CXTech Landscape Across Asia by Alan Quayle, with the support of hundreds of people across CXTech
The main updated include:
Added another 200+ companies (bottoms-up analysis)
Expanded list of global VoIP providers and CXTech companies
Expanded list of master agents and distributors (mainly North America, international TBC)
Added channel and telco contributions to the revenues
Updated projections to include global recession for H2 2020 and H1 2021.
Most collaboration providers are not impacted – slight acceleration for some
Call center is initially not impacted, slight downturn in H1 2021
Usage based businesses impacted in H2 2020, e.g. CPaaS.
Will update downturn model as company results get announced through 2020.
Added regionalization of revenues (simple Americas, EMEA, Asia split)
Below I show the gap for Asia on CXTech earnings for CPaaS. In the presentation you can also see the gap for enterprise VoIP, particularly for innovative smaller providers. Put simply, revenue earned in Asia is going to North America.
Hence why for TADSummit Asia 2020 we're trying to help close the gap through:
Encourage the Rise of Open Source Telecom Software across Asia
Open Source Telecom Software Landscape
Sessions from Asterisk, freePBX, Kamailio, OpenSIPS, and dratchio
The Universal Telecom API in Asia
An evolutionary outlook on the role of IT, by Sebastian Schumann, Technology & Innovation at Deutsche Telekom
Improving the Experience of Realizing CXTech Use Cases, by Marten Schoenherr, CEO/Founder at Automat Berlin GmbH
Panel discussion including:
Mark White, Tech M&A, Investor, Founder, Board Member, Startup.
Craig Richards, Vice President, Products and Engineering at Apigate
Dinesh Saparamadu, Founder of Applova Inc., hSenid Group of Companies & PeoplesHR | Entrepreneur | HR & Mobile Industry Thought Leader
Lots of programmable communications innovator interviews from across Asia, and an interview with David Curran from Dublin on the importance of hackathons.
My hope is TADSummit Asia will help Asian entrepreneurs close the revenue gap in CXTech.
2. We’ve Reached an Equitable Situation in
Global Telecom Revenues
Telecom services: Fixed telephony and broadband. Mobile voice, messaging, and broadband. Total is about $1.35T.
34%
33%
33%
Global Distribution of Telecom Revenues
Americas APAC EMEA
10. Bottom-up Build of Market Size
Yes, I know these growth figures are conservative compared to your business plan, but reality!
Public CPaaS 2018 Revenue2019 Growth2020 Growth2021 Growth2022 Growth SIP Trunking Core API / Aggregation / Routing (voice and messaging) / minutes and messages / IVR / VASBusiness Messaging / Marketing2FA / Identity / Authenitcation / Fraud ManagementIoT CCaaS (Customer Comms / Collab - voice & video / chat)UCaaS (Employee Comms / Collab / messaging / IVR)Employees Simple Description
2600Hz / Kazoo 10 30% 15% 15% 25% 10% 70% 20% 40 Refocused on CPaaS / UCaaS enabler with Kazoo
46elks 8 25% 10% 20% 20% 100% 8 Swedish CPaaS
Aculab 25 25% 15% 20% 20% 40% 20% 10% 15% 15% 80 Long established enterprise comms provider
AeriaLink 5 45% 15% 25% 40% 60% 40% 20 Landline messaging
Amazon 180 75% 40% 65% 60% 50% 20% 20% 10% 145
Simple Notifiction Service, MFA, resell of Twilio Voice (but likely
to roll its oen in time), plus voice services like Poly and Chime
Apeiron (bought 2019 Konatel) 2 40% 10% 25% 35% 100% 3 Couple of years old cpaas, based in CA
Apifonica (Dzinga) 10 35% 10% 20% 35% 15% 65% 20% 25 European CPaaS - focused on services
aql 20 35% 30% 35% 35% 60% 20% 10% 10% 80 Long established wholesale telecoms provider
babl.biz 10 35% 30% 35% 35% 20% 60% 20% 20 UK-based CPaaS
Bandwidth 165 30% 20% 25% 25% 20% 75% 5% 400 NAR-focused voice/messaging API (911 focus)
BrightLink 20 40% 30% 35% 35% 10% 20% 35% 35% 30 Cloud based PBX / CPaaS
Callfire 25 40% 30% 35% 35% 100% 90 Voice/SMS customer comms
Callr 5 35% 15% 35% 35% 15% 75% 10% 8 Paris-based CPaaS since 2010
Cequens 45 35% 15% 35% 35% 10% 30% 45% 5% 5% 5% 125 MEA focus
Cloudonix 1 100% 20% 50% 60% 100% Cloud based Asterisk platform
CM 25 20% 10% 15% 15% 40% 50% 10% 100 Dutch Business Messaging / CPaaS
CYDNE 15 35% 25% 30% 30% 65% 25% 10% 80 Notification services (voice and messaging)
Dreambox 4 25% 0% 15% 25% 50% 50% 20 CPaaS and cloud contact center (currently focused on chatbots)
Exotel 15 35% 15% 35% 35% 100% 120 India based CPaaS
Flowroute (West) 15 35% 25% 35% 30% 40% 60% 50 NAR-focused SIP Trunking provider
FoneDynamics 5 25% 10% 20% 25% 100% 20 Australian CPaaS bought by Uniti Wireless
hoiio 25 65% 65% 60% 55% 20% 60% 20% 45 Singapore based CPaaS - expanding in Asia
Infobip 400 10% 5% 10% 10% 25% 65% 10% 1800 Original A2P SMS provider, based in Crotia
Intelepeer 170 25% 20% 25% 25% 20% 30% 15% 10% 15% 10% 240
CPaaS products complementary to UC/CC solutions, channel
sales model, expanding internationally
11. CPaaS Market
Sizing
IDC Market size estimate is $2B in
2017, $11B in 2022
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Public CPaaS Revenues
SIP Trunking Core API Business Messaging
Authenitcation IoT CCaaS
UCaaS Total
12. CPaaS Market:
By Region
Company is
HQed
Asia is significantly
underrepresented in CPaaS.
Growth is anticipated to be capped
by acquisitions from US companies,
e.g. Wavecell and 8X8.
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
CPaaS Revenue by Region (of Company)
Global Americas EMEA APAC
13. CPaaS Market:
By Where
revenue is
earned
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
CPaaS Revenue by Region Earned
Global Americas EMEA APAC
Asia is catching the US slightly
faster than EMEA in CPaaS
revenues earned.
14. But how to close the gap?
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
CPaaS Revenue by Region (of Company)
Global Americas EMEA APAC
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
CPaaS Revenue by Region Earned
Global Americas EMEA APAC
1. Talent is everywhere – so that’s not an excuse
2. CPaaS is no longer that interesting to VCs – so conservative Asian VCs in not an excuse
3. Open Source will commoditize CPaaS (Wazo and Dratchio) – so technology barrier is not an
excuse, though adoption of open source is lower in Asia than in other regions
4. Perception in Asia that I do not see in Western markets that “telcos still own telecoms”
16. Bottom-up Build of Market Size
Yes, I know these growth figures are conservative compared to your business plan, but reality!
Business Messaging 2018 Revenue2019 Growth2020 Growth2021 Growth2022 Growth
Partial list, there's 100+ more, many geographically focused on regions / cities
3C Interactive (IMIMobile) 24 25% 25% 25% 35% 60% 40% 100 SMS shortcode business messaging
ActiveCampaign 100 25% 25% 25% 25% 100% 375
Email marketing, expanded into business messaging and
automation
AirMovil 5 45% 25% 35% 45% 100% 15 Mexico based, business messaging projects
aldeamo 12 35% 25% 25% 35% 60% 40% 50 Latim America based business messaging / aggregation
Avidmobile 8 15% 15% 5% 15% 20% 80% 10 Business messaging with reseller model
avochato 4 65% 25% 35% 65% 100% 18 Business messaging for CRM platforms
Callloop 4 35% 25% 25% 35% 100% 5 Business messaging and calling, not sure of current status
Clickatel 60 20% 10% 5% 20% 20% 60% 5% 15% 140 Business Messaging (less CPaaS focus)
Clicksend 5 50% 25% 25% 50% 100% 18 Oz based aggregator for business messaging
ComAPI 18 25% 15% 15% 25% 70% 30% 45
UK based business messaging aggregator - bought 2017 by
dotdigital (adding services beyong aggregation)
Digital Media Interactive (Parateum) 5 25% 15% 15% 25% 80% 20% 20 Aggregator for business messaging
enageSPARK 3 20% 10% 10% 20% 100% 12 Philippines based business communications workflows
EZTexting 25 35% 15% 20% 35% 100% 110 US based business messaging
gupshup 50 50% 25% 25% 50% 40% 60% 120 India based business messaging raised 40+M
HeyWire (SFDC) 55 30% 15% 15% 30% 30% 70% 100 Business Messaging within SFDC
Hustle 20 25% 15% 15% 25% 100% 80 US based business messaging focused on p2p comms
IMIMobile 170 30% 10% 15% 25% 20% 80% 2000 India based technology and business messaging provider
ImpactMobile 10 20% 10% 15% 20% 50% 50% 20 Business messaging, based in Canada, division of IMIMobile
Kirusa 5 10% 0% 10% 10% 80% 20%
Primarily a telco platform provider with a small enterprise
messaging business (note figures are for enterprise revenue
NOT telco)
Lime Cellular 25 35% 15% 20% 35% 100% 45 Business messaging reseller / provider
MacroKiosk 30 25% 15% 15% 25% 20% 60% 20% 60 KL based enterprise messaging / payments
Mediaburst / ClockworkSMS 20 45% 20% 20% 45% 100% 15 Manchester based SMS API / Aggregator
MessageMedia 8 20% 10% 10% 20% 30% 60% 10% 40 Australian Business Messaging
21. UC / Enterprise Phone System Market Sizing
• Analysis has closed the gap on top-down predictions, UC market is approx. $33B in 2021!
• Of small players approx 80% use open source telecom software, with Asterisk being the
dominate project. Average age of companies is 6.5 years old.
• For small players 50% of revenue is from cloud/hosted services – hybrid matters
• For large players 30% is from cloud/hosted because legacy revenues tend to be on-prem
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Enterprise Voice / UC
Total Large Small
22. Regional Distribution of UC / Phone System Revenues
• Regional distributions is similar to other top-down analysis – its an established
market
• However, Asia is under-performing with respect to innovative smaller VoIP providers
in the market
• Perception in Asia that I do not see in Western markets that “telcos own telecoms”
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Regional Distribution Total Enterprise VoIP
Global Americas EMEA APAC
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Regional Distribution of Small Providers
Global Americas EMEA APAC
23. What Should Asia Do?
• Encourage the Rise of Open Source Telecom Software across Asia
– Open Source Telecom Software Landscape
– Sessions from Asterisk, freePBX, Kamailio, OpenSIPS, and dratchio
• The Universal Telecom API in Asia
– An evolutionary outlook on the role of IT, by Sebastian Schumann, Technology & Innovation at Deutsche
Telekom
– Improving the Experience of Realizing CXTech Use Cases, by Marten Schoenherr, CEO/Founder at
Automat Berlin GmbH
– Panel discussion including:
• Mark White, Tech M&A, Investor, Founder, Board Member, Startup.
• Craig Richards, Vice President, Products and Engineering at Apigate
• Dinesh Saparamadu, Founder of Applova Inc., hSenid Group of Companies & PeoplesHR | Entrepreneur | HR &
Mobile Industry Thought Leader
• Lots of programmable communications innovator interviews from across Asia, and an
interview with David Curran from Dublin on the importance of hackathons
24. Any Questions?
• Go to the TADSummit weblog on this presentation for a public
discussion: http://blog.tadsummit.com/2020/05/4/cxtech-
landscape/
• Contact me directly alan@alanquayle.com
Editor's Notes
Revision - 4th August 2020
The CXTech Framework breaks out the main components:
Communication Enabling Software and Platforms / Open Source Projects - these are the building blocks of the whole of CXTech. See slide 3 for companies.
Public CPaaS is defined as requiring PSTN and optionally IP based: voice, messaging and often DIDs. Available through an on-demand or B2B public APIs. See slide 4 for companies.
Business messaging focused on SMS (MMS/RCS), Whatsapp and other IP messaging for marketing automation. See slide 5 for companies.
In-app communications is voice, video and messaging that is generally IP only, not breaking out to the PSTN. See slide 6 for companies.
There is a massive tool box of automation technologies, like bots, conversational interface technology, speech rec, analytics, workflow management, that lower costs and improve experiences in employee and customer communications. This is not studied in this rev of the analysis.
We break the Enterprise Communications Solutions into 2 broad categories, which reflects the two main buying groups in an enterprise: Employee Communications and Customer Communications. See Slide 7 for a partial list of Employee Communication companies. Customer Communications is for a later rev of the analysis.
And last but definitely not least are the Enterprise Channels that package, configure, and customize ICT solutions for businesses in the cities / countries of operations. This is not studied in this rev of the analysis.
Boxes in green are studied in this revision of the analysis.
Revision - 8th August 2019
These are the companies building the telecom application services, application frameworks, management GUIs, testing and control systems of CXTech. Its a small group of open source software experts revolutionizing the whole communications / telecoms industry.
There are also a group of companies building CPaaS / UCaaS / CCaaS enablers for other companies to build and offer services. For example, hSenid Mobile supplies the technology and processes for IdeaMart, one of the longest running and most successful telco CPaaS. Apigate, Kandy, Telenity, Telestax, MITTO, IMIMobile and 2600Hz also fall into this category. See associated Excel sheet for categorization and revenue breakdown – all my guestimates.
See associated Excel sheet for categorization and revenue breakdown – all my guestimates.
Also check out the business messaging slide for CPaaS you consider missing. It’s not a clear divide between the 2 categories of Public CPaaS and Business Messaging, many in the business messaging segment are customers of the CPaaS segment. And some of the CPaaS providers like thinQ, Bandwidth, Sinch are suppliers to other CPaaS based on region and communications type. The division between CPaaS and business messaging is based on business focus, that is where the majority of the revenue or business effort is spent.
See associated Excel sheet for categorization and revenue breakdown – all are my guestimates.
These are just a few of the providers, there are lots to add, some focus on addressable markets limited to just one cities. The reason is the focus on customer relationship to filter out all the technology and options, and simply work with their customers to improve customer and employee experiences.
See associated Excel sheet for names of companies – I’m working on revenue breakdowns and further categorization. We’re just scratching the surface of this space in this slide. I’ve not included all the legacy audio conference providers, rather the richer video, whiteboard, online collab tools.
LHS of slide is focused on telephony, RHS on messaging and collab. With the big companies in the middle that cover both.
Key Points:
There are LOADS of messaging platforms, looking at the customer logos shows enterprises are using multiple messaging platforms. Also messaging is embedded in lots of enterprise tools, like project management, I’ve not included those companies in the landscape. Messaging and collaboration are not a one supplier wins all for many enterprises.
While telephony for employee communications does appear to be generally a single supplier win, and the telephony win does not correlate to a messaging win. Hence, diversity in supply of employee communications will remain the norm.
Cloud based telephony is maturing, yet there are still lots of premise and hosted based offers being bought today. Many VAR focus on user experience simplicity, reselling the core platform of an established UC vendor, and they focus on augmenting with devices and UE that meet specific vertical needs.
Slack is not the only game in town for enterprise messaging, there are tens of other providers, some focused on verticals, or security, or simplicity, or business process features built-in.
Telephony has a simpler enterprise use case A calls B for a voice conversation (with recording, analytics and integrations being options), messaging and collaboration have many more use cases and hence diversity in supply.
For employee communications, anything that tries to be unifying across all communications is likely to result in an overly complex experience. Sometimes a calculator is good enough, sometime an excel sheet, and sometimes a specialized modelling tool is required. The modelling tool can do everything the others can, but most people can not use it. Messaging and collaboration use cases are too varied for a single unified solution – UCaaS is a misnomer.
Use as an example of how the sizes where determined