Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Alexandra Messtick
Advisor: Ms. Hodges
Police Body Cameras: Can They Foster Trust Between Teenagers and Police in
Baltimor...
“No Body Cameras for Madison Police.” Weau.com. 18 November 2015. Web. 18
November 2015.
WEAU is a local tv news station a...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Sample annotated bibliography

6,289 views

Published on

bib

Published in: Education
  • Login to see the comments

  • Be the first to like this

Sample annotated bibliography

  1. 1. Alexandra Messtick Advisor: Ms. Hodges Police Body Cameras: Can They Foster Trust Between Teenagers and Police in Baltimore? Personal Project Goal: The goal of this personal project is to investigate whether or not police body cameras will significantly improve the level of trust between police and teenagers in the city of Baltimore by creating a documentary film that captures the opinions of a diverse group of teens. Global Context: Fairness and Development Annotated Bibliography Ariel, Barak, William A Farrar, and Alex Sutherland. "The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomized controlled trial." Journal of Quantitative Criminology: 1-27. January 2014. Web. 18 November 2015. Ariel, Farrar and Sutherland are all graduate students at the Institute of Criminology at Cambridge, UK. Farrar is also the Chief of Police in Rialto, CA. In their study they randomly selected officers to participate. Officers were assigned shifts during which they wore their cameras and those during which they didn’t. The researchers found that the number of incidents defined in the study as “use of force” were reduced by 10% when cameras were worn. This article is valuable for my project because it provides background and evidence that use of force incidents may be reduced when cameras are present. This article is limited in value, however, because it does not deal at all with issues of trust between the police and it does not address teenagers specifically. Moore, Michael. “Michael Moore’s 13 Rules for Making Documentary Films.” Indiewire.org. Web. 18 November 2015. Michael Moore is a renowned documentary filmmaker, known for such films as Fahrenheit 9/11, Bowling for Columbine, and Sicko. This set of “rules” for making a documentary film are published in this magazine for independent filmmakers and lovers was Moore’s keynote address at the Toronto International Film Festival’s annual Doc Conference. In it Moore tells filmmakers to tell a compelling story that doesn’t preach or teach. It should be entertaining and funny with high quality sound and a clear message. Moore’s article is a valuable perspective for this project because it refers specifically to effective storytelling techniques for the documentary filmmaker like focusing your film on people you disagree with and keeping your story as short as possible. Moore’s address, however, is limited when helping to create my personal project because he is repetitive in his structure and repeats the same advice about needing to make a movie people will like.
  2. 2. “No Body Cameras for Madison Police.” Weau.com. 18 November 2015. Web. 18 November 2015. WEAU is a local tv news station affiliated with NBC. This story aired in November 2015 provides details about how the Madison Police Department, in consultation with a community advisory board, has determined that it is not in its best interest to spend the departmental budget on a body camera program. Instead, it recommends that the police invest more in community programming in order to build trust. This article is valuable for this project because it provides an example of an alternative to police body cameras and questions the wisdom of investing in camera programs instead of investing in programs designed to build community trust. This article has limited value, however, because it provides no real proof that the strategy of investing in community programs will be more successful in building trust than a camera program would be. White, Michael D. "Police officer body-worn cameras: Assessing the evidence." Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Feb 2014. Web. 18 November 2015. Michael D. White is a professor of Criminology at Arizona State University and a senior diagnostic specialist for the Office of Justice Programs Diagnostics Center. This document is a summary of the research on police body cameras, presenting evidence both in favor and against the cameras. It concludes with the idea that not enough is known about the implementation of body cameras to unilaterally recommend implementation; however, that those who wished to implement should proceed cautiously. This report is valuable to my project because it provides a comprehensive review of all studies about the use and implementation of police body cameras. This sources is limited in its value, however, because it specifically states that little is known about community perceptions of body cameras, the exact area of study for this project.

×