Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Uc2 2009


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Uc2 2009

  1. 1. UC 2 2009 Berkeley One night, a small man dressed in ill-fitting, ragged clothes asked if I could spare some change. I gave the man twenty dollars. As he thanked me, his solemn face glowed and his mouth spread into a smile exposing his crooked, yellow teeth. While I initially believed that this ten-second transaction had the more significant influence on the object of my generosity, I now consider those moments to have had a more substantial impact on me. Not long after my experience, one of my teachers remarked that treating an impoverished person to a meal rather than giving him money, which he might spend irresponsibly, is a kinder act. That forced me to rethink my altruistic actions, which I now worried may have contributed to his decline. I felt my actions were nominal, motivated by self-satisfaction rather than for the sake of really helping. It takes much more courage to break bread with a homeless person than it does to give him a few dollars and walk away. Was I taking the easy way out? Then I got another perspective on the issue: to treat a panhandler to a meal could also be seen as patronizing. In doing so, I would essentially be telling that man that I knew what was better for him than he did. I would be deeming myself superior. I certainly did not want that. By giving him the money, I gave him the choice to decide what was best for him. If it was a vice he chose, who was I to judge how he found relief from his harsh reality? The dilemma, then, is in the perspective: On one hand, by sharing a meal with him, I recognize him as a human; on the other hand, by giving him money, he is empowered to make his own decisions. I must content myself by believing both of my choices are superior to handing him a bag of fast food and thereby depriving him of both his visibility and his self-determination There is another dimension to this event in regards to its influence on my thinking. A key factor in my act of generosity was that I was alone. I have passed other homeless people in the company of my family or friends, and I did not offer my money then. I realize that I was afraid of what others would say were I to perform such a charitable act in their presence. What I would perceive as kindness and benevolence, I feared others would see as idiocy. And I was not courageous enough to stand alone, to ask them what made them so cold as to ignore a man obviously in dire need. I would be showing a compassionate, sensitive side typically not associated with males. When I realized how much I had been influenced by social expectation, I found it hard to accept, as I pride myself on my efforts in following my conscience and resisting conformity. In the future, I will face dilemmas similar to this one. I may not immediately know which is the best action to take. Reality is rarely black and white, after all. Whatever I do though, will be a result of my contemplation and my personal moral compass, and I am confident that I have the ability to make decisions that will benefit both others and myself.