-
Be the first to like this
Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.
Art 8 arbitration. Mgt already agreed they shouldn't have mandated non-ODL carriers but refused to abide by prior cease and desist orders and prior Informal A, Formal A, and Step B decisions that awarded non-ODL carriers a financial remedy and refused to agree that their way of mandating non-ODL carriers (first in the door, first sent back out) was a violation even if it didn't go by juniority. Mgt also argued that cease and desist remedies were improper and so were remedies to the non-ODL carriers. Arbitrator Bierig was NOT a good arbitrator for this case and yet we still prevailed.
Be the first to like this
Login to see the comments