Per a semiotic approach, Terry Deacon has critiqued Dawkins' stance for its computational, genetic and memetic fallacies, invalidating the core of spiral dynamics, but not invalidating, necessarily, Clare Graves' inventory of values, which I believe can be mapped per our axiological categories of truth, beauty, goodness and unity, as fleshed out in my articulation of criteria of epistemic virtue, which uses the work of Peirce, Popper and Richard Rohr. richard rohr, jason dulle, stephen fowl, amos yong, brian mclaren, walker percy, charles sanders peirce, bernard lonergan, carl jung, myers-briggs, spiral dynamics, clare graves, philip st. romain, tony demello, symphonic dynamics, epistemic virtue, emotional sobriety, spiritual pathways, thomas merton, bernardian love, purgative, illuminative, unitive, developmental stages, levels of consciousness, levels of spiritual maturity, richard rohr's lineage, formative spirituality, spiritual transformation, philosophical theology, philosophical anthropology, theological anthropology, interreligious dialogue, univocity of being, analogy of being, john 10:30 father and I are one, richard dawkins, computational fallacy, genetic fallacy, memetic fallacy, terrence deacon