Public Workshop Meeting #4 <br />March 30th,  2011<br />
2<br />Meeting Agenda<br />Project Recap<br />Project Update<br />Summary of Workshop #3 Concepts<br />Overview of Tech Me...
3<br />Project Background Video<br />
4<br />Project Website/Virtual Workshop (http://172nd.com)<br />
5<br />Project Purpose Statement <br />The purpose of this project is to effectively address the 172nd-190th corridor cong...
Project Process<br />WE ARE HERE<br />
7<br />Alternatives Development Process<br />WE ARE HERE<br />
8<br />Pubic Involvement Recap<br /><ul><li>Workshop #1 – August 18th, 2010
Introduce Background and Project Purpose
Workshop #2 - October 6th, 2010
Develop Corridor Alignment and Streetscape Concepts
Workshop #3 - December 8th, 2010
Screen Corridor Alignment and Streetscape Concepts to 3 Alternatives
Workshop #4 – March 30th, 2011
Review and Comment on Preferred Corridor Alternatives, </li></li></ul><li>9<br />Schedule (cont.)<br />Open House<br />Jul...
December 2011 – Damascus Planning Commission
January 2012 – Happy Valley Planning    Commission
January 2012 – Damascus City Council
February 2012 – Happy Valley City Council
Winter 2012 – Board of County Commissioners</li></li></ul><li>Key Project Elements<br />
Initial Corridor Alignment Recommendations Prior to Public Workshop #3<br />Recommended for Further Review<br /><ul><li>5 ...
Initial Corridor Alignment Recommendations Prior to Public Workshop #3<br />Recommended for Further Review<br /><ul><li>5 ...
Project Evaluation Criteria<br />Vehicular Mobility<br />Multi-Modal Mobility<br />Local Access<br />Multi-Modal Safety<br...
Alignment Concepts – AT2<br />
Alignment Concepts – AT4<br />
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Public Workshop #4

611 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
611
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
149
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Public Workshop #4

  1. 1. Public Workshop Meeting #4 <br />March 30th, 2011<br />
  2. 2. 2<br />Meeting Agenda<br />Project Recap<br />Project Update<br />Summary of Workshop #3 Concepts<br />Overview of Tech Memo 7.1<br />Work Session to Select and Refine Concepts for Further Review <br />Public Comment Period<br />Next Steps <br />Key Goal: Identify 3 Most Promising Roadway Alignment Alternatives<br />
  3. 3. 3<br />Project Background Video<br />
  4. 4. 4<br />Project Website/Virtual Workshop (http://172nd.com)<br />
  5. 5. 5<br />Project Purpose Statement <br />The purpose of this project is to effectively address the 172nd-190th corridor congestion and safety problems, serve future north-south traffic, serve expected population growth in Damascus, Happy Valley, the Pleasant Valley Plan Area and Gresham, and to serve the growing demand for regional travel.<br />
  6. 6. Project Process<br />WE ARE HERE<br />
  7. 7. 7<br />Alternatives Development Process<br />WE ARE HERE<br />
  8. 8. 8<br />Pubic Involvement Recap<br /><ul><li>Workshop #1 – August 18th, 2010
  9. 9. Introduce Background and Project Purpose
  10. 10. Workshop #2 - October 6th, 2010
  11. 11. Develop Corridor Alignment and Streetscape Concepts
  12. 12. Workshop #3 - December 8th, 2010
  13. 13. Screen Corridor Alignment and Streetscape Concepts to 3 Alternatives
  14. 14. Workshop #4 – March 30th, 2011
  15. 15. Review and Comment on Preferred Corridor Alternatives, </li></li></ul><li>9<br />Schedule (cont.)<br />Open House<br />July 13th, 2011<br />Review and Comment on Preferred Corridor Plan<br />Public Hearings<br /><ul><li>Fall 2011 – County Planning Commission
  16. 16. December 2011 – Damascus Planning Commission
  17. 17. January 2012 – Happy Valley Planning Commission
  18. 18. January 2012 – Damascus City Council
  19. 19. February 2012 – Happy Valley City Council
  20. 20. Winter 2012 – Board of County Commissioners</li></li></ul><li>Key Project Elements<br />
  21. 21. Initial Corridor Alignment Recommendations Prior to Public Workshop #3<br />Recommended for Further Review<br /><ul><li>5 Concepts (AT2, AT4, AT6, AS4, AS9)</li></ul>Under Consideration for NO Further Review<br /><ul><li>9 Concepts (AT1, AT5, AT7, AT8, AS2, AS5, AS7, AS8, AS10)</li></ul>Recommended for NO Further Review<br /><ul><li>4 Concepts (AT3, AS1, AS3, AS6)</li></li></ul><li>Corridor Alignment Modifications Per Public Input<br />
  22. 22. Initial Corridor Alignment Recommendations Prior to Public Workshop #3<br />Recommended for Further Review<br /><ul><li>5 Concepts (AT2, AT4, AT6, AS4, AS9)</li></ul>Under Consideration for NO Further Review<br /><ul><li>9 Concepts (AT1, AT5, AT7, AT8, AS2, AS5, AS7, AS8, AS10a)</li></ul>Recommended for NO Further Review<br /><ul><li>4 Concepts (AT3, AS1, AS3, AS6)</li></li></ul><li>Future Transportation Conditions (2035) Analysis Findings<br />* Subject to change - further analysis needed.<br />
  23. 23. Project Evaluation Criteria<br />Vehicular Mobility<br />Multi-Modal Mobility<br />Local Access<br />Multi-Modal Safety<br />Impacts to Natural Environment<br />Impacts to Built Environment<br />Land Use Compatability<br />Cost (Construction Only)<br />Aesthetic Character<br />
  24. 24. Alignment Concepts – AT2<br />
  25. 25. Alignment Concepts – AT4<br />
  26. 26. Alignment Concepts – AT5<br />
  27. 27. Alignment Concepts – AT6<br />
  28. 28. Alignment Concepts – AS10a<br />
  29. 29. Evaluation Scores<br />
  30. 30. Preliminary Corridor Alignment Recommendations<br />Recommended for Further Review<br /><ul><li>3Concepts (AT2, AT6, AS10a)</li></ul>Recommended for NO Further Review<br /><ul><li>2Concepts (AT4, AT5)</li></li></ul><li>Let’s Get Your Input<br />Posters for Alignment Concepts<br /><ul><li>Future Land Use/Environmental Constraints
  31. 31. Pros/Cons
  32. 32. Scores</li></ul>Use “Notes” Section of Your Handout to Provide Feedback<br />Today’s Goals are to: <br />1) Narrow the Alignment Concepts to 3 Most Promising Alternatives<br />2) Provide Suggested Refinements to the 3 Most Promising Alternatives<br />
  33. 33. Next Steps<br />Process Feedback from PAC, Virtual Workshop #4, and Public Workshop #4<br />PMT to narrow the 5 Corridor Alignment Concepts Down to the 3 Most Promising Alternatives for Further Review<br />Report back to PAC and the public regarding the PMT’s recommendations for concepts to be further reviewed in the next round<br />Open House on July 13th, 2011 to review and comment on preferred corridor<br />
  34. 34. Thanks!<br />

×