Chapter 3


Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Chapter 3

  1. 1. Chapter 3: Locating and Reviewing Related Literature Kristen Fuller and Pan Zhang
  2. 2. The Purpose of Reviewing Related Literature <ul><li>To relate previous research and theory to the problem under investigation. </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul><ul><li>Refining the research problem </li></ul><ul><li>Establishing the conceptual or </li></ul><ul><li>theoretical orientation </li></ul><ul><li>Developing significance </li></ul><ul><li>Identifying methodological limitations </li></ul><ul><li>Identifying contradictory findings </li></ul><ul><li>Developing research hypotheses </li></ul><ul><li>Learning about new information </li></ul>
  3. 3. Step 1: Select a Topic & Key Terms <ul><li>Select a topic & key terms </li></ul><ul><li>- Have idea of topic </li></ul><ul><li>- Identify most important terms </li></ul><ul><li>*use related terms to topic </li></ul><ul><li>- Use terms in computer database </li></ul><ul><li>Jump in or refine terms </li></ul><ul><li>- ERIC (Education Resources Information Center) </li></ul><ul><li>Thesaurus or PsycINFO Thesaurus </li></ul><ul><li>- Controlled Vocabulary – descriptors vs. key words </li></ul><ul><li>- Search thesaurus for term matches </li></ul><ul><li>- Alternative – search library catalog </li></ul>
  4. 4. Step 2: Identify Database & Access Software <ul><li>ERIC </li></ul><ul><li>- Sponsored by Federal government </li></ul><ul><li>- Has articles from 1966 </li></ul><ul><li>- 2002 Education Sciences Reform Act </li></ul><ul><li>Different access methods </li></ul><ul><li>- ERIC website: </li></ul><ul><li>- Other Servers – EBSCOhost, First </li></ul><ul><li> Search, CSA ILLUMINA </li></ul><ul><li>- Hits vary depending on access methods </li></ul><ul><li>PsycINFO </li></ul><ul><li>- Psychology & related fields </li></ul><ul><li> *includes fields not contained in ERIC </li></ul><ul><li>Info Trac Onefile </li></ul><ul><li>- Scholarly & popular journals </li></ul>
  5. 5. Step 3: Conduct Search <ul><li>Use advanced search </li></ul><ul><li>- First decision: Search Limits: Author, date, ERIC </li></ul><ul><li> number, journal title, descriptor, keywords </li></ul><ul><li>- Second decision: Publication types: Journals, book </li></ul><ul><li> reviews, etc. </li></ul><ul><li>Limit search </li></ul><ul><li>- Connectors – “and”, “or”, etc. </li></ul><ul><li>- Keywords vs. Descriptors </li></ul><ul><li>- Sets or Boolean logic </li></ul>
  6. 6. Step 3: Conduct Research (cont.) <ul><li>Search results </li></ul><ul><li>- Article list, summary information & abstract </li></ul><ul><li>- Check details to determine relevancy </li></ul><ul><li>- Judge credibility </li></ul><ul><li>Obtain articles </li></ul><ul><li>- Collect 5-20 articles </li></ul><ul><li>- Examine articles for relevancy </li></ul><ul><li>- Retain relevant articles </li></ul>
  7. 7. Discussion Question: <ul><li>What is the difference between a primary and secondary source? Give examples of each. Why is it important to be careful with secondary sources? </li></ul>
  8. 8. Step 4: Identify the Source as Primary or Secondary <ul><li>Primary-original article or report </li></ul><ul><li>- Refereed and nonrefereed journals </li></ul><ul><li>Secondary-reviews, summarizes or discusses primary research </li></ul><ul><li>- Textbooks </li></ul><ul><li>- Scholarly Books </li></ul><ul><li>- Encyclopedias </li></ul><ul><li>- Reviews, Handbooks and </li></ul><ul><li> Yearbooks </li></ul><ul><li>- ERIC digests </li></ul>
  9. 9. Step 5: Summarize & Analyze Primary Source Information Summarize results & conclusion In outline form, indicate subjects, instruments & procedures used Identify independent & dependent variables Summarize the research problem Complete bibliographic information How the study may be related to your problem Analysis of the data, or conclusions Indicate weaknesses or limitations in methodology Interesting or insightful quotations
  10. 10. 5 x 8 Index Card Example <ul><li>APA Formatting: </li></ul>
  11. 11. Discussion Question: <ul><li>What would be the differences and similarities among the literature reviews for qualitative, quantitative and mixed method research? </li></ul>
  12. 12. Step 6: Organize & Write the Review <ul><li>Quantitative Reviews - often detailed and found in the beginning sections of an article. </li></ul><ul><li>Step 1 – Provide brief summary of articles </li></ul><ul><li>Step 2 – Analyze the studies </li></ul><ul><li>Step 3 – State explicitly how reviewed studies relate to present research </li></ul><ul><li>Qualitative Reviews - tend to be brief in the beginning but more integrated throughout. </li></ul><ul><li>Thematic – topic is identified and discussed, without a detailed analysis of individual studies. </li></ul><ul><li>Most qualitative reviews are thematic. </li></ul>
  13. 13. <ul><li>Mixed-Method Reviews - </li></ul><ul><li>Review presented in one section rather than separate for quantitative and qualitative sections. </li></ul><ul><li>Often, review reflects quantitative or qualitative emphasis of study: </li></ul><ul><li>- Explanatory research uses a review like those in quantitative study </li></ul><ul><li>- Exploratory study review tends to be like those found in qualitative </li></ul><ul><li> research </li></ul>
  14. 14. Review of Literature <ul><li>Identify which part of the article is the review of literature </li></ul><ul><li>Scan the review to get an idea of the general structure & organization </li></ul><ul><li>When reading, highlight points of references, places where findings from other studies are summarized & analyses of the studies </li></ul><ul><li>Determine how well the review corresponds to the following criteria: </li></ul>
  15. 15. Criteria for Evaluating the Review of Literature <ul><li>The review of literature should: </li></ul><ul><li>Adequately cover previous research on your topic </li></ul><ul><li>Cite actual findings from other studies </li></ul><ul><li>Be up-to-date </li></ul><ul><li>Analyze as well as summarize previous studies </li></ul><ul><li>Be organized logically by topic, not by author </li></ul><ul><li>Briefly summarize minor studies & discuss major studies in detail </li></ul><ul><li>Relate previous studies explicitly to the research problem or methods </li></ul><ul><li>Provide a logical basis for the hypothesis </li></ul><ul><li>Establish a theoretical or conceptual framework for the problem </li></ul><ul><li>Help establish the significance of the research </li></ul>