Why We Share

714 views

Published on

Why people share what they share is integral marketing today. Find out what compels and what sells.

Published in: Marketing, Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
714
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
15
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Why We Share

  1. 1. “I’m at Starbucks”: Why We Share & What It Means For Marketing S S W Y T U N Communications
  2. 2. There  is  no  deba-ng  that  we  all  share.  Gossip,  news,  the  weather,  brand  experiences.  The  very  prac-ce  of  sharing  has   come   under   increased   scru-ny   due   to   social   media.   Much   of   this   online   ac-vity   is   ques-oned   for   purpose,   appropriateness,  and  value.  But  while  social  media  has  captured  the  public  and  marketer’s  aBen-on,  the  real  human   need   to   share   has   existed   throughout   the   centuries.   People   share   stories   and   exchange   informa-on   …   it   is   called   conversa-on  and  it  happens  online  and  off.     We  forward  ar-cles,  swap  tales  over  lunch,  and  gossip  to  our  neighbors  about  other  neighbors.  Social  technologies  like   tex-ng,  Facebook,  and  other  social  media  sites  have  only  made  it  more  convenient  and  immediate  but  the  need  to  share   is  nothing  new.  Sharing  is  not  the  result  of  social  media.  Social  media  is  the  result  of  human  behavior.       This  paper  spends  some  -me  on  our  interes-ng  online  habits,  but  it  is  truly  about  the  psychology  of  sharing  overall  and   how  cri-cal  this  is  to  marke-ng.  It  examines  why  we  share,  what  we  share,  and  how  marketers  can  benefit.     Why  We  Share   I  entered  branding  and  marke-ng  because  of  human  behavior.  It  all  started  by  laughing  at  my  own  foibles  concerning   brands,   personal   iden-ty,   and   buying   prac-ces.   Quickly   I   found   that   the   influences   on   people   around   me   were   both   startling  similar  and  astonishingly  unique.  This  aBracted  me  because  it  proved  that  branding  and  marke-ng  are  both  art   and  science  and  can  never  be  en-rely  mastered.  This  appealed  to  my  restless,  yet  ordered  mind.  Every  answer  you  arrive   at  in  this  business  produces  three  more  ques-ons.  This  challenge  remains  real  and  fascina-ng.     But  there  is  a  common  thread  to  success  in  this  profession  and,  of  course,  it  is  the  study  of  human  behavior.  Show  me  a   high-­‐performing  marketer  and  I  will  show  you  one  with  a  natural  curiosity  as  to  why  we  do  the  things  we  do  (while  some   just  have  an  innate  ability  to  assess  behavior).  Marke-ng  is  a  process  of  iden-fying  insights  drawn  from  behavior  and   leveraging  them  for  commercial  gain.  In  that  sense,  sharing  is  a  behavior  every  marketer  needs  to  study.       Sharing  is  a  core  human  behavior  and  is  at  the  founda-on  of  human  interac-on.  It  is  a  base  unit  of  socializing.  We  are   social   animals   and   this   provides   defini-on   to   who   we   are   as   individuals.   But   some-mes   why   and   what   we   share   is   downright  head  scratching.     Author   and   trainer,   Peggy   Klaus   recently   blogged   on   The   New   York   Times   site   about   the   bizarre   prac-ces   of   20-­‐ somethings   who   over   share   their   personal   exploits   in   the   workplace.   Apparently   this   is   causing   consterna-on   in   the   human  resources  ranks.  Organiza-ons  are  now  puzzling  over  how  to  manage  these  young  hires  who  openly  share  sexual   conquests,  drunken  escapades,  and  the  fact  they  are  looking  for  a  beBer  job  somewhere  else!   2   “Did  you  see  the   game  last  night?”   “She  missed  a  huge   deadline  again.”   “I  got  it  at  Costco.”   “I’m  at  Starbucks.”   “Supposedly  he  le>  her.”   “I  am  the  Mayor  of  Falafel  House.”   “Service  really  sucks  there.”   “Does  anyone  have  extra   concert  Eckets?”   “Are  you  into  yoga?”  
  3. 3. In  trying  to  figure  out  why  taboo  subjects  are  no  longer  taboo,  the  blame,  in  this  case,  is  being  placed  on  online   behavior  finding  its  way  into  face-­‐to-­‐face  communica-ons.  Others  aBribute  it  to  “narcissis-c  baby-­‐boomer  parents   for   raising   children   with   an   overblown   sense   of   worth,   who   believe   that   everything   they   say   or   think   should   be   shared”.   More   accurately   it   may   be   that   these   par-cular   people   seek   connec-on   and   affirma-on   and   in   this   par-cular  case  it  happens  to  come  at  the  expense  of  appropriateness  and  professionalism.     But  that  does  not  really  get  at  why  we  share  what  we  share.  Beyond  boredom  and  ease  of  technology,  why  are  we   talking  and  clicking  with  wild  abandon?  The  reasons  appear  to  be  a  complex  mix  of  personal  and  mass  psychologies,   sociology,  peer  rela-ons,  cultural  confusion,  along  with  a  healthy  distrust  of  established  organiza-ons.  Based  on  my   research,  here  are  the  commonly  ascribed  reasons  people  are  sharing  more  of  their  lives  for  beBer  or  for  worse.     Insecurity   It   is   a   big   and   fast   moving   world.   There   is   a   perceived   lack   of   stability   in   so   many   of   the   ins-tu-ons   that   once   provided  founda-ons  and  touchstones  for  people  as  they  moved  through  life.  This  goes  as  far  as  to  include  the   construct  of  family  and  certainly  applies  to  organized  religion  and  government.  People,  especially  younger  ones,  are   looking  for  a  meaningful  sense  of  self  and  this  leads  to  the  next  reason  we  share.       Iden1ty   We  share  to  help  cra_  who  we  are,  what  we  stand  for.  And  as  we  do  so,  we  are  aBracted  to  those  who  are  seen  to   hold  our  interests,  beliefs,  and  values.  We  like  and  comment  on  each  other’s  posts,  only  partly  because  of  the  actual   substance  of  the  content,  we  are  really  aBemp-ng  to  get  closer  to  what  we  believe  is  our  homogeneous  set  (or   desired  set).  If  you  have  visited  a  suburban  high  school  lately,  it  is  almost  comedic  how  the  cliques  are  segmented  by   appearance,   and   how   teens   espouse   individuality,   but   look   pressed   out   of   a   handful   of   molds.   Now   we   know   a   universal  truth  in  life  and  in  marke-ng,  as  we  interact  amongst  hundreds  of  rela-onships,  in  the  end,  we  tend  to   trust  a  very  small,  inner  circle.     3   Connec1on   The   vast   majority   of   our   very   real   human   efforts   go   into   contribu-ng   to   and   nourishing   that   inner   circle.   The   shared   values  and  beliefs  of  our  inner  circle  provide  the  guardrails  and   goalposts  for  our  life.  And  we  are  thrown  off  kilter  if  one  of  our   inner   circle   goes   in   a   different,   perhaps   reckless,   direc-on.   It   does  not  mean  the  group  does  not  challenge  itself  to  grow  but  it   requires   some   permanence   to   keep   personal   and   group   equilibrium.   As   individual   ‘members’   of   this   group   we   reward   the  shared  direc-on  with  our  loyalty.     Enrichment   It   comes   as   no   real   surprise   that   sharing   represents   a   way   of   making  ourselves  feel  good.  We  are  rewarded  if  there  is  value  in   what  we  share.  This  is  both  enrichment  of  self  and  enrichment   of  others  (it  is  why  there  are  a  gazillion  blogs  in  the  world).  It  is   easily  related  to  the  famous  hierarchy  from  Maslow.  Belonging,   esteem,   and   self-­‐actualiza-on   require   human   interac-on   and   that  means  sharing.  We  are  especially  pleased  and  o_en  fulfilled   if  we  enrich  our  inner  circle.   3  
  4. 4. It  Boils  Down  To…Valida1on     Based  on  my  work  in  this  area,  I  find  it  helpful  to  think  of  all   of  these  behaviors  and  mo-va-ons  as  an  aBempt  to  seek   valida-on.   When   people   approve,   appreciate   or   relate   to   something  we  do  or  say,  we  feel  good.  Sharing,  it  turns  out,   is  a  process  of  valida-on  in  our  life  choices.       This  is  easily  proven  by  viewing  the  last  ten  status  updates   of   your   friends   on   Facebook.   A   closer   examina-on   will   undoubtedly   reveal   that   each   of   these   updates,   in   some   way,   represents   a   need   to   be   validated,   to   gain   corrobora-on,   and   to   seek   feedback   (Like!).   I   recently   caught  myself  sharing  a  milestone  on  Facebook  related  to   the   pos-ng   of   my   500th   book   review   on   Amazon   –   a   personal  double-­‐dose  of  social  media  valida-on  seeking.     So  when  people  share  something,  they  do  it  for  their  own   reasons.  They  might  want  to  help  a  friend,  but  when  they   share   they   also   tell   something   about   themselves   and   the   recipient:  “I  found  this  interes-ng,  I  believe  you  will  too.”   Regardless,  the  act  and  ac-on  of  sharing  is  a  form  of  gi_   giving.  Unfortunately,  the  content  is  not  always  posi-ve  as   some   people   share   nega-ves   and   find   some   bizarre   sa-sfac-on  in  doing  so  (inner  circles  will  end  up  bumping   that   person   out   eventually   because   they   prefer   members   who  share  ‘vaccines’  over  ‘viruses’).     What  We  Share   Recently,  The  New  York  Times  put  out  a  piece  of  research   that   iden-fied   six   iden-fiable   types   of   online   sharers.   It   ranged   from   helpful   and   thoughhul   ‘Altruists’   to   crea-ve   ‘Hipsters’   who   eschew   email   to   Selec-ves   who   are   more   careful  and  thoughhul  with  what  they  endorse.       I   have   prepared   my   share   of   similar   studies   through   the   years   and   they   can   be   dangerous   in   over-­‐simplifying   complex   human   personas.   Or   more   importantly,   they   do   not   recognize,   in   the   case   of   this   study,   that   we   are   probably  all  six  types  at  different  -mes.  We  could  take  on   aspects   of   each   depending   on   how   happy   we   are,   how   many  drinks  we  have  consumed,  or  if  we  just  came  back   from  vaca-on  or  about  to  go  on  one.       The   value   in   this   study   is   not   the   personality   types   but   rather  the  type  of  content  that  is  shared.  As  The  New  York   Times   reports,   “we   share   more   content,   from   more   sources,   with   more   people,   more   o_en,   more   quickly.”   I   must   challenge   this   conclusion   (it   is   more   tagline   than   research).  I  agree  that  we  are  sharing  more.  But  at  the  very   beginning  of  this  process  is  the  crea-on  of  content.  And  I   contend   that   the   propor-on   of   actual   new,   innova-ve,   valuable  content  is  shockingly  low  given  the  cacophony  of   ac-vity  and  sharing  going  on.  Granted,  pure  originality  and   innova-on   may   be   unaBainable.   Consider   this   compelling   passage  from  Mark  Twain…   4   “…the   substance,   the   bulk,   the   actual   and   valuable   material  of  all  human  uBerances  —  is  plagiarism.  For   substan-ally   all   ideas   are   second-­‐hand,   consciously   and   unconsciously   drawn   from   a   million   outside   sources…     When   a   great   orator   makes   a   great   speech   you   are   listening   to   ten   centuries   and   ten   thousand   men   —   but  we  call  it  his  speech,  and  really  some  exceedingly   small  por-on  of  it  is  his.     These  object  lessons  should  teach  us  that  ninety-­‐nine   parts  of  all  things  that  proceed  from  the  intellect  are   plagiarisms,  pure  and  simple;  and  the  lesson  ought  to   make  us  modest.”     Modestly   aside,   this   should   provide   huge   instruc-on   for   marketers.   Interes-ngly,   Twain’s   Bri-sh   contemporary   touched   on   this   no-on   of   innova-on   and   originality   too.   Charles   Dickens   summed   it   up   nicely,  “all  compe--on  is  in  its  nature  only  a  furious   plagiarism.”   If   one   wants   to   do   something   that   has   never   been   done   before   …   it   must   come   with   the   sober   realiza-on   that,   at   best,   it   may   not   be   the   individual   ac-ons   that   are   completely   innova-ve…it   will  be  in  the  brilliance  of  the  combina-on  of  ac-ons   that  resonate  and  compel  that  represents  something   fresh  and  new.   The  proporEon  of  actual  new,   innovaEve,  valuable  content  is   shockingly  low  given  the   cacophony  of  acEvity  and   sharing.   When  people  approve,   appreciate  or  relate  to   something  we  do  or  say,  we   feel  good.  Sharing,  it  turns   out,  is  a  process  of  validaEon   in  our  life  choices.  
  5. 5. This  ‘plagiarism’  supports  the  fact  that  sharing  is  largely  redistribu-on.  How  much  value  is  there  in  reTwee-ng  an  ar-cle?   The  real  purpose  of  sharing  is  to  lend  one’s  opinion  to  the  original  idea.  It  is  to  garner  a  reac-on.  It  is  to  provide  deeper   insight.  This  has  huge  implica-ons  for  marke-ng  and  the  content  it  creates.  Content  that  tends  to  take  off  is  made  up  of   one  or  more  of  the  following:     Strives  to  Entertain:  people  appreciate  being  entertained.  They  want  to  have  an  emo-onal  reac-on.  Make  them  laugh,   tug  at  their  heart  strings.  The  agency  Rethink  has  had  great  fun  on  its  work  with  Science  World  with  ads  that  educate,   entertain  and  inform.     Valuable  Informa5on:  no  one  truly  hates  learning.  It  is  just  that  people  learn  in  different  ways.  Insights  delivered  in  clever   ways  resonate.     Exci5ng  Promise:  we  all  like  to  look  forward  to  something.  Content  that  sets  an  interes-ng  expecta-on  is  exci-ng.  Just   make  sure  it  is  followed  up  and  delivered  on.     Suggest  Exclusivity:  at  the  end  of  the  day  branding  is  the  percep-on  of  belonging  to  a  club  of  like-­‐minded  members.   People  want  to  be  on  the  inside  of  something  special.     In  order  to  knit  these  elements  together  I  recommend  that  clients  think  about  “Logic  Emo-onally  Applied  …  Crea-vely  &   Passionately  Delivered”.  It  is  a  mouthful  but  it  has  to  be  as  every  communica-on  must  be  assessed  on  the  logic  of  its   informa-on,  hold  emo-onal  appeal,  work  in  theory  and  prac-ce,  be  crea-ve  in  substance,  and  come  across  as  real  and   authen-c  no  maBer  where  it  appears.  If  one  can  accomplish  this,  the  content  will  stand  a  beBer  chance  of  being  shared   widely  and  appropriately.     5  
  6. 6. 6   What  This  Means  to  Marke1ng   Here  are  four  considera-ons  for  marke-ng  when  we   think  of  human  behavior  and  the  prac-ce  of  sharing.     1.  W.O.M.  S1ll  Rules   There  is  a  simple  fact:  marke-ng  doesn’t  work  unless   people  share.  It  is  not  solely  a  broadcast  medium,  it   never  was.  All  marke-ng  is  meant  to  elicit  a  reac-on,   a  response.  The  most  desired  is  to  have  the  content   shared.   Bill   Bernbach   of   DDB   stated   fi_y   years   ago   that   word   of   mouth   was   the   most   effec-ve   form   of   marke-ng  and  that  remains  true.  This  was  supported   by   Ernest   Dichter’s   research   that   appeared   in   the   Harvard  Business  Review  in  1966.  It  s-ll  holds  amazing   lessons  on  how  word  of  mouth  actually  works  and  it   maps   consistently   to   the   mo-va-ons   that   drive   people  to  share.     What   Dichter   calls   Product   involvement   is   actually   a   great  experience  that  people  are  compelled  to  share   and   they   do   so   unreservedly.   That   experience   is   a   combina-on  of  surprise,  delight,  and  fulfillment.  Self   Involvement  relates  to  being  an  expert  in  some  area   and  dovetails  nicely  with  the  theory  of  self  enrichment   as  a  primary  reason  for  sharing.       The   20%   aBributed   to   Message   Involvement   is   why   we  share  humorous  adver-sements,  the  “message  is   so  humorous  or  informa-ve  that  it  deserves  sharing.”   Almost   single   minded   in   their   purpose,   adver-sing   agencies  focus  on  this  20%  giving  them  only  a  1  in  5   chance  for  success  on  each  and  every  campaign.  This   is  part  of  the  reason  why  most  adver-sing  is  largely   forgeBable   and   unsuccessful.   Dichter   believed   that   the  remaining  20%  of  the  -me,  we  share  to  directly   offer  help  and  demonstrate  friendship.     Ideally,   companies   are   building   the   brand   and   marketers  the  communica-ons  that  aBempt  to  invite,   involve,   and   enlist   people   in   some   aspect   of   all   four   ways  of  involvement  iden-fied  by  Dichter.  This  gives   sharing   a   broader   chance   of   success.   Think   of   the   most  successful  campaigns  in  the  past  few  years  and   you  will  see  they  had  a  strategy  of  addressing  two  or   more  of  these  “reasons  to  share”.     One  that  deserves  such  credit  is  Dove’s  Real  Beauty.  It   is   recognized   for   its   honesty,   insights,   and   efforts   in   changing  both  percep-on  and  behavior.  The  fact  that   it  has  subsequently  received  cri-cism  from  members   of   the   adver-sing   industry   speaks   less   to   its   success   and  more  to  jaded  fac-ons  that  will  never  give  credit   when  due.   How  Word  of  Mouth  Adver-sing  Works   Ernest  Dichter,  1966   +/-­‐  33%  “Product  Involvement”   +/-­‐  24%  “Self  Involvement”   +/-­‐  20%  “Message  Involvement”   +/-­‐  20%  “Other  Involvement”   AdverEsing  agencies  focus  on   only  this  20%  giving  them  a  1   in  5  chance  for  success  on  each   and  every  campaign.  This  is   part  of  the  reason  why  most   adverEsing  is  largely   forgePable  and  unsuccessful.  
  7. 7. Weber  Shandwick’s  2012  report  on  reputa-on  management  showed  that  word  of  mouth  is  s-ll  the  leading  influence   (88%)  when  it  comes  to  impac-ng  consumers’  opinion  of  a  company,  whether  online  or  offline.  Noteworthy  is  the  power   of  online  reviews  (83%)  in  determining  what  people  say  about  companies  and  the  brands  they  make.  These  reviews  are   nearly   as   important   as   word   of   mouth   in   determining   percep-ons   and   impac-ng   public   opinion.   Consumer’s   online   reviews  such  as  those  found  on  recommenda-on  sites  (amazon.com,  TripAdvisor,  Yelp,  TaoBao,  Ctrip  and  Dianping  in   China,  and  Buscapé  and  ReclameAQUI  in  Brazil)  have  fast-­‐become    arbiters  of  brand  trust  and  company  assurance.     2.  Persuasive  Interac1ons   As  this  paper  has  outlined,  we  know  the  reasons  why  people  share,  most  of  which  have  to  do  with  how  it  makes  them   feel.  By  understanding  their  mo-va-ons  and  emo-ons  we  can  connect  and  enlist  them  to  help  market  our  brand.  The   most   effec-ve   marke-ng   takes   a   nuanced,   indirect   approach.   The   focus   is   on   educa-ng,   entertaining,   and   delivering   value  to  the  consumer,  rather  than  a  hard  pitch.  This  works  to  get  them  involved  and  associate  with  the  brand.     What  I  call  Persuasive  Interac-ons  are  predicated  on  this  value  and  demand  compelling  copy  and  delighhul  design  to  pull   it   off.   I   covered   this   in   another   paper   specifically   on   the   topic.   In   it   I   provide   three   examples   of   brands   employing   Persuasive  Interac-ons.  Apple  is  all  about  understanding  the  human  aspect  of  technology,  Canadian  Club  is  meant  to   facilitate  connec-ons,  and  Utah  Tourism  promises  a  new  experience  that  one  may  not  have  considered.  Each  promotes   and  emphasizes  an  interac-on  with  the  brand  that  is  meant  to  engage  and  promote  sharing.  Whether  the  purpose  is   awareness,  considera-on,  trial  or  purchase  –  all  three  brands  en-ce  the  consumer  with  a  promise  of  benefit.  All  require   the  brands  to  insert  themselves  into  the  consumer’s  lives  or  present  themselves  in  such  a  way  that  consumers  invite  the   brands  in.     Part  of  the  process  that  can  help  iden-fy  and  provide  persuasive  interac-ons  is  by  asking  three  fundamental  ques-ons  of   your  brand:            What  do  you  have  that  is  unique?          Who  wants  or  needs  it?          How  do  they  like  to  be  engaged?     It   is   marketers   who   employ   this   simple   construct   (but   ul-mately   challenging   process)   that   build   brands   worthy   of   engagement.  Brands  that  converse,  listen,  and  let  us  talk  about  how  we  and  our  friends  interact  with  the  brand  give  us   greater  reason  to  share.  S-ll,  how  something  catches  on  and  is  shared  is  elusive.  We  can’t  force  content  to  be  a  hit.     3.  Earned  Media   One  advantage  of  sharing  for  marketers  is  “Earned  Media”.  “Earned  Media”  refers  to  the  2nd,  3rd,  4th,  5th  person  who   becomes  your  follower  as  a  result  of  the  1st  follower  sharing  your  content.  Or  it  is  measured  buzz  as  a  result  of  much   talked  about  and  shared  campaign.  It  means  you  have  not  paid  to  have  your  brand  promoted.  Theore-cally,  social  media   can  lower  tradi-onal  marke-ng  costs  but  I  cau-on  gezng  caught  up  measuring  how  much  media  you  earned  and  focus   instead  on  the  direct  sales  that  resulted.  Earned  media  is  analogous  to  the  “eyeball  metric”  at  the  height  of  the  dotcom   bubble…interes-ng  but  ul-mately  not  material.     4.  Brands  Built  Around  People   Marke-ng  has  historically  been  built  around  the  product.  Then  the  web  was  first  organized  around  content  forcing  us  to   search  for  it.  We  are  now  in  the  process  of  organizing  content  around  people  so  brands  find  their  audience  with  more   accuracy.  ‘Brands  built  around  people’  does  not  sound  like  rocket  science  but  marke-ng  has  had  a  hard  -me  gezng  it.       Marketers  have  tons  of  data  to  inform  their  decisions  but  in  many  cases  they  end  up  targe-ng  an  algorithm  and  forget   that  they  are  trying  to  connect  with  very  real  people.  That  is  why  crea-vity  remains  an  integral  and  cri-cal  variable  in  all   marke-ng.  Paul  Adams,  Global  Head  of  Brand  Design  at  Facebook,  says  that  every  crea-ve  idea  must  come  from  a  real   insight  about  social  interac-on.  A  focus  on  ‘crea-ve  social  interac-on  insights’  will  help  you  connect  with  your  desired   consumer.   7  
  8. 8. How  to  Get  Shared   It  is  o_en  bizarre  what  takes  off  and  frustra-ng  when  you  believe  you  have  something  of  value  and  it  goes  nowhere.  So   do  not  assume  what  follows  is  an  absolute  prescrip-on  for  success.  The  value  is  in  thinking  differently  about  how  you   communicate   your   brand.   All   that   follows   is   predicated   on   a   deep   respect   for   your   audience   demonstrated   by   your   thorough  understanding  of  their  goals  and  what  influences  their  behavior.     Keep  Asking  Yourself  These  Three  Ques1ons   Brands   are   not   sta-c   they   change   with   each   and   every   interac-on.   A   strong   marketer   knows   when   to   intervene   and   change  the  conversa-on  or  to  let  the  brand  evolve  on  its  own.  By  asking,  on  an  ongoing  basis,  what  do  we  have  that  is   truly  unique  you  consistently  build  your  case  of  relevance  and  differen-a-on.  Who  wants  or  needs  it  iden-fies  the  most   appropriate  customer  base.  And  how  do  they  like  to  engage  tells  you  where  to  put  your  efforts  and  investment  in  terms   of  communica-ons  channels.     Remember  What  Drives  Sharing   In  this  fast  moving,  insecure  world  people  are  seeking  connec-on  as  they  con-nually  form  their  iden-ty.  They  are  looking   to   belong   to   groups   of   like-­‐minded   people.   And   they   do   all   of   this   to   seek   valida-on   of   their   own   choices.   By   understanding  what  this  means  to  your  brand  you  will  be  five  steps  ahead  of  your  nearest  compe-tor.     ‘What’  is  as  Important  as  ‘Why’   What  people  choose  to  share  is  a  very  personal  statement.  A  long  held  goal  is  to  have  customers  be  an  extension  of  the   marke-ng  department  but  they  will  only  be  advocates  if  the  material  is  beneficial,  authen-c,  and  honest.  All  of  which   should  be  communicated  in  an  entertaining  way  that  clearly  provides  value,  makes  a  promise,  and  I  contend,  suggest   exclusivity.     Challenge  Your  Brand  and  Yourself   Take  a  day  away  from  your  normal  rou-ne.  Walk  around  a  mall,  visit  an  art  gallery  or  museum  (especially  the  gi_  shop),   go  to  the  airport  when  you  do  not  have  a  flight,  really  observe  the  people  around  you  the  next  -me  you  are  downing  a   Ven-  Double  Chocolaty  Chip  Frappuccino.  Insights  into  human  behavior  are  right  there  for  the  picking.  Choose  one  that   excites  you  for  its  poten-al  and  write  up  a  strategic  and  crea-ve  brief  to  capitalize  on  it.  Then  be  gutsy  and  present  it  to   your  boss,  colleagues,  and  peers.  There  are  far  too  many  mediocre  businesses  and  brands  in  the  world  today  …  make  sure   yours  is  not  one.  Do  not  be  a  passive  caretaker  of  your  brand.  All  it  takes  is  a  passion  for  studying  human  behavior.   8   Jeff  Swystun  is  President  &  CMO  of  Swystun  Communica-ons.     A   natural   curiosity   of   human   behaviour   led   Jeff   to   his   20+   year   career   in   branding   and   marke-ng.   And   that   curiosity   has   not   diminished.     Fascinated   with   subjects   like   pricing   and   consumer   percep-on,   why   CMO’s   are   largely   tac-cal,   how   a   strong   brand   can   guide   employee  ac-ons,  and  why  companies  con-nue  to  make  decisions   not  in  the  best  interests  of  their  customers…Jeff  takes  data…turns   it  into  ac-onable  intelligence  and  develops  unique  strategies  and   solu-ons  for  his  clients.     Jeff   works   with   start-­‐ups   to   blue-­‐chips   on   the   intersec-on   of   business   and   brand   strategy.   That   advisory   and   consul-ng   work   informs  his  wri-ng,  speaking  and  media  appearances  on  all  things   branding  and  marke-ng…because  theory  is  only  prac-cal  when  it   is  applied.   AUTHOR  
  9. 9. www.jeffswystun.com S S W Y T U N Communications

×