From Classical, Neo Classical to Iintegrative


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

From Classical, Neo Classical to Iintegrative

  1. 1. From Classical, Neo-Classical to Integrative/Modern Organization Theories Prof. Josefina B. Bitonio, DPA LNU Dagupan City
  2. 2. <ul><li>Frederick Taylor , dubbed as the “Father of Scientific Management,” is best known for his “one best way approach” in accomplishing task. Classical organization theory evolved from this notion. </li></ul>
  3. 3. <ul><li>Another popular manifestation of this approach was that of Luther Gulick’s POSDCORB methodologies. Gulick and Urwick (1937 as cited in Shafrtiz and Hyde 1997) integrated the ideas of earlier theorists like Henri Fayol into a comprehensive theory of administration. They believed that a single science of administration, which exceeds the boundaries of the private and the public sector, exists. The reasoning of the science of administration was largely borrowed from Fayol’s fourteen principles of organization. </li></ul>
  4. 4. POSDCORB <ul><li>POSDCORB was coined by Gulick with Urwick. It stands for the functions of management - planning, organizing, staffing, directing, coordinating, reporting & budgeting. </li></ul>POSDCORB, however, was seen as less influential in post-war American government. Thereafter, Simon, Waldo and Appleby attacked the idea of POSDCORB.
  5. 5. <ul><li>Simon(1946) in his book, “Administrative Behavior,” created a distinction between theoretical and practical science. He introduced more common principles in the literature of administration administrative efficiency and specialization when he wrote the article, &quot;The Proverbs of Administration.” (Simon 1946 as cited in Shafffritz and Hyde 1997; Stillman 1991) </li></ul>
  6. 6. <ul><li>in 1945, Appleby, led a postwar attack on the concept of politics-administration dichotomy by drafting a convincing case that “public administration was not something apart from politics” but rather at the “center of political life.” (Stillman 1991: 123) </li></ul>
  7. 7. <ul><li>In 1948, Dwight Waldo tried to establish the direction and thrust of Public Administration as a field of study in his book, “The Administrative State,” which hit the “gospel of efficiency” that dominated the administrative thinking prior to Word War II. That same year, Sayre attacked public personnel administration as “the triumph over purpose.” (Shafritz and Hyde 1997: 74) </li></ul>
  8. 8. <ul><li>In 1949, Selznick introduced the so-called “ cooptative mechanism” where he defined “cooptation” as “the process of absorbing new elements into the leadership or policy determining structure of an organization as a means of averting threats to its stability or existence.” (Shafritz and Hyde 1997: 147) </li></ul>
  9. 9. <ul><li>A contemporary of Goodnow was William Willoughby (1918). Willoughby stressed the role of the trilogy covering all three branches of government but he was more known for his budgetary reforms. He discussed the movements for budgetary reforms in the US in view of the budget as an instrument for democracy, as an instrument for correlating legislative and executive action, and as an instrument for securing administrative efficiency and economy . </li></ul>
  10. 10. <ul><li>Mary Parker Follet (1926) also made some significant contribution to the discourse of Public Administration as one of the proponents of participatory management and the “law of situation” which can be attributed to the concept of contingency management . She illustrated the advantages of participatory management in her article, “The Giving of Orders. “ </li></ul>
  11. 11. <ul><li>In the 1920s and early 1930s, Elton Mayo conducted the Hawthorne experiments on the theory of individuals within an organization which propelled the human relations school of management thought. </li></ul>
  12. 12. <ul><li>Chester Barnard (1938) presented a more comprehensive theory of organizational behavior when he wrote the functions of the executive. He argued that for the executive to become more effective, he should maintain an equilibrium between the needs of the employees and the organization . </li></ul>
  13. 13. <ul><li>His concepts were later explored and developed into more comprehensive theories and principles as advocated by other researches in organizational behavior and management , such as, Herzberg’s “motivation hygiene theory,” Mc Gregor’s “Theory X and Y,” 11 Argyris’ “personality versus organization and Likert’s Systems 1 to 4, among others. (Shafritz and Hyde 1997) </li></ul>
  14. 14. <ul><li>Maslow (1943), on the other hand, focused on the hierarchical needs of the individual. His “theory of human motivation,” states that the human being has five sets of needs: physiological, safety, love or affiliation, esteem and ultimately, and self-actualization. </li></ul>
  15. 15. Is there a Philippine Public Administration or Better Still, for whom is Public Administration? By; Alex Brillantes, Jr. and Maricel Fernandez June, 2008 Reference: