its entirety (commonly where the arbitrator was found to have no jurisdiction)
  14. 14. Remedies continued2. Remit or send the case back to the arbitrator or board for a re- hearing If there is bias – get a new arbitrator or new board (rare)
  15. 15. Can a Judicial Review be Appealed ? Is the Court’s judicial review decision “Appealable”? Yes – can be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada. Supreme Court of Canada can review a lower court’s judicial review of an arbitrator’s decision or a labour board’s decision on matters of national importance.
  16. 16. Remember: on Judicial Review:The decision must be correct in lawA court looking into the qualities that make a decision reasonable: • the process of making the decision • articulating the reasons for the decision • The overall reasonableness of the outcomeReasonableness is mostly about: • Justification of the decision, on the facts, the law and reasoning • Transparency – is it clear how the decision was reached?
  17. 17. Summary of Judicial Review Procedural errors: bias, party denied right to be “heard” Errors of fact Errors of law (e.g. jurisdiction) Court doesn’t order the ultimate outcome of the case on its merits Remedy – usually a re-hearing