Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Microbiome studies using 16S ribosomal DNA PCR: some cautionary tales.

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 43 Ad

Microbiome studies using 16S ribosomal DNA PCR: some cautionary tales.

Download to read offline

Presentation at a workshop conducted by the UC Davis Bioinformatics Core Facility: Using the Linux Command Line for Analysis of High Throughput Sequence Data, September 15-19, 2014

Presentation at a workshop conducted by the UC Davis Bioinformatics Core Facility: Using the Linux Command Line for Analysis of High Throughput Sequence Data, September 15-19, 2014

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you (20)

Advertisement

Similar to Microbiome studies using 16S ribosomal DNA PCR: some cautionary tales. (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Advertisement

Microbiome studies using 16S ribosomal DNA PCR: some cautionary tales.

  1. 1. “Scientists often have a naïve faith that if only they could discover enough facts about a problem, these facts would somehow arrange themselves in a compelling and true solution.” Theodosius Dobzhansky
  2. 2. Microbiome studies using 16S ribosomal DNA PCR: some cautionary tales. Jenna Morgan Lang postdoc Jonathan Eisen’s Lab UC Davis email: jennomics@gmail.com Twitter: @jennomics websites: jennomics.com seagrassmicrobiome.org phylogenomics.wordpress.com
  3. 3. 16S ribosomal RNA PCR surveys
  4. 4. Metagenomics
  5. 5. Typical laboratory workflow • Extract DNA with MoBio PowerSoil Kit • Amplify 16S rDNA with barcoded primers • Pool samples and sequence on the MiSeq – 15 million reads, 250bp PE – 50-200(?) samples – Sample drop out
  6. 6. Typical bioinformatic workflow • Demultiplex and QC sequence data • Process using QIIME • Stare at graphs and wait for a revelation
  7. 7. inputs pre-processing under the hood analysis Meta-data Sequence data z Sequence pre-processing Cluster sequences Build OTU table Build phylogenetic tree Assign taxonomy Alpha diversity Beta diversity Hypothesis testing Data visualization Q I I M E
  8. 8. You can do lots of things with a .biom table produced by QIIME • METAGENassist • interactive web tool that will do lots of stats and make pretty pictures • PICRUSt (google: picrust metagenomes) • infers functional potential based on your 16S data • STAMP (google: stamp bioinformatics) • flexible python tool (with a GUI) that will do statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles on the fly • R (phyloseq package) • If you are familiar with R, this will bridge the gap between QIIME and Rstats • Phinch • Interactive web-based visualization tool
  9. 9. METAGENassist • Input is .biom table and “mapping file” • can input matrix of taxonomy or functional assignments • many options for statistical analysis • easily generate nice plots
  10. 10. Some examples of METAGENassist output:
  11. 11. PICRUSt (Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States) • .biom table input from QIIME • normalize by copy number • predict metagenome • .biom table output (with functional categories) Zaneveld, J.R., Lozupone, C., Gordon, J.I. & Knight, R. Ribosomal RNA diversity predicts genome diversity in gut bacteria and their relatives. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 3869–3879 (2010) Martiny, A.C., Treseder, K. & Pusch, G. Phylogenetic conservatism of functional traits in microorganisms. ISME J. 7, 830–838 (2013)
  12. 12. PICRUSt accuracy across various environmental microbiomes
  13. 13. PICRUSt can produce results that make sense! Tributary contaminated by old sulfur mine Sulfur Metabolism
  14. 14. STAMP • Input is .biom table and “mapping file” • Can input matrix of taxonomy or functional assignments • powerful statistical options • Can subsample data on the fly • Generates OK plots
  15. 15. Using STAMP to identify SEED subsystems which are differentially abundant between Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis sequences obtained from a pair of enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) sludge metagenomes(data originally described in Parks and Beiko, 2010).
  16. 16. phyloseq R package • Create a phyloseq object – .biom table – “mapping file” – phylogenetic tree • google: phyloseq demo • do stats and make plots that you can prettify with ggplot2
  17. 17. phinch.org • Add metadata to biom table • Upload to phinch
  18. 18. Phinch allows you to manipulate and explore your data
  19. 19. Lots of data cannot compensate for a poorly designed experiment
  20. 20. Bioinformatics cannot save a poorly designed experiment
  21. 21. Design your experiment. replication controls biases
  22. 22. Read number distribution for 60 samples on one MiSeq run 233 sequences
  23. 23. Read number distribution for 95 samples on one MiSeq run 318 sequences
  24. 24. Standardize collection, storage, and laboratory procedures Figure 3. Predicted and observed frequencies of sequence reads from each organism. Morgan JL, Darling AE, Eisen JA (2010) Metagenomic Sequencing of an In Vitro-Simulated Microbial Community. PLoS ONE 5(4): e10209. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010209 http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0010209
  25. 25. Beware the chimera
  26. 26. The How: The Why: • too many cycles • extension time too short • close relatives in the mix • less abundant taxa
  27. 27. Include kit / negative controls
  28. 28. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of a pure Salmonella bongori culture
  29. 29. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of a pure Salmonella bongori culture
  30. 30. Child nasopharyngeal samples from Thailand, appears to show age-related clustering
  31. 31. Child nasopharyngeal samples from Thailand, extraction kit lot # explains the pattern better
  32. 32. Child nasopharyngeal samples from Thailand, loss of clustering after excluding contaminant OTUs
  33. 33. Schloss reducing artifacts Last Bit of Ugly Data mock community consisting of 21 taxa 3 different regions amplified 4 different sequencing centers Fecal sample
  34. 34. “Perfection is the enemy of progress”
  35. 35. WORDS OF WISDOM Consult an expert.
  36. 36. WORDS OF WISDOM Include replicates and controls. Design your experiment!
  37. 37. WORDS OF WISDOM Have a specific question. Seek to answer THAT question. (no pilots!)
  38. 38. WORDS OF WISDOM Do microbes differ between your treatments? Yes.
  39. 39. WORDS OF WISDOM Know the answer to the question: So now what? (follow-up experiments)
  40. 40. WORDS OF WISDOM Avoid metagenomics.

Editor's Notes

  • Image lifted from: http://www.kcdsg.org
    Some very basic background on what the Eisen lab typically does.

    Microbial genome sequencing and assembly – I will talk about this in more detail near the end of this presentation)
    16S rDNA PCR surveys (i.e., microbial ecology) – describe what this is
    Metagenomics (wholesale sequencing of environmental microbial DNA) – next slide


  • image lifted from http://buildanawesomebusiness.com

    Metagenomic data, while richer in terms of information content, is much more complex and messy

    We have developed some cool tools for analyzing metagenomic data (Phylosift)
  • These are elements of experimental design that people understand in the context of their daily scientific lives, but tend to forget about when designing their microbiome experiments. And, I’m not going to address each of these points, but I’m going to spend a couple of minutes showing you some scary, ugly data that should reinforce the need to keep these things in mind.

  • These are elements of experimental design that people understand in the context of their daily scientific lives, but tend to forget about when designing their microbiome experiments. And, I’m not going to address each of these points, but I’m going to spend a couple of minutes showing you some scary, ugly data that should reinforce the need to keep these things in mind.

  • These are elements of experimental design that people understand in the context of their daily scientific lives, but tend to forget about when designing their microbiome experiments. And, I’m not going to address each of these points, but I’m going to spend a couple of minutes showing you some scary, ugly data that should reinforce the need to keep these things in mind.

  • Venus the cat
  • Aliquots from a single culture were sent to three institutes where they were process with three batches of the FastDNA Spin Kit for Soil
  • Same lab, 4 different kits

    MoBio kits had lowest taxonomic diversity, but also WAY fewer reads
  • Fecal sample is thought to show a different pattern because it is dominated by fewer taxa, whereas the mock community was even
  • So, what do we do when presented with all of this depressing data? We just keep doing our science!

×