Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Speech EC


Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

Speech EC

  2. 2. What Is An Argument?<br />Destructive Argument- A person disagrees for the sole purpose to win the argument. The “winner” feels superior. It is not positive and usually does not help matters.<br />Constructive Argument- A person truly wants to find a valid solution to the disagreement. The goal is to arrive at a better conclusion. <br />
  3. 3. CLAIMS<br />Claims- What the arguer is telling the audience to do or think <br />Claims of <br />Fact - something is, was, or will be<br />Value- something is good or bad<br />Policy- something should or should not be done<br />
  4. 4. RESPONSIBILITIES IN AN ARGUMENT<br />Burden of Proof - providing "good and sufficient" reasons to accept the claim.<br />Burden of Presumption - providing reasons to maintain the status quo, reject the claim.<br />Burden of Rebuttal - the obligation of both sides to respond to each other. Remember, silence equal consent, in other words, you agree with the previous argument.<br />
  5. 5. PROOF<br />Artistic Proof<br />Ethos<br />An appeal to the authority, integrity, or honesty of the speaker<br />Pathos<br />an appeal to the audience’s emotions<br />Logos<br />logical appeal or the simulation of it<br />Inartistic Proof- Using persuasive strategies such as blackmail, torture, bribery… etc<br />
  6. 6. Stephen Toulmin<br />Authored “The Uses of Argument”<br />Evaluated Arguments and critiqued modern philosophers<br />Created the Toulmin Model<br />Identifies 6 aspects of argument that are common<br />
  7. 7. The Toulmin Model<br />Grounds: what you have observed either first hand or second hand.<br />Warrant: A general rule which links the claim to the grounds.<br />Claim: The conclusion of the argument. What the arguer is attempting to convince the audience to do or think.<br />Backing: Specific support for the grounds or warrant. Where did it come from.<br />Reservation: Reasons why the warrant not apply. Exceptions to the rule.<br />Qualifier: A word or phrase which suggests the degree of validity of the claim. <br />
  8. 8. Grounds<br />Another word for data, this is the basis of real persuasion and is the reasoning for the claim.<br />Provide reasoning<br />
  9. 9. Warrant<br />These link the grounds (data) to the claim. They show that the provided data is relevant to the point the arguer is trying to prove. <br />Claim<br />Grounds<br />
  10. 10. Backing<br />This is the support for the warrants and provides additional information and proof that answers various questions.<br />
  11. 11. Reservations<br />Indicates the strength of the relationship between the grounds and warrant.<br />Indicates the relativity of the claim in relation to specificity <br /><ul><li>Grounds------>Warrant</li></ul> Strong<-------------------------->Weak<br />Is it a Universally accepted claim?<br />Who all does it pertain to?<br />Are the grounds really that supportive?<br />
  12. 12. Qualifiers<br />Words or phrases that tell the validity of the claim. They enforce the strength of the argument to observers.<br />
  13. 13. Rebuttal<br />A chance for the opposing view to give a case and respond to the Claim.<br />Rebuttal’s can attack the Ethos, Pathos, or Logos of the Burden of Proof<br />
  14. 14. Examples<br />