Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Technology Integration Now


Published on

Technology Integration Now: Why and How

A guide for K-12 administrators and teachers regarding the need for educational technology

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

Technology Integration Now

  1. 1. Technology Integration Now:Why and How<br />A Guide for Teachers and Administrators<br />by Matthew Gudenius<br />
  2. 2. The EdTech FAQ<br />Why use educational technology?<br />Do students really need more than they already get on the computers in the classroom or lab?<br />Isn’t it too expensive?<br />
  3. 3. Why use technology?<br />Differentiation<br />Intervention<br />Assessment<br />Cognitive Growth:Develop higher-order thinking skills<br />Real-world Application<br />
  4. 4. Technology for Differentiation<br />Technology – especially computers – can ease the burden of differentiating learning for a variety of learners by having these qualities:<br />Tailored to ability level<br />Self-paced<br />Independent or collaborative<br />Caters to multiple intelligences<br />
  5. 5. Technology for Intervention<br />Custom-tailored assessments and tutorials<br />Drill-and-practice software and games build automaticity as defined by Gagné (1982) and Bloom (1986)<br />Engages student without need for one-on-one tutor or paraprofessional<br />Special technologies exist to accommodate special needs<br />Advanced students can pursue challenging problem/project-based tasks<br />
  6. 6. Technology for Assessment<br />Automatic scoring reduces labor for teacher and/or aides<br />Provides immediate feedback to student<br />Can be more fun or engaging, improving student motivation (click here for example)<br />
  7. 7. Technology for Cognitive Growth<br />Technology can be applied at every level of Bloom’s Taxonomy, including “the big six”: task definition, information-seeking, location and access, use of information, synthesis, and evaluation (Johnson and Eisenberg, 1996)<br />By analyzing, evaluating, and creating with technology, students build technological literacy and vital 21st-century skills<br />Bloom’s taxonomy diagram.<br />Source: Wikimedia Commons(public domain)<br />
  8. 8. Real-World Applicability<br />Situating knowledge in real-life or simulated problem-solving tasks and projects improves retention and transfer of knowledge (Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989)<br />These activities support the widely-recognized National Educational Technology Standards for Students (2007)<br />© 2007 ISTE®<br />
  9. 9. II: Do students really need more?<br />Most classrooms have only one computer per 4 to 6 students. Whole-group instruction and guided practice will not be possible.<br />One central computer lab shared between all classes in a school results in lack of sufficient time for online lessons and projects.<br />Recommended computer time for K-12 students ranges from 30 minutes per day in elementary school up to 2 hours per day for high school<br />Sample times for various computer activities.<br />As you can see, 30 minutes per week in a labor sharing a classroom computer will not be sufficient!<br />
  10. 10. III: Isn’t it too expensive?<br />Wifi capability means rooms no longer need to be wired<br />Netbook computers fulfill educational needs for under $300/computer<br />Can move to any classroom in the school<br />Plenty of free software available:<br />Google Apps<br /><br />OpenOffice<br />Google SketchUp<br />Google Earth<br />…and more!<br />Xerox costs based on sample school study.<br />Paraprofessional average salary $29,000 accordingto<br />
  11. 11. Conclusion<br />Integrating technology into education is no longer optional. Students of today can and must learn how to use higher-order skills and modern tools to solve complex and varied problems.<br />Educational technology – especially computer technology – provides a tool that is flexible, cost-efficient, and reduces stress and labor on human resources while ensuring individualized student growth, from low-level automaticity through high-level synthesis and application skills.<br />
  12. 12. References<br />Bloom, B. (1986). Automaticity. Educational Leadership, 43(5), 70-77.<br />Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-41.<br />Churches, A. (2008, April 1). Bloom&apos;s taxonomy blooms digitally.   Retrieved February 8, 2010 from:<br />Gagné, R. (1982). Developments in learning psychology: Implications for instructional design. Educational Technology, 22(6), 11-15.<br />International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). National educational technology standards for students. Eugene, OR: Author.<br />Johnson, D. & Eisenberg, M. (1996). Computer literacy and information literacy: A natural combination. Emergency Librarian, 23(5), 12-16.<br />