2. Topic Objectives:
At the end of the discussion, the learners
must be able to:
1)Give descriptions of the different kinds of
curriculum designs;
2)Discuss the different kinds of curriculum
design; and
3)Identify the different curriculum designs as
applied in the curriculum development.
4. Organization of Curriculum
⢠Horizontal
Organization
- the direction of the
curriculum element is
sideways
Example:
Social Science subject
â history, geography,
civics and culture
⢠Vertical
Organization
- Curiculum follow a
vertical order
Example:
In Social Science, a
content about
Family will be put
ahead than
community
7. Subject-Centered
Designs
⢠Most popular and most widely used
⢠Focuses on the content and the
knowledge
⢠Corresponds mostly to the textbook,
written for the specific subject
⢠It is subdivided into 5 categories or
classifications
8. Subject DesignâŚ
⢠Subject divisions have increased in number
and sophistication
⢠Assumes that subjects are best outlined in
textbooks and e-books and even in developed
computer information programs
⢠In-depth knowledge of curriculum design and
curriculum is required if teachers are to
encourage and guide students in intellectual
exploration.
10. SUBJECT DESIGN
- Separate -subject design
- Curriculum is organized on the basis
of how essential knowledge has
been developed in various subject
areas
11. STRENGTHS OF
SUBJECT DESIGN:
- Easy to deliver
- Complementary books are written
and support instructional materials
are commercially available
- Teachers are familiar with the format
- Traditional
12. WEAKNESSES OF
SUBJECT DESIGN:
⢠Compartmentalizes learning and
expanding of knowledge
⢠Neglects studentsâ needs, interests and
experiences
⢠Prevents individuality and originality
⢠Disempowers students and lowers self-
esteem
⢠Fails to foeter communication, physical
and emotional development
14. Henry Morrison
⢠New Hamshireâs Superintendent of
public instruction
⢠University of Chicago
⢠âsubject matter curriculum
contributed most to literacy, which
should be the focus of the
elementary curriculumâ
⢠âa variety of courses should be
offered to meet studentsâ diverse
needsâ
15. William Harris
⢠Superintendent of the St. Louis
schools in the 1870s
⢠Classifies subject-centered
curriculum as the conservative
liberal arts design
16. Robert Hutchins
⢠In 1930s, he indicated which
subjects made up a curriculum
design:
1. Language and its uses (reading,
writing, grammar, literature)
2. Mathematics
3. Sciences
4. History
5. Foreign languages
17. DISCIPLINE DESIGN
⢠Based on the contentâs inherent
organization
⢠The manner in which content is
learned is suggested by the methods
scholars employ to study the content
of their fields
⢠Focuses on the academic discipline
18. Proponents
of Discipline Design
⢠Arthur King
⢠John Brownell
Essential Characteristics of a
Discipline:
ďźCommunity of persons
ďźExpression of human imagination
ďźDomain
ďźTradition
ďźMode of inquiry
ďźConceptual structure
ďźSpecialized language
ďźHeritage of literature
ďźNetwork of communications
ďźValuative and affective stance
ďźInstructive community
19. DISCIPLINE DESIGNâŚ
⢠Advocates view the school as a
microcosm of the world of intellect
⢠The methods by which scholars study
the content of their fields suggest the
ways by which students learn that
content.
⢠Students experience the disciplines so
that they can comprehend and
conceptualize.
20. ASSUMPTIONSâŚ
⢠Students must adapt to the
curriculum rather than the other way
around.
⢠Students have common or similar
learning style
21. Bruner believedâŚ
âAny subject can be taught in some
effectively honest form to any child at
any stage of development.â
âintelectual activity anywhere is the
sameâ
22. STRENGTHS OF
DISCIPLINE DESIGN:
⢠Students attain mastery of content
and independent learning
⢠Stresses on understanding
conceptual structures
⢠Subjects are taught to any child at
any stage of development
23. WEAKNESSES OF
DISCIPLINE DESIGN:
⢠Ignores the vast amount of
information that cannot be classified
as disciplined knowledge.
⢠Addresses only the interests of the
college or higher education bound
⢠It is compulsory for students to adapt
to the curriculum
24. BROAD FIELDS DESIGN
⢠Often called âinterdisciplinary designâ
⢠Strives to give students a sweeping
understanding of all content areas
⢠Attempts to integrate content that fit
together logically to discern
relationships among various aspects of
the curriculum content, as well as
wholeness of meaning
25. SPOKEPERSON
⢠Harry Broudy
Curriculum Categories:
1.Symbolics of information (English,
foreign language and Mathematics)
2.Basic Sciences (genral science,
biology, physics and chemistry)
3.Developmental Studies ( evolution of
cosmos, of social institutions and of
human culture)
4.Exemplars (modes of easthetic
experience- art, drama, music and
literature)
5.âmolar problemsâ which addresses
typical social problems.
26. STRENGTHS OF BROAD
FIELDS DESIGN
⢠It brings together well-accepted content
fields.
⢠consists of related conceptual clusters
rather than subjects or disciplines combined
in interdisciplinary organization
⢠Focuses on âcurriculum webâ, the
connection between related themes or
concepts
⢠âholistic curriculumâ
27. WEAKNESS OF BROAD
FIELDS DESIGN
⢠Breadth at the expense of depth
âHow will the students learn to appreciate the
value of reading and learning if knowledge
is made so superficial in schools?â
âHow much was learned by the students?â
28. CORRELATION DESIGN
⢠attempts to identify ways in which
subjects can be related, yet maintain
their separate identities
⢠Allows for some connection or
linkage of separate subjects that
differ from each other in order to
reduce fragmentation of the curricular
content
29. SPOKEPERSONS
⢠Harold Alberty
⢠Elsie Alberty
⢠Presented a correlation
design with an
âoverarching themeâ
⢠This thematic organizer
retained subjectsâ basic
content, but it was
selected and organized
with reference to broad
themes, problems, or
units.â
30. STRENGTHS OF
CORRELATION DESIGN
⢠Collaboration of ideas between or
among teachers which results to
combination of subjects in an innovative
manner
⢠Allows linkage of some subjects to
reduce fragmentation
⢠Subjects are correlated, organized and
selected with broad themes, problems
and units
31. WEAKNESSES OF BROAD
CORRELATION DESIGN
⢠Lacks time for collaboration which
requires teachers to to plan differently
and cooperatively
⢠Class schedules donât allow a block of
time sufficient for students to
meaningfully study correlated subjects
⢠Requires alternative forms of
scheduling
32. PROCESS DESIGN
⢠Focuses on the procedures and
processes by which students advance
knowledge, either in specific and fixed
disciplines or general terms.
⢠Students are meaning makers
⢠Teaching of intelligence and
development of intellectual character is
focused
33. Ritchhartâs thoughtâŚ
⢠âto cluster particular dispositions
requisite for effective and productive
thinkingâ
⢠Intellectual character, recognizes the
role of attitude and affect in everyday
cognition and the importance of
developed patterns of behavior.
34. ⢠Educators suggest that students be taught
to think.
⢠Curricular designs must address how
learners learn and the application of
process to subject matter.
⢠Emphasizes the procedure that enable the
students to analyze reality and create
frameworks but this framework differ from
the way the world appears to the casual
observer
PROCESS DESIGNâŚ
35. ⢠In process designs that reflect a
modern orientation, students learn the
process of knowledge acquisition in
order to reach some degree of
consensus.
⢠Jean-François Lyotard argue that we
engage in process not to reach
consensus, but to search for
instabilities.
PROCESS DESIGNâŚ
36. PROCESS DESIGNâŚ
⢠postmodern orientation, process exists in
a duration of time, and this duration of
time upon completion still is embedded in
the present, which is also a duration.
⢠Individualsâstudents and teachersâ
exist in a series of durations, a constant
flow of ânows.â
38. WEAKNESSES OF
PROCESS DESIGN
⢠Lacks emphasis on the content of the
subject, theme or curriculum
⢠Gives more privilege to the scientific
method and it implies the existence of a
fully objective reality. As such, students
must realize that methods of inquiry
result in a world that, to some extent,
they construct.
40. LEARNER-CENTERED
DESIGN
ďą emphasizes LEARNERS as the center
of the curriculum design and that they
are the programâs focus
ďą âTeachers/educators cannot create
experiences, rather they can provide
opportunities for potential experiences,
but actual experiences only occur and
develop when teachers enable and
allow students to.â -William Doll-
42. CHILD-CENTERED
DESIGN
ďThis approach educates students to
be active participants in their
environments to enable teachers to
optimize their learning experiences.
ďThe curriculum is based on studentsâ
lives, needs, and interest.
43. Rousseauâs
Educational
Philosophy
⢠âChildren should be taught within the
context of their natural environment,
not in an artificial one like a
classroomâ
⢠Emile (book written in 1762)
⢠teaching must suit the childâs
developmental level
44. Parkerâs ViewâŚ
⢠âEffective education does not require
strict discipline. Rather, the
instructional approach should be
somewhat free, drawing on the
childâs innate tendency to become
engaged in interesting thingsâ.
⢠Quincy System
45. Deweyâs Child-centered
Curriculum
⢠The curriculum he designed was
organized around human impulses â
the impulses to socialize, construct,
inquire, question, experiment, and
express or create artistically.
46. ⢠Ellsworth Collings â introduced the
child centered curriculum into public
schools of McDonald County
⢠William Kilpatrick â created the
Project Method , which engaged
children in their learning at the
Lincoln School in New York City.
47. STRENGTHS OF
CHILD-CENTERED DESIGN
⢠Interaction between learners,
teachers and environment, thus
creating collaborative effort on both
sides to plan lessons, select content
and do activities together
⢠Empowers students through
ownership of knowledge
⢠Allows for constructivist learning
49. EXPERIENCE-
CENTERED DESIGN
ď Childrenâs needs and interests cannot be
met or anticipated
ď A curriculum framework cannot be
preplanned
ď Everything must be done âon the spotâ
ď Experiences of the learners become the
starting point of the curriculum, thus the
school environment is left open and free
51. STRENGTHS OF
EXPERIENCE-CENTERED DESIGN
⢠Curriculum is based on the experiences
and prior knowledge of the students
⢠Learners are empowered to shape their
own learning since they are given the
chance to choose on the various activities
prepared by the teachers
⢠Time is flexible and children are free to
make options
52. WEAKNESS OF
EXPERIENCE-CENTERED DESIGN
⢠The content of knowledge of the
curriculum is not specific or fixed
because it is focused on the learnerâs
experience and prior knowledge
⢠Ignores the vast amount of
information available about childrenâs
growth and development â cognitive,
affective, emotional, and social
53. ROMANTIC DESIGN
ď Learning results from the
communication among people thus by
challenging content and accepting
different opinions about the content, as
well as from critiquing the purposes of
the information presented.
ďâRadical Approachâ
54. ROMANTIC DESIGNâŚ
⢠believe that schools have organized
themselves, their curriculum,and their
students in stratifications so that the
advantages that this segments enjoy
will continue without challenge from
their subordinates.
55. ROMANTIC DESIGNâŚ
⢠Radicals consider that schools are using
their curricula to control students and
indoctrinate rather than educate and
emancipate. Students in âhaveâ societies
are manipulated to believe that what they
have and will learn is good and just,
whereas students in the âhave notâ
societies are shaped to gladly accept their
subordinate positions.
56. Freireâs Pedagogy of the
Oppressed
⢠Freire believed that education should
enlighten the masses about their
oppression, prompt them to feel
dissatisfied with their condition, and
give them the competencies
necessary for correcting the identified
inequities.
57. Habermasâ Theory
⢠Habermas emphasized that educationâs
goal is emancipation of the
awarenesses, competencies, and
attitudes that people need to take
control of their lives. In this view,
educated people do not follow social
conventions without reflection.
58. William Ayers
⢠Students should be invited by the teacher not
to just âlearnâ the curricula, but to travel and to
experience the curricula as coadventurers and,
perhaps at times, coconspirators.
⢠Students must become the subjects of
communication, actors in their own dramas and
writers of their own scripts â this will define the
modern educational institution.
59. STRENGTHS OF
ROMANTIC DESIGN
⢠Emancipates as well as liberates
the students
⢠Address social and economic
inequality and injustice
60. WEAKNESS ES OF
ROMANTIC DESIGN
⢠Threatens the status quo of a
particular curriculum
⢠Radical educators are
considered to be overtly
political.
61. HUMANISTIC DESIGN
ďFocuses on the attention that should be
on the subject nature of human existence
ďIt emphasizes that there is a relationship
between learning and feeling
ďStresses on empowering individuals and
the development of positive self-concept
and interpersonal skills
63. Abraham Maslow
⢠Self-actualization
⢠Characteristics of a Self-actualized person:
1. accepting of self, others, and nature;
2. spontaneous, simple, and natural;
3. problem oriented;
4. open to experiences beyond the ordinary;
5. empathetic and sympathetic toward the less fortunate;
6. sophisticated in interpersonal relations;
7. favoring democratic decision-making; and
8. possessing a philosophical sense of humor.
64. Carl Rogers
⢠Advocates self-directed learning, in which
students draw on their own resources to
improve self-understanding and guide their
own behavior.
⢠Students are developed into âfully
functioning peopleâ
⢠Educators provide an environment that
encourages genuineness,empathy, and
respect for self and others.
65. Confluent and
Transcendent Education
⢠stresses
participation;
⢠emphasizes power
sharing,
negotiation, and
joint responsibility.
⢠stresses intuition,
creative thinking,
and a holistic
perception of
reality
CONFLUENT
EDUCATION
TRANSCENDT
EDUCATION
66. STRENGTHS OF
HUMANISTIC DESIGN
⢠Empowers students and develops
oneâs love for self
⢠Develops studentsâ self-esteem
and confidence
67. WEAKNESSES OF
HUMANISTIC DESIGN
⢠Inadequate consideration of methods in
light of consequences for learners
⢠Inconsistent emphasis on uniqueness of
individuals and activities that all
students experience
⢠Too much emphasis on the needs of
the individual over the over-all society
⢠Does not integrate what is known about
human learning and development
69. PROBLEM-CENTERED
DESIGNS
ď§ Focus on real-life problems of individuals and
society
ď§ intended to reinforce cultural traditions and
address unmet needs of the community and
society
ď§ Based on social issues
ď§ Place the individual within a social setting, but
differ from learner-centered designs in that
they are planned before studentsâ arrival
(although they can be adjusted to studentsâ concerns
and situations).
71. LIFE-SITUATIONS
DESIGNS
⢠The content of this designs focus on the
social situations within the context of the
learner
⢠This context is organized in such a way that
students see direct relevance to what they
are studying (social or life situations) which
involve them directly in improving society
73. Commission on the Reorganization
of Secondary Education
⢠National Education Association
⢠Outlines curriculum that deals with
health, command of fundamentals,
âworthy home membershipâ,
vocation, citizenship, leisure and
ethical charcater
75. STRENGTH OF THE
LIFE-SITUATIONS DESIGNS
ď§ Focus on problem solving procedures
ď§ Use the past and current experiences of
learners as a means of getting them to
analyze the basic areas of living
ď§ Integrate subject matter by cutting across
the separate subjects and centering on
related categories of social life
76. WEAKNESSES OF THE
LIFE-SITUATIONS DESIGNS
ď§ It pose a challenge in determining the scope and
sequence of essential areas of livingâs essential aspects
ď§ Does not adequately expose students to their cultural
heritage
ď§ Teachers lack adequate preparation to mount life-
situations curriculum
ď§ Textbooks and other teaching materials inhibit the
implementation of the curriculum
ď§ Teachers are uncomfortable because it departs from their
training
ď§ Departs from the traditional curriculum promoted by the
secondary schools, colleges, and universities
77. RECONSTRUCTIONIST
DESIGNS
ďź This method of curriculum address
contemporary social problems and
social action aimed at reconstructing
society.
ďźIts primary purpose is to engage
learners in analyzing many severe
problems confronting humankind.
78. George Count
⢠He believed that society must be
completely reorganized to promote
common good
⢠Speech, âDare Progressive Education
Be Progressive?â
⢠âDare the Schools Build a New Social
Order?âââ
79. Harold Rugg
⢠Believed that school should engage
children in critical analysis of society in
order to improve it
⢠Criticized child-centered schools,
contending that their laissez-faire
approach to curriculum development
produced chaos of disjointed curriculum
and rarely involved a careful review of a
childâs educational program
80. Theodore Brameld
⢠Argued that reconstructionists were
committed to facilitate the emergence of
a new culture
⢠The times demanded a new social
order; existing society displayed decay,
poverty, crime, racial conflict,
unemployment, political oppression,
and the destruction of the environment
81. STRENGTHS OF THE
RECONSTRUCTIONIST
DESIGN
⢠Engages students in critical analysis
of the local, national, and
international community in order to
address humanityâs problems
⢠Encourages industrial and political
changes
84. MODERN INFLUENCED DESIGNS
(CONSTRUCTIONIST PERSPECTIVE)
ďą Curriculum design is influenced by the
intellectual stance that âWe live in
modern times. As such, we approach
and interact with out times with a
modernistic mindset.â
ďąScientific Method/Management - the
world could be managed, manipulated,
even controlled.â
85. POSTMODERNISM - INFLUENCED
DESIGNS (POSTCONSTRUCTIVIST
PERSPECTIVE)
ďąLeads us to pure mobility of life
generally and unfinalized and living
curriculum
ďąThe aspect of this perspective focus
on mobility, ambiguity, uncertainty,
chaos, and complexity
Curriculum Design Models (Curriculum Development by Dr. Bilbao, et al.)
Let me start with the threefold functions embedded in the teaching profession that is⌠everyday the teacher plans, implement and evaluates the curriculum in school. In short, as teachers we have to be a curriculum designer, a curriculum implementor and a curriculum evaluator. Hence, it would be of great help to know how curricula are made or crafted.
-Subject-centered design is considered as the most popular and widely used curriculum model, which focuses on the content and the knowledge which are considered as integral parts of curriculum. This curriculum corresponds mostly to the textbook, written for the specific subject. This has its roots from the academic idea of Plato.
Schools have a strong history of academic rationalism; also the materials available for school use reflect content organization. Content is central to schooling; therefore, we have many concepts to interpret our diverse organization.
With the explosion of knowledge and the resulting specializations in various knowledge fields, subject divisions have increased in number and sophistication. For instance History is now divided into cultural, economic, and geographic history. English can be divided into literature, writing, speech, grammar, reading, and linguistics.
This subject design assumes that subjects are best outlined in textbooks and e-books and even in developed computer information programs. With this reasons, some educators say that teachers do not need to know much about curriculum design or curriculum development which is not true since teachers still have to assume an active role in direct instruction, recitation and large-group discussion. In-depth knowledge of curriculum design and curriculum is required if teachers are to encourage and guide students in intellectual exploration.
To sum up the subject design, a table is presentedâŚ
This design is both the oldest and the best-known school design to both teachers and laypersons who were also educated or trained in schools employing the curriculum. The focus of this curriculum design is the organization of the curriculum on the basis of how essential knowledge has developed in various subject areas. Furthermore, this design corresponds to textbook treatment and teachersâ training as subject specialists. It is further emphasized because of the continued stress on school standards and accountability.
One of the advantages of this design is that, it is easy to deliver since complementary books used in teaching and learning are written and support instructional materials are commercially available. In terms of the teachers, they are already familiar with the format because they, themselves were also educated using the design. Hence, it is considered traditional.
critics contend that this design prevents individualization and deemphasizes the learner. Some also argued that this design disempowers the students by not allowing them to choose the content most meaningful to them.
Henry Morrison is one of the firm believers of the subject-centered design who was a New Hamshireâs Superintendent of public instruction
Before he joined the University of Chicago. He argued that subject matter curriculum contributed most to literacy, which should be the focus of the elementary curriculum. He also believed that a variety of courses should be offered to meet studentsâ diverse needs.
Wiiliam Harris was a superintendent of the St. Louis Schools in the 1870s who fostered subject-based curriculum design. Under his guidance, St. Louis schools established a subject-oriented curriculum which was noted by one educator that most Americans would recognize this curriculum design (which he classifies as the conservative liberal arts design) as the type they experienced in school.
Evolved from separate-subject design which had appeared after the 2nd world war
Gained popularity during 1950s and reached its zenith during the mid 1960s
Discipline design, unlike the subject design which does give clear foundational basis on which it is organized or established, this designâs orientation does s;pecify its focus on academic discipline
As stated from the book of Dr. Bilbao, this discipline design model is often used in college but not in elementary or secondary levels. But with the introduction of the K-12 education system, this also now used in secondary level especially with school having a tvl curricula.
Arthur King and John Brownell are the proponents of this design who indicated that a discipline is a specific knowledge that has the following the essential characteristics:
This stress on disciplined knowledge empahsizes Science, Mathematics, English, History and certain other disciplines.
For example, students approach history as a historian would, and students investigate biological topics by procedures used by biologist. With this, students
From which, Bruner believed that
He argued that students can comprehend any subjectâs fundamental principles at almost any age which was criticized as Romantic and was disagreed upon by developmentalists because of his thesis thatâŚ
Developmentalist point out that thinking process of young children differ in kind and degree from those of adolescents and adults.
It causes the schools to ignoreâŚ.
Such knowledge â dealing with easthetics, humanism, personal-social living and vocational education â difficult to categorize as a discipline
This appears to be an effort to correct the fragmentaed and compartmetalized learning brought by the subject design.
For example: linguistics, grammar, literature, composition and spelling were fused into language arts
biology, chemistry, physics were integrated into general scince.
In short, integration of two or more related subjects into a single broader field of study.
These clusters can be connected by themes.
In fact, some educators are calling for the organization of curriculum as integrated thematic units while others use the term âholistic curriculumâ.
Take this example:
A year of social studies teaches students a greater range of social science concepts than a year of history. But is the resulting knowledge of social science superficial? Certainly, a year of history builds more historical knowledge than a year of social studies.
Is it necessary to have great depth at the elementary level? Is it not the purpose of the curriculum to acquaint students with the complete field of social science?
Superficial â existing or occuring at or on the surface
Correlation designers did not wish to create a broad-fields design but they realized that there are times when separate subjects require linkage to avoid fragmentaion of curricular content.
Most frequently correlated subject: 1. English Literature and history (secondary level)âŚwhile studying historical period, students read novels related to the same period in their English class
2. Science and Mathematics are also correlated.
3. Language arts and social studies (elementary level)
The content areas remain distinct and teachers of the courses retain their subject-matter specialties
In 1950s and 1960s, many found the notion of this correlation design attractive.
It required a schedule within a block time. Teachers of the various content areas to be correlated could work together and have students work on assignments drawing from the correlated content areas.
Requires teachers to plan their lessons cooperatively which is difficult to accomplish because teachers have self-contained classes at the elementary level (elementary level)
Little time to work with other teachers on team teaching since secondary teachers are organized into separate departments
This emphasizes the procedures and dispositions to act that allow students to analyze their decisions, to create and to organize frameworks from the knowledge obtained from the process exposed to them in learning.
Ron Ritchhart borrowed a term from Tishman, which states thatâŚ.
He further believed thatâŚ
According to him, intellectual character goes beyond a listing of abilities and the speed of enactment of those abilities, or the retrieval of detailed information.
In the modern orientation, intellectual and physical processes exist in an irreversible
linear arrow. Time and action always move forward. One cannot repeat the past. One cannot
undo what has been accomplished.
These nows are shaped by past durations recognized and future durations anticipated. We all
are in a process or processes of becoming. âHuman consciousness can never be static. Interpretation
should emphasize possibility and becoming.âPostmodern
process design stresses statements and ideas that are open to challenge; designs are
organized so that students can continually revise their understandings.
postmodernists criticize âŚ
In response to the educational planners who valued subject matter, educators in 1900s asserted that students must be the center or focus of the curriculum program.
Advocates of child-centered design believe that students must be active in their learning environment and that learning should not be separated from studentsâ lives, as is often the case with the subject-centered designs.
However, attending to studentsâ needs and intersts require careful observation of the students and faith that they can articulate those needs and interests.
âyoung studentsâ interest must have educational valueâ.
The shift in emphasis from subject matter to studentsâ needs and interest was part of âŚ.
This was expressed in his 1762 bookâŚEmile
He further stresses thatâŚ
This child-centered curriculum design is often attributed to Dewey but this was actually conceived by Parker who laid its foundation.
Like Rousseau, parker believedâŚ
Parker puts his views of teaching into practice when he developed Science and Geography curricula urging geography teachers to have children experience the content as a geopgrapher by making observations, recording them in sketchbooks and analyzing them.
Since Parker was a superintendent of schools in Quincy, Massachusetts, his approach in curriculum was called âQUINCY SYSTEMâ.
Deweyâs early thinking also entailed similar notions so in 1896, he put his ideas into action in his laboratory school at the University of Chicago.
In 1920s and 1930s, child-centered curriculum flourished primarily with the works of the progressives such asâŚ.
This approach resembles that of the child-centered design but they differ in the sense thatâŚ
Thus, making this design almost impossible to implement
In this child or experience centered curriculum, it heavily emphasizes the ââŚ
The emergence of multiple intelligence theory blends well with this experience-centered curriculum.
Individuals in the radical camp âŚ
School curricular designs, school curricula, and the administration of schoolsâ programs
are planned and manipulated to reflect and address the desires of those in power. Educators
in the radical camp work to alter this dividing of students into haves and have-nots.
Curricula are organized to
foster in students a belief in and desire for a common culture that does not actually exist and to
promote intolerance of difference.
Freireâs Pedagogy of the Oppressed influenced the thinking of some present-day radicals.
Many radicals draw on the theory of Jurgen Habermas
In writing about Habermas and his critical theory of education, Robert Young notes that the theme
of emancipation dates back to Roman times and was also expressed by many Enlightenment philosophers.
Students must accept responsibility for educating themselves and demand freedom.
Along with coauthor Rick Ayers they write,
To Ayers, âcurriculum is an ongoing
engagement with the problem of determining what knowledge and experiences are the most
worthwhile.â
Teachers function as âawareness makers.â They are present within the curricular
arena to âexpose, offer, encourage, stimulate,â and, we would add, to challenge, create awe
and wonder, and nurture inquisitiveness.
Humanistic designs gained prominence in the 1960s and 1970s, partly
in response to the excessive emphasis on the disciplines during the 1950s and early 1960s.
Humanistic education appeared in the 1920s and 1930s as part of progressive philosophy and
the whole-child movement in psychology. After World War II, humanistic designs connected to
existentialism in educational philosophy.
ASCD published in 1962 yearbookâŚ. Presents new focus of educ- an approach to curricular design and instruction that allows individual to be fully functioning persons.
Stressed the affective dimensions of humanistic educ designs and emphasized human potential
It suggest that educators must permit students to feel, value and grow
Abraham Maslowâs conceptâŚheavily influenced humanistic design
Maslow emphasized that people do not self-actualize until they are
40 or older, but the process begins when they are students. Some educators miss this point and
think that their humanistic designs will have students attain self-actualization as an end product.
Carl Rogersâs work has been another major humanistic force.
Individuals able to initiate action and
take responsibility are capable of intelligent choice and self-direction. Rogers stressed knowledge
relevant to problem solving. Classroom questions foster learning and deep thinking. The
quest is collaborative and the inquiries are multidisciplinary. There is no need to âstay within discipline lines.â
Mistakes are accepted as part of the learning process. Conclusions are regarded
as temporary. Students approach problems with flexibility and intelligence; they work
cooperatively
but do not need othersâ approval.
In the 1970s, humanistic education absorbed the notion of confluence, which blends the affective domain (feelings, attitudes, values) with the cognitive domain (intellectual knowledge and problem-solving abilities). It adds the affective component to the conventional subject-matter curriculum.
Confluent education - also stresses the whole person and the integration of thinking, feeling, and
acting. It centers on subject matterâs relevance to studentsâ needs and lives.
Howver some humanistic educators would add the social and
spiritual domains. This gives rise to Transcendent Education - curricula that prioritize the uniqueness of the human personality but also
transcendence of individuality.
James Miffet cautions that society must foster morality and spirituality, not just knowledge and power. Transcendent education is hope, creativity, awareness, doubt and faith, wonder, awe, and reverence.
The curricular organization depends on the nature of the problems to be studied.
The content extends beyond the subject boundaries, however, it must address also the studentsâ needs, concerns, and abilities.
This design emphasizes both the content and the learner development.
Divided into two (2) classifications
Life-Situations designs can be traced back to the 19th century and Herbert Spencerâs writings on curriculum for complete living.
Emphasizes activities thatâŚ
1918
There are three assumptions fundamental to life-situations designsâŚ
Process and content are effectively integrated into a curricular experience
Takes studentsâ existing concerns, as well as societyâs pressing problems, as starting point
It encouragse students to learn problem-solving procedures by linking subject matter to real life situations â w/c increases the curriculumâs relevance
âContextualizationâ
Aspects of Reconstructionism first appeared in the 1920s and 1930s whenâŚ
The times demanded a new social order and the schools should play a major role in the redesign
He challenged the Progressive Education Association to broaden its thinking beyond the current social structure and accused its members of advocating only curricula that perpetuated the middle-class dominace and privilege.
He further expanded his call for a reconstructed society in Dare the SchoolsâŚ.
He further argued students must be involved in creating a more equitable society.
In 1940s he observed that the Progressive Education association overemphasized the child since not one of its 7 stated purposes took crucial social conditions and problems into consideration
Advocated the reconstructionism well in 1950s
Believed that schools should help develop the students into becoming a social being dedicated to the common good
Primary purpose of reconstructionismâŚ.
Attention is given to the political practices of business and government groupâs and their impact on workforce
1. Francis BACON (1561-1626) developed this scientific method which was expanded by
Isaac Newton (1642-1727) who planted this approach to analyzing mysteries of reality. The belief of cause and effect gained acceptance not only intellectuals, but also among workers and industrial leaders of the 18 and 19th century.
2. Scientifc management could bring about specific results with the least amount of effort.
BookâŚunderlined red
Operational Curriculum â emerges as a result of the teachers selecting particular aspects of the planned curriculum
Her choices and decisions are influenced by his/her âREADâ of the communityâs and schoolâs political, social, and philosophical views and beliefs.
Hidden Curriculum â arises from the interactions among students and between students and teachers. This is influeneced by the sequencing and emphases of the operational curriculum content and angaged experiences.
Null Curriculum â refers to the curriculum content, values and experiences that are omitted by the teacher but recognized as being ignored by students, the community or both. Often âcontroversial topicsâ.