Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.
Scribd will begin operating the SlideShare business on September 24, 2020 As of this date, Scribd will manage your SlideShare account and any content you may have on SlideShare, and Scribd's General Terms of Use and Privacy Policy will apply. If you wish to opt out, please close your SlideShare account. Learn more.
Published on
Most presentations in the Czech Republic still suck. It's time for a change!
'Banque de connaissances' groupe Slideshare http://www.slideshare.net/group/bank-of-knowledge
You make the case well about there being insufficient improvement in presentation quality/standards. It's great to see you are addressing it seriously.
Many presenters haven't lifted the game from the old 'overhead projection' times - the same mistakes are being made; too much information on slides (too 'busy'), sometimes too much glitz...too little 'message', too little focus on the audience's needs and expectations. More than anything, there is little attention given to basic design elements and concepts (like fonts (serif/sans serif), whitespace, colour, content positioning, etc)
However, the result must be about being a 'Presentation', per se. It should not be regarded as a 'PowerPoint presentation' - it just uses PowerPoint as the key tool. Many presenters think that simply employing PowerPoint software will be enough - too little thought is given to the presentation...you cover this clearly.
The 'author' also has to balance the requirements of the actual presenter (often an executive, not the author) with the message they want to convey to the audience. First and foremost, I've found it crucial to be certain what the overall purpose of the presentation is in terms of a message, plus what the presenter wants to avoid - this has a big impact on both the specific, detailed content and the overall feel of the imagery.
I’ve prepared very many presentations and you learn from experience how different 'customers' want them done for them.
Some financial managers I've worked with, for example, demand it plain and simple (absolutely no 'frills' or 'bells and whistles'), and 'kept on message'. Some may want a more light-hearted approach - say, if it's for training purposes.
Excellent presentations are usually done by the large mining/mineral export corporations, where the audience comprises fund managers, shareholders, major customers, etc. The preparation time can be long, but subject to late changes/updates, plus several levels of management generally want to review it and want you to incorporate changes.
The same thing, though, can apply to their website updates, so that they are sometimes not as useful to their audience as they could/should be. Rather than the Marketing people having the overall control, engineers and others can treat it like a 'committee' exercise.
That's why the saying 'a camel is a horse designed by a committee' came into being.