SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 19
TPS Plant Gap Assessment
Plant                                                                                      Date

                                                                  Current     Past
  Sec #                          Modules
                                                                   Score      Score
   A1      Standardized Work                                         0.0
   A2      Workplace Organization                                    0.0
   A3      Audio & Visual Management                                 0.0
                                                                                          Gap Assessment
   A4      Operation Certification & Support                         0.0
   A5      Internal Pull & Material Conveyance                       0.0
                                                                                            Plant % Score
   A6      External Pull & Transportation System                     0.0
   A7      Central Material Storage                                  0.0                            0.0
   A8      Lean Containers & Packaging                               0.0
   A9      Andon System                                              0.0
   A10     In-Process Quality Verification                           0.0
   A11     Continuous Improvement Process (Kaizen)                   0.0                    PM Estimated
   A12     Problem Solving                                           0.0
   A13     Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)                        0.0                    Plant % Score
   A14     Error Proofing / Poke-Yoke                                0.0
   A15     Quick Changeover (SMED)                                   0.0
  Total                                                              0.0

                                   Goal                Actual

    Days on Hand                                                                TPS Assessor:


                                                                              Plant Assessor:
  Inventory Turns
                                                                              Plant Manager:


   Hours/Vehicle
                                                                                  Division VP:

Accuracy of Assessment: Requires randomized data collection at time of Gap Assessment
Quantifiable Results:     Used to identify progress and opportunity. Do not try to compare plant % scores
Assessment
 nt % Score




  Estimated
nt % Score




% scores
A1 - Standardized Work
For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the
rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only
found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%);
4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                                        Score
         1           Work standards are developed by the people performing the tasks
                     Score Justification
         2           Standardized Work is followed and understood by all operators (each shift).
                     Score Justification
         3           Distance operators travel to install and get parts is within proper pitch (8' - 10' pitch for
                     linear & distance governed by cycle time for continuous line)
                     Score Justification
         4           Material presentation allows ease of access, minimizes space and reduces waste of
                     motion
                     Score Justification
         5           Operator trips to the work bench and material are minimized to two (2) or less per cycle.

                   Score Justification
        6          Operator decisions are minimized to minimize delays or mistakes
                   Score Justification
        7          Handling of non-productive material by operators is minimized
                   Score Justification
        8          Operator movements are not restricted, obstructed or in conflict with other operators

                   Score Justification
        9          Machines, tools and equipment are located to minimize space utilization and waste of
                   motion.
                   Score Justification
        10         Written Standardized Work Instructions are displayed at each operation contains correct
                   information.
                   Score Justification
        11         Machines are equipped with part ejectors or transfer devices to minimize waste of motion.

                   Score Justification
        12         Operator and machines cycle independently.
                   Score Justification
        13         Visual line balance process (i.e. display wall approach) is used to distribute work
                   elements between operators
                   Score Justification
        14         Standardized Work content and development process is periodically assessed to
                   evaluate effectiveness.
                   Score Justification
        15         Indirect Labor work functions use Standardized Work.
                   Score Justification
                                                                                                             Total      0
A2 - Workplace Organization
 For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your
  assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%);
2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%)

     1        Plant Workplace Organization (Five „S‟) guidelines have been developed
              Score Justification
     2        Assessment and review processes is systematized to evaluate compliance to Five 'S' guidelines
              Score Justification
     3        Is there a system in place to actively maintain, correct & improve workplace organization
              Score Justification
     4        Effective TPM housekeeping process is in place on all shifts
              Score Justification
     5        Safety and emergency equipment are located and organized to assure easy access and use
              Score Justification
     6        Five “S” Workplace Organization training is provided and improvement activities are in place
              Score Justification
     7        Is PFEP & PFES utilized to organize Line-Side material storage
              Score Justification
     8        Is the PFEP used to organize Bulk storage
              Score Justification
     9        Manufacturing areas have a clear line of site
              Score Justification
                                                                                                                      Total
dicate the rationale for your
nd in some areas (25%);
here, no exceptions (100%)
                    Score




                     0
A3 - Audio & Visual Management
For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the
rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only
found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%);
4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                                      Score
     1     Flow rack for small material containers are clearly marked with labels to identify the specific
           spot where parts are to be located.
           Score Justification
     2     Central Material Storage locations for bulk material are clearly marked with signs to identify the
           specific spot where parts are to be located.
           Score Justification
     3     All non-conforming material is visually identified.
           Score Justification
     4     Miscellaneous material is visually identified.
           Score Justification
     5     Storage areas, traffic aisles and pedestrian walkways are visually identified.
           Score Justification
     6     Material container safe stacking height have visual indicators and/or instructions displayed.

         Score Justification
   7     Work-In-Process buffer and bank locations and size limitations are visually identified.
         Score Justification
   8     Truck delivery dock receiving times and status are visually displayed.
         Score Justification
   9     All machines are identified and locations visually identified.
         Score Justification
   10    Safety related visual aids provide alerts of potential hazards.
         Score Justification
   11    Total Preventive Maintenance schedules and status are visually displayed on equipment

         Score Justification
   12    Operation Certification display boards contain all necessary information.
         Score Justification
   13    Problem Solving display boards communicate status of continuous improvement activity.
         Score Justification
   14    Visual control standards/policies are established, communicated, understood.
         Score Justification
   15    Quality issues be easily identified
         Score Justification
   16    Material issues be easily identified
         Score Justification
   17    Safety issues be easily identified
         Score Justification
   18    Production issues be easily identified
         Score Justification
19   Operator issues be easily identified
     Score Justification
20   Quality, material, safety, production & operator performances are tracked and posted
     Score Justification
                                                                                            Total   0
A4 - Operation Certification & Support
For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for
your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas
(25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no
exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                                              Score
    1    Operation Certification boards are reviewed for content with employee and are current
         Score Justification
    2    Safety Certification Checklist is posted and maintained on the Operation Certification board.
         Score Justification
    3    Changes are reviewed by employees prior to implementation (layout, job content, work station etc…)

          Score Justification
   4      Employees are empowered to make changes
          Score Justification
   5      Employees are actively involved in continuous improvement activities
          Score Justification
   6      Employees' suggestions are regularly solicited and reviewed.
          Score Justification
                                                                                                                    Total       0
A5 - Internal Pull System & Material Conveyance
For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for
your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas
(25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no
exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                                             Score
    1   All material is replenished using a pull signal initiated by the operator (user).
        Score Justification
    2   Material replenishment is Just-In-Time (Pulled) based on consumption.
        Score Justification
    3   Standardized routes are used to deliver parts and pick up empty containers /dunnage.
        Score Justification
    4   Material presentation allows ease of access, minimizes space and reduces waste of motion
        Score Justification
    5   Material is replenished in build sequence order
        Score Justification
    6   Signaled material is replenished promptly
        Score Justification
    7   Pull systems are derived through PFEP
        Score Justification
    8   All parts are populated in the PFEP
        Score Justification
    9   PFEP is current and updated regularly
        Score Justification
   10 Analysis is completed to justify all WIP (work in process) in order to keep Wip to a minimum level

         Score Justification
  11     Material is stored in no more than one central location and then moves directly to point of use

         Score Justification
                                                                                                                   Total        0
A6 - External Pull & Transportation System
For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the
rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only
found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%);
4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                                    Score
    1     Parts are ordered based on actual consumption.
          Score Justification
    2     Material is received when needed at a specified time (Window Receiving)
          Score Justification
    3     Transportation logistics optimizes pick-ups, deliveries and freight.
          Score Justification
    4     Communication system is established to rapidly provide advance warning or feedback.
          Score Justification
    5     All suppliers provide an ASN
          Score Justification
    6     Vendor received parts are in sequential order
          Score Justification
                                                                                                          Total         0
A7 - Central Material Storage
For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the
rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only
found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%);
4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                                   Score
    1    Centralized Material Storage areas are used to temporarily hold bulk and small containers until
         requested
         Score Justification
    2 Central Material Storage areas are well organized and visually managed.
         Score Justification
    3 Process is in place to assure that Central Material Storage areas is being properly managed
         and maintained.
         Score Justification
    4 Central Material Storage area inventory levels are maintained within controlled limits.
         Score Justification
    5 Out of control situations are corrected in a timely manner (shortages and overages)
         Score Justification
    6 Small containers are stored to assure FIFO flow and are organized in one specific location that
         is visually managed.
         Score Justification
    7 Bulk containers are stored to assure FIFO flow and are organized in one specific location that
         is visually managed.
         Score Justification
    8 Empty returnable bulk containers are stored/ staged within the Central Material Storage area.
         Score Justification
    9 Empty returnable small containers are sorted in a dedicated area.
         Score Justification
   10 Fork lift traffic is restricted to receiving docks and “put away” storage aisles within the Central
         Material Storage areas.
         Score Justification
                                                                                                          Total       0
A8 - Lean Containers & Packaging
For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the
rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere;
1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some
exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                              Score
  1 Packaging business case is completed for all inbound suppliers
       Score Justification
  2 Vendor providing all relevant information including storage location on labels
       Score Justification
  3 Current packaging falls within Safety & Ergonomic guidelines
       Score Justification
                                                                                                    Total        0
A9 - Andon
For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale
for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some
areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere,
no exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                                          Score
   1 Andon System hardware and infrastructure provides status at a glance and line stop capability at a
        fixed position locations.
        Score Justification
   2 Andon display boards provide status at a glance operating system and call status.
        Score Justification
   3 Andon workstation (stack) lights provide status at a glance to quickly locate specific operators
        requesting support.
        Score Justification
   4 Andon cords and buttons are readily accessible at each operation.
        Score Justification
   5 Out of Control Audio signals (music/tones) provide audible signals when Andon system is activated.
        Score Justification
   6 Andon system functionality provides the ability to activate and deactivate FPS (Fixed Position Stop)
        and is fully active
        Score Justification
                                                                                                                Total         0
A10 - In-process Quality Verification
For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the
rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only
found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%);
4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                                   Score
   1 In-process Quality Verifications (QV) stations are in place to perform standardized inspections
       Score Justification
     2 Visual display boards are in place at each QV station to track discrepancies.
       Score Justification
     3 Communication and awareness process is in place to rapidly communicate quality information
       and receive corrective action status.
       Score Justification
     4 Standardized Work Instructions (SWI) are written and used to perform inspections.
       Score Justification
     5 Quality alarm thresholds are established as control limits.
       Score Justification
     6 Shipping Quality Standards (SQS) are defined, written, communicated and enforced.
       Score Justification
     7 Successive (layered) inspections are performed by operators.
       Score Justification
                                                                                                         Total        0
A11 - Continuous Improvement Process (Kaizen)

For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for
your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas
(25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no
exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                                              Score
   1 A structured and standardized process is established to assess work activities and make improvements
       on an on-going basis.
       Score Justification
   2 Teams have been trained and fully understand Continuous Improvement and are responsible for driving
       the process
       Score Justification
   3 Continuous improvement plans, goals and objectives are established and achieved.
       Score Justification
   4 Improvement ideas are replicated.
       Score Justification
   5 Work stations / elements / activities are reviewed for the reduction & elimination of the 7 wastes

       Score Justification
                                                                                                                    Total       0
4-12 Problem Solving (PDCA)
For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate
the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere;
1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some
exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                           Score
   1    Practical Problem Solving (PPS) process is in place and employees are actively engage
        in on-going activities
        Score Justification
   2 Practical Problem Solving is used first as a means of resolving issues before higher
        level tools are applied.
        Score Justification
   3 On-going Practical Problem Solving training is provided to all employees.
        Score Justification
   4 Communication process is in place to transfer information from problem solving
        activities.
        Score Justification
   5 Top Leadership is actively involved in mentoring and conducting regular progress
        reviews.
        Score Justification
   6 Repetitive and recurring problems are tracked and Problem Solving conducted.
        Score Justification
   7 Problem Solving goals and objectives are set for all levels of the organization.
        Score Justification
   8 Category 1 (Do now) action items are complete within required time period
        Score Justification
   9 Category 2 (Do Quick) action items are complete within required time period
        Score Justification
  10 Category 3 (Do Soon) action items are complete within required time period
        Score Justification
                                                                                                   Total      0
A13 - Total Productive Maintenance (TPM)

For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale
for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some
areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere,
no exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                                          Score
   1 TPM process is well defined, written, communicated and performed properly.
       Score Justification
   2 Tracking system is in place to monitor TPM performance based on defined metrics.
       Score Justification
   3 Leadership understands, supports and reviews TPM activities.
       Score Justification
   4 All employees are fully trained TPM process, practices, roles, responsibilities, safety and ergonomic
       requirements.
       Score Justification
   5 Operators perform minor and routine preventive maintenance functions
       Score Justification
   6 Operators' TPM Tasks and responsibilities are written communicated and tracked.
       Score Justification
   7 Skilled Trades perform technical maintenance functions.
       Score Justification
   8 Monthly, weekly and daily Skilled Trades technical TPM inspections and tasks are visually displayed.

    Score Justification
  9 TPM technical History logs are maintained.
    Score Justification
 10 Skilled Trades are fully trained in Predictive Technologies.
    Score Justification
 11 Operators and Skilled Trades have the ability to easily monitor the status of equipment functions,
    pressures, fluids, temperatures, etc.
    Score Justification
 12 TPM activities are continuously evaluated and improvements made.
    Score Justification
                                                                                                               Total       0
A-14 Error Proofing / Poka-yoke
For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for
your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas
(25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no
exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                                            Score
   1 Workers have been trained in the basics of error-proofing and there is a team responsible for
        analyzing production defects and identifying error proofing opportunities
        Score Justification
   2 Error-proofing devices and methods have been implemented or are being developed to eliminate the
        top production defects for each work area in the plant.
        Score Justification
   3 Error-proofing devices and methods have been applied to both manual operations and automated
        process.
        Score Justification
   4 Error-proofing devices that have been installed are monitored for effectiveness, and are maintained
        and kept in sound working condition.
        Score Justification
   5 Analysis has been conducted on parts and components to identify design opportunities to eliminate
        waste and improve productivity.
        Score Justification
   6 Operators can stop the line when a defective unit is found or when they can not complete their
        process according to the SOP
        Score Justification
   7 Manual processes or tasks have been equipped with mechanical checks to aid human judgment
        wherever possible.
        Score Justification
                                                                                                                 Total        0
A15 - Quick Changeover (SMED)
For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the
rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only
found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions
(75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%)
                                                                                                                Score
    1 Change overs are scheduled in advance and communicated so all workers on the team
        know the day‟s change over schedule
        Score Justification
    2 Quick change over teams have received training on change-over time reduction procedures
        and are actively improving change over methods.
        Score Justification
    3 Set-up activities have been subject to detailed process analysis techniques such as motion
        and time study, videotaping to identify waste, etc.
        Score Justification
    4 Change-over time, both internal and external, is visibly tracked at each work station where
        change-overs are performed.
        Score Justification
    5 As new change-over procedures are developed, they are standardized and replicated in
        other areas of the plant.
        Score Justification
    6
        All of the dies, fixtures, tools, fasteners, materials, parts, raw stock, operators, etc. needed
        for the next production run are prepared in advance to reduce change-over times
        Score Justification
    7 All dies, fixtures, and change-over tools are stored in a neat, orderly fashion when not inuse
        and are maintained in good working condition.
        Score Justification
                                                                                                       Total        0

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Tony Zarrella Designs ~ SGO Global Projects Look
Tony Zarrella Designs ~ SGO Global Projects LookTony Zarrella Designs ~ SGO Global Projects Look
Tony Zarrella Designs ~ SGO Global Projects LookTony Zarrella
 
My Powerpoint Presentation Project
My Powerpoint Presentation ProjectMy Powerpoint Presentation Project
My Powerpoint Presentation ProjectComercyn2131
 
Tony Zarrella Designs ~SGO Global Projects Review
Tony Zarrella Designs ~SGO Global Projects ReviewTony Zarrella Designs ~SGO Global Projects Review
Tony Zarrella Designs ~SGO Global Projects ReviewTony Zarrella
 
Converting Measurement Systems From Attribute
Converting Measurement Systems From AttributeConverting Measurement Systems From Attribute
Converting Measurement Systems From Attributejdavidgreen007
 

Viewers also liked (7)

Tony Zarrella Designs ~ SGO Global Projects Look
Tony Zarrella Designs ~ SGO Global Projects LookTony Zarrella Designs ~ SGO Global Projects Look
Tony Zarrella Designs ~ SGO Global Projects Look
 
My Powerpoint Presentation Project
My Powerpoint Presentation ProjectMy Powerpoint Presentation Project
My Powerpoint Presentation Project
 
Consultation & Decision Making
Consultation & Decision MakingConsultation & Decision Making
Consultation & Decision Making
 
Tony Zarrella Designs ~SGO Global Projects Review
Tony Zarrella Designs ~SGO Global Projects ReviewTony Zarrella Designs ~SGO Global Projects Review
Tony Zarrella Designs ~SGO Global Projects Review
 
Converting Measurement Systems From Attribute
Converting Measurement Systems From AttributeConverting Measurement Systems From Attribute
Converting Measurement Systems From Attribute
 
Significance Of Risk
Significance Of RiskSignificance Of Risk
Significance Of Risk
 
Poem - Have You Been There
Poem - Have You Been TherePoem - Have You Been There
Poem - Have You Been There
 

Similar to Plant Gap Assessment

Test result abstraction
Test result abstractionTest result abstraction
Test result abstractionJohan Hoberg
 
The audacity of quality requirement-non functional testing- Aware in BugDay B...
The audacity of quality requirement-non functional testing- Aware in BugDay B...The audacity of quality requirement-non functional testing- Aware in BugDay B...
The audacity of quality requirement-non functional testing- Aware in BugDay B...Prathan Dansakulcharoenkit
 
Chattanooga sme oee down time presentation
Chattanooga sme oee down time presentationChattanooga sme oee down time presentation
Chattanooga sme oee down time presentationJames Mansfield
 
Waste identification and elmination exercise materials todd mc cann rev 23
Waste identification and elmination exercise materials todd mc cann rev 23Waste identification and elmination exercise materials todd mc cann rev 23
Waste identification and elmination exercise materials todd mc cann rev 23leansavant
 
Maximizing the return on your control investment meet the experts sessions pa...
Maximizing the return on your control investment meet the experts sessions pa...Maximizing the return on your control investment meet the experts sessions pa...
Maximizing the return on your control investment meet the experts sessions pa...Emerson Exchange
 
Tba Honky Tonk
Tba Honky TonkTba Honky Tonk
Tba Honky TonkBlock One
 
06 operations and feedback dap-kabel
06   operations and feedback dap-kabel06   operations and feedback dap-kabel
06 operations and feedback dap-kabelDavid Alvarez Palomo
 
Base your initial m&a to ppm, qpm, car
Base your initial m&a to ppm, qpm, carBase your initial m&a to ppm, qpm, car
Base your initial m&a to ppm, qpm, carKobi Vider
 
NG BB 22 Process Measurement
NG BB 22 Process MeasurementNG BB 22 Process Measurement
NG BB 22 Process MeasurementLeanleaders.org
 
ServiceNow Event 15.11.2012 / Beispiele aus Kundenprojekten von Aspediens
ServiceNow Event 15.11.2012 / Beispiele aus Kundenprojekten von AspediensServiceNow Event 15.11.2012 / Beispiele aus Kundenprojekten von Aspediens
ServiceNow Event 15.11.2012 / Beispiele aus Kundenprojekten von AspediensRené Haeberlin
 
ICTSS 2010 - Iterative Software Testing Process for Scrum and Waterfall Projects
ICTSS 2010 - Iterative Software Testing Process for Scrum and Waterfall ProjectsICTSS 2010 - Iterative Software Testing Process for Scrum and Waterfall Projects
ICTSS 2010 - Iterative Software Testing Process for Scrum and Waterfall ProjectsEliane Collins
 
Pulse Design & Delivery Panel
Pulse Design & Delivery PanelPulse Design & Delivery Panel
Pulse Design & Delivery PanelMauricio Godoy
 
6 OEE overview
6 OEE overview6 OEE overview
6 OEE overviewWebseology
 
relayr IOT solutions - industrial performance optimization
relayr IOT solutions - industrial performance optimizationrelayr IOT solutions - industrial performance optimization
relayr IOT solutions - industrial performance optimizationJens Mueller
 
World Class Manufacturing Asset Utilization
World Class Manufacturing Asset UtilizationWorld Class Manufacturing Asset Utilization
World Class Manufacturing Asset Utilizationlksnyder
 
TQM, 5S, Kaizen, Poka-yoke, JIT, KAnban
TQM, 5S, Kaizen, Poka-yoke, JIT, KAnbanTQM, 5S, Kaizen, Poka-yoke, JIT, KAnban
TQM, 5S, Kaizen, Poka-yoke, JIT, KAnbanAkansha Jha
 

Similar to Plant Gap Assessment (20)

BLUE BELT -NIBM.pp
BLUE BELT  -NIBM.ppBLUE BELT  -NIBM.pp
BLUE BELT -NIBM.pp
 
Test result abstraction
Test result abstractionTest result abstraction
Test result abstraction
 
The audacity of quality requirement-non functional testing- Aware in BugDay B...
The audacity of quality requirement-non functional testing- Aware in BugDay B...The audacity of quality requirement-non functional testing- Aware in BugDay B...
The audacity of quality requirement-non functional testing- Aware in BugDay B...
 
Chattanooga sme oee down time presentation
Chattanooga sme oee down time presentationChattanooga sme oee down time presentation
Chattanooga sme oee down time presentation
 
Waste identification and elmination exercise materials todd mc cann rev 23
Waste identification and elmination exercise materials todd mc cann rev 23Waste identification and elmination exercise materials todd mc cann rev 23
Waste identification and elmination exercise materials todd mc cann rev 23
 
Maximizing the return on your control investment meet the experts sessions pa...
Maximizing the return on your control investment meet the experts sessions pa...Maximizing the return on your control investment meet the experts sessions pa...
Maximizing the return on your control investment meet the experts sessions pa...
 
Tpm Diagnostic 4
Tpm Diagnostic              4Tpm Diagnostic              4
Tpm Diagnostic 4
 
Tba Honky Tonk
Tba Honky TonkTba Honky Tonk
Tba Honky Tonk
 
06 operations and feedback dap-kabel
06   operations and feedback dap-kabel06   operations and feedback dap-kabel
06 operations and feedback dap-kabel
 
Base your initial m&a to ppm, qpm, car
Base your initial m&a to ppm, qpm, carBase your initial m&a to ppm, qpm, car
Base your initial m&a to ppm, qpm, car
 
NG BB 22 Process Measurement
NG BB 22 Process MeasurementNG BB 22 Process Measurement
NG BB 22 Process Measurement
 
ServiceNow Event 15.11.2012 / Beispiele aus Kundenprojekten von Aspediens
ServiceNow Event 15.11.2012 / Beispiele aus Kundenprojekten von AspediensServiceNow Event 15.11.2012 / Beispiele aus Kundenprojekten von Aspediens
ServiceNow Event 15.11.2012 / Beispiele aus Kundenprojekten von Aspediens
 
Engineering operations
Engineering operationsEngineering operations
Engineering operations
 
ICTSS 2010 - Iterative Software Testing Process for Scrum and Waterfall Projects
ICTSS 2010 - Iterative Software Testing Process for Scrum and Waterfall ProjectsICTSS 2010 - Iterative Software Testing Process for Scrum and Waterfall Projects
ICTSS 2010 - Iterative Software Testing Process for Scrum and Waterfall Projects
 
ESC - More than Great Software
ESC -  More than Great SoftwareESC -  More than Great Software
ESC - More than Great Software
 
Pulse Design & Delivery Panel
Pulse Design & Delivery PanelPulse Design & Delivery Panel
Pulse Design & Delivery Panel
 
6 OEE overview
6 OEE overview6 OEE overview
6 OEE overview
 
relayr IOT solutions - industrial performance optimization
relayr IOT solutions - industrial performance optimizationrelayr IOT solutions - industrial performance optimization
relayr IOT solutions - industrial performance optimization
 
World Class Manufacturing Asset Utilization
World Class Manufacturing Asset UtilizationWorld Class Manufacturing Asset Utilization
World Class Manufacturing Asset Utilization
 
TQM, 5S, Kaizen, Poka-yoke, JIT, KAnban
TQM, 5S, Kaizen, Poka-yoke, JIT, KAnbanTQM, 5S, Kaizen, Poka-yoke, JIT, KAnban
TQM, 5S, Kaizen, Poka-yoke, JIT, KAnban
 

Plant Gap Assessment

  • 1. TPS Plant Gap Assessment Plant Date Current Past Sec # Modules Score Score A1 Standardized Work 0.0 A2 Workplace Organization 0.0 A3 Audio & Visual Management 0.0 Gap Assessment A4 Operation Certification & Support 0.0 A5 Internal Pull & Material Conveyance 0.0 Plant % Score A6 External Pull & Transportation System 0.0 A7 Central Material Storage 0.0 0.0 A8 Lean Containers & Packaging 0.0 A9 Andon System 0.0 A10 In-Process Quality Verification 0.0 A11 Continuous Improvement Process (Kaizen) 0.0 PM Estimated A12 Problem Solving 0.0 A13 Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) 0.0 Plant % Score A14 Error Proofing / Poke-Yoke 0.0 A15 Quick Changeover (SMED) 0.0 Total 0.0 Goal Actual Days on Hand TPS Assessor: Plant Assessor: Inventory Turns Plant Manager: Hours/Vehicle Division VP: Accuracy of Assessment: Requires randomized data collection at time of Gap Assessment Quantifiable Results: Used to identify progress and opportunity. Do not try to compare plant % scores
  • 2. Assessment nt % Score Estimated nt % Score % scores
  • 3. A1 - Standardized Work For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 Work standards are developed by the people performing the tasks Score Justification 2 Standardized Work is followed and understood by all operators (each shift). Score Justification 3 Distance operators travel to install and get parts is within proper pitch (8' - 10' pitch for linear & distance governed by cycle time for continuous line) Score Justification 4 Material presentation allows ease of access, minimizes space and reduces waste of motion Score Justification 5 Operator trips to the work bench and material are minimized to two (2) or less per cycle. Score Justification 6 Operator decisions are minimized to minimize delays or mistakes Score Justification 7 Handling of non-productive material by operators is minimized Score Justification 8 Operator movements are not restricted, obstructed or in conflict with other operators Score Justification 9 Machines, tools and equipment are located to minimize space utilization and waste of motion. Score Justification 10 Written Standardized Work Instructions are displayed at each operation contains correct information. Score Justification 11 Machines are equipped with part ejectors or transfer devices to minimize waste of motion. Score Justification 12 Operator and machines cycle independently. Score Justification 13 Visual line balance process (i.e. display wall approach) is used to distribute work elements between operators Score Justification 14 Standardized Work content and development process is periodically assessed to evaluate effectiveness. Score Justification 15 Indirect Labor work functions use Standardized Work. Score Justification Total 0
  • 4. A2 - Workplace Organization For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) 1 Plant Workplace Organization (Five „S‟) guidelines have been developed Score Justification 2 Assessment and review processes is systematized to evaluate compliance to Five 'S' guidelines Score Justification 3 Is there a system in place to actively maintain, correct & improve workplace organization Score Justification 4 Effective TPM housekeeping process is in place on all shifts Score Justification 5 Safety and emergency equipment are located and organized to assure easy access and use Score Justification 6 Five “S” Workplace Organization training is provided and improvement activities are in place Score Justification 7 Is PFEP & PFES utilized to organize Line-Side material storage Score Justification 8 Is the PFEP used to organize Bulk storage Score Justification 9 Manufacturing areas have a clear line of site Score Justification Total
  • 5. dicate the rationale for your nd in some areas (25%); here, no exceptions (100%) Score 0
  • 6. A3 - Audio & Visual Management For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 Flow rack for small material containers are clearly marked with labels to identify the specific spot where parts are to be located. Score Justification 2 Central Material Storage locations for bulk material are clearly marked with signs to identify the specific spot where parts are to be located. Score Justification 3 All non-conforming material is visually identified. Score Justification 4 Miscellaneous material is visually identified. Score Justification 5 Storage areas, traffic aisles and pedestrian walkways are visually identified. Score Justification 6 Material container safe stacking height have visual indicators and/or instructions displayed. Score Justification 7 Work-In-Process buffer and bank locations and size limitations are visually identified. Score Justification 8 Truck delivery dock receiving times and status are visually displayed. Score Justification 9 All machines are identified and locations visually identified. Score Justification 10 Safety related visual aids provide alerts of potential hazards. Score Justification 11 Total Preventive Maintenance schedules and status are visually displayed on equipment Score Justification 12 Operation Certification display boards contain all necessary information. Score Justification 13 Problem Solving display boards communicate status of continuous improvement activity. Score Justification 14 Visual control standards/policies are established, communicated, understood. Score Justification 15 Quality issues be easily identified Score Justification 16 Material issues be easily identified Score Justification 17 Safety issues be easily identified Score Justification 18 Production issues be easily identified Score Justification
  • 7. 19 Operator issues be easily identified Score Justification 20 Quality, material, safety, production & operator performances are tracked and posted Score Justification Total 0
  • 8. A4 - Operation Certification & Support For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 Operation Certification boards are reviewed for content with employee and are current Score Justification 2 Safety Certification Checklist is posted and maintained on the Operation Certification board. Score Justification 3 Changes are reviewed by employees prior to implementation (layout, job content, work station etc…) Score Justification 4 Employees are empowered to make changes Score Justification 5 Employees are actively involved in continuous improvement activities Score Justification 6 Employees' suggestions are regularly solicited and reviewed. Score Justification Total 0
  • 9. A5 - Internal Pull System & Material Conveyance For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 All material is replenished using a pull signal initiated by the operator (user). Score Justification 2 Material replenishment is Just-In-Time (Pulled) based on consumption. Score Justification 3 Standardized routes are used to deliver parts and pick up empty containers /dunnage. Score Justification 4 Material presentation allows ease of access, minimizes space and reduces waste of motion Score Justification 5 Material is replenished in build sequence order Score Justification 6 Signaled material is replenished promptly Score Justification 7 Pull systems are derived through PFEP Score Justification 8 All parts are populated in the PFEP Score Justification 9 PFEP is current and updated regularly Score Justification 10 Analysis is completed to justify all WIP (work in process) in order to keep Wip to a minimum level Score Justification 11 Material is stored in no more than one central location and then moves directly to point of use Score Justification Total 0
  • 10. A6 - External Pull & Transportation System For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 Parts are ordered based on actual consumption. Score Justification 2 Material is received when needed at a specified time (Window Receiving) Score Justification 3 Transportation logistics optimizes pick-ups, deliveries and freight. Score Justification 4 Communication system is established to rapidly provide advance warning or feedback. Score Justification 5 All suppliers provide an ASN Score Justification 6 Vendor received parts are in sequential order Score Justification Total 0
  • 11. A7 - Central Material Storage For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 Centralized Material Storage areas are used to temporarily hold bulk and small containers until requested Score Justification 2 Central Material Storage areas are well organized and visually managed. Score Justification 3 Process is in place to assure that Central Material Storage areas is being properly managed and maintained. Score Justification 4 Central Material Storage area inventory levels are maintained within controlled limits. Score Justification 5 Out of control situations are corrected in a timely manner (shortages and overages) Score Justification 6 Small containers are stored to assure FIFO flow and are organized in one specific location that is visually managed. Score Justification 7 Bulk containers are stored to assure FIFO flow and are organized in one specific location that is visually managed. Score Justification 8 Empty returnable bulk containers are stored/ staged within the Central Material Storage area. Score Justification 9 Empty returnable small containers are sorted in a dedicated area. Score Justification 10 Fork lift traffic is restricted to receiving docks and “put away” storage aisles within the Central Material Storage areas. Score Justification Total 0
  • 12. A8 - Lean Containers & Packaging For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 Packaging business case is completed for all inbound suppliers Score Justification 2 Vendor providing all relevant information including storage location on labels Score Justification 3 Current packaging falls within Safety & Ergonomic guidelines Score Justification Total 0
  • 13. A9 - Andon For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 Andon System hardware and infrastructure provides status at a glance and line stop capability at a fixed position locations. Score Justification 2 Andon display boards provide status at a glance operating system and call status. Score Justification 3 Andon workstation (stack) lights provide status at a glance to quickly locate specific operators requesting support. Score Justification 4 Andon cords and buttons are readily accessible at each operation. Score Justification 5 Out of Control Audio signals (music/tones) provide audible signals when Andon system is activated. Score Justification 6 Andon system functionality provides the ability to activate and deactivate FPS (Fixed Position Stop) and is fully active Score Justification Total 0
  • 14. A10 - In-process Quality Verification For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 In-process Quality Verifications (QV) stations are in place to perform standardized inspections Score Justification 2 Visual display boards are in place at each QV station to track discrepancies. Score Justification 3 Communication and awareness process is in place to rapidly communicate quality information and receive corrective action status. Score Justification 4 Standardized Work Instructions (SWI) are written and used to perform inspections. Score Justification 5 Quality alarm thresholds are established as control limits. Score Justification 6 Shipping Quality Standards (SQS) are defined, written, communicated and enforced. Score Justification 7 Successive (layered) inspections are performed by operators. Score Justification Total 0
  • 15. A11 - Continuous Improvement Process (Kaizen) For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 A structured and standardized process is established to assess work activities and make improvements on an on-going basis. Score Justification 2 Teams have been trained and fully understand Continuous Improvement and are responsible for driving the process Score Justification 3 Continuous improvement plans, goals and objectives are established and achieved. Score Justification 4 Improvement ideas are replicated. Score Justification 5 Work stations / elements / activities are reviewed for the reduction & elimination of the 7 wastes Score Justification Total 0
  • 16. 4-12 Problem Solving (PDCA) For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 Practical Problem Solving (PPS) process is in place and employees are actively engage in on-going activities Score Justification 2 Practical Problem Solving is used first as a means of resolving issues before higher level tools are applied. Score Justification 3 On-going Practical Problem Solving training is provided to all employees. Score Justification 4 Communication process is in place to transfer information from problem solving activities. Score Justification 5 Top Leadership is actively involved in mentoring and conducting regular progress reviews. Score Justification 6 Repetitive and recurring problems are tracked and Problem Solving conducted. Score Justification 7 Problem Solving goals and objectives are set for all levels of the organization. Score Justification 8 Category 1 (Do now) action items are complete within required time period Score Justification 9 Category 2 (Do Quick) action items are complete within required time period Score Justification 10 Category 3 (Do Soon) action items are complete within required time period Score Justification Total 0
  • 17. A13 - Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 TPM process is well defined, written, communicated and performed properly. Score Justification 2 Tracking system is in place to monitor TPM performance based on defined metrics. Score Justification 3 Leadership understands, supports and reviews TPM activities. Score Justification 4 All employees are fully trained TPM process, practices, roles, responsibilities, safety and ergonomic requirements. Score Justification 5 Operators perform minor and routine preventive maintenance functions Score Justification 6 Operators' TPM Tasks and responsibilities are written communicated and tracked. Score Justification 7 Skilled Trades perform technical maintenance functions. Score Justification 8 Monthly, weekly and daily Skilled Trades technical TPM inspections and tasks are visually displayed. Score Justification 9 TPM technical History logs are maintained. Score Justification 10 Skilled Trades are fully trained in Predictive Technologies. Score Justification 11 Operators and Skilled Trades have the ability to easily monitor the status of equipment functions, pressures, fluids, temperatures, etc. Score Justification 12 TPM activities are continuously evaluated and improvements made. Score Justification Total 0
  • 18. A-14 Error Proofing / Poka-yoke For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 Workers have been trained in the basics of error-proofing and there is a team responsible for analyzing production defects and identifying error proofing opportunities Score Justification 2 Error-proofing devices and methods have been implemented or are being developed to eliminate the top production defects for each work area in the plant. Score Justification 3 Error-proofing devices and methods have been applied to both manual operations and automated process. Score Justification 4 Error-proofing devices that have been installed are monitored for effectiveness, and are maintained and kept in sound working condition. Score Justification 5 Analysis has been conducted on parts and components to identify design opportunities to eliminate waste and improve productivity. Score Justification 6 Operators can stop the line when a defective unit is found or when they can not complete their process according to the SOP Score Justification 7 Manual processes or tasks have been equipped with mechanical checks to aid human judgment wherever possible. Score Justification Total 0
  • 19. A15 - Quick Changeover (SMED) For each statement, please indicate the score that best represents the observed frequency in the plant and indicate the rationale for your assessment under score justification. For scoring use the following: 0= Not found anywhere; 1=Only found in some areas (25%); 2=Commonly found but not in majority (50%); 3=Very typical, some exceptions (75%); 4=Found everywhere, no exceptions (100%) Score 1 Change overs are scheduled in advance and communicated so all workers on the team know the day‟s change over schedule Score Justification 2 Quick change over teams have received training on change-over time reduction procedures and are actively improving change over methods. Score Justification 3 Set-up activities have been subject to detailed process analysis techniques such as motion and time study, videotaping to identify waste, etc. Score Justification 4 Change-over time, both internal and external, is visibly tracked at each work station where change-overs are performed. Score Justification 5 As new change-over procedures are developed, they are standardized and replicated in other areas of the plant. Score Justification 6 All of the dies, fixtures, tools, fasteners, materials, parts, raw stock, operators, etc. needed for the next production run are prepared in advance to reduce change-over times Score Justification 7 All dies, fixtures, and change-over tools are stored in a neat, orderly fashion when not inuse and are maintained in good working condition. Score Justification Total 0