Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Email Metrics That Matter


Published on

Email Marketing Metrics

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Email Metrics That Matter

  1. 1. Email Metrics that MatterJoe Scharf, Director of Operations & Services@ SendGrid<br />
  2. 2. Session Agenda<br />Email Metrics Explained<br />Deliverability<br />Understanding Reputation<br />Joe<br />
  3. 3. Email Metrics<br />Requests<br />What you sent us<br />aka list size<br />Delivered<br />ISP accepted<br />What does this mean?<br />Understanding the spread<br />Delivered / Requests<br />Baselines<br /><ul><li>Great: > 95%
  4. 4. Good: 80 – 95%
  5. 5. Poor: < 80%</li></li></ul><li>Email Metrics: Opens<br />Unique vs. Total<br />How does Open Tracking work?<br />Web beacon / Tracking pixel<br />Caveats<br />Images must be displayed in mail client<br />Return Path certification can help!<br /><imgsrc=3D";u3DpXSqrS_HQ36gIqlbzXiA=MA%2Foo0.gif" alt=3D""><br />Opens / Delivered<br />Baselines<br /><ul><li>Great: > 30%
  6. 6. Good: 15 – 30 %
  7. 7. Poor: < 15%</li></li></ul><li>Email Metrics: Clicks<br />Unique vs. Total<br />How does Click Tracking work?<br />Replace all URLs with encoded URL<br />Click is recorded and redirected<br />Caveats<br />DNSBL of click-track domain<br />Whitelabel will help here<br /><br />Clicks / Delivered<br />Baselines<br /><ul><li>Great: > 15%
  8. 8. Good: 5 – 15%
  9. 9. Poor: < 5%</li></li></ul><li>Email Metrics: Subscription<br />New Subscribers<br />Unsubscribes<br />CAN-SPAM Compliance<br />Prevent deception<br />Identify Sender<br />Provide and honor opt-out<br />Better than spam report<br />Unsubs. / Delivered<br />Baselines<br /><ul><li>Great: < 1%
  10. 10. Good: 1-3%
  11. 11. Poor: > 3%</li></li></ul><li>Email Metrics: Bounces<br />Hard bounce<br />Address does not exist<br />Soft bounce<br />Mailbox full <br />Deferral / Rate limiting<br />Retried for three days<br />Bounces <br />Uses ISP resources, with no benefit<br />Chronic bouncing hurts reputation<br />Bounces / Requests<br />Baselines<br /><ul><li>Great: < 2%
  12. 12. Good: 2 - 5 %
  13. 13. Poor: > 5%</li></li></ul><li>Email Metrics: Spam Reports<br />Recipient clicks spam button<br />ISP measurement often higher<br />Spam / Delivered vs. Spam/Inbox<br />How it works:<br />Feedback loops (FBL)<br />Tell ISPs where to send abuse reports<br />Caveats<br />Recipients sometimes misuse<br />Biggest contributor to reputation<br />Spam / Delivered<br />Baselines<br /><ul><li>Great: < 0.5%
  14. 14. Good: 0.5 - 1%
  15. 15. Poor: > 1%</li></li></ul><li>Email Metrics: Request-Delivered Spread<br />My requests are so high, but delivered so low<br />(repeat) Bounce rate<br />(repeat) Spam Reports<br />Deferrals & Throttling<br />New content, new IP: warmup<br />First line of defense before spam folder<br />Rate limiting<br />Can hurt reputation if not heeded<br />
  16. 16. Deliverability: Common Issues<br />Don’t act like a spammer:<br />When sending HTML, you must send text <br />Image to text ratio <br />Your list is a problem<br />Opt-in? Does it matter?<br />Everyone has an opt-in list<br />How can you prove it?<br />What does this even mean?<br />Temporal opt-in<br />How old are the “opt-in” addresses on your list?<br />When was the last time you touched them?<br />
  17. 17. Deliverability: Engagement<br />Content is out, Engagement is in<br />ISPs monitoring abandoned email accounts<br />Why bother sending if nobody is listening?<br />Implicit Spamtrapvs. Honeypot <br />Keep track of your user engagement<br />Interaction with your service<br />Clicks and opens<br />Segment accordingly<br />
  18. 18. Sending Reputation<br />IP-based Reputation<br />Return Path Sender Score<br /><br />Cisco IronPort Sender Base <br /><br />Blacklists<br />Not all created equal<br />Add/removal policies & who is referencing?<br /><br />Goodbye IPv4<br />Transition to domain-based reputation<br />
  19. 19. Thank You!<br />Joe Scharf<br />@JoeScharf<br /><br />