Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Six Sigma DMAIC Project                    Kaiser Permanente – Asset Management                                  Project L...
Six Sigma in Action                                                                           Serial # - Model # MatchCust...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Sn Model Accuracy Six Sigma Case Study

156 views

Published on

Lean Six Sigma Group Free Project Case Study Overviews http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Lean-Six-Sigma-37987
Sponsored by the International Standard for Lean Six Sigma, e-Zsigma http://www.e-zsigma.com, IQPC, and PEX Network.

Please contact Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt, Steven Bonacorsi, Owner of the Lean Six Sigma Group to have your project case studies to be added to the Lean Six Sigma Group Library. Steve Bonacorsi sbonacorsi@comcast.net

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Sn Model Accuracy Six Sigma Case Study

  1. 1. Six Sigma DMAIC Project Kaiser Permanente – Asset Management Project Leader/Green Belt: Kahlil Rahaman Project Leader Title: Enterprise Planning & Strategy Analyst Project Start Date: July 24, 2003Master Black Belt: Steven Bonacorsi
  2. 2. Six Sigma in Action Serial # - Model # MatchCustomer Profile - 130,000 Seat Health Care ProviderBusiness Problem & ImpactThe Serial numbers within the current asset management databases Process Capability – Before(NOIS, AssetCenter, USS & DISCO) are not accurately matched to the Success 37Model numbers (affixed to the servers by the manufacturers). Thisimpacts problem solving, change management and maintenance contract Defects 160 19%management. 81% Measure & Analyze Data Collection: Focused on Servers within the Corona Data Center Root Causes: 1. Multiple Databases 2. Data must be verified across all databases 3. Manual replication of data 4. No documented processes Process Capability – After 5. Databases not accurately maintained 30 DefectImprove & Control 91 Success1. One Central CMDB established in Asset Center 4.x 25%2. Any Serial Number to Model Number inaccuracies found in 75% AssetCenter through physical audits will be corrected and root cause analysis doneResults/BenefitsMultiple CMDB’s consolidated into one definitive CMDB, AssetCenterProcess Improvement from Z_ST = 2.5 Sigma to Z_ST = 2.7 Sigma. Reduced Defects and Increased Sigma Level!

×