2. “I see my work as being
at the intersection of
information & knowledge
management, digital
security, and community
building within the field
of human rights.”
2
MY BACKGROUND
4. What are the barriers to knowledge-exchange?
1.Competition. There is a small pool of funding and
organisations often feel the need to prove that they know
how to do something better than others.
2.Security. Human rights defenders need to think carefully
about what to share, and how, in order to keep themselves
and those around them safe.
3.Lack of time. Human rights work is hard and endless. It is
hard to prioritise sharing your knowledge on developing
mobilisation strategies over the actions themselves.
4
KNOWLEDGE-EXCHANGE IN HUMAN RIGHTS
5. Why do we share knowledge with peers? To
strengthen our human rights work (mission-driven):
1.Learn what works and why: learn and apply successful
approaches to human rights work
2.Learn what doesn’t work and why: we have a lot to learn
from others’ mistakes.
3.Learn something new through reflection: the act of
sharing in and of itself is very useful
4.Create a stronger network of peers that we can turn to for
advice and support.
5
KNOWLEDGE-EXCHANGE IN HUMAN RIGHTS
6. 6
KNOWLEDGE-EXCHANGE IN HUMAN RIGHTS
Community What they share Platform for sharing
Rising Voices https://
rising.globalvoices.org/
Citizen media practitioners sharing
knowledge
Facebook
Namati https://community.namati.org/ Sharing innovations in legal
empowerment
Discourse
Kabissa https://forum.kabissa.org/ African Civil Society Orgs sharing
knowledge using ICT
Discourse
New Tactics in Human Rights https://
www.newtactics.org/
Human rights “tactics” across the
sector
Drupal (forums module)
Equitas https://community.equitas.org/
login/index.php
Knowledge and experience on human
rights education
Not sure, closed platform
8. We felt that these were the main incentives for
participation:
1.To learn a new human rights approach/tactic.
2.To learn a new resource (guide, tool, platform, organization, etc).
3.To learn something new by reflecting on and sharing my
experiences.
4.To meet new practitioners that may provide support and advice
in the future.
5.To give back to the community.
6.To be seen as a leader in this field.
8
INCENTIVES: OUR ASSUMPTIONS
9. Average response to post-discussion survey for New Tactics conversation leaders
Based on 198 respondents from 2010 to 2014.
9
INCENTIVES: WHAT WE LEARNED
I learned a new approach or tactic that I hope to use in the future.
I learned about a new resource or tool that I hope to use in the future.
Sharing my experiences and challenges helped me to reflect on my own work.
I met new practitioners that I may contact in the future.
1 2 3 4 5
3.9
4.3
3.8
3.7
10. 10
INCENTIVES: TACTICS TO UTILIZE THEM
Incentives Tactics
To learn a new approach/tactic/resource. Ask questions to get at the transferable knowledge,
model the kind of knowledge you want people to share
To learn something new by reflecting on
and sharing my experiences.
Provide questions, templates, guides and advice on
effective sharing; lots of follow-up questions; they can
share the output/summary w/ colleagues
To meet new practitioners that may
provide support and advice in the future.
Video conference calls provide a way to build
familiarity and rapport
To be seen as a leader in this field. Promote their contributions through social media,
newsletter, website, etc.
12. Webinars, Conference Calls and Hangouts
For my research on affordable platforms, read: https://www.theengineroom.org/useful-online-
meeting-tools/
12
FORMATS FOR EFFECTIVE KNOWLEDGE-EXCHANGE
13. Email Discussion Lists
Is your community concerned about privacy and security?
Read: https://www.huridocs.org/?p=4833
13
FORMATS FOR EFFECTIVE KNOWLEDGE-EXCHANGE
14. Online Discussion Forums
Drupal: New Tactics in Human Rights BuddyPress: GPSA Knowledge Platform
14
FORMATS FOR EFFECTIVE KNOWLEDGE-EXCHANGE
16. In-Person Exchange
Each participants is a skill-sharer and a
skill-learner.
• Write down a skill to share
• Write down a skill to learn
• Mingle!
More info on facilitating in-person
events from AspirationTech:
http://facilitation.aspirationtech.org
16
FORMATS FOR EFFECTIVE KNOWLEDGE-EXCHANGE
18. A few ingredients for successful facilitation
18
FACILITATION AND SUPPORT
What seems to work What doesn’t work so well
Selecting specific topics leads to sharing of practical,
useful information
Big, broad, or vague topics often stay conceptual/
theoretical
Coach a few people to share their knowledge on the
topic w/ structured format
Present a list of questions to a group of people and ask
them to respond = chaos
Encourage participants to share examples and case
studies grounds the information in the real-world
Sharing hypotheticals and ideas can only provide so
much info (can’t provide advice and experience)
Encourage less background info, more of the “how we
did it” info
Open-ended discussion/presentation, with little
format/structure
19. Model the behavior you want
• Sharing examples
• “Here is an example of the kind of comment we’re looking for…”
• “Watch this recorded presentation to give you an idea of what we’re looking for…”
• Participate, yourself. As facilitator, you set the tone.
• Recruit champions to model what want
• “I know you have developed an open source tool for video verification - can you please
reply to this comment and share why you decided open source was the best approach.”
• Guidelines and templates
• “When replying to comment, include: acknowledgement of author’s situation, your own
experience that relates, any advice, resources or ideas. End with a question for others.”
19
FACILITATION AND SUPPORT
20. Encouragement
This is SO important! Here’s what it could look like:
• Lots of “That comment you shared was really useful!”
emails.
• Show your appreciation with lots of thanks. Promote their
contributions on social media.
• Do whatever it takes to get a few people to ask follow up
questions.
• Share info on the reach of their contribution: If possible,
update them on who is listening/reading/watching their
contributions (can you pull stats, use Google Analytics, etc?).
20
FACILITATION AND SUPPORT
21. Technical support
Make it as easy as possible for people to contribute to your initiative.
• Providing very clear instructions on how to use the platform
(consider creating a video or a guide with lots of screenshots, or
both!) Example: https://www.newtactics.org/resource/how-do-i-
participate-new-tactics-online-conversation
• Host a conference call with participants before the knowledge-
exchange event to walk them through all the steps, layout
expectations, share advice, and answer any questions.
• Be available for additional support.
21
FACILITATION AND SUPPORT
22. THANK YOU
You can read about me at www.kristinantin.com, and reach me at
kristin@huridocs.org or @kjantin on Twitter.
Editor's Notes
Facilitating knowledge-exchange: providing the right format, incentives, facilitation and support
Capturing knowledge is an important and sometimes difficult step in knowledge management. That’s why it’s important to provide the right format, incentives, facilitation and support to your community. Whether you are working with project team, an organisation, or a broader, cross-organisational community of practice, you need to find incentives and formats for members to share their knowledge. Based on my experience working with communities of practice in the human rights field, I will share what I have learned about formats for effective knowledge-exchange, helpful incentives, and techniques for providing useful facilitation and support.
I see my work as being at the intersection of information & knowledge management, digital security, and community building within the field of human rights. I have over 8 years of experience building communities of practice and creating opportunities for peer-to-peer learning for: the New Tactics in Human Rights Project at the Center for Victims of Torture, the engine room, and CIVICUS. Now, as Community Knowledge Manager for HURIDOCS, I am excited to be capturing our community’s knowledge on human rights information management and documentation.
Competition. I don’t see this often, but I know it exists. There is a small pool of funding and organisations often feel the need to prove that they know how to do something better than others. It would be hard to keep your hold on the market if you are sharing your trade secrets with peers!
Security. Sharing the ins and outs of your LGBT rights campaign in Uganda might be incredibly useful to other practitioners, but it could also land you in jail (or worse). Human rights defenders need to think carefully about what to share, and how, in order to keep themselves and those around them safe.
Lack of time. This work is hard and endless. It is hard to prioritise sharing your knowledge on developing mobilisation strategies over the actions themselves.
learn and apply successful approaches to human rights work (whether these approaches related to efforts of advocacy, healing, strategic litigation, mobilization, policy making, etc).
learn what doesn’t work and why. We have a lot to learn from others’ mistakes.
reflect on and celebrate the work we’ve done, so that we learn something new.
create a stronger network of peers that we can turn to for advice and support.
Examples
Human rights practitioners do not have a lot of time, so how can we ask them to take the time to share their knowledge? Answer: they *have to* feel like they benefit directly from the exchange in some way: it helps them do their job well, they feel less isolated.
People will have different reasons for sharing their knowledge and experience. These are the reasons/incentives that we came up with.
Within the human rights and nonprofit areas, we know that many practitioners are motivated by the mission of their work. Therefore, it isn’t so strange for these practitioners to be motivated to share their knowledge in order to “give back” to the community - as long as they believe it will be valued and used.
We felt that the first 4 incentives on this list represented the main areas of impact for our community-building efforts. So, we decided to include questions about these incentives/areas of impact in our post-discussion survey for community members.
People benefit from sharing.
We were surprised to learn how many participants felt that the opportunity to share and reflect on their own experiences was particularly valuable. Often, human rights practitioners barely have time to tie their shoes let alone reflect on their work. But providing the format and structure for practitioners to reflect on their work is something that is extremely valuable. (and being able to share these reflections in a helpful way with peers is an added bonus!)
Remember: It is also important to demonstrate the impact that this knowledge-sharing is having on the community. Only then do people know that their contribution is meaningful. Collect a few stories of people who have benefited from this exchange. Example: https://vimeo.com/84681639 (more tactics later in the presentation)
Great way to engage people (visuals, short and sweet)
Recordable and can be used over and over
Recruit and coach 2-3 people to present their experience/knowledge on the topic, then open it up to questions. Allow for ongoing discussion on an email discussion, forum, Twitter, or other format.
Good facilitation is important. Have someone on hand to help with tech issues.
Link to list of platforms: https://www.theengineroom.org/useful-online-meeting-tools/
A good option for communities that want their exchange to be more private/closed (depending on how you set it up). For more info, see: https://www.huridocs.org/?p=4833
Good moderation is important. Encourage people to reply to each other - it’s within these person-to-person exchange that useful knowledge is shared.
Tap members to post questions to the list to model the behavior you want. Tap other members to reply!
You need to figure out how you want to capture/share/organise the knowledge shared in the list. Do you simply use the email archive? Or, provide a summary of the exchange on your website?
A way to crowdsource knowledge and have it live as content online. If you do it right (using a CMS), it can connect to other content on your website. This could also be part of an online community of practice.
Could host regular discussions once per month, recruit practitioners to lead the discussion.
Good moderation is important. Encourage people to reply to each other - it’s within these person-to-person exchange that useful knowledge is shared.
Also helpful to provide a summary of the exchange so people don’t have to read through 100 comments.
Examples:
New Tactics
#commbuild
OKFN
Namati
A way to crowdsource knowledge and have it live as content online. If you do it right (using a CMS), it can connect to other content on your website. This could also be part of an online community of practice.
Could host regular discussions once per month, recruit practitioners to lead the discussion.
Good moderation is important. Encourage people to reply to each other - it’s within these person-to-person exchange that useful knowledge is shared.
Also helpful to provide a summary of the exchange so people don’t have to read through 100 comments.
I’ve used this approach at a few conferences. We usually spend about 40-60 minutes on this activity.
Each participant writes down on a colored piece of paper: one skill that they can share. On a different colored piece of paper, write down: one skill you want to learn.
For 20 minutes, half of the group is on a mission to learn a new skill. They mingle throughout the group to find someone with a skill they want to learn, then they discuss.
For the next 20 minutes, the group switches and the other half mingles to find a skill they want to learn.
Bonus: participants meet each other, and learn a little more about what their peers know and what they are struggling with. Hopefully they’ll continue the knowledge exchange over lunch!
It’s important to find the right balance between providing a good amount of structure to the exchange while also keeping the space open to all voices and perspectives. Structure is especially important if you need to keep the discussion within a certain timeframe.
What do I mean by “structure”? At New Tactics, we had a pretty good formula down for each online discussion: each discussion lasted 5 days, we recruited 6-10 discussion leaders, each leader posted at least twice per day, we had a clear timeline of steps so everyone knew what to expect, we provided a conference call the day before. (Example of expectations: https://www.newtactics.org/resource/what-conversation-leader) We also provided tips for useful participation: https://goo.gl/ncybLc
People learn from observing you and others.
2. Encouragement
This is SO important! Here’s what it could look like:
Lots of “You’re doing great!” emails. You could even provide some additional advice or tips based on their contribution so far. (Afterall, they want to do this well)
Show your appreciation with lots of thanks. Promote their contributions on social media.
Do whatever it takes to get a few people to ask follow up questions. If your sharers know that people are interested, they are more willing to share!
If possible, update them on who is listening/reading/watching their contributions (can you pull stats, use Google Analytics, etc?).
Example of instructions: https://www.newtactics.org/resource/how-do-i-participate-new-tactics-online-conversation