Product Design & Process Selection-Manufacturing


Published on

Operations Management-
Product Design & Process Selection-Manufacturing

1 Comment
No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 4
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 14
  • 14
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 4
  • 17
  • 17
  • Product Design & Process Selection-Manufacturing

    1. 1. Chapter 5 Product Design & Process Selection-Manufacturing
    2. 2. <ul><li>Typical Phases of Product Design Development </li></ul><ul><li>Designing for the Customer </li></ul><ul><li>Design for Manufacturability </li></ul><ul><li>Types of Processes </li></ul><ul><li>Process Flow Structures </li></ul><ul><li>Process Flow Design </li></ul><ul><li>Global Product Design and Manufacturing </li></ul>OBJECTIVES
    3. 3. Typical Phases of Product Design Development <ul><li>Concept Development </li></ul><ul><li>Product Planning </li></ul><ul><li>Product/Process Engineering </li></ul><ul><li>Pilot Production/Ramp-Up </li></ul>
    4. 4. Concurrent Engineering Defined <ul><li>Concurrent engineering can be defined as the simultaneous development of project design functions, with open and interactive communication existing among all team members for the purposes of reducing time to market, decreasing cost, and improving quality and reliability </li></ul>
    5. 5. Concurrent Engineering(Continued) <ul><li>Teams provide the primary integration mechanism in CE programs </li></ul><ul><li>There are three types of teams </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Program Management Team </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Technical Team </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Design-Build Teams </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Time savings of CE programs are created by performing activities in parallel </li></ul>
    6. 6. Designing for the Customer Ideal Customer Product Quality Function Deployment Value Analysis/ Value Engineering House of Quality
    7. 7. Designing for the Customer: Quality Function Deployment <ul><li>Interfunctional teams from marketing, design engineering, and manufacturing </li></ul><ul><li>Voice of the customer </li></ul><ul><li>House of Quality </li></ul>
    8. 8. Designing for the Customer: The House of Quality <ul><li>The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004 </li></ul>Customer requirements information forms the basis for this matrix, used to translate them into operating or engineering goals. Customer Requirements Importance to Cust. Easy to close Stays open on a hill Easy to open Doesn’t leak in rain No road noise Importance weighting Engineering Characteristics Energy needed to close door Check force on level ground Energy needed to open door Water resistance 10 6 6 9 2 3 7 5 3 3 2 X X X X X Correlation: Strong positive Positive Negative Strong negative X * Competitive evaluation X = Us A = Comp. A B = Comp. B (5 is best) 1 2 3 4 5 X AB X AB XAB A X B X A B Relationships: Strong = 9 Medium = 3 Small = 1 Target values Reduce energy level to 7.5 ft/lb Reduce force to 9 lb. Reduce energy to 7.5 ft/lb. Maintain current level Technical evaluation (5 is best) 5 4 3 2 1 B A X BA X B A X B X A BXA BA X Door seal resistance Accoust. Trans. Window Maintain current level Maintain current level
    9. 9. Designing for the Customer: Value Analysis/Value Engineering (VA/VE) <ul><li>Achieve equivalent or better performance at a lower cost while maintaining all functional requirements defined by the customer </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Does the item have any design features that are not necessary? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Can two or more parts be combined into one? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>How can we cut down the weight? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Are there nonstandard parts that can be eliminated? </li></ul></ul>
    10. 10. Design for Manufacturability <ul><li>Traditional Approach </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ We design it, you build it” or “Over the wall” </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Concurrent Engineering </li></ul><ul><ul><li>“ Let’s work together simultaneously” </li></ul></ul>
    11. 11. Design for Manufacturing and Assembly <ul><li>Greatest improvements related to DFMA arise from simplification of the product by reducing the number of separate parts: </li></ul><ul><li>During the operation of the product, does the part move relative to all other parts already assembled? </li></ul><ul><li>Must the part be of a different material or be isolated from other parts already assembled? </li></ul><ul><li>Must the part be separate from all other parts to allow the disassembly of the product for adjustment or maintenance? </li></ul>
    12. 12. Types of Processes <ul><li>Conversion (ex. Iron to steel) </li></ul><ul><li>Fabrication (ex. Cloth to clothes) </li></ul><ul><li>Assembly (ex. Parts to components) </li></ul><ul><li>Testing (ex. For quality of products) </li></ul>
    13. 13. Process Flow Structures <ul><li>Job shop (ex. Copy center making a single copy of a student term paper) </li></ul><ul><li>Batch shop (ex. Copy center making 10,000 copies of an ad piece for a business) </li></ul><ul><li>Assembly Line (ex. Automobile manufacturer) </li></ul><ul><li>Continuous Flow (ex. Petroleum manufacturer) </li></ul>
    14. 14. Exhibit 5.10 These are the major stages of product and process life cycles IV. Continuous Flow III. Assembly Line II. Batch I. Job Shop Low Volume, One of a Kind Multiple Products, Low Volume Few Major Products, Higher Volume High Volume, High Standard- ization Commercial Printer French Restaurant Heavy Equipment Automobile Assembly Burger King Sugar Refinery Flexibility (High) Unit Cost (High) Flexibility (Low) Unit Cost (Low)
    15. 15. Virtual Factory Defined <ul><li>A virtual factory can be defined as a manufacturing operation where activities are carried out not in one central plant, but in multiple locations by suppliers and partner firms as part of a strategic alliance </li></ul>
    16. 16. Break-Even Analysis <ul><li>A standard approach to choosing among alternative processes or equipment </li></ul><ul><li>Model seeks to determine the point in units produced (and sold) where we will start making profit on the process or equipment </li></ul><ul><li>Model seeks to determine the point in units produced (and sold) where total revenue and total cost are equal </li></ul>
    17. 17. Break-Even Analysis (Continued) <ul><li>This formula can be used to find any of its components algebraically if the other parameters are known </li></ul>Break-even Demand= Purchase cost of process or equipment Price per unit - Cost per unit or Total fixed costs of process or equipment Unit price to customer - Variable costs per unit
    18. 18. Break-Even Analysis (Continued) <ul><li>Example: Suppose you want to purchase a new computer that will cost $5,000. It will be used to process written orders from customers who will pay $25 each for the service. The cost of labor, electricity and the form used to place the order is $5 per customer. How many customers will we need to serve to permit the total revenue to break-even with our costs? </li></ul><ul><li>Break-even Demand: </li></ul><ul><li> = Total fixed costs of process or equip . </li></ul><ul><li>Unit price to customer – Variable costs </li></ul><ul><li> =5,000/(25-5) </li></ul><ul><li> =250 customers </li></ul>
    19. 19. Process Flow Design Defined <ul><li>A process flow design can be defined as a mapping of the specific processes that raw materials, parts, and subassemblies follow as they move through a plant </li></ul><ul><li>The most common tools to conduct a process flow design include assembly drawings, assembly charts, and operation and route sheets </li></ul>
    20. 20. Example: Assembly Chart (Gozinto) From Exhibit 5.14 A-2 SA-2 4 5 6 7 Lockring Spacer, detent spring Rivets (2) Spring-detent A-5 Component/Assy Operation Inspection
    21. 21. Example: Process Flow Chart Material Received from Supplier Inspect Material for Defects Defects found? Return to Supplier for Credit Yes No , Continue…
    22. 22. Global Product Design and Manufacturing Strategies <ul><li>Joint Ventures </li></ul><ul><li>Global Product Design Strategy </li></ul>
    23. 23. Measuring Product Development Performance Measures <ul><li>Freq. Of new products introduced </li></ul><ul><li>Time to market introduction </li></ul><ul><li>Number stated and number completed </li></ul><ul><li>Actual versus plan </li></ul><ul><li>Percentage of sales from new products </li></ul>Time-to-market Productivity Quality <ul><li>Engineering hours per project </li></ul><ul><li>Cost of materials and tooling per project </li></ul><ul><li>Actual versus plan </li></ul><ul><li>Conformance-reliability in use </li></ul><ul><li>Design-performance and customer satisfaction </li></ul><ul><li>Yield-factory and field </li></ul>Performance Dimension
    24. 24. End of Chapter 5