4. Indications
Benign or Malignant obstruction relief
Adjunct to stone therapy
Perioperative
Obstruction
ESWL
Identification of the ureter
Management of Urine leaks
After trauma, surgery or fistula
5. Placement
Typically in OR
Cystoscopy (identify ureteral orifice)
+/- Retrograde pyelogram to outline upper tract
Placement of soft guidewire into upper tract
(kidney)
Place stent over guidewire (using pusher)
Remove guidwire
8. An aside – French Scale for Drads
Charriere, Parisian surgical
instrument maker
French scale or gauge system
Fr, F or Ga
Catheter size
1 Fr = 1/3mm
D(mm) = Fr/3
Ex. 30 fr catheter is (30/3)
– 10mm in diameter
Fr is close to circumference
Sp. = External diameter
30 fr cath is about 30mm in
circumference
pi*d = C
Contrasts Needle gauge size,
where increasing gauge is
smaller
9. Normal Position
Proximal coil in renal
pelvis
Distal coil in bladder
In upper 1/4
Within 5cm of UVJ
Not beyond midline or
along bladder base
Proper position …
Assures proper function
Reduces chance of
migration
Reduces irritative
symptoms
Proximal loop in
renal pelvis
Distal loop in
bladder, best in
upper 1/4
12. Malposition
Too short
Doesn’t bridge the
obstruction/ureter
“fish reeling”
Too long
Irritation
Urinary tract penetration
Usually proximal
Urinoma; hematoma
Stent in optimal position
15. Update – Multi Length Stents
Variable length
Distal coil adjusts to
ureter length
22-28 cm most
common
Shorter ureter – more
coil
Longer ureter – less
coil
Many fewer “too
short” or “too long”
stents
21. Inadequate Relief of Obstruction
or Stent Malfunction
Relief of obstruction with ureteral stent is
complex
Intrinsic obstruction (ie stones - stent good)
Extrinsic obstruction (ie malignant – less effective)
Complex issues
Stent May become clogged/obstructed
Clinical Suggestion
Flank pain (but often present anyway)
Renal insufficiency (insenstive)
Hydronephrosis (may persist from previous)
22. Inadequate Relief of Obstruction
or Stent Malfunction
Imaging Diagnosis
Doppler US – no ureteral jet and increasing hydro
No reflux at VCUG (or loopagram)
25. Encrustation
All stents will accrue crystalline deposition
Hastened by UTI; lithogenic urine
Increases with time (50% at 6-12 weeks)
Particularly involves proximal and distal ends
Complications
A main reason for stent exchange
Urinary tract injury and stent fracture at removal
Must be dealt with if severe prior to removal
Lithotripsy, cystoscopy, etc.
29. Encrustation
Stone analysis revealed calcium oxalate 8% and calcium phosphate 92%
Kidney International (2007) 72, 899–900. doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5002429
30. Ureteral Erosion or Fistula
Rarest and most feared
complication, especially
arterial
Usually in setting of
XRT and malignancy,
with indwelling stent
eroding into vessel
Hematuria, can be
massive
Arteriogram or CTA
31. Stent Fracture
Urine is a hostile enviroment
Rare today
Increases with indwelling time
Increases with encrustation
35. Ureteral Stents – Wrap up
Typical Stent
Indications
Placement
Stent
Normal Position
Common Symptoms
Complications
Malposition (Too short or long/outside ureter)
Migration
UTI
Inadequate relief or recurrent obstruction
Encrustation
Fracture
Ureteral erosion/fistula
Forgotten Stent
Editor's Notes
First inserted in 1967 as “indwelling ureteral splint” for obstruction and fistula
From UNC
Too short stent at placement, which with reconstitution of the proximal coil pulls distal stent into ureter (fish reeling)
Too long
Contrast in and around stent at VCUG
Left: increaed hydro with no doppler flow
Right: decrease hydro with flow after stent exchange
a) Conventional radiograph demonstrates minimal encrustation around the proximal portion of a ureteral stent (arrows), which was initially placed to assist with treatment of urinary tract stone disease. (b) Conventional radiograph obtained after stent removal shows the encrusting shell that was left behind. The patient was successfully treated with ESWL.
Stent fracture in a patient with disseminated prostatic carcinoma. (a) Abdominal radiograph shows bilateral ureteral stents that were placed for relief of ureteral obstruction. No arrangements were made for follow-up given the patient’s condition. (b) On a conventional radiograph obtained 18 months later when the patient presented with a complaint of recurrent urinary tract infections, the stents are fractured into multiple pieces. This necessitated percutaneous entry with cystoscopic and ureteroscopic manipulations for complete removal.