Hugs & Kisses: An Innovative Prevention Program and Evaluation Model

Associate Professor
Feb. 7, 2020
Hugs & Kisses: An Innovative Prevention Program and Evaluation Model
1 of 1

More Related Content

What's hot

Ap stats survey project do itAp stats survey project do it
Ap stats survey project do itmariaalejandra712
Unit 1 lesson 4Unit 1 lesson 4
Unit 1 lesson 4VMRoberts
Assessment and individual differencesAssessment and individual differences
Assessment and individual differencesSullivan Turner
Item Analysis - Discrimination and Difficulty IndexItem Analysis - Discrimination and Difficulty Index
Item Analysis - Discrimination and Difficulty IndexMr. Ronald Quileste, PhD
Item analysisItem analysis
Item analysisaneez103
unit planunit plan
unit planTeasha Jenkins

Similar to Hugs & Kisses: An Innovative Prevention Program and Evaluation Model

ADAA 2016 CALM Open Trial 2016ADAA 2016 CALM Open Trial 2016
ADAA 2016 CALM Open Trial 2016Nancy Driska
Item analysis report Item analysis report
Item analysis report Noah Ark Angel
Playful Toothbrush CHI 2008 presentationPlayful Toothbrush CHI 2008 presentation
Playful Toothbrush CHI 2008 presentationguestd2f315
Holmenkollen conferenceHolmenkollen conference
Holmenkollen conferenceJames Nottingham
Science competency based nat intervention program: PAPER PRESENTATIONScience competency based nat intervention program: PAPER PRESENTATION
Science competency based nat intervention program: PAPER PRESENTATIONDeped Tagum City
Analysis of item testAnalysis of item test
Analysis of item testSiti Purwaningsih

More from Jimmy Young

Please Retweet #SocialWorkEducation: A Content Analysis of Social Work Progra...Please Retweet #SocialWorkEducation: A Content Analysis of Social Work Progra...
Please Retweet #SocialWorkEducation: A Content Analysis of Social Work Progra...Jimmy Young
Equipping future nonprofit professionals with digital literacies for the 21st...Equipping future nonprofit professionals with digital literacies for the 21st...
Equipping future nonprofit professionals with digital literacies for the 21st...Jimmy Young
Social Media, Civic Engagement, and Participation in the Digital AgeSocial Media, Civic Engagement, and Participation in the Digital Age
Social Media, Civic Engagement, and Participation in the Digital AgeJimmy Young
Exploring & Understanding the Use of Social Media and How It Relates to Capac...Exploring & Understanding the Use of Social Media and How It Relates to Capac...
Exploring & Understanding the Use of Social Media and How It Relates to Capac...Jimmy Young
Implementation and Evaluation of HBSE Courses using Collaborative Learning Gr...Implementation and Evaluation of HBSE Courses using Collaborative Learning Gr...
Implementation and Evaluation of HBSE Courses using Collaborative Learning Gr...Jimmy Young
Building an Evaluation Model for Online HBSE Social Work CoursesBuilding an Evaluation Model for Online HBSE Social Work Courses
Building an Evaluation Model for Online HBSE Social Work CoursesJimmy Young

Recently uploaded

Models of Communication.pptxModels of Communication.pptx
Models of Communication.pptxMYDA ANGELICA SUAN
SOFTWARE TESTING.pptxSOFTWARE TESTING.pptx
SOFTWARE TESTING.pptxDrTThendralCompSci
Quick Tips in Odoo 16Quick Tips in Odoo 16
Quick Tips in Odoo 16Celine George
Ethernet.pptEthernet.ppt
Ethernet.pptDrTThendralCompSci
PALATAL RUGAE PALATAL RUGAE
PALATAL RUGAE DR. SNEHA NAIR
ff.pptxff.pptx
ff.pptxAmanMalviya14

Hugs & Kisses: An Innovative Prevention Program and Evaluation Model

Editor's Notes

  1. There were 154 teacher surveys received with the grade distribution as follows: 22 kindergarten (14.3%); 32 first grade (20.8%); 30 second grade (19.5%); 26 third grade (16.9%); 23 fourth grade (14.9%); and, 21 fifth grade (13.6%). We were able to match 1,171 children’s surveys to their teachers’ surveys who held an in-class discussion. A total of 66 teachers held an in-class discussion with the grade distribution as follows: 8 kindergarten (36.4%); 8 first grade (25.0%); 9 second grade (30.0%); 18 third grade (69.2%); 10 fourth grade (43.5%); and 13 fifth grade (61.9%). Demographic data for teachers was not collected to ensure confidentiality and privacy of the participants.