Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Is there a future for Model Transformation Languages?

384 views

Published on

Results of an online survey on the future of model transformation languages

Published in: Software
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Is there a future for Model Transformation Languages?

  1. 1. Is there a future for MT languages? Jordi Cabot, Loli Burgueño, Sébastien Gérard @softmodeling – jordicabot.com July 2019
  2. 2. panel
  3. 3. To transform, or not to transform, this is the WRONG question - Shakespeare
  4. 4. Why are we having this discussion now?
  5. 5. An LSTM-Based Neural Network Architecture for Model Transformations – Burgueño, Cabot, Gérard, Models’19
  6. 6. https://mdse-book.com/ (Personal) perceptions on MTLS: • Research on MTL falling out of fashion • No new MT languages • Companies do not use them Let’s have this discussion as a community: True? Why? What next?
  7. 7. What have people said? (63 answers)
  8. 8. Average Expertise = 10.61 years
  9. 9. Simple Mature, standard
  10. 10. If you don't use any MT Language, can you give at least a couple of reasons why not? complex setup and IDE-specific dependencies transformation engines are mostly research prototypes No real debugging Hard to hire staff poor documentation ATL when simple transformations, Java when complex transformations complex to understand learning curve Practitioners without a background on MDE are skeptical performanceNot adapted to the web
  11. 11. Too much expectations BUT MTL concepts made their way into GPLs
  12. 12. Thoughts on the future of MTLs Lack support from easily comparable, strong, empirical metrics Scalability is a must An experienced tool developer may be quicker with an MT API than by learning a new language, and less dependent on proprietary tools Non-existence of a homogeneous community Little standardization of useful languages Undoubtedly needed and useful Need better showcase to industryMTs suffers from the misconception of modelling MTL are important. But we have to break out from classical transformation problems and approaches Not mature for industrial applications Stupendous and I hope they will be even more used MT may have longevity in Data Model Transformation We won’t be able to design a system without working with models due to its complexity MTs are overrated and over-researched
  13. 13. What do YOU say?: Is There a future for MTLs??? (and if so, what does this future look like?)
  14. 14. • Were you surprised by these results? • Do you think we have answers for the criticisms? • If they have been solved already, how to convince the industry? Is it a marketing or a technical problem? (e.g. MDE vs low-code) • Do we need a Yet Another MTL? Or we just stick to Java? • What should we do as a MT community (if anything)? • Do you plan to continue doing research on MTLs? • Should we just move to the next big thing?

×