Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

The Decision: Build New vs The Cloud

2,502 views

Published on

This presentation was developed for the 2011 AFCOM Data Center World conference as a case study. It outlines the the decision by one college to not build a new data center and instead develop a strategy to leverage off premise solutions including the Cloud.

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

The Decision: Build New vs The Cloud

  1. 1. THE DECISION:BUILD NEW vs. THE CLOUD <br />CS04 Case Study <br />Data Center World 2011<br />Jerry Bishop, CIO SunGard Higher Education<br />Chippewa Valley Technical College<br />This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License<br />
  2. 2. Synopsys<br />Phase 1: Renovation & Move<br />Phase 2: Future Requirements<br />Phase 3: Evaluating Cloud<br />Phase 4: The Decision<br />Phase 5: Strategy for Future State<br />Wrap-up<br />Outline<br />
  3. 3. Renovations displacing current data center<br />Move to colocation site for ~18mo. to assess<br />Requirement: New Level 7+ to Level 8 <br />Build-out: $980,000 to $1,200,000<br />Operating costs: $55,500 / yr<br />Breakeven point: 35 Years<br />85% Virtualized with all on SAN<br />Consolidated infrastructure<br />Applications moving to Cloud <br />Synopsys<br />
  4. 4. PHASE 1RENOVATION & MOVE<br />
  5. 5. Built 1970<br />1450 sq ft<br />Raised floor<br />15 Racks<br />2 CRACs<br />1 UPS<br />No Generator<br />SPOF’s<br />Original Level 6 Data Center<br />
  6. 6. Displaces the existing computer room<br />LIBRARY RENOVATION<br />
  7. 7. New Learning Space<br />
  8. 8. Rapid needs assessment<br />Surveyed anticipated future college needs<br />Reviewed likely government and private providers<br />Issued RFP for 18 months contract w/ options<br />Selected local colo provider<br />Built new MDF on campus<br />Relocated over New Year’s weekend<br />Total time: 5 months<br />Colocation<br />
  9. 9. PHASE 2FUTURE REQUIREMENTS<br />
  10. 10. Hired a Data Center Design-Build Firm<br />Requirements Analysis<br />Existing Level 6 capabilities and uses<br />Projected future requirements<br />Determine Reliability Level (Level 7+ to 8)<br />Developed Design-Build Specs<br />Design Power, Cooling, Fire Suppression, Security<br />Develop Budget Estimates<br />Construction Costs: $980,000 to $1,200,000<br />Annual Operating Costs: $55,500 / yr<br />Design-Build Analysis<br />
  11. 11. 525 ft2<br />Computer<br />Room<br />Space Projections<br />
  12. 12. 100 ft2<br /> Setup Area<br />240 ft2<br /> Utility Area<br />Space Projections<br />
  13. 13. PHASE 3EVALUATING CLOUD<br />
  14. 14. “The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing”<br />On-demand self-service provisioning<br />Broad network access <br />Resource pooling<br />Rapid elasticity, sometime automatically<br />Measured service<br />Cloud Computing Characteristics<br />
  15. 15. Software as a Service (SaaS)<br />Provider app’s running on cloud infrastructure<br />Consumer may control application configuration<br />Can include Integration as a Service solutions<br />Platform as a Service (PaaS)<br />Consumer controls apps but not the O/S<br />Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)<br />Consumer controls O/S, apps, storage, network but not underlying infrastructure<br />Cloud Service Models (NIST)<br />
  16. 16. History & comfort with sourcing non-core services including IT<br />Colocation operational & political success <br />Ending IT managed services in 2011<br />Strong interest in replacing ERP system<br />General and IT budget constraints<br />Data center not strategic<br />Campus space at premium<br />IT staffing a challenge for critical skills<br />Institutional Assessment<br />
  17. 17. Already Delivering Apps to other schools<br />Community or Government Cloud Options<br />State of Wisconsin Data Center<br />Distance, limited services, budget uncertainty<br />Regional Government Data Center<br />CINC Community Area Network<br />19 member organizations<br />Expanding to 275 miles of fiber<br />Building 1350 sq mi WiMax<br />UW Eau Claire Shared Data Center<br />Similar requirements but no capital<br />Hybrid Cloud Assessment<br />
  18. 18. Servers virtualized at 85%<br />Solaris 80% at 4:1 ratio<br />Windows 85% at 6:1 ratio enterprise wide<br />Main ESX clusters at 15:1 in data center<br />Storage 98% SAN (50TB)<br />Remote site back-ups<br />Citrix for desktop & remote access - 85 apps<br />FY12 refreshing ESX, SAN, & Back-up<br />Private fiber >10Gbps to 7 of 10 locations<br />Infrastructure Assessment<br />
  19. 19. More likely than not all future applications would run as a service not on premise?<br />381 Applications in portfolio<br />Down from 521<br />185 are instructional apps used in courses<br />Web site redesign eliminates ~25 more apps<br />Early success with ASP and SaaS<br />Enterprise apps remain the main barrier<br />Banner ERP system<br />BlackBoard CMS/LMS<br />Applications Assessment<br />
  20. 20. Student Services<br />
  21. 21. Academic Functions<br />O<br />O<br />
  22. 22. Administrative Functions<br />O<br />
  23. 23. Operations Functions<br />
  24. 24. IT Service Functions<br />
  25. 25. Applications Portfolio Summary<br />
  26. 26. PHASE 3THE DECISION<br />
  27. 27. Do NOT Build New Data Center<br />Not Strategic to College’s Mission<br />35yr Breakeven Too Long<br />Other Capital and Space Needs are Priorities<br />Do NOT Build Shared Data Center w/ UWEC<br />Extend Colocation for 12 months<br />Execute Strategy<br />Simplification, Consolidation & Preserving Options<br />The Decision<br />
  28. 28. PHASE 3STRATEGY for FUTURE STATE<br />
  29. 29. Consolidated (Converged) Infrastructure<br />CISCO UCS – Reducing footprint by 50%<br />Hybrid Cloud – Private, Public maybe Community<br />IaaS for Refresh Options on Storage and Back-Ups<br />Applications Strategy<br />ERP & LMS – SaaS or hosted options<br />Evaluate point solutions over big ERP suites<br />SaaS or Hosted preferred for anything new<br />Integration as a Service for on-premise to cloud<br />Desktop Strategy - MS BPOS or Google Apps<br />Citrix from the cloud<br />Strategy – Simplify & Options<br />
  30. 30. WRAP-UP<br />Thank-You & Questions<br />The Higher Ed CIO<br />This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License<br />

×