Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Life found in our upper atmosphere, maybe it is from deep
space?
A team of Uk scientists believe that they have discovered...
plausible that any the team is in error, or that this is simply another case of microscopic life showing
up in an unusual ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Life found in our upper atmosphere, maybe it is from deep space?

158 views

Published on

A team of Uk scientists believe that they have discovered organisms in earth’s environment that or...

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Life found in our upper atmosphere, maybe it is from deep space?

  1. 1. Life found in our upper atmosphere, maybe it is from deep space? A team of Uk scientists believe that they have discovered organisms in earth’s environment that originate from space. As difficult as that may be to believe, Professor Milton Wainwright, the team’s boss, insists that this is certainly the case. The team, out of the University of Sheffield, found the tiny organisms (misleadingly known as ‘bugs’ by quite a lot of persistent journalists) living on a probe balloon that was sent 16.7 miles into our environment throughout last month’s Perseids meteor shower. In keeping with Professor Wainwright, the microscopic creatures could not have been carried into the stratosphere on the balloon. He said, "A lot of people will assume that those biological particles must have just drifted up into the stratosphere from Earth, but it is usually accepted a particle of the size found can't be lifted from Earth to heights of, as an example, 27km. Really the only known exemption is by a violent volcanic eruption, none of which occurred within three years of their sampling trip." Wainwright maintains that the only salient end is these organisms originated from space. He went on to mention that “life isn’t restricted to this planet and it almost definitely did not originate here” However, not everyone is so persuaded. Dr. Seth Shostak, senior astronomer with the SETI (Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence) project said, “I’m very skeptical. This claim has been made before, and dismissed as earthly contamination." The team responds to that by saying they were thorough as they readied the balloon before the experiments begun. Though, they do acknowledge that there could be an strange method for those organisms to reach such altitudes. It must also be renowned that microbal organisms discovered within the 1980’s and 1990’s and named ‘extremophiles’ shocked the scientific community by living in environments that will instantaneously kill the bulk of life on earth. These creatures have always been observed living deep under Glacial ice or 1900 feet below the ocean floor. In March of this year, Ronnie Glud, a biogeochemist in the Southern Danish University in Odense, Denmark was quoted as saying "Inside the most isolated, unfriendly places, you can actually have higher motion than their surroundings," and that "You'll find microbes in all places - they're enormously compliant to surroundings, and stay alive where they are," so it seems more
  2. 2. plausible that any the team is in error, or that this is simply another case of microscopic life showing up in an unusual place. Moreover, it isn’t the 1st time this unique team has come under fire for stating such claims, either. Back in January of this year, astrobiologist Dr. Chandra Wickramasinghe reported that ‘fossils’ found inside a Sri Lankan meteorite were testimony ofextraterrestrial life, an assertion that is widely criticized by the scientific community. Other scientists have complained that there basically is not enough proof to make a great claim, as the theory this valuable would require a large body of evidence to prove its authority. What that claims to a reporter is that microbes can live basically anywhere and that it simply is not good science to jump to wild conclusions like aliens when a more plausible explanation is most certainly present. Science should not be subject to such wild leaps of elaborate. Imagination is a great aid to science, but it really is not a science in and of by itself. Sadly, Dr. Wainwright and his team appear to be seeing what they want to observe. Want to find the original post look here

×