Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime. Shared Resource


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this Shared Resource

  1. 1. Satvir Daroch
  2. 2. ◦ Need for a quick, simple and cheap way of making a claim in court.◦ Avoiding the cost of a case exceeding the remedy gained.◦ 1973 saw the introduction of the small claims procedure.◦ Limit for cases changed several times, stands at £5000 since 1999◦ 2007 limit still£5000 but £1000 for P.I.
  3. 3.  PROCEDURE ◦ People are encouraged to bring their own case to prevent costs. ◦ Lawyers can be used to start the case and represent in the court but this adds cost. ◦ Winner of a case can not usually claim their legal costs so lawyers are discouraged. ◦ “lay Representatives” can be used for representation as they are unqualified and cheaper. ◦ District judges can hear these cases in private which allows them more flexibility. ◦ D. Judges will take a more inquisitorial and have been trained to handle these cases.
  4. 4.  ADVANTAGES ◦ Costs of proceedings are low. ◦ Losing doesn’t mean having to pay other parties legal costs. ◦ Lawyers are not needed ◦ Fairly quick procedure. ◦ D. Judge helps people to explain their case properly.
  5. 5.  DISADVANTAGES ◦ For cases over £1000 there is an allocation fee of £100 ◦ No legal funding for Lawyers although “no win no fee” available in some cases. ◦ If other party are a business they usually use a lawyer therefore this can lead to unfairness in court. ◦ John Baldwin research suggests that D. Judges are not very helpful. ◦ Only around 60% of people receive the money they are awarded.