Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

IASPM UK and Ireland, September 2012

Slides for paper given by Martin Cloonan and John Williamson at IASPM UK and Ireland conference, University of Salford, September 2012

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

IASPM UK and Ireland, September 2012

  1. 1. M A RT I N C LO O N A N A N D J O H N W I L L I A M S O N 5 T H S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 2 Researching The Musicians’ Union
  2. 2. Outline  Context  Perceptions of the MU  About the Project  Why it is important
  3. 3. Context  Amalgamated Musicians’ Union formed in Manchester, 1893  Merger with London Orchestral Union of Professional Musicians in 1921  31 482 members (2011).
  4. 4. Enemies of the Union  “You are invited to attend a meeting in Manchester on 7th May 1893 to discuss forming a Union for orchestral players. The Union that we require is a protection Union. One that will protect us from amateurs, protect us from unscrupulous employers, and protect us from ourselves. [J.B.Williams, 1893]
  5. 5. Perceptions  London Orchestral Association: “organised tyranny which is the curse of modern trades unionism in this country” (1894)  William Boosey, PRS: “these gentlemen who are the spoilt darlings of the musical profession” (1922)  McKay: “the ban did sterling work over two decades in keeping professional British jazz and dance music white.”  “Virtually every one of the music’s practitioners, nearly all of whom were black, were kept out of Britain by an overwhelmingly white organisation, the Musicians Union” (2005)
  6. 6. Perceptions  Oliver: “the ‘ban’ was as inflexibly applied as it was stupidly imposed.” (1980)  Frith: “the MU has always been out of touch with the particular needs of rock musicians.” (1978)  Street: “as each innovation appears to threaten jobs, the MU has resisted each one in turn, first opposing multi- track recording, then mellotrons and finally synthesisers and drum machines. While inspired by a desire to protect members, the MU’s policy appears as merely reactionary.” (1985)
  7. 7. Perceptions  Sweeting: “a left-wing, doctrinaire organisation as secretive and tight-lipped as the KGB.” (2001)  Mendick: “the glorious unreconstructed ways of the Musicians’ Union . .you have a scenario that would make Arthur Scargill weep with nostalgia.” (2001)  Lawson: “it is a massive black mark on a Union that has done so much for grassroots music. You’re effectively crapping on the best music discovery, fan- generating, culture-sharing, life-benefitting ecosphere that musicians in the world have ever experienced.” (2010)
  8. 8. About the Project  Extension of previous work on music industries, generally and  Live music industry AHRC project –  Importance of pre-1955 music industries  Importance of MU in these agreements  Primary source: Musicians’ Union archive @ University of Stirling:  Minutes and agreements  Publications  Correspondence
  9. 9. Importance  3 main areas:  trade union  working as a musician  the music industries
  10. 10. Importance / Trade Union  Lack of dispassionate analysis from both inside and outside the union  No detailed history of the Union  Footnote in the history of Trade Unionism – but  Involvement in TUC and its leadership  Unique contemporary nature of the Union
  11. 11. Importance / Working Musicians  Debates around what constitutes a musician and who can become a member  Craft Union vs. General Union?  Problems of acceptance of part-time/ semi-professional members
  12. 12. Importance / Music industries  Union missing from most accounts of British music industries  MU at the centre of agreements underpinning relationships between employers and musicians – for example:  MU rates for live performance  BBC / ITV/ Broadcasting agreements  PPL / public performance  Lobbying with other industry organisations on copyright related claims
  13. 13. Conclusions  Need for history of Musicians’ Union of interest beyond labour relations / Union members  MU as a lens for understanding the music industries and how these have changed – specifically with regard to:  Organisation of workers in the music industries  Payments / how creative work has been rewarded
  14. 14. Conclusions  Caves (2000): “ The basic forces driving the organisation of workers in creative activities”  Hesmondhalgh (2007): “how has creative work been rewarded in the complex professional era?”  Need to understand why it acted the way it did, when it did.