Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Barrier Analysis Survey: Working Group Participation

1,216 views

Published on

Barrier Analysis Survey: Working Group Participation

Mitzi Hanold, Food for the Hungry

SBC Working Group Showcase

CORE Group Spring Meeting, April 29, 2010

Published in: Health & Medicine
  • Be the first to comment

Barrier Analysis Survey: Working Group Participation

  1. 1. Mitzi Hanold, MPH Food for the Hungry
  2. 2. Background: <ul><li>Survey size: 40 respondents </li></ul><ul><li>Doer and Nondoer Analysis </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Doers are those who have met in a working group 2 or more times in the last six months. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>14 Doers versus 26 Non-doers </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Purpose: To find the reasons the help and/or hinder active participation and the advantages and disadvantages of participation. </li></ul>
  3. 3. Significant Findings: <ul><li>Doers were 5.6 times more likely to believe that NOT participating in a working group is a very serious or somewhat serious problem. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Help CORE members to understand the role of working groups and how they are instrumental in CORE’s survival. </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Non-doers were more likely to believe that NOT participating in a working group would NOT have a negative impact on their organization. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Help CORE members to understand the value added of their participation and how it can positively impact their organization. </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. Additional Findings (not ss) <ul><li>Advantages of participating in WG: </li></ul><ul><li>Networking (OR = 3.00) </li></ul><ul><li>Things that make being an active member easier: </li></ul><ul><li>Greater involvement by others in working group; discreet tasks for each person. (OR = 4.80) </li></ul><ul><li>Regular meetings (OR = 4.80) </li></ul><ul><li>Doers were more likely to believe that their religious beliefs are in keeping with active participation in working groups. (OR = 3.41) </li></ul>
  5. 5. Significant Findings <ul><li>Doers were 5.1 times more likely to believe that they could be a working group member in the next year with their time, experience, skills and resources. </li></ul><ul><li>Non-doers were 10 times more likely to say that they were LURKERS/ Invisible men in the Working group. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Need to find a way to help people stop lurking and become visible and active! </li></ul></ul><ul><li>To the person who wanted to be personally invited…. </li></ul>

×