SlideShare a Scribd company logo
IA          NH            SC           FL

IA 2008      NH 2008      SC 2008       2008
 10.0%         7.7%        3.7%         3.2%

 5th place    5th place    5th place    5th place




 11.4%       15.2%       9.3%        3.8%
  2012         2012        2012         2012
  21.4%       22.9%        13.0%        7.0%

 3rd place    2nd place    4th place    4th place
NV           MO           MN           CO

 2008         2008         2008         2008
 13.7%        4.5%         15.7%        8.4%

 2nd place    4th place    4th place    4th place




 5.1%        7.7%        11.4%       3.4%
 2012         2012          2012        2012
 18.8%        12.2%        27.1%        11.8%

 3rd place    3rd place    2nd place    4th place
ME           MI           AZ           WA

 2008         2008         2008         2008
  18.3%       6.3%         4.2%         21.6%

 3rd place    4th place    4th place    3rd place




 17.4%       5.3%        4.2%        3.2%
  2012        2012         2012         2012
  35.7%       11.6%        8.4%         24.8%

 2nd place    3rd place    4th place    2nd place
AK           GA            ID          MA

 2008         2008         2008         2008
 17.2%        2.9%         23.8%        2.7%

 3rd place    4th place    2nd place    4th place




 6.8%        3.6%        5.7%        6.8%
 2012         2012         2012         2012
 24.0%        6.5%         18.1%        9.5%

 3rd place    4th place    3rd place    3rd place
ND           OH           OK           TN

 2008         2008         2008         2008
 21.3%        4.6%         3.3%         5.6%

 3rd place    3rd place    4th place    4th place




 6.8%        4.6%        6.3%        3.4%
 2012         2012         2012         2012
 28.1%        9.2%         9.6%         9.0%

 2nd place    4th place    4th place    4th place
VT           VA            WY               KS

  2008         2008           2008            2008
  6.7%         4.5%             NA            11.2%

 3rd place     3rd place    (no vote held)    3rd place




 18.7%       36.0%        12.2%            1.4%
  2012         2012           2012            2012
 25.4%        40.5%           12.2%           12.6%

 2nd place    2nd place       3rd place       4th place
AL              HI             MS           PR

 2008           2008            2008         2008
 2.7%             NA            3.8%         4.3%

 4th place    (no vote held)    3rd place    3rd place




 2.3%        18.3%            0.6%        3.0%
 2012           2012            2012         2012
 5.0%           18.3%           4.4%          1.3%

 4th place      3rd place       4th place    4th place
IL          LA           MD           WI

IL 2008      LA 2008      MD 2008      WI 2008
 5.0%         5.3%         6.0%         4.7%

 4th place    4th place    4th place    4th place




 4.3%          –             –            –
IL 2012      LA 2012      MD 2012      WI 2012
  9.3%        0.0%         0.0%         0.0%

 3rd place    Mar. 24       Apr. 3       Apr. 3

More Related Content

More from kkellyfv

Romney vs. romney (update, 04.04.12)
Romney vs. romney (update, 04.04.12)Romney vs. romney (update, 04.04.12)
Romney vs. romney (update, 04.04.12)kkellyfv
 
Gop 2012 nomination share of popular vote and delegates per candidate (03.2...
Gop 2012 nomination   share of popular vote and delegates per candidate (03.2...Gop 2012 nomination   share of popular vote and delegates per candidate (03.2...
Gop 2012 nomination share of popular vote and delegates per candidate (03.2...kkellyfv
 
FairVote.org - Why NPV makes sense (for Utah)
FairVote.org - Why NPV makes sense (for Utah)FairVote.org - Why NPV makes sense (for Utah)
FairVote.org - Why NPV makes sense (for Utah)kkellyfv
 
Portland, me 2011, mayoral election graphs (1)
Portland, me 2011, mayoral election graphs (1)Portland, me 2011, mayoral election graphs (1)
Portland, me 2011, mayoral election graphs (1)kkellyfv
 
San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphs (1)
San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphs (1)San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphs (1)
San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphs (1)kkellyfv
 
San francisco, 2011 district attorney election graphs (1)
San francisco, 2011 district attorney election graphs (1)San francisco, 2011 district attorney election graphs (1)
San francisco, 2011 district attorney election graphs (1)kkellyfv
 
San francisco 2011, mayoral election graphs
San francisco 2011, mayoral election graphsSan francisco 2011, mayoral election graphs
San francisco 2011, mayoral election graphskkellyfv
 
San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphs
San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphsSan francisco 2011, sheriff election graphs
San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphskkellyfv
 
San francisco, 2011 mayoral election graphs
San francisco, 2011 mayoral election graphsSan francisco, 2011 mayoral election graphs
San francisco, 2011 mayoral election graphskkellyfv
 
Portland, ME 2011 Mayoral Results
Portland, ME 2011 Mayoral ResultsPortland, ME 2011 Mayoral Results
Portland, ME 2011 Mayoral Resultskkellyfv
 
San francisco, CA 2011 Mayoral Results
San francisco, CA 2011 Mayoral ResultsSan francisco, CA 2011 Mayoral Results
San francisco, CA 2011 Mayoral Resultskkellyfv
 

More from kkellyfv (11)

Romney vs. romney (update, 04.04.12)
Romney vs. romney (update, 04.04.12)Romney vs. romney (update, 04.04.12)
Romney vs. romney (update, 04.04.12)
 
Gop 2012 nomination share of popular vote and delegates per candidate (03.2...
Gop 2012 nomination   share of popular vote and delegates per candidate (03.2...Gop 2012 nomination   share of popular vote and delegates per candidate (03.2...
Gop 2012 nomination share of popular vote and delegates per candidate (03.2...
 
FairVote.org - Why NPV makes sense (for Utah)
FairVote.org - Why NPV makes sense (for Utah)FairVote.org - Why NPV makes sense (for Utah)
FairVote.org - Why NPV makes sense (for Utah)
 
Portland, me 2011, mayoral election graphs (1)
Portland, me 2011, mayoral election graphs (1)Portland, me 2011, mayoral election graphs (1)
Portland, me 2011, mayoral election graphs (1)
 
San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphs (1)
San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphs (1)San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphs (1)
San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphs (1)
 
San francisco, 2011 district attorney election graphs (1)
San francisco, 2011 district attorney election graphs (1)San francisco, 2011 district attorney election graphs (1)
San francisco, 2011 district attorney election graphs (1)
 
San francisco 2011, mayoral election graphs
San francisco 2011, mayoral election graphsSan francisco 2011, mayoral election graphs
San francisco 2011, mayoral election graphs
 
San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphs
San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphsSan francisco 2011, sheriff election graphs
San francisco 2011, sheriff election graphs
 
San francisco, 2011 mayoral election graphs
San francisco, 2011 mayoral election graphsSan francisco, 2011 mayoral election graphs
San francisco, 2011 mayoral election graphs
 
Portland, ME 2011 Mayoral Results
Portland, ME 2011 Mayoral ResultsPortland, ME 2011 Mayoral Results
Portland, ME 2011 Mayoral Results
 
San francisco, CA 2011 Mayoral Results
San francisco, CA 2011 Mayoral ResultsSan francisco, CA 2011 Mayoral Results
San francisco, CA 2011 Mayoral Results
 

Paul vs paul (post super tuesday update, 03.22.12)

  • 1. IA NH SC FL IA 2008 NH 2008 SC 2008 2008 10.0% 7.7% 3.7% 3.2% 5th place 5th place 5th place 5th place  11.4%  15.2%  9.3%  3.8% 2012 2012 2012 2012 21.4% 22.9% 13.0% 7.0% 3rd place 2nd place 4th place 4th place
  • 2. NV MO MN CO 2008 2008 2008 2008 13.7% 4.5% 15.7% 8.4% 2nd place 4th place 4th place 4th place  5.1%  7.7%  11.4%  3.4% 2012 2012 2012 2012 18.8% 12.2% 27.1% 11.8% 3rd place 3rd place 2nd place 4th place
  • 3. ME MI AZ WA 2008 2008 2008 2008 18.3% 6.3% 4.2% 21.6% 3rd place 4th place 4th place 3rd place  17.4%  5.3%  4.2%  3.2% 2012 2012 2012 2012 35.7% 11.6% 8.4% 24.8% 2nd place 3rd place 4th place 2nd place
  • 4. AK GA ID MA 2008 2008 2008 2008 17.2% 2.9% 23.8% 2.7% 3rd place 4th place 2nd place 4th place  6.8%  3.6%  5.7%  6.8% 2012 2012 2012 2012 24.0% 6.5% 18.1% 9.5% 3rd place 4th place 3rd place 3rd place
  • 5. ND OH OK TN 2008 2008 2008 2008 21.3% 4.6% 3.3% 5.6% 3rd place 3rd place 4th place 4th place  6.8%  4.6%  6.3%  3.4% 2012 2012 2012 2012 28.1% 9.2% 9.6% 9.0% 2nd place 4th place 4th place 4th place
  • 6. VT VA WY KS 2008 2008 2008 2008 6.7% 4.5% NA 11.2% 3rd place 3rd place (no vote held) 3rd place  18.7%  36.0%  12.2%  1.4% 2012 2012 2012 2012 25.4% 40.5% 12.2% 12.6% 2nd place 2nd place 3rd place 4th place
  • 7. AL HI MS PR 2008 2008 2008 2008 2.7% NA 3.8% 4.3% 4th place (no vote held) 3rd place 3rd place  2.3%  18.3%  0.6%  3.0% 2012 2012 2012 2012 5.0% 18.3% 4.4% 1.3% 4th place 3rd place 4th place 4th place
  • 8. IL LA MD WI IL 2008 LA 2008 MD 2008 WI 2008 5.0% 5.3% 6.0% 4.7% 4th place 4th place 4th place 4th place  4.3% – – – IL 2012 LA 2012 MD 2012 WI 2012 9.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3rd place Mar. 24 Apr. 3 Apr. 3