Granite City Town Hall Meeting
March 25, 2014
Presented by Steve Knogl
Why has the District stated that
the increasing cost of the
teacher’s salaries and benefits
along with the reductions in
r...
Revenue- From the District’s Proposal
GSA- From the District’s Proposal
General State Aid
2011-2012
$19,427,479
2012-2013
$19,575,581
2013-2014
$19,789,189
This is an increase of $364,710
EAV-From the District’s Proposal
• Without a multiplier, these numbers are
almost meaningless.
• In the Board presentation this was said to be
an “Initial ...
Ed Fund-From the District’s Proposal
Ed Fund
2011-2012
$5,293,033
2012-2013
$5,602,113
2013-2014
$6,344,018
This is an increase of $1,050,985
Ed Fund Revenue-From the District’s Proposal
Ed Fund Revenue
2011-2012
$33,353,325
2012-2013
$35,325,124
2013-2014
$35,411,508
This is an increase of $2,058,183
Ed Fund-From the District’s Proposal
Ed Fund Overview
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-1014
$48,000,000 $49,000,000 $49,000,000
$53,000,000 $55,000,000 $52,000,000
Exp...
TEACHER SALARY
(TRS contribution included)
2012-2013
$26,766,151
$25,280,787
2013-2014
$24,451,000
(Projected with Step)
D...
Teacher Health Care
$4,153,680 $4,266,000 $4,253,400
Steady for nearly 400 people
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-1014
Inflated Teacher Salaries
• Publications show inflation of
teacher salaries
• Beginning GCSD9 teacher salary
• Base $35,887 Cost $39,610
• Beginning GCSD9 Superintendent salary
• Base $ 161,547 Cost...
• Currently, our top 8 Administrators cost the
District over $1.2 million, including
retirement, healthcare, & fringe bene...
Unnecessary Spending
• The District employs 3 attorneys to represent
them at negotiations.
• This costs $750-$1,000 an hou...
• Let’s look at Scholarships
• Let’s look at Grants
• Let’s look at Title
• Let’s look at the money not mentioned to the
c...
• The only way to truly ever understand the
Granite City School District’s finances is….
•Forensic Audit
•Line Item Budget
Regarding General State Aid
(from ISBE)
Finding #1-
The school district’s summary for attendance computation
was incorrect...
Regarding Transportation
(from ISBE)
Finding #3-
The LEA understated revenues as reconciled with
the Annual Financial Repo...
Regarding Title - Low Income
(from ISBE)
• Finding #3-
The grant recipient did not maintain separate expenditure accounts ...
Title II- Teacher Quality
(from ISBE)
• Finding #2
The grant recipient did not submit timely
periodic expenditure reports....
GCSD9 Auditor’s Report
• 2012- “As in year prior, we noted some journal
entries that were not reviewed and approved
prior ...
GCSD9 Auditor’s Report
• 2012- Bank balances should be reconciled to
the general ledger and differences should be
investig...
GCSD9 Auditor’s Report
• 2012- The District was required to file 4
expenditures reports for the 2012 project
year. The Dis...
GCSD9 Auditor’s Report
• During the test of 40 expenditures for the Title
1 program, we noted 13 expenditures that
were no...
Further Questions? Contact Us!
www.gcsd9.wordpress.com
E-mail us at
Local743@outlook.com
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Town Hall Meeting in Granite City 2014

869 views

Published on

Granite City Town Meeting to discuss the state of District #9 's finances.

Published in: News & Politics
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
869
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
545
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Town Hall Meeting in Granite City 2014

  1. 1. Granite City Town Hall Meeting March 25, 2014 Presented by Steve Knogl
  2. 2. Why has the District stated that the increasing cost of the teacher’s salaries and benefits along with the reductions in revenue are what is putting the District in deficit?
  3. 3. Revenue- From the District’s Proposal
  4. 4. GSA- From the District’s Proposal
  5. 5. General State Aid 2011-2012 $19,427,479 2012-2013 $19,575,581 2013-2014 $19,789,189 This is an increase of $364,710
  6. 6. EAV-From the District’s Proposal
  7. 7. • Without a multiplier, these numbers are almost meaningless. • In the Board presentation this was said to be an “Initial Estimate” Initial Estimate= A GUESS
  8. 8. Ed Fund-From the District’s Proposal
  9. 9. Ed Fund 2011-2012 $5,293,033 2012-2013 $5,602,113 2013-2014 $6,344,018 This is an increase of $1,050,985
  10. 10. Ed Fund Revenue-From the District’s Proposal
  11. 11. Ed Fund Revenue 2011-2012 $33,353,325 2012-2013 $35,325,124 2013-2014 $35,411,508 This is an increase of $2,058,183
  12. 12. Ed Fund-From the District’s Proposal
  13. 13. Ed Fund Overview 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-1014 $48,000,000 $49,000,000 $49,000,000 $53,000,000 $55,000,000 $52,000,000 Expenditures- Constant or reduced? 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-1014 Revenue Expenditures
  14. 14. TEACHER SALARY (TRS contribution included) 2012-2013 $26,766,151 $25,280,787 2013-2014 $24,451,000 (Projected with Step) DECREASING! 2014-2015
  15. 15. Teacher Health Care $4,153,680 $4,266,000 $4,253,400 Steady for nearly 400 people 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-1014
  16. 16. Inflated Teacher Salaries • Publications show inflation of teacher salaries
  17. 17. • Beginning GCSD9 teacher salary • Base $35,887 Cost $39,610 • Beginning GCSD9 Superintendent salary • Base $ 161,547 Cost $187, 807
  18. 18. • Currently, our top 8 Administrators cost the District over $1.2 million, including retirement, healthcare, & fringe benefits • The District Cut Package had no cuts in administration?
  19. 19. Unnecessary Spending • The District employs 3 attorneys to represent them at negotiations. • This costs $750-$1,000 an hour • The Local’s negotiation team includes 6 teachers, who do this voluntarily • Who is looking out for the Districts spending?
  20. 20. • Let’s look at Scholarships • Let’s look at Grants • Let’s look at Title • Let’s look at the money not mentioned to the community
  21. 21. • The only way to truly ever understand the Granite City School District’s finances is…. •Forensic Audit •Line Item Budget
  22. 22. Regarding General State Aid (from ISBE) Finding #1- The school district’s summary for attendance computation was incorrect. The district commingled attendance data for various categories resulting in duplicative errors especially in the elementary category. These errors decreased the original best three month ADA by 893.5 days or 13.33 pupils. Finding #3- The LEA (Local Education Agency) claimed attendance of half day Early Childhood Special Education pupils as full day instead of half day. This error decreased the original best three month Average Daily Attendance (ADA) by 2,829 days, or 42.22 pupils.
  23. 23. Regarding Transportation (from ISBE) Finding #3- The LEA understated revenues as reconciled with the Annual Financial Report. The District did not properly account for all revenues to be recognized and had treated some as direct offset to the expense account. However, the District failed to recognize deductible special education revenues including those of the special education orphanage pupils totaling $62,222. The non-deductible field trip revenues totaled $25,381.
  24. 24. Regarding Title - Low Income (from ISBE) • Finding #3- The grant recipient did not maintain separate expenditure accounts or subsidiary ledger accounts for grant expenditures. The review noted that the District’s general ledger accounts did not adequately delineate expenditures between two fiscal years. Also, expenditures were obligated before the project begin date and have been included in the District’s June 30, 2013 expenditure report. • Finding #4- Salaries paid from grant funds were not approved and/or accurate. The District expended grant funds in Salaries and Benefits before the October 15, 2012 project begin date. The net effect was an overstatement of salaries and benefits totaling $302,407.
  25. 25. Title II- Teacher Quality (from ISBE) • Finding #2 The grant recipient did not submit timely periodic expenditure reports. All quarterly expenditure reports were not submitted within the 20 days required at the end of the quarter or period.
  26. 26. GCSD9 Auditor’s Report • 2012- “As in year prior, we noted some journal entries that were not reviewed and approved prior to entry into the general ledger” • “Without proper controls in place, management has the ability to override controls.” • Pg 43
  27. 27. GCSD9 Auditor’s Report • 2012- Bank balances should be reconciled to the general ledger and differences should be investigated and resolved. • The District obligated funds prior to submitting an application for approval for the Title 1 grant money.
  28. 28. GCSD9 Auditor’s Report • 2012- The District was required to file 4 expenditures reports for the 2012 project year. The District failed to submit ALL 4 expenditure reports within the correct time frame. • Of the 17 cells, on the June 30, 2012 report, 6 cells were understated and 1 was overstated.
  29. 29. GCSD9 Auditor’s Report • During the test of 40 expenditures for the Title 1 program, we noted 13 expenditures that were not included in the District’s program budget and 4 expenditures that were not properly supported with an invoice or did not have a stated purpose
  30. 30. Further Questions? Contact Us! www.gcsd9.wordpress.com E-mail us at Local743@outlook.com

×