Lightroom Workflow Intro
•2 likes•4,221 views
Report
Share
Download to read offline
An introduction to basic workflow concepts, and why to use Lightroom over Aperture.
More Related Content
Featured
Featured(20)
Lightroom Workflow Intro
- 1. Workflow 2.0 Introduction to Adobe LIghtroom Monday, March 2, 2009
- 2. Workflow 2.0 Introduction to Adobe LIghtroom adobe.com/lightroom and Please go to: download the lightroom trial. If you don’t have an Adobe ID, User: donewmedia@gmail.com Pass: supho Monday, March 2, 2009
- 3. (I’m not too conceded but…) Monday, March 2, 2009
- 4. (I’m not too conceded but…) None of you are like me. Monday, March 2, 2009
- 5. Monday, March 2, 2009
- 6. workflow application. Not a Monday, March 2, 2009
- 7. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 8. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 9. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 10. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 11. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 12. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 13. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 14. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 15. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 16. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 17. Your Options: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 18. Workflow 1.0 Workflow 1.5 Workflow 2.0 Monday, March 2, 2009
- 19. Workflow 1.0 Workflow 1.5 Workflow 2.0 Monday, March 2, 2009
- 20. Workflow 1.0 Workflow 1.5 Workflow 2.0 Monday, March 2, 2009
- 21. Workflow 1.0 Workflow 1.5 Workflow 2.0 Monday, March 2, 2009
- 22. What we’re gonna miss from Aperture Monday, March 2, 2009
- 23. Paneled interface Monday, March 2, 2009
- 24. The loupe tool Monday, March 2, 2009
- 25. OS integration Monday, March 2, 2009
- 26. Backups are easy Monday, March 2, 2009
- 27. Already said it, but: stacks! Monday, March 2, 2009
- 28. Light Table Monday, March 2, 2009
- 29. It’s Apple, It’s Shiny Monday, March 2, 2009
- 30. So, why lightroom? Monday, March 2, 2009
- 31. ‘Cause: Monday, March 2, 2009
- 32. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 33. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 34. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 35. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 36. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 37. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 38. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 39. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 40. ‘Cause: √ Importing √ Stacks √ √ Output tools √ Culling tools √ (barely) Speed √ Localized Corrections √ Developing tools √ Metadata Monday, March 2, 2009
- 41. Monday, March 2, 2009
- 42. Monday, March 2, 2009
Editor's Notes
- How many of you: Shoot Nikon? Use a Mac? Shoot RAW? Are anal about file names? Are in love with metadata? Would rather do things the correct way, then the fast way?
- Who doesn’t love photoshop? – it’s great for editing your photos and doing PIXEL MANIPULATION
- Who doesn’t love photoshop? – it’s great for editing your photos and doing PIXEL MANIPULATION
- Who doesn’t love photoshop? – it’s great for editing your photos and doing PIXEL MANIPULATION
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Photo Mechanic: it’s common, but it doesn’t do WORKFLOW, no adv culling features Bridge: SLOW, doesn’t really do workflow, no culluing Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Capture One: Nearly there, but relies very heavily on folders, creates lots of new files Bibble: nice, but not too standardized, doesn’t do xmp ACDsee: It’s a file browser first, interface is clunky, editing tools are not fluid Expression Media: It’s from iView Media pro, which was a file browser that specialized in metadata. It’s a MS product. For MS’s recent “I’m a PC” commercials, MS used Apple products instead of their own ‘expression’ line.
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!
- Output: LR: web, printing, slideshow; Ap: Books, light table Culling: Survey Mode! Speed: 2.0 helps AP a lot, but LR is still a bit quicker (plus, 64-bit!) Loc. Cor.: Ap, plugin only Dev Tools: Curves!, it’s just better Metadata: Keywording a bit better in LR, xmp!