Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Napa Valley School Library  Consortium<br />A different solution for a very difficult time<br />Kate MacMillan, Sandy Bial...
Who We Are & What We look Like<br />Napa Valley School  Library Consortium Members *<br />Michelle, Susan, Lisa, Paula: SH...
con·sor·ti·um<br /> <br /> a.  An association or a combination…..for the purpose of engaging in a joint venture.<br />b.  ...
The  Rationale  for School Library Consortiums*<br />  Innovative solutions to support library  management at the district...
         What the NVSL Consortium Can Do<br />Provide technical hardware, stability and support<br />Provide training/netw...
What the NVSL Consortium Cannot Do<br />Mandate District or Site staffing  <br /> Mandate District or Site budgets<br />De...
What Are the Benefits?Consortium members benefit from peer support <br />Consortium host provides:<br />Up-to-date technol...
What Other Benefits?<br />Autonomous cost efficient funding<br />Agreed upon managed library services as per MOU<br />Dist...
 Cost Efficient Funding<br />
Fees = Funding<br />
Background:  California School Districts<br />1998 – 2001 State funds for  school  libraries<br />Updated Collections <br ...
 Post California Public School Library Act of 1998 <br />Library and technology staffing not keeping  pace with school lib...
Background: Tough Times Require  Innovative Solutions ( 2004 – 200?)<br />
Background: Funding Shortages<br />
Background … Spread All Over<br />Napa County: 612 square miles <br />Small rural districts: tiny remote sites:   private/...
 Background: NVUSD  <br />NVUSD  = acts as a COE<br /> ISP for the county <br />Established business relationship with sur...
Background: How It All Began…….<br />2003 Napa COE Curriculum Library<br />Server crash<br />Web Collection goes offline<b...
Background:   Consortium Partners<br />Napa Valley USD<br />Napa County Office of Education: 2004<br />Calistoga Joint Uni...
Strength in Numbers<br />Consortium = members = power<br />
So What Technology Does the Member Need ?<br />Web based ILS program<br />Sufficient internal bandwidth<br />Sufficient to...
What Technology Does the Host Need?<br />Stable ILS-trained IT department<br />SQL based server<br />Sufficient bandwidth<...
So …. What’s the Next Step?<br />Consortium host and member(s) agree upon<br />Memorandum of Understanding<br />MOU = a bu...
The Glue That Holds It Altogether<br />The MOU  (Memorandum of Understanding)<br />Board approved document that outlines s...
Different districts, schools and libraries<br />Require<br />Different solutions while maintaining centralizedautomation s...
Management Styles<br />	Centralization = clearly defined structure<br />	Consortium = collaboration, loose structure   <br...
Centralized Management<br />Centralization = all resources under one authority<br />All decisions from one source<br />Top...
 3 C’s of Consortium Member Management<br />Members provide peer management through <br /><ul><li>Cooperation
  Collaboration
  Consensus  </li></li></ul><li>Centralized  ILS  <br />Holdings on a single server  <br />  Centralized automation admini...
The Relationships<br />
Most Important Relationship<br />
IT  <br />Facilitates ILS implementation at the hardware level <br />ILS upgrades<br />Data  queries and updates <br />Tro...
Library Services<br />*ILS Administrator represents consortium and host <br />*DL: Site Teacher Librarian/ Media Specialis...
Implementation Team<br />Vendor Relationship Vital<br />Training<br />Support<br />Communication<br />
Who Does What?  <br />Library Services<br />IT/Technology<br />    Support<br />Training<br />
Technology<br />IT support includes*<br />*IT administrator<br />Student management specialist<br />Technicians<br />Bandw...
Library Services<br />Facilitates and supports ILS implementation at the consortium  level<br />Provides managed library s...
   Managed Services(as per MOU)  <br /> District and/or site reports<br /> Library committee and district site visits<br /...
Managed Services Collaboration<br />
 Support:  Annual Reports<br />Collection/circulation data  including:  <br />Collection maps; Collection reports <br />An...
Library Services/Collection Development <br />Recommend curriculum/ standard based materials  <br />Participate in site li...
Collection Development Communication<br />Keeping track of list and requests<br />Titlewave Accounts<br />Baker and Taylor...
 Staff <br />Provide growth and staff development  opportunities to all members<br />User group/open circle training model...
 Training*<br />    Training = all library staff<br /> Consortium decides needs and presenters<br />Correlates training se...
 Communicating, Networking & Sharing<br />How to keep the information lines open<br />How to keep information current<br /...
Library 101 Help Page <br />Support Available 24/7<br />Archived trainings<br />Current Library information<br />Areas of ...
Logical Hosts = County Offices of Education     <br />Form consortium with member districts<br />  Node for the DCP (Digit...
The Outcome and the  Result<br />Consortiums are cost efficient <br />Generate income to support the consortium host  and ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

NVLSL Consortium CSLA 2008.

934 views

Published on

An overview of Napa Valley School Library Consortium

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

NVLSL Consortium CSLA 2008.

  1. 1. Napa Valley School Library Consortium<br />A different solution for a very difficult time<br />Kate MacMillan, Sandy Biale, Michelle Holguin <br />
  2. 2. Who We Are & What We look Like<br />Napa Valley School Library Consortium Members *<br />Michelle, Susan, Lisa, Paula: SHUSD<br />Janis, Cathy: CJUSD<br />Michelle W, Alissa, Matilda; PARTNER<br />Loreen, Sandy ,Suzanne, Anne, Colette, Cathy, Roberta, Sean, Stefani, Pam<br />Terry, Diane, Amy, Nancy, Terry, Julie, Roberta, Janine, Deana, Tina, Bobbie, Grace, Joanne, Linda, Laura, Lorrie, Melissa, Louisa, Cathy, Deb: NVUSD<br />Kate: Library Services<br />Tim: IT: Bea, Aeries<br />
  3. 3. con·sor·ti·um<br /> <br /> a. An association or a combination…..for the purpose of engaging in a joint venture.<br />b. A cooperative arrangement among groups or institutions: a library consortium<br />
  4. 4. The Rationale for School Library Consortiums*<br /> Innovative solutions to support library management at the district and site level<br />Keep libraries open<br />Databases and automation programs stable<br /> Equal access to resources for all students<br />*An integrated Web based library system is required for this type of school library consortium<br />
  5. 5. What the NVSL Consortium Can Do<br />Provide technical hardware, stability and support<br />Provide training/networking<br />Host automation software & library databases <br />Provide managed library services as per MOU<br />
  6. 6. What the NVSL Consortium Cannot Do<br />Mandate District or Site staffing <br /> Mandate District or Site budgets<br />Deviate from the MOU* <br />*Agreed upon by member administrations<br />
  7. 7. What Are the Benefits?Consortium members benefit from peer support <br />Consortium host provides:<br />Up-to-date technology<br />Technical support<br />Hardware/Servers<br />Software upgrades<br />Database hosting/including backups<br />
  8. 8. What Other Benefits?<br />Autonomous cost efficient funding<br />Agreed upon managed library services as per MOU<br />District/Admin buy-in<br />Strength of numbers<br />Training and networking opportunities<br />
  9. 9. Cost Efficient Funding<br />
  10. 10. Fees = Funding<br />
  11. 11. Background: California School Districts<br />1998 – 2001 State funds for school libraries<br />Updated Collections <br />Sophisticated library automation programs<br />Outcome: improved school libraries <br />
  12. 12. Post California Public School Library Act of 1998 <br />Library and technology staffing not keeping pace with school library needs. <br /> Districts have difficulty funding necessary library services<br />…..or even keeping their libraries operational<br />
  13. 13. Background: Tough Times Require Innovative Solutions ( 2004 – 200?)<br />
  14. 14. Background: Funding Shortages<br />
  15. 15. Background … Spread All Over<br />Napa County: 612 square miles <br />Small rural districts: tiny remote sites: private/parochial schools <br />Little federal funding: average poverty level<br /> Minimal funding, less purchasing power of larger districts<br />
  16. 16. Background: NVUSD <br />NVUSD = acts as a COE<br /> ISP for the county <br />Established business relationship with surrounding districts, private/parochial schools<br />Technology and library staff to implement and support a library consortium <br />
  17. 17. Background: How It All Began…….<br />2003 Napa COE Curriculum Library<br />Server crash<br />Web Collection goes offline<br />Curriculum Library can’t circulate<br />IT asks NVUSD for assistance<br />Partnership formed<br />
  18. 18. Background: Consortium Partners<br />Napa Valley USD<br />Napa County Office of Education: 2004<br />Calistoga Joint Unified: 2005<br />Justin Siena High School: 2005<br />St. Apollinaris: 2006<br />St. Helena Unified: 2007<br />Blue Oak School: 2008<br />
  19. 19. Strength in Numbers<br />Consortium = members = power<br />
  20. 20. So What Technology Does the Member Need ?<br />Web based ILS program<br />Sufficient internal bandwidth<br />Sufficient to internet <br />Ensure speed<br />Variable depends on District size<br />.<br />
  21. 21. What Technology Does the Host Need?<br />Stable ILS-trained IT department<br />SQL based server<br />Sufficient bandwidth<br />Available staff to provide support to sites<br />
  22. 22. So …. What’s the Next Step?<br />Consortium host and member(s) agree upon<br />Memorandum of Understanding<br />MOU = a business plan <br />MOU = a menu of services <br />
  23. 23. The Glue That Holds It Altogether<br />The MOU (Memorandum of Understanding)<br />Board approved document that outlines services and charges<br />Protects both parties<br />A form of business plan<br />* ILS Lead included<br /> Memorandum<br /> of <br />Understanding<br />
  24. 24. Different districts, schools and libraries<br />Require<br />Different solutions while maintaining centralizedautomation services<br />Recommended Reading<br /> Management <br />
  25. 25. Management Styles<br /> Centralization = clearly defined structure<br /> Consortium = collaboration, loose structure <br />Centralization = top down management Consortium = open ended leadership<br />
  26. 26. Centralized Management<br />Centralization = all resources under one authority<br />All decisions from one source<br />Top down ‘spider’ management<br />
  27. 27. 3 C’s of Consortium Member Management<br />Members provide peer management through <br /><ul><li>Cooperation
  28. 28. Collaboration
  29. 29. Consensus </li></li></ul><li>Centralized ILS <br />Holdings on a single server <br /> Centralized automation administrators<br />Single point of contact <br />Standard automation features<br /> Standard student management queries<br />*Agreed upon at implementation<br />
  30. 30. The Relationships<br />
  31. 31. Most Important Relationship<br />
  32. 32. IT <br />Facilitates ILS implementation at the hardware level <br />ILS upgrades<br />Data queries and updates <br />Troubleshoot and/or fix the problem(s)<br />
  33. 33. Library Services<br />*ILS Administrator represents consortium and host <br />*DL: Site Teacher Librarian/ Media Specialist represents district <br />
  34. 34. Implementation Team<br />Vendor Relationship Vital<br />Training<br />Support<br />Communication<br />
  35. 35. Who Does What? <br />Library Services<br />IT/Technology<br /> Support<br />Training<br />
  36. 36. Technology<br />IT support includes*<br />*IT administrator<br />Student management specialist<br />Technicians<br />Bandwidth<br /> ILS Program<br /> SQL based Server<br />(Implementation Team) <br />
  37. 37. Library Services<br />Facilitates and supports ILS implementation at the consortium level<br />Provides managed library services including<br />Administrative guidelines<br />Initial training sessions<br />
  38. 38. Managed Services(as per MOU) <br /> District and/or site reports<br /> Library committee and district site visits<br />Collection development <br />Trainings; cohort meetings<br />Library 101 Help Page <br />Liaise with technical support <br />
  39. 39. Managed Services Collaboration<br />
  40. 40. Support: Annual Reports<br />Collection/circulation data including: <br />Collection maps; Collection reports <br />Annual inventory results<br />Weeding lists with recommendations <br />Site and aggregate reports to consortium schools and School Boards <br />
  41. 41. Library Services/Collection Development <br />Recommend curriculum/ standard based materials <br />Participate in site library committee <br />Provide current collection maps <br />
  42. 42. Collection Development Communication<br />Keeping track of list and requests<br />Titlewave Accounts<br />Baker and Taylor Web lists<br />Permabound Web lists<br />One account per site<br />Common password<br />
  43. 43. Staff <br />Provide growth and staff development opportunities to all members<br />User group/open circle training model<br />Network<br />Collaborate<br />Share<br />
  44. 44. Training*<br /> Training = all library staff<br /> Consortium decides needs and presenters<br />Correlates training sessions to needs<br />Provide networking and feedback opportunities<br />Request professional resources as needed <br />Open ended circle model <br />*biggest change <br />
  45. 45. Communicating, Networking & Sharing<br />How to keep the information lines open<br />How to keep information current<br />How to keep information available 24/7<br />How to keep information relevant <br />
  46. 46. Library 101 Help Page <br />Support Available 24/7<br />Archived trainings<br />Current Library information<br />Areas of interest for parents, students, teachers and library staff<br />Online resource links<br />Current newsletter<br />
  47. 47. Logical Hosts = County Offices of Education <br />Form consortium with member districts<br /> Node for the DCP (Digital California Project) and the Internet Service Provider (ISP)<br /> Expand existing technology to include school libraries<br />
  48. 48. The Outcome and the Result<br />Consortiums are cost efficient <br />Generate income to support the consortium host and pay for general support of the consortium member <br />Offer much needed support and direction to school libraries<br />
  49. 49. Thanks for taking Napa Valley USD School Library Consortium Guided Tour <br />Any questions or comments, please contact<br />Kate MacMillan<br />

×