Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Open Government Implementation Model - Internal Data Monitoring - CeDEM 2012


Published on

Enhancement of the Open Government Implementation Model (Lee/Kwak 2011). Internal Data Monitoring for public agencies to as decicion support for disclosing information to open data portals.

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Open Government Implementation Model - Internal Data Monitoring - CeDEM 2012

  1. 1. www.kdz.or.atInternal Data Monitoring forOpen Government3. May 2012CeDEM 2010, KremsBernhard Krabina
  2. 2. IntroductionKDZ – Centre forPublic AdministrationResearchNGO, founded 1969Competence centre for  Public Management/Public Governance  Public Finance and  City ManagementResearch, consulting andtrainingKnow-how transfer fromresearch to 2
  3. 3. Open Gover nmentImplementation Model(Lee/Kwak 2011) nment-vor 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 3
  4. 4. 4 phases of the model phase 1 – Incr easing Data Tr anspar ency  increasing transparency of government processes and performance by publishing relevant data online and sharing it with the public. phase 2 – Impr oving Open Par ticipation  improving open participation of the public in government work and decision making through various methods and tools. phase 3 – Enhancing Open Collabor ation  public engagement in complex tasks or projects that aim to produce specific outputs and co-create value-added services. phase 4 – Realizing Ubiquitous Engagement  take transparency, participation, and collaboration to the next level of public 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 4
  5. 5. Phase 1: Open Gover nmentData two most impor tant tasks :Identifying high-value, high-impact data for the publicImpr oving and assuring data quality in ter ms ofaccur acy, consistency, and timeliness80/20 r ule: top 20% of data that would most benefit thepublic:qW hat have we alr eady published? (think about for mats,licenses, por tal,…)qW hat have other s (national/inter national) alr eadypublished?qW hat does the community want? (sur veys, meetings)qW hat else can we publish ? -> Data 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 5
  6. 6. Phase 1: inter naldata monitoring Questions  What data do we have?  What data can be published?  On what criteria do we base our decision? Metrics  starting point: services catalogue  10 criteria incl. description and & metrics  assessment in scores 0 – 5 (0 = K.O.) 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 6
  7. 7. Criteria 1/3Criterion Description Metrics (0-5) pointsnon- Is the data subject to 0: non-disclosure obligation non-disclosure 1: restrictions exist, are hardly changeable (e. g. EU restrictions)disclosure/legal obligations or other 2: restrictions exist, changeable (e. g. regional or district councilrestrictions legal restrictions? with extraordinary resolution) 3: restrictions exist, easily changeable (e. g. regional or district council with simple majority) 4: restrictions exist, very easily changeable (e. g. internal rules and practices) 5: no restrictionspersonal Does the data include 0: personal referenced data personal references 1: data cannot be made anonymous, missing approval hardlyreferences or can individuals be obtainable identified? 2: data cannot be made anonymous, missing approval obtainable 3: approval obtained (e. g. subsidies) 4: data can be made anonymous 5: no identification of individuals possiblecompany Does the data include 0: company referenced data company references 1: data cannot be made anonymous, missing approval hardlyreferences or can individual obtainable companies be 2: data cannot be made anonymous, missing approval obtainable identified? 3: approval obtained (e. g. subsidies) 4: data can be made anonymous 5: no identification of individual companies possible 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 7
  8. 8. Criteria 2/3Criterion Description Metrics (0-5) pointscopyright Is the agency sole 0: copyrights of third parties prohibit disclosure possessor of copyright? 1: subject to license fees and approval 2: subject to license fees, approval obtained 3: no license fees, subject to approval 4: no license fees, no approval needed 5: sole possession of copyright ensuredvalue How high is the 0: no value estimated value of 1: very low value disclosure (for the 2: low value public, for companies, 3: medium value for other agencies…) 4: high value 5: very high valuecost How high is the cost of 0: unjustifiable cost disclosure? 1: very high cost 2: high cost 3: medium cost 4: low cost 5: very low costcontent- How high is the data 0: data quality unjustifiable quality? (timeliness, 1: data quality very lowrelated data completeness, 2: data quality lowquality accurateness, 3: data quality medium faultiness) 4: data quality high 5: data quality very high 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 8
  9. 9. Criteria 3/3Criterion Description Metrics (0-5) pointstechnical 0: data available on paper only vailable data 1: data available electronicallyavailability formats, open 2: data available in machine readable format standards, 5-Stars- 3: data available in OGD formats Model, OGD 4: data available with URI / as RDF formats 5: data available as linked datasynergy 0: not yet published s the data /are 1: published on the agency’s website services being 2: published/to be published on external portals (e. g., made available for Centropemap etc.) other purposes?  3: published/to be published under regional/national laws (e. g. WGeoDIG) 4: published/to be published due to EU regulations (e. g. INSPIRE, SEIS, Directive 2003/4/EG…) 5: published/to be published for external customers due to contracts (e. g. economic chamber …)compliance 00: OGD principles cannot be met (less than 5 principles) an the OGD 1: OGD principles partly be met (5 - 7 principles)with OGD principles be met? 2: OGD principles largely met (minimum of 8 principles), exemption notprinciples granted 3: OGD principles cannot be met (less than 5 principles), exemption granted 4: all OGD principles can be met by exemption to principle 1 5: all OGD principles can be met 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 9
  10. 10. Technical availability  5-star model of Ber ner 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 10
  11. 11. OGD principles 1. Completeness 2. Primacy 3. Timeliness 4. Ease of Physical and Electronic Access 5. Machine readability 6. Non-discrimination 7. Use of Commonly Owned Standards 8. Licensing 9. Documentation (instead of Permanence) 10. Privacy (instead of Usage Costs) 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 11
  12. 12. Changes of principlesPer manence Dokumentation … should be  … ar e documented available online in compr ehensivel y by ar chives in medatata and per petuity. available online over …should r emain a long time period. online, with Once disclosed data appr opriate ver sion- is published with tr acking and appr opriate ver sion- ar chiving over time. tr acking and ar chiving over time. 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 12
  13. 13. Changes of principlesUsa ge costs PrivacyNot needed in Austria, as Per sonall y identifiablethe Cr eative Commons infor mation will not beAttribution- disclosed.NonCommer cial- If ther e might be aShar eAlike 3.0 Austria possibility to dr awLicense was chosen conclusions to a per sonalexplicitl y excluding usa ge level, the OGDcosts. competence center is to be infor med to decide on w heter or not to disclose the data. 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 13
  14. 14. Planning of disclosur e… 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 14
  15. 15. Setting up an OGDcompetence centr e V ir tual or ganisation as inter nal steering committee and exter nal contact point Actions like  initiate pilot pr ojects  car r y out contests, giving out awar ds  ask stakeholder s  or ganise events (e.g. barcamp)  set up gover nance str uctur es for data disclosur e  mana ge cultural change (e. g. ideas competition)  channell use of social media  define metrics to measure success  watch over adherence to OGD principles  initiate community of practice: „Cooper ation OGD Austria“ 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 15
  16. 16. Set up of an OGD por tal Naming convention: CKAN Austria: of Austrian data por tal  Harmonise meta data  Single point of contact to the EU data portal EU data por tal 2012/2013… 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 16
  17. 17. OutlookOpen Gover nment is mor than Open Data!Transparency?  Austria is last! Par ticipation?  E-Participation?  Participartory Budgeting?Collaboration?  Realizing Ubiquitous Engagement?  Co-Commission, Co-Design, Co-Deliver, Co-Assess… 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 17
  18. 18. Tr anspar ency thr ough thir dpar ties……civil society is lining up Meineabgeor verwaltungsr efor refor diemutbuer demokratiebe gehr plattfor … 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 18
  19. 19. Open Gover nment in V ienna… 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 19
  20. 20. W hat is left to do? Open Gover nment Implementation Model  Work out other phases, including:  remove banning of social media platforms  social media guidelines and trainings  participatory projects  … Fur ther topics to be considered  Open Source / Open Commons  Knowledge Management and Social Media? (Knowledge Management 2.0)  New structures for working/leading/organising/governing?  … 2. Mai 2012 · Seite 20
  21. 21. Contact  KDZ – Centre for Public Administration Research  Bernhard Krabina      Seite 21