Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Does open science matter at proposal evaluation

1,163 views

Published on

"Winning Horizon2020 with Open Science" (doi 10.5281/zenodo.12247) brief was integrated in Marie Curie ETNs and Societal Challenge 2 & 5 proposals in order to test whether Open Science can give applicants a competitive edge. These slides offer preliminary extracts from 2015-2016 Evaluation Summary Reports (ESR).

Published in: Science
  • Be the first to comment

Does open science matter at proposal evaluation

  1. 1. Does #OpenScience matter at Proposal Evaluation? Ivo Grigorov, DTU Nordic Open Science and Research Forum, 22 November 2016
  2. 2. … but at grassroots level …
  3. 3. Could proposal evaluation be an Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247 effective incentive
  4. 4. Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247 We reduced FOSTER partners know-how into 15 pages of advice …
  5. 5. Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
  6. 6. Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247 … aiming to enhance the standard Research Lifecycle from this …
  7. 7. IDEA & PROPOSAL TEST DATA MODEL CODE PUBLISHEDUCATE & TRAIN RESEARCH LIFECYCLE Peer- review Impact Factor (IF) “Research Cycle” adapted from Tenopir et al., (2011) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101 http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
  8. 8. Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247 … into this …
  9. 9. IDEA & PROPOSAL TEST DATA MODEL CODE Gold & Green OA EDUCATE & TRAIN REF Evaluation, Impact Factor (IF), Societal Impact, Open Innovation CO-CREATION Open Notebook Science RDM, Archive & Publish Curate & Publish OS key part of concept Open Educational Resources RESEARCH LIFECYCLE www.fosteropenscience.eu PUBLISH
  10. 10. Advisory Board, May 2015 … then we took it around the EU!
  11. 11. Does #OpenScience matter at proposal evaluation Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
  12. 12. “Weakness: highly focused on academic activities, and lacks an advanced communication strategy” Excellence Impact Implementation “data accessibility is unclear!” “data storage & access not considered” “Open Access to scientific knowledge is an essential principle in the project, but there is not enough information on data management or IPR.” Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
  13. 13. “Strengths: extensive dissemination of data to the scientific community (open access, databases)” “outreach activities to a broad audience” “research software is freely available” “The communication plan is very effective. Training for communication and open access procedures are especially welcome.” Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247 Impact:
  14. 14. “new knowledge delivered to SMEs by depositing research outputs in OpenAIRE2020 and EMODNet” “Data management is based on INSPIRE Directive that will favour open access for environmental data and open publications” “web-based decision support system (with open code) to make it available to a wide, but targeted audience” Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247 Impact:
  15. 15. @ fosterscience # fosteropenscience ivgr @ aqua.dtu.dk Good Luck with Horizon2020! Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247

×