4. 4
C. elegans neural network
Global level (277 neurons)
Local level (131 neurons)
5. 5
Most projections connect adjacent neurons
(Gamma function for connection length distribution)
0 20 40
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
Connection length[mm]
Frequency
0 0.5 1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Connection length[mm]
Frequency
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Connection length[mm]
Frequency
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0.2
0.4
0.6
Connection length[mm]
Frequency
Macaque
cortical
Rat
neuronal
C. elegans
neuronal (local)
C. elegans
neuronal (global)
Kaiser et al. (2009) Cerebral Cortex
6. 0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Connection length [mm]
Relativefrequency
C
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Connection length [mm]
Relativefrequency
D
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Connection length [mm]
Relativefrequency
A
20 40 60 80 100
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Connection length [mm]
Relativefrequency
B
Macaque
cortical
Rat
neuronal
Human DTI Human
rsMRI
Also true for human structural
and functional connectivity
Kaiser (2011) Neuroimage
7. 7
Why is there an exponential tail?
100
0
0 50 100
0
100
200
300
w2d1000001
0 50 100
0
100
200
300
w2d1000010
0 50 1
0
100
200
300
w2d1000011
0
300
w2d1000101
300
w2d1000110
300
w2d1000111
Connection length (units)
Occurrences
X: number of steps until another neuron
is in the range of the axonal growth cone
p: probability that unit space contains a neuron
q = 1 - p
t=1
t=2
t=3
P(X = n) = p * qn-1
-> exponential distribution
Kaiser et al. (2009) Cerebral Cortex
8. 8
Reducing neural wiring costs
• Minimizing total wire length reduces metabolic costs for
connection establishment and signal propagation
• Component Placement Optimization, CPO
Every alternative arrangement of network nodes will lead
to a higher total wiring length
• Not the case! Reductions by 30-50% possible
A
B C
D A
B C
D
rearranging
nodes A and D
Kaiser & Hilgetag (2006) PLoS Computational Biology, 7:e95
10. 10
When long-distance fibers are missing (minimal):
original
minimal
ASP
Long-distance connections are short-cuts that help to reduce
the characteristic path length (or average shortets path, ASP):
Less long-distance connections -> longer path lengths
11. 11
Low path lengths = few intermediate
processing steps are beneficial
- Synchrony of near and distant regions
- Reduced transmission delays
- Less (cross-modal) interference
- Higher reliability of transmission
13. 13
Small-world properties
Stam et al. Cerebral Cortex (2007)
EEG
synchronization
Network
(functional connectivity)
in Alzheimer’s patients
and control group
14. 14
Alzheimer: Path length vs. task performance
Mini Mental State Examination
(attention, memory, language)
Diamonds:
Alzheimer patients
Empty squares:
Control
15. 15
Cognition: Path length vs. IQ
Van den Heuvel (2009) J. Neurosci. 29: 7619
Correlations between local path length lambda (shortest path length from one
node to any other node) and IQ (Intelligence Quotient) for medial prefrontal cortex,
bilateral inferior parietal cortex and precuneus / posterior cingulate regions (p <
0.05, corrected for age).
Resting state fMRI in 19 subjects (functional connectivity based on coherence)
16. 16
Summary
5. Linking structure and function:
- Alzheimer’s disease: path lengths
- IQ: path lengths
4. Spatial properties:
- Preference for connections
to neighbours
- Fast processing due to
long-distance connections