SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 30
Download to read offline
MTCP Program
                 Six Sigma Introduction
                     15th June 2009
    Topic: Six Sigma Introduction

    Malaysia Productivity Corporation
    (Statutory Body under MITI)
    P.O Box 64, Jalan Sultan,
    46904 Petaling Jaya
    Website: www mpc gov my
             www.mpc.gov.my

    Consultant: Mohd Azlan Abas
    Tel: +6 012 308 7421
    Email: Mohdazlan.abas@gmail.com

                                    1 of 60




Why Does One Need a Quality Initiative?
   Meet customer expectations for higher quality
   Provide a competitive differentiator in the service market
   Build greater pride and satisfaction in the team
   Drive other key goals: productivity and growth

       Tangible Costs                         Intangible Costs
        - Inspection                          - Expediting
        - Scrap                               - Lost Customers
        - Rework                              - Longer Cycles
        - Warranty                            - Lower Morale


                        Enormous opportunity




                                    2 of 60




                                                                 1
Six Sigma Provides focus on
    Critical to Quality (CTQ) Metrics in businesses
  Vital Few CTQs that apply to all Customers:
    – Responsiveness
    – Marketplace Competitiveness
             p         p
    – On-time, Accurate and Complete Deliverables
    – Product/Service Technical Performance

  Key CTQs for a company:
    – Post Sales Issue resolution
    – Service Delivery Span
    – Contract Fulfillment
    – Parts Fulfillment
    – Pricing
    – Customer Escalation Cycle Time

                                     3 of 60




    Six Sigma Provides focus on
    Critical to Quality (CTQ) Metrics in businesses

           Practical
                                                          Traditional
           Problem
                                                           Approach
Define Measure
D fi & M
                              Statistical
                               Problem
                       Analyze
                                                   Statistical
                                                    Solution
      6Quality Methodology
     Systematic Approach Focusing                p
                                               Improve
     on Statistically Significant Root
                                                                   Practical
          Causes & Solutions                                       Solution

     Driving Customer & Shareholder Benefits                       Control



                                     4 of 60




                                                                               2
What is Six Sigma?
Process to reduce defects per million opportunities
                                                                B    DPMO
    • From current levels to “Six Sigma”
    • “Sigma” is standard deviation from the ideal              2    308,537
    • Can be applied to all business functions
      Can be applied to all business functions                  3     66,807
                                                                      66 807
         » Manufacturing, Products, Transactions
         » Service, Sales Support
                                                                4     6,210
Quantitative methodology                                        5       233
    • Uses measurements and scientific process                  6        3.4
 3 to 6
       ... 20 000 times improvement ...
           20,000
                     ... A true quantum leap




                                      5 of 60




                        Process = Hose

   Four Important Properties:
   (1) Centering
   (2) Spread
   (3) Shape
   (4) Stability Over Time




                                      10.5       10
                                                          9.5
                                  Y axis = Weight (lbs)


                                      6 of 60




                                                                               3
Six Sigma Concept
Every Human Activity Has Variability...

                               Mean
      Lower                                               Upper
    Customer
    C t                                                 Customer
                                                        C t
   Specification                                       Specification




                                        1                      p(defect)


                             Target
    Reducing variability is the essence of six sigma
                            7 of 60




                                      Mean              Specification
What is Sigma?                                             Limit
                                                                 Some
                                                               Chance of
                                                                Failure
                                             1


        The hi h th
        Th higher the                            3
      number (Z) in front
     of the sigma symbol
     the lower the chance
        of producing a                                        Much Less
                                                              Chance of
             defect                                            Failure
                                           1



                                                  6
     Reducing variation is the key to reducing defects

                            8 of 60




                                                                            4
Reducing Variation is the Key
                                                                            What GE sees
   Order by Order Delivery Times
             Starting Point   After Project

                  28              29
  (Days)          18               6
                   6              10                                13 17
                  23              12
                   5               4
                   8              10                     What Customers feel
                  16              13                           Mean
                  19              10
                                                              Big Change
                                                                   h
                  33              20
                  11              13                           30% improvement
                                                              Variance
Average            17              13                    No Significant Change

                                              9 of 60




                      Reference: Six Sigma Performance
                3.8 Sigma                                             Six Sigma
                99% Good                                           99.99966% Good
• 20,000 lost articles of mail per                         • Seven articles lost per hour
  hour

• Unsafe drinking water for                                • One unsafe minute every
  almost 15 minutes each day                                 seven months

• 5,000 incorrect surgical                                 • 1.7 incorrect operations per
  operations per week                                        week

• Two short or long landings at                            • One short or long landing
  most major airports each day                               every five years

• 200,000 wrong drug                                       • 68 wrong prescriptions per
  prescriptions each year                                    year

                                              10 of 60




                                                                                            5
Key Terms: Process or Activity
       Process X’s
        or Factors                                                    Outputs

         X1
                                                                                Y1
         X2
         X3
                                    PROCESS                                     Y2
                                                                                Y3
         X4


     For any given product, procedure or transaction, there are inputs, a
     process, and outputs. You will need to measure the outputs to quantify how
     well you satisfy a CTQ requirement; the output measures are Ys To
                                                                   Ys.
     change the process performance however, you must find and change the
     critical Xs.
                          Find and control the critical X’s


                                      11 of 60




                               The People
                                     GM Global
                                      Quality

                                                                       Master
Quality Leaders
Q
                                                                     Black Belts
                                   Greenbelts
                                Apply Six Sigma tools
                                 and methodology in                 Develop tools and
Help choose projects,
                                   everyday work.                   teaching materials.
interview Black Belt
candidates, tie projects                                            Conduct training and
to business needs.                                                  communication
Remove barriers and               Six Sigma
                                        g                           sessions. Mentor
drive Six Sigma into the          Black Belts                       Black Belts and their
culture of their functions.                                         projects.
                              Project leaders, change agents,
                              expert application of tools, mentor
                              Green Belts and their projects.


                                      12 of 60




                                                                                            6
DMAIC
                        Objectives                                Step A

   • DEFINE Phase Purpose
      – Step A: Customer & Project CTQs
      – Step B: Team Charter (4‐Blocker)
      – St C Th Hi h L l P
        Step C: The High Level Process Map 
                                       M
   • Change Acceleration Process (CAP)
      – E = Q x A
      – The Model
      – Key CAP tools: 
         • ARMI
         • GRPI
         • Threat/Opportunity Matrix
         • In/Out of the Frame

                            13 of 60




                                                                 DMAIC
                Customer & Project CTQs                           Step A
CTQ Definition and CTQ Elements

                              Product/
                                               Cycle Time to Deliver
                              Process               Drawings
                            Characteristic

                                              From Notice To Proceed To
Customer                         Measure      Delivery Time of Drawings
                                                       (Weeks)
  Need
                  CTQ
 On Time                           Target             13 Weeks
 Delivery

                            Specification/
                             Tolerance              15 Weeks
                              Limit(s)

A performance standard translates customer needs into
  quantified requirements for our product or process

                            14 of 60




                                                                           7
A Project Team Charter                                                                                              DMAIC
                                                                                                                                                                 Step B
 Business Case (Problem statement)                                                  Potential Issues/ Speed Inhibitors

•Multilin has a small market share in Indonesia                                     • Data collection 
compared to the more established European relays 
manufacturer. Need to improve our service to                                        Project Team

customer and increase sales in Indonesia.  
customer and increase sales in Indonesia
                                                                                    Name                          Org.                      Role          % Ded.

Goal Statement
                                                                               Vince Tullo       Manager         Champion
                                                                               Stuward Thompson Manager                 Champion
•To increase sales figures in Indonesia in 2004 to  
                                                                               W.N. Yew          Sales                 Leader          70%
$1.8M.                                                                         Daniel Sutando Sales leader Member                       10%
                                                                               W.Y. Tan          Sr App Engr Member                     10%
• To ensure relevant projects are pursued and to                               Steven Tao        BB                  Member         5%
improve the market coverage for distributors, EPCs, 
and end users.                                                                  Milestones
                                                                                   esto es                                             Owner              Date
 Scope Included:
                                                                               Project Charter Approved         YWN /Tao        Apr 30
 • Multilin relays, Indonesia Market                                           Measure /Baseline                      YWN/Tan          July 30
                                                                               Analyze                                         WN/Tao                      Aug 30
 Deliverables                                                                  Improve                                       YWN/Tao                       Sept 30
                                                                               Control                                          YWN/Tao                    Oct 30
Order growth for 2004                                                          Close                                              YWN/Tao                  Nov 30
                                                                15 of 60




                                                                                                                                                             DMAIC
                                                      WIRE MILL PROJECT                                                                                          Step C

                           2         3      4         5             6      7            8           9            10        11
                                                                                                                                       12
                                            correct   wire on   cold       change     wire           correct     wire on       wire
                                            size      pulley    weld       reel       speed          size        pulley        build
                                                                stand                 # feet per                               on
                                            out of    damaged                         spool          out of      damaged       reel
                                            round     pulley                                         round       pulley



                           1
                                                      measureme
                                                      nt accuracy
                                                                                                                 measureme
                                                                                                                 nt accuracy                          Xs
                                                                                               proper die
                                                                                                                                                   Input Legend
                                                                                               lubrication
                                                                                               l b i ti
                                                                                               direction of
                                                                                                                                                      critical
                                                                                               lubricant
                                                                                               flow
                                                                                                pH level                                              controllabl
                                                                                                                                                      e
                           13    14         15        16        17        18          19            20         21          22          23             noise
                                                                correct             accurat
                                                                                    e              fat level
                                                                size
                                                                                    tension
                                                                                    setting        pressure
                                                                out of                             temperature
                                                                round
  Legend
 1) Start of shift             13)   Wire size change
 2) Change final capstan felt 14)    Stop machine
 3) Check for excessive        15)   Replace dies (as required)
 slivers/fines
 4) Check size
 5) Check surface quality
                               16)
                               17)
                               18)
                                 )
                                     Restring new setup
                                     Check wire size
                                     Attach wire to spool
                                                     p
                                                                                                                        CTQ’s
                                                                                                                       A) Diameter
                                                                                                                       B) Out-of-round
                                                                                                                        )
                                                                                                                                                           Ys
 6) Check stand supply
                               19)   Set dancer air pressure                                                           C) Loops
 7) Is reel spooled
                                                                                                                       D) Tangles
 8) Connect wire to new reel 20)     Crack valve
                               21)   Check lubricant flow                                                              E) Pinchouts
 9) Check size
                               22)   Start spooler                                                                     F) Surface
 10) Check surface quality                                                                                             quality
 11) Check for acceptable spool23)   Start capstan
 build
 12) Store in enamel room




                                                                16 of 60




                                                                                                                                                                          8
Objectives                           DMAIC

  • Introduction to Measure
      - Measure Phase Deliverables
      - Using Statistics to Solve Problems
  • Measure Step 1: Select CTQs
      - Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Process
         Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Process
      - Process Mapping
      - Failure Modes & Effect Analysis (FMEA)
      - Pareto Chart
      - Cause & Effect Diagram
  • Measure Step 2: Define Performance Standards
      - Performance Standard / Defect
                                 /
      - Basic Nature of Data
  • Measure Step 3: Measurement System
      • Introduction to Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA)


                                    17 of 60




                                                                     DMAIC
                       The Statistical Problem
                           Goal: Find the Relationship
              Process - A        Y = f(X1, …, Xn)   Process - B



                                                                 
                                

                                                            
       Shape of the Curves CHARACTERIZES the Process
          p
              Process B is Better than Process A*
* Assumes same scale




                                    18 of 60




                                                                             9
DMAIC
                                                                                Select CTQ Characteristics                                                                                                                Step 1
        Quality Function Deployment (QFD)                                                                                                                                           Process Mapping (Flow Chart)


                                                        Functional Requirements
                                                                (HOW’s)
                Requirements
                  Customer

                  (WHAT’s)




                                                      Map Customer Needs to
                                                          Potential Hows



            Identify Critical Few - Resource Planning                                                                                                                                        Map “Information” Flow
                                                                                                                                                                                             Identify All Touch Points




                                                                                                                                                         19 of 60




                                                                                                                                                                                                                          DMAIC
                                                                                Select CTQ Characteristics                                                                                                                Step 1
                                                                              Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (FMEA)
                  Process Step                                  Potential                                          Potential                           SE               Potential   O    Current    D   R      Action     Owner
                       OR                                        Failure                                        Failure Effects                         V                Causes     C    Controls   E   P   Recommended
                  Part Number                                     Mode                                                                                                              C               T   N




        Anticipate Potential Failures in Process / Products & Develop Proactive Mitigation Plans
                                                         D e fe c ts b y O p e ra tio n
                                                                                                                                                                                        20% of causes account for
         1 00 0 0 00
                                                                                                                                                                    100                    80% of the problem
                                                                                                                                                                    80
                                                                                                                                                                          Percent
Count




                                                                                                                                                                    60
           50 0 0 00
                                                                                                                                                                    40


                                                                                                                                                                    20


                     0                                                                                                                                              0
                                                        W                                                                                                       W
                                           PE        LO                                       P                                                            LO
                                        HA        EF       AT             1               INS               2           P       H          E3            RF
        D e fe c t              CH
                                     .S
                                             ST
                                               AG       CO      HO
                                                                     LE
                                                                              X -R
                                                                                     AY           HO
                                                                                                       LE         INS       BE
                                                                                                                              NC
                                                                                                                                    HO
                                                                                                                                       L
                                                                                                                                                LW
                                                                                                                                                   A   TE
                           MA             AL                                                                                               A
                                      FIN                                                                                              FIN
           C o unt       2 7 6 1 4 41 3 0 8 4 41 2 7 2 0 41 0 2 5 9 91 0 1 4 9 1 9 3 3 5 3 8 2 8 6 1 5 4 1 1 0 4 9 6 4 3 3 6 7 0 7
         P erce nt            2 6 .2     1 2 .4     1 2 .1       9 .7       9 .6      8 .8      7 .9      5 .1      4 .7      3 .5
         C um %               2 6 .2     3 8 .6     5 0 .6     6 0 .4     7 0 .0    7 8 .8    8 6 .7    9 1 .8    9 6 .5 1 0 0 .0




                                                                                                                                                         20 of 60




                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   10
Performance Standards Objectives                                 DMAIC
                                                                                      Step 2

• Determine the Performance Standard
• Define a Defect
     - What are the customer’s acceptance criteria for the part/product or process?

• Established How to Measure the Quality of the Part /
  Product or Process
     - Where are the data coming from?
     - How do you measure the process?
     - What are the units of measure?
     - Is it a discrete or continuous measure?

• Gained Consensus On the Performance Standard




                                     21 of 60




                                                                                  DMAIC
   What’s Performance Standards                                                       Step 2

• Are Requirement(s) or Specification(s) Imposed by the
  Customer on a Specific CTQ
• Translate Customer Needs into Measurable
  Characteristic
    – Have Clear Operational Definition, i.e. Specifies What to Measure, How to
      Measure & Collect the Data
    – Specifies Target or Mean
    – Impose Specification Limits
    – Have Clear Defect Definition

 CTQs Quantified – Everybody on Same Page




                                     22 of 60




                                                                                               11
DMAIC
More Performance Standards . . .                                                         Step 2

                                      Target

          Good Product




   Defective Product                  Tolerance               Defective Product
                                    = USL - LSL


                          LSL                        USL
                    Lower Spec Limit           Upper Spec Limit

Specification limits are set in order to divide customer satisfaction from customer
disappointment. While the exact limits may not be explicitly stated by the customer
(and captured in Step 1), their specific values come from what the customer defines as
a defect.


                                        23 of 60




                                                                                         DMAIC
     The Basic Nature of Data                                                            Step 2

      • Continuous Data
           - Characterizes a product or process feature in terms of its size, weight,
             volts, time, or currency
           - The measurement scale can be meaningfully divided into finer and finer
             increments of precision
           - Distributions: To apply the normal distribution, one must necessarily use
             continuous data


      • Discrete Data
           - Counts the frequency of occurrence: e.g., the number of times something
             happens or fails to happen
           - Is not capable of being meaningfully subdivided into more precise
             increments
           - The validity of inferences made from discrete data are highly dependent
             upon the number of observations. The sample size required to characterize
             a discrete product or process feature is much larger than that required
             when continuous data is used.
           - Distributions: The Poisson and binomial models are used in connection
             with this type of data


                                        24 of 60




                                                                                                  12
DMAIC
 Making Data Driven Decisions                                                                               Step 3

• Six Sigma is all about reducing defects for the customer.  Fewer defect result in 
  a more satisfied customer.
• The project team must decide what needs to be done to improve quality for 
  the customer based on actual data – measurements of the product or process.
• The measurement system (gauge) used to collect the project data has to be
  The measurement system (gauge) used to collect the project data has to be 
  sufficiently good to allow the project team to make the correct decisions.
• A measurement system must deliver data that accurately represents the 
  project or product. It is defective if it does not.
• The Six Sigma project team becomes the customer for the measurement 
  process. There are many CTQs a project team must consider when evaluating 
  the quality of a gauge…

If the gauge isn’t good enough for the needs of the project,
   th        i ’t       d      h f th      d f th      j t
  you have to fix it (using DMAIC) before you can move on!



                                                        25 of 60




           The Measurement Process                                                                         DMAIC
                                                                                                            Step 3
  In order to improve a product or process, we must measure it. We have
  submit the output from that process to a second measurement process.
                           Parts
                         (Example)                                                  As a result, all of our
                                                                                    observations of the original
  Inputs
            Process
              ocess
                      Outputs                                                       p
                                                                                    process are distorted byy
                                                                                    errors in our measurement
                                     Inputs




                                                                                    system. We need to make
                                                                                    sure these error don’t
                                                                                    dominate our view of the
                                                                                    process!
                                                                   • Observations
                           Measurement        Outputs              • Measurements
                             Process                               • Data




                                                        26 of 60




                                                                                                                     13
DMAIC
               Accuracy (Bias) ‐ Shift in the Average                                                       Step 3


   Inputs            Process   Outputs                     Inputs        Measurement   Outputs
                                                                           Process




Actual(Part) +                     Meas. System =                          Observed(Total)


                           True Avg                           Bias                               Obs. Avg




                          Measurement System Bias –
                     Determined through “Calibration Study”



                                                27 of 60




                                                                                                         DMAIC
  Measurement System Precision                                                                              Step 3



            Inputs        Process     Outputs                       Inputs     Measurement   Outputs
                                                                                 Process



            Product Variability                      Measurement                     Total Variability
                 (part)                               Variability                   (Observed total)


               actual(part) + meas. system = observed(total)




                        Measurement System Variability –
                        Investigated through “R&R Study”

                                                28 of 60




                                                                                                                     14
DMAIC
                  Accuracy vs. Precision                                                               Step 3


                                                             x xx
                                                             x xx
                                                              x xx                             Accurate?
      Accurate?                                               x                          Yes               No
Yes               No
                                   x xx
                                   xx
                                    x xx
                                                                                                Precise?
      Precise?                      x                                                    Yes               No
Yes               No



Measured Value
                                                                                               The True Value
                                   x
                               x    x x
                                                                                               Accurate?
      Accurate?                  x x     x                                               Yes
Yes               No
                              x      x                           x
                                                                                                           No

                                x x    x                                 x       x              Precise?
      Precise?                      x                                x                   Yes               No
Yes               No                                         x
                                                                 x
                                                                             x
                                                                                     x
                                                                 x
  Accuracy: the difference between the observed average and the truth.
  Precision: the amount of inconsistency between measurements.



                                             29 of 60




                       Characteristics of a Measurement System                                        DMAIC
                                                                                                       Step 3
  • Accuracy          : Differences between observed average measurement 
                         and a standard.
  •   Resolution      : The smallest scale of the measurement.
  •   Stability       : Do measurements change with time?
  •   Linearityy      : Is the measurement proportional to the magnitude (size, 
                                               p p                g       ( ,
                         weight, etc) of the sample.
  •   Precision       : Noise of the measurements.
          – Repeatability: variation when one person repeatedly measures the 
              same unit with the same measuring equipment.  Also called Equipment 
              Variation (EV).
          – Reproducibility: variation when two or more people measure the same 
              unit with the same measuring equipment.  Also called Appraiser 
              Variation (AV).
              Variation (AV)




                                             30 of 60




                                                                                                                15
WHAT IS MINITAB?
• Statistical software package
• Has many of the tools needed to successfully analyze data with
  rigor
     - Graphs
     - Statistical tools for data analysis
     - Six Sigma Reports
•   Descriptive Statistics
•   Gage R & R
•   Capability Analysis (ZST/ZLT)
•   Graphing - Many Types! (Try them all!)
•   Pareto, Fish bone
•   Hypothesis Testing
•   Product & Process Six Sigma Reports
•   Generation of Test Plans for Designed Experiments
•   Analysis of DOE results
•   Statistical Process Control

 A Great Toolbox for Six Sigma Projects!
                                     31 of 60




                           What does Minitab Look Like?
    Menu Bars: For
    quick access to
    common
    commands.


    Session Window:
    Shows Minitab text
    output (One only is
    present)


    Worksheet
    Window: Kind of
    like an Excel
    worksheet (at
    least one is
    always present). A
    tool is available to
    manage multiple
    worksheets.




                                     32 of 60




                                                                   16
Objectives                                                DMAIC


   • Calculate baseline capability of the process using either 
     continuous or discrete data
   • Statistically define the improvement goals
                 y              p         g
   • Generated a list of Statistically Significant Xs based on 
     analysis of historical data
   • Identified which Xs to further investigate in the Improve 
     phase
   • Gained consensus with the project team on the list of Xs for
     Gained consensus with the project team on the list of Xs for 
     investigation




                                       33 of 60




                                                                                          DMAIC
                 Step 4: Establish Process Capability                                     Step 4
                              USL


                                                      Y = f (X   1     . . . X n)


The variation inherent to any dependent variable (Y) is determined by
the variations inherent to each of the independent variables. (X)

                 Poor                                     Excellent
           Process Capability                         Process Capability
 Very High                  Very High          Very Low                    Very Low
Probability of             Probability of    Probability of              Probability of
  Defects                    Defects            Defects                     Defects



         LSL              USL                        LSL                 USL
                 Low Z                                        High Z

                 Z is a Measure of Process Capability
                                       34 of 60




                                                                                                   17
Step 5: Define Performance Objective
    p(x)                     Benchmark
                                                  Entitlement
                                                                       Baseline



                                                                        Defects


Benchmark: World-Class performance

            Entitlement: The level of performance a business should be able to
                         achieve given the investments already made

                                             Baseline: The current level of performance


    Benchmarking Sets the Ultimate Goal, while Baselining
           Takes Current Measurements to Monitor a Process

                                      35 of 60




                                                                                  DMAIC
Step 6: Identify Sources of Variation                                             Step 6


                                                                  Y= f (X)
To get results, should we focus our behavior on the Y or X ?

n   Y                                        n   X1 . . . Xn
n   Dependent                                n   Independent
n   Output                                   n   Input-Process
n   Effect                                   n   Cause
n   Symptom                                  n   Problem
n   Monitor                                  n   Control

    Historically the Y, … with Six Sigma the Xs


                                      36 of 60




                                                                                           18
Process Capability                                                   DMAIC
                                                                                                          Step 4
Determining Process Capability (Steps 1 – 4)

1.    Identify Requirements on the Customer or Internal Y

      These are often expressed quantitatively as target values plus
      specification limits. - Anything “outside of the specification limits” is a defect.

                                            Target Value
                                               g
  (lower specification limit) LSL                                       USL (upper specification limit)
                           90                         100                      110
             Defects                                                                  Defects


                                              Tolerance

2. Determine Process Distribution
      We expect variation in our process.
                                                                      Mean = 102
      The Y’s measured on a large number
           Ys                                                             = 5.0
      of parts will form a distribution. For
      simplicity, we’ll assume that they form
      a normal distribution with a known
      mean and standard deviation.
                                                                85       90          95     100   105     110   115




                                                  37 of 60




                                     Process Capability                                                   DMAIC
                                                                                                          Step 4
3. Superimpose your process distribution on to the target
   and specification limits.

                                              Target            Mean = 102
                                                                    = 5.0
                                 LSL                                 USL
Probability of                                                                              Probability of
  a Defect                                                                                    a Defect


                          85        90       95       100       105      110         115

 4.    Apply some Basic Statistics.
       1. We can relate our distribution to the standardized normal distribution.
           •    The total area under the standard curve = 1 (or 100%)
       2. If we can determine the Z l corresponding to a specification li i
       2            d       i    h Z-value              di           ifi i limit,
           then we can calculate the area beyond that limit (out of specification)
           •    The area beyond a given specification limit is the fraction of the
                population that is defective wrt that limit.




                                                  38 of 60




                                                                                                                      19
Process Capability                                                                              DMAIC
                                                                                                                                       Step 4
 Putting it all together (Steps 1 – 4)

      Total Area Outside of Specification Limits = (0.055 + 0.008) = 0.063
                    6.3% of what we produce is defective


         90  102                        Notice also that our                                        110  102
Z(LSL)            2.4                                                                     Z(USL)              1.6
             5                         process is not centered                                            5
Probability  0.008                         on the target                                   Probability  0.055

                                                  Target                 Mean = 102
                                                                             = 5.0
                          LSL                                                         USL




                  85         90              95           100            105              110           115


                                                   39 of 60




               Single-
               Single-Tail Z Table (values from 0.00 to 3.99)
                        Z             0        0.01       0.02       0.03        0.04        0.05       0.06       0.07       0.08        0.09
                        0          0.5000     0.4960     0.4920     0.4880      0.4840      0.4801     0.4761     0.4721     0.4681      0.4641
                       0.1         0.4602     0.4562     0.4522     0.4483      0.4443      0.4404     0.4364     0.4325     0.4286      0.4247
                       0.2         0.4207     0.4168     0.4129     0.4090      0.4052      0.4013     0.3974     0.3936     0.3897      0.3859
                       0.3         0.3821     0.3783     0.3745     0.3707      0.3669      0.3632     0.3594     0.3557     0.3520      0.3483
                       0.4         0.3446     0.3409     0.3372     0.3336      0.3300      0.3264     0.3228     0.3192     0.3156      0.3121
                       0.5         0.3085     0.3050     0.3015     0.2981      0.2946      0.2912     0.2877     0.2843     0.2810      0.2776
                       0.6         0.2743     0.2709     0.2676     0.2643      0.2611      0.2578     0.2546     0.2514     0.2483      0.2451
           z           0.7         0.2420     0.2389     0.2358     0.2327      0.2296      0.2266     0.2236     0.2206     0.2177      0.2148
                       0.8         0.2119     0.2090     0.2061     0.2033      0.2005      0.1977     0.1949     0.1922     0.1894      0.1867
                       0.9         0.1841     0.1814     0.1788     0.1762      0.1736      0.1711     0.1685     0.1660     0.1635      0.1611
                        1          0.1587     0.1562     0.1539     0.1515      0.1492      0.1469     0.1446     0.1423     0.1401      0.1379
                       1.1         0.1357     0.1335     0.1314     0.1292      0.1271      0.1251     0.1230     0.1210     0.1190      0.1170
                       1.2         0.1151     0.1131     0.1112     0.1093      0.1075      0.1056     0.1038     0.1020     0.1003      0.0985
                       1.3         0.0968     0.0951     0.0934     0.0918      0.0901      0.0885     0.0869     0.0853     0.0838      0.0823
Calculates the         1.4         0.0808     0.0793     0.0778     0.0764      0.0749      0.0735     0.0721     0.0708     0.0694      0.0681
                       1.5         0.0668     0.0655     0.0643     0.0630      0.0618      0.0606     0.0594     0.0582     0.0571      0.0559
probability of a USL   1.6         0.0548     0.0537     0.0526     0.0516      0.0505      0.0495     0.0485     0.0475     0.0465      0.0455
                       1.7         0.0446     0.0436     0.0427     0.0418      0.0409      0.0401     0.0392     0.0384     0.0375      0.0367
defect above the       1.8         0.0359     0.0351     0.0344     0.0336      0.0329      0.0322     0.0314     0.0307     0.0301      0.0294
                       1.9         0.0287     0.0281     0.0274     0.0268      0.0262      0.0256     0.0250     0.0244     0.0239      0.0233
given value of z        2          0.0228     0.0222     0.0217     0.0212      0.0207      0.0202     0.0197     0.0192     0.0188      0.0183
                       2.1         0.0179     0.0174     0.0170     0.0166      0.0162      0.0158     0.0154     0.0150     0.0146      0.0143
                       2.2         0.0139     0.0136     0.0132     0.0129      0.0125      0.0122     0.0119     0.0116     0.0113      0.0110
                       2.3         0.0107     0.0104     0.0102     0.0099      0.0096      0.0094     0.0091     0.0089     0.0087      0.0084
                       2.4         0.0082     0.0080     0.0078     0.0075      0.0073      0.0071     0.0069     0.0068     0.0066      0.0064
                       2.5         0.0062     0.0060     0.0059     0.0057      0.0055      0.0054     0.0052     0.0051     0.0049      0.0048
                       2.6         0.0047     0.0045     0.0044     0.0043      0.0041      0.0040     0.0039     0.0038     0.0037      0.0036
                       2.7         0.0035     0.0034     0.0033     0.0032      0.0031      0.0030     0.0029     0.0028     0.0027      0.0026
                       2.8         0.0026     0.0025     0.0024     0.0023      0.0023      0.0022     0.0021     0.0021     0.0020      0.0019
                       2.9
                       29          0.0019
                                   0 0019     0.0018
                                              0 0018     0.0018
                                                         0 0018     0.0017
                                                                    0 0017      0.0016
                                                                                0 0016      0.0016
                                                                                            0 0016     0.0015
                                                                                                       0 0015     0.0015
                                                                                                                  0 0015     0.0014
                                                                                                                             0 0014      0.0014
                                                                                                                                         0 0014
                        3          0.0013     0.0013     0.0013     0.0012      0.0012      0.0011     0.0011     0.0011     0.0010      0.0010
                       3.1        9.68E-04   9.36E-04   9.04E-04   8.74E-04    8.45E-04    8.16E-04   7.89E-04   7.62E-04   7.36E-04    7.11E-04
                       3.2        6.87E-04   6.64E-04   6.41E-04   6.19E-04    5.98E-04    5.77E-04   5.57E-04   5.38E-04   5.19E-04    5.01E-04
                       3.3        4.83E-04   4.67E-04   4.50E-04   4.34E-04    4.19E-04    4.04E-04   3.90E-04   3.76E-04   3.62E-04    3.50E-04
                       3.4        3.37E-04   3.25E-04   3.13E-04   3.02E-04    2.91E-04    2.80E-04   2.70E-04   2.60E-04   2.51E-04    2.42E-04
                       3.5        2.33E-04   2.24E-04   2.16E-04   2.08E-04    2.00E-04    1.93E-04   1.85E-04   1.79E-04   1.72E-04    1.65E-04
                       3.6        1.59E-04   1.53E-04   1.47E-04   1.42E-04    1.36E-04    1.31E-04   1.26E-04   1.21E-04   1.17E-04    1.12E-04
                       3.7        1.08E-04   1.04E-04   9.96E-05   9.58E-05    9.20E-05    8.84E-05   8.50E-05   8.16E-05   7.84E-05    7.53E-05
                       3.8        7.24E-05   6.95E-05   6.67E-05   6.41E-05    6.15E-05    5.91E-05   5.67E-05   5.44E-05   5.22E-05    5.01E-05
                       3.9        4.81E-05   4.62E-05   4.43E-05   4.25E-05    4.08E-05    3.91E-05   3.75E-05   3.60E-05   3.45E-05    3.31E-05




                                                   40 of 60




                                                                                                                                                   20
Identify Variation Sources                                                       DMAIC
                                                                                                              Step 6
        Goal: Process on Target with Minimum Spread

                          Desired                                Problem with Spread
 Accurate but                                                                      Current
  not Precise                                                                      Situation
                            LSL                       T                     USL


             Problem with Centering – Not on Target
                                                                                         Current
                       Desired
                                                                                         Situation
Precise but not
   Accurate
                          LSL                     T                      USL


                                                             
           Is the Problem Centering, Spread, or Both?
                                                  41 of 60




                                                                                                           DMAIC
              Continuous Data Analysis Road Map                                                               Step 6
                    One Sample               Two Samples                   Multiple Samples


                                         Study Stability
                                              (Run Chart)



                                          Study Shape
                                   (Histogram, Dot Plot, Normality)




Study Spread                              Data paired?
(Chi Square-Test)                                                                              Study Spread
                                                                                           (Homogeneity of Variance)



                                 Study Spread                Study Centering
                                       (F test)
                                       (F-test)                  (Paired t test)
                                                                         t-test)


Study Centering                                                                                Study Centering
   (1 sample t-test)                                                                                (ANOVA)


                            Study Centering
                                 (2 sample t-test)

                                                  42 of 60




                                                                                                                       21
Descriptive Statistics                                           DMAIC
                                                                                          Step 6
Stat > Basic Statistics >
Display Descriptive
Statistics
 Provides summary report
 of basic statistical
 information

                                                                         p-value > .05 Cannot
  Histogram                                                              Reject H0
                    Minitab Output                                       No evidence that
                                                                         data is non-normal
 Dot Plot
                                                                            Basic Statistical
                                                                            Information




                                                                   Confidence Intervals




                                     43 of 60




                                                                                          DMAIC
                      X and Y Data Correlation                                            Step 6

                    25
                             Strong Positive Correlation
                    20
                    15
                Y




                    10
                     5
                     0
                         0     5      10            15   20   25
                                                X



                    25
                                   No Correlation
                    20
                    15
                Y




                    10
                     5
                     0
                         0     5      10            15   20   25
                                                X




                                     44 of 60




                                                                                                   22
Improve Phase Objectives
• The benefits of Design of Experiments (DOE’s)

• Key concepts and terms associated with DOE’s

• Performing a simple full factorial and fractional DOE’s and 
  interpreting the results

• Awareness of screening designs and higher level response 
  surface designs




                                45 of 60




                                                                      DMAIC
            What’s Improve Phase About. . .
• Develop an Improvement Strategy
    • Determine which candidate x’s identified in the Analyze Phase
      are truly “critical X’s”.
    • If possible, determine a quantitative transfer function that
      relates your Y to these critical X’s

• Identify Improvement Actions
    • Determine optimal settings for the X’s
    • Show the impact of the changes on meeting
      project or business objectives.                     Y = f(x)
• Validate the Improvement
    • Demonstrate the validity of your identified improvement
      actions via additional experiments or a pilot study

• Develop a Plan to Implement the Change

   It’s More than Just Designed Experiments


                                46 of 60




                                                                              23
DMAIC
                      Common “Improve” Tools

          Basic                     Intermediate                     Advanced
 Process Map                    DOE                         DOE
 Fishbone                            Full Factorial              Response Surface
 Box Plot                            Fractional                  Taguchi (Inner /
                                       Factorial                    Outer Array)
 Time Order Plots
                                      Intro to               Simulation Models
 Hypothesis Tests                     Response
 Linear Regression                    Surface                  Already Covered
                                                                Covered in Improve
 Mistake Proofing               Multivariate                  Covered in DFSS
                                  Regression                    Adv. Level III e.g. ProModel


   LOW                   Problem Sophistication
• Complexity                                                 • Risk       HIGH
                              Match the Tool to the
• Business Impact                  Problem                   • Data Availability



                                       47 of 60




                                                                                      DMAIC
                DOE – Design of Experiments                                          Steps 7-8


             Y = f (x1, x2, x3,……xn)
Response (Y)                                      Factors (x’s)
                                                          (x s)
• The measured outcome of an                      • The critical X’s which determine the
  experiment                                        response,Y
• The value observed for the CTQ                  • They can be categorical or
  being explored                                    numerical



Ranges                                            Levels
• The extreme values for each factor              • In DOE’s we investigate the effect
  determines the range for that factor              of each factor at more than one
  - the region of interest/investigation            setting or value


                                       48 of 60




                                                                                                 24
DMAIC
                             Benefits of DOEs                                       Steps 7-8
Classical Approach
OFAT - One Factor at a Time

• Change one variable, X2,                                      100      90
  while holding all others
  constant.
                                                                 80
• Find a maximum                                         70
• Hold X2 at the                         60
  “maximum effect” level and
                                                              Factor X1
  repeat the process for the other variables.

OFAT
• Requires more experiments than a DOE
• Becomes unmanageable as the number of factors increases
• Can be very expensive and time consuming – and may not work very well



                                       49 of 60




                  Benefits of Design of Experiments                                  DMAIC
                                                                                    Steps 7-8
 DOE Approach
 • Select factors and levels

 • Select mathematical model
   designed to obtain maximum
   information for the number                                   100
                                                                 00      90
   of factors/levels selected.

 • In your experiments change                                    80
   the factor levels in a systematic                     70
   manner so that all coefficients in               60
   the model can be uniquely computed.
   (Orthogonality)                                            Factor X1
 • Solve the resulting set of simultaneous equations to obtain the coefficients.
                                                                   coefficients

 • Use statistical tests to determine if the coefficients are statistically significant,
   and if the resulting model (transfer function) is adequate.

 • Use the results of your DOE to plan the next DOE (if needed).


                                       50 of 60




                                                                                                25
DMAIC
                           Screening Designs                                      Steps 7-8
      The Team’s understanding at
      the beginning of the project                       What Mother Nature Knows


The following 7 Factors may be critical X's                 Yield = 64.25
                                                                       +
A.   Temperature (160C - 180C)                                      11.50*A
B.   Monomer Concentration (20% - 40%)                                 -
C.   Catalyst Vendor (Sally - Ed)                                    2.50*B
D.   Stirring Speed ( 50 RPM - 100 RPM)                                +
E.   Monomer Purity ( 90% - 98%)                                     0.75*C
F.   Pressure ( 100 PSI - 500 PSI)                                     +
G.   Acetone/Methanol Ratio - ( 0.25 - 0.50)                         5.00*A*C


              We need an efficient method for screening these
                         "candidate critical X's"
                  so that we can identify the 'Vital Few"

                                      51 of 60




                                                                                    DMAIC
                                   Objectives

     • In the physical world, the law of Entropy explains the gradual loss of 
       order in a system.  The same law applies to business processes. 
     • Unless we add “energy” (in the form of documentation and ongoing 
       process controls), processes will tend to degrade over time, losing the 
       gains achieved by design and improvement activities.
     • The quality plan is the structure through which we add this “energy” 
       to business processes.   This is Control and the main objectives:
         – To make sure that our process stays in control after the solution has been 
           implemented. 

         – To quickly detect the out of control state and determine the associated 
           special causes so that actions can be taken to correct the problem before 
           special causes so that actions can be taken to correct the problem before
           nonconformance are produced.




                                      52 of 60




                                                                                              26
DMAIC
           Control –
           Control – Keep It On Target
              • Focus on the Right CTQ
              • Quantify the Problem
Define        • Determine the Drivers
Measure                 Y = f(X)
Analyze       • Identify Needed Change
Improve       • Implement the Change

              • Validate Measurement System (Xs)
              • Determine Process Capability
              • Develop/Modify Quality Plan
 Control        > Process Documentation
                > Process Controls
              • Implement Process Controls
              • Audit Plan Established
              • Transition to Operating Owners

                                 53 of 60




                                                                     DMAIC
On the Lookout for Special Cause
 • Common cause variation
     – Natural variability
     – Random
     – Inherent in the process
 • Special cause variation
     – May be caused by operator errors, adjusted machines, or 
       defective raw materials
     – Generally large when compared to the common cause variation
     – Considered an unacceptable level of process performance
 • Special causes tend to cause a process to shift out of 
   control where. The output does not meet the desired 
   specifications.



                                 54 of 60




                                                                             27
DMAIC
What is a Process Control System?
• A Process Control System (PCS)
    – strategy for maintaining the improved process performance over time
    – identifies the specific actions and tools required for sustaining the 
       process improvements or gains 
• A control system may incorporate
             y        y      p
    – Risk Management
    – Mistake‐proofing devices 
    – Statistical process control (SPC) 
    – Data collection plans 
    – Ongoing measurements 
    – Audit plans 
    – Response plans*
       Response plans
    – Product drawings 
    – Process documentation 
    – Process ownership



                                 55 of 60




                Statistical Process Control                                    DMAIC
                                                                               Step 12

Statistical -- Probability based decision rules.
Process -- Any repetitive task or steps.
Control     -- Monitoring of process performance.



                      SPC will signal when the
                     process is “out-of- control”.




 Your Mission is to find out why and take
            corrective action!

                                 56 of 60




                                                                                         28
Control Chart Components                                                            DMAIC
                                                                                                                      Step 12
                 Average Chart
    Statis (mean/defects)
                          0.065
                                                                                       Upper Control Limit
              measured


                                                                                                  Grand Average
                          0.060
                                                                                                   Central Line
         stic




                                                                                       Lower Control Limit
                          0.055

                                  0         5     Sample / Subgroup (time ordered)
                                                     10            15            20        25


                                                                                          Monitors Shift
     Variation Chart
               e/Sigma)




                          0.010
                                                                                            Upper Control Limit
               red
Statistic (Range
         measur




                          0.005
                          0 005
                                                                                                Average Range/Sigma
                          0.000
                                                                                                     Central Line

                                                                                             Lower Control Limit
                                                  Sample / Subgroup (time ordered)
                                                                                           Monitors Drift

                                                             57 of 60




                                        Significance of 3s limit                                                      DMAIC
                                                                                                                      Step 12
                                      A Control Chart is a graphic display of a
                                       continuing two tailed test with HO and HA
                                       defined as:
                                               Ho: iHa: i

                                                                               /2
                                                                                /2
                                                                                UCLx


                                                                                 X

                                                                                LCLx
                                                                         /2

• For 3 limits,  = 0.00135. approximate confidence level is 99.7%.
• 3  limits provide good sensitivity to change with low potential for over-
  reacting when the process is stable.


                                                             58 of 60




                                                                                                                                29
Types of Control Chart                                                       DMAIC
                                                                                                          Step 12
      Variable Chart (Continuous)                               Attribute Chart (Discrete)
• Uses Measured Values                                •     Defects: Number of non
                                                            conformance in a part
     – Cycle Time, Lengths,
                                                      •     Defective: Pass/Fail,
       Diameters, Drops, etc.
                                                            Good/Bad, Go/No-Go
• Generally One Characteristic Per
           y                                                Information
  Chart                                               •     Can Be Many Characteristics
• More Expensive, But More                                  Per Chart
  Information                                         •     Less Expensive, But Less
                                                            Information
                   High or Low
                     Volume?                                            Constant           Variable
                                                                      Lot / Unit Size   Lot / Unit Size

       Low
       L                         High
                                                           Defects                                   Poisson
                                                                             c             u

   Individuals &                 X-Bar &
      Moving                     Range
                                                          Defective           np           p         Binomial
      Range


                                           59 of 60




                                    THANK YOU




                                           60 of 60




                                                                                                                    30

More Related Content

What's hot

Sales enablement industry benchmark study results
Sales enablement  industry benchmark study resultsSales enablement  industry benchmark study results
Sales enablement industry benchmark study resultsCorporate Visions
 
Breaking the Status Quo Barrier
Breaking the Status Quo BarrierBreaking the Status Quo Barrier
Breaking the Status Quo BarrierCorporate Visions
 
Warranty Outsourcing For Strategic Gains
Warranty Outsourcing For Strategic GainsWarranty Outsourcing For Strategic Gains
Warranty Outsourcing For Strategic GainsImranMasood
 
Stocking The Inventory Optimization Toolbox
Stocking The Inventory Optimization ToolboxStocking The Inventory Optimization Toolbox
Stocking The Inventory Optimization ToolboxG3 Communications
 
The Transitions Group Llc 2009
The Transitions Group Llc 2009The Transitions Group Llc 2009
The Transitions Group Llc 2009John A Deasy
 
Amacom.a.blueprint.for.corporate.governance.e book lib
Amacom.a.blueprint.for.corporate.governance.e book libAmacom.a.blueprint.for.corporate.governance.e book lib
Amacom.a.blueprint.for.corporate.governance.e book libdumitru dan ometita
 
Key Point Sampler 2011
Key Point Sampler 2011Key Point Sampler 2011
Key Point Sampler 2011dsandlerny
 
Praxes Group Capabilities Overview
Praxes Group Capabilities OverviewPraxes Group Capabilities Overview
Praxes Group Capabilities OverviewJohn Gregoire
 
Navigating Customer Lifetime Value Conundrum
Navigating Customer Lifetime Value ConundrumNavigating Customer Lifetime Value Conundrum
Navigating Customer Lifetime Value Conundrumgregmgaffney
 
A Test of B2B Sales Forecasting Methods
A Test of B2B Sales Forecasting MethodsA Test of B2B Sales Forecasting Methods
A Test of B2B Sales Forecasting MethodsSalesClic
 
Value Reference Model - Sales
Value Reference Model - SalesValue Reference Model - Sales
Value Reference Model - SalesArnaldo Colombo
 
Igh presentation - value chain excellence in retail
Igh   presentation - value chain excellence in retailIgh   presentation - value chain excellence in retail
Igh presentation - value chain excellence in retailIGH_Consulting
 
Profit Focused Customer Care: Seven Proven Strategies 091509
Profit Focused Customer Care: Seven Proven Strategies 091509 Profit Focused Customer Care: Seven Proven Strategies 091509
Profit Focused Customer Care: Seven Proven Strategies 091509 VIPdesk
 
Flevy.com - Retail Gross Profit Recovery
Flevy.com - Retail Gross Profit RecoveryFlevy.com - Retail Gross Profit Recovery
Flevy.com - Retail Gross Profit RecoveryDavid Tracy
 
7 Ways To Outservice The Competition Wp
7 Ways To Outservice The Competition Wp7 Ways To Outservice The Competition Wp
7 Ways To Outservice The Competition WpHulla Girl
 
Process Consulting Perspective
Process Consulting PerspectiveProcess Consulting Perspective
Process Consulting PerspectiveVibhanshu Sharma
 
Share & care october 2012
Share & care october 2012Share & care october 2012
Share & care october 2012A V MANIVANNAN
 
Labor employment in thailand as 2011
Labor employment in thailand as 2011Labor employment in thailand as 2011
Labor employment in thailand as 2011Sakda Hwankaew
 

What's hot (20)

Sales enablement industry benchmark study results
Sales enablement  industry benchmark study resultsSales enablement  industry benchmark study results
Sales enablement industry benchmark study results
 
Smbp 2012
Smbp 2012Smbp 2012
Smbp 2012
 
Breaking the Status Quo Barrier
Breaking the Status Quo BarrierBreaking the Status Quo Barrier
Breaking the Status Quo Barrier
 
Warranty Outsourcing For Strategic Gains
Warranty Outsourcing For Strategic GainsWarranty Outsourcing For Strategic Gains
Warranty Outsourcing For Strategic Gains
 
Stocking The Inventory Optimization Toolbox
Stocking The Inventory Optimization ToolboxStocking The Inventory Optimization Toolbox
Stocking The Inventory Optimization Toolbox
 
The Transitions Group Llc 2009
The Transitions Group Llc 2009The Transitions Group Llc 2009
The Transitions Group Llc 2009
 
Amacom.a.blueprint.for.corporate.governance.e book lib
Amacom.a.blueprint.for.corporate.governance.e book libAmacom.a.blueprint.for.corporate.governance.e book lib
Amacom.a.blueprint.for.corporate.governance.e book lib
 
Key Point Sampler 2011
Key Point Sampler 2011Key Point Sampler 2011
Key Point Sampler 2011
 
Bam stage summary detail w contact
Bam stage  summary detail w contactBam stage  summary detail w contact
Bam stage summary detail w contact
 
Praxes Group Capabilities Overview
Praxes Group Capabilities OverviewPraxes Group Capabilities Overview
Praxes Group Capabilities Overview
 
Navigating Customer Lifetime Value Conundrum
Navigating Customer Lifetime Value ConundrumNavigating Customer Lifetime Value Conundrum
Navigating Customer Lifetime Value Conundrum
 
A Test of B2B Sales Forecasting Methods
A Test of B2B Sales Forecasting MethodsA Test of B2B Sales Forecasting Methods
A Test of B2B Sales Forecasting Methods
 
Value Reference Model - Sales
Value Reference Model - SalesValue Reference Model - Sales
Value Reference Model - Sales
 
Igh presentation - value chain excellence in retail
Igh   presentation - value chain excellence in retailIgh   presentation - value chain excellence in retail
Igh presentation - value chain excellence in retail
 
Profit Focused Customer Care: Seven Proven Strategies 091509
Profit Focused Customer Care: Seven Proven Strategies 091509 Profit Focused Customer Care: Seven Proven Strategies 091509
Profit Focused Customer Care: Seven Proven Strategies 091509
 
Flevy.com - Retail Gross Profit Recovery
Flevy.com - Retail Gross Profit RecoveryFlevy.com - Retail Gross Profit Recovery
Flevy.com - Retail Gross Profit Recovery
 
7 Ways To Outservice The Competition Wp
7 Ways To Outservice The Competition Wp7 Ways To Outservice The Competition Wp
7 Ways To Outservice The Competition Wp
 
Process Consulting Perspective
Process Consulting PerspectiveProcess Consulting Perspective
Process Consulting Perspective
 
Share & care october 2012
Share & care october 2012Share & care october 2012
Share & care october 2012
 
Labor employment in thailand as 2011
Labor employment in thailand as 2011Labor employment in thailand as 2011
Labor employment in thailand as 2011
 

Viewers also liked

power point presentation
power point presentationpower point presentation
power point presentationangiecarvajal20
 
Cid presentation
Cid presentationCid presentation
Cid presentationcidmn
 
Asking the right questions audience
Asking the right questions   audienceAsking the right questions   audience
Asking the right questions audienceIra Tobing
 
Communicating financial information
Communicating financial informationCommunicating financial information
Communicating financial informationIra Tobing
 
Presentation university of phoenix uers manual
Presentation university of phoenix uers manualPresentation university of phoenix uers manual
Presentation university of phoenix uers manualMaurice Anthony Murphy Sr
 
Investment promotion handbook for diplomat
Investment promotion handbook for diplomatInvestment promotion handbook for diplomat
Investment promotion handbook for diplomatIra Tobing
 
IT Arch Conf speakers
IT Arch Conf speakersIT Arch Conf speakers
IT Arch Conf speakersmjlandy
 
Dr. Andrea Goldstein - Industrial Cluster in the Global Economy
Dr. Andrea Goldstein -  Industrial Cluster in the Global EconomyDr. Andrea Goldstein -  Industrial Cluster in the Global Economy
Dr. Andrea Goldstein - Industrial Cluster in the Global EconomyIra Tobing
 
Nonverbal communication
Nonverbal communicationNonverbal communication
Nonverbal communicationIra Tobing
 

Viewers also liked (13)

power point presentation
power point presentationpower point presentation
power point presentation
 
communication
communicationcommunication
communication
 
Cid presentation
Cid presentationCid presentation
Cid presentation
 
Asking the right questions audience
Asking the right questions   audienceAsking the right questions   audience
Asking the right questions audience
 
Communicating financial information
Communicating financial informationCommunicating financial information
Communicating financial information
 
Presentation university of phoenix uers manual
Presentation university of phoenix uers manualPresentation university of phoenix uers manual
Presentation university of phoenix uers manual
 
Investment promotion handbook for diplomat
Investment promotion handbook for diplomatInvestment promotion handbook for diplomat
Investment promotion handbook for diplomat
 
Public
PublicPublic
Public
 
IT Arch Conf speakers
IT Arch Conf speakersIT Arch Conf speakers
IT Arch Conf speakers
 
Dr. Andrea Goldstein - Industrial Cluster in the Global Economy
Dr. Andrea Goldstein -  Industrial Cluster in the Global EconomyDr. Andrea Goldstein -  Industrial Cluster in the Global Economy
Dr. Andrea Goldstein - Industrial Cluster in the Global Economy
 
Naraţiunea
NaraţiuneaNaraţiunea
Naraţiunea
 
Nonverbal communication
Nonverbal communicationNonverbal communication
Nonverbal communication
 
Method Study
Method Study Method Study
Method Study
 

Similar to Mpc mtcp six sigma [compatibility mode]

Yellow belt training program
Yellow belt training programYellow belt training program
Yellow belt training programNarendra Narendra
 
Six Sigma seminar by Nehall
Six Sigma seminar by NehallSix Sigma seminar by Nehall
Six Sigma seminar by NehallNehal Dixit
 
Six Sigma Final
Six Sigma FinalSix Sigma Final
Six Sigma Finalanubhuti10
 
Lean six sigma_webinar_presentation_slides
Lean six sigma_webinar_presentation_slidesLean six sigma_webinar_presentation_slides
Lean six sigma_webinar_presentation_slidessondhiya
 
Introduction to Lean 6 sigma
Introduction to Lean 6 sigmaIntroduction to Lean 6 sigma
Introduction to Lean 6 sigmaDominique LAPERE
 
SCP Six Sigma presentation 6.30.2010
SCP Six Sigma presentation 6.30.2010SCP Six Sigma presentation 6.30.2010
SCP Six Sigma presentation 6.30.2010The Hackett Group
 
Six Sigma_DMAIC_Bharath Seminar
Six Sigma_DMAIC_Bharath SeminarSix Sigma_DMAIC_Bharath Seminar
Six Sigma_DMAIC_Bharath SeminarBharath M
 
Six sigma
Six sigmaSix sigma
Six sigmaHome
 
Yellow belt training 68 s
Yellow belt training 68 sYellow belt training 68 s
Yellow belt training 68 sRachit Gaur
 
Process Improvement Presentation V1
Process Improvement Presentation V1Process Improvement Presentation V1
Process Improvement Presentation V1mike4656
 
Integrating Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing the Challenges & Benefits
Integrating Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing the Challenges & BenefitsIntegrating Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing the Challenges & Benefits
Integrating Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing the Challenges & BenefitsAdvent Design Corporation
 

Similar to Mpc mtcp six sigma [compatibility mode] (20)

Green belt training
Green belt trainingGreen belt training
Green belt training
 
Yellow belt training program
Yellow belt training programYellow belt training program
Yellow belt training program
 
Six Sigma seminar by Nehall
Six Sigma seminar by NehallSix Sigma seminar by Nehall
Six Sigma seminar by Nehall
 
Six Sigma Final
Six Sigma FinalSix Sigma Final
Six Sigma Final
 
Six Sigma Yellow Belt
Six Sigma Yellow BeltSix Sigma Yellow Belt
Six Sigma Yellow Belt
 
Lean six sigma_webinar_presentation_slides
Lean six sigma_webinar_presentation_slidesLean six sigma_webinar_presentation_slides
Lean six sigma_webinar_presentation_slides
 
six sigma key introduction
six sigma key introduction six sigma key introduction
six sigma key introduction
 
Introduction to Lean 6 sigma
Introduction to Lean 6 sigmaIntroduction to Lean 6 sigma
Introduction to Lean 6 sigma
 
SCP Six Sigma presentation 6.30.2010
SCP Six Sigma presentation 6.30.2010SCP Six Sigma presentation 6.30.2010
SCP Six Sigma presentation 6.30.2010
 
Six Sigma_DMAIC_Bharath Seminar
Six Sigma_DMAIC_Bharath SeminarSix Sigma_DMAIC_Bharath Seminar
Six Sigma_DMAIC_Bharath Seminar
 
Six sigma
Six sigmaSix sigma
Six sigma
 
Final Six Sigma
Final Six SigmaFinal Six Sigma
Final Six Sigma
 
Yellow belt training 68 s
Yellow belt training 68 sYellow belt training 68 s
Yellow belt training 68 s
 
Aqm Programme Six Sigma
Aqm Programme   Six SigmaAqm Programme   Six Sigma
Aqm Programme Six Sigma
 
Six Sigma Orientation
Six Sigma OrientationSix Sigma Orientation
Six Sigma Orientation
 
Six sigma
Six sigmaSix sigma
Six sigma
 
Process Improvement Presentation V1
Process Improvement Presentation V1Process Improvement Presentation V1
Process Improvement Presentation V1
 
Six Sigma
Six SigmaSix Sigma
Six Sigma
 
Six sigma
Six sigmaSix sigma
Six sigma
 
Integrating Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing the Challenges & Benefits
Integrating Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing the Challenges & BenefitsIntegrating Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing the Challenges & Benefits
Integrating Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing the Challenges & Benefits
 

More from Ira Tobing

Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.
Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.
Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.Ira Tobing
 
World Investment Report 2015 of UNITED NATIONS from UNCTAD
World Investment Report 2015 of UNITED NATIONS from UNCTADWorld Investment Report 2015 of UNITED NATIONS from UNCTAD
World Investment Report 2015 of UNITED NATIONS from UNCTADIra Tobing
 
Regional and bilateral trade agreement
Regional and bilateral trade agreementRegional and bilateral trade agreement
Regional and bilateral trade agreementIra Tobing
 
The Doha Round
The Doha Round The Doha Round
The Doha Round Ira Tobing
 
UNCTAD and the post 2015 agenda -
UNCTAD and the post 2015 agenda - UNCTAD and the post 2015 agenda -
UNCTAD and the post 2015 agenda - Ira Tobing
 
Assessing the evolution of the international trading system and enhancing its...
Assessing the evolution of the international trading system and enhancing its...Assessing the evolution of the international trading system and enhancing its...
Assessing the evolution of the international trading system and enhancing its...Ira Tobing
 
International cooperation and development: a conceptual overview
International cooperation and development: a conceptual overviewInternational cooperation and development: a conceptual overview
International cooperation and development: a conceptual overviewIra Tobing
 
Supply Chain Perspectives and Issues: A Literature Review
Supply Chain Perspectives and Issues: A Literature ReviewSupply Chain Perspectives and Issues: A Literature Review
Supply Chain Perspectives and Issues: A Literature ReviewIra Tobing
 
Non-Tariff Measures - A Fresh Look at Trade Policy's New Frontier
 Non-Tariff Measures - A Fresh Look at Trade Policy's New Frontier Non-Tariff Measures - A Fresh Look at Trade Policy's New Frontier
Non-Tariff Measures - A Fresh Look at Trade Policy's New FrontierIra Tobing
 
FTA policy and strategy
FTA policy and strategyFTA policy and strategy
FTA policy and strategyIra Tobing
 
Coalition proofness in a class of games with strategic substitutes
Coalition proofness in a class of games with strategic substitutesCoalition proofness in a class of games with strategic substitutes
Coalition proofness in a class of games with strategic substitutesIra Tobing
 
Patacconi perspectives from international organization and private sectors ...
Patacconi   perspectives from international organization and private sectors ...Patacconi   perspectives from international organization and private sectors ...
Patacconi perspectives from international organization and private sectors ...Ira Tobing
 
Dr.Andrea Goldstein - Developing Industrial Cluster and The Role of Investment
Dr.Andrea Goldstein  - Developing Industrial Cluster and The Role of InvestmentDr.Andrea Goldstein  - Developing Industrial Cluster and The Role of Investment
Dr.Andrea Goldstein - Developing Industrial Cluster and The Role of InvestmentIra Tobing
 
Introduction to Climate Change
Introduction to Climate ChangeIntroduction to Climate Change
Introduction to Climate ChangeIra Tobing
 
Intoduction to E F F E C T
Intoduction to  E F F E C TIntoduction to  E F F E C T
Intoduction to E F F E C TIra Tobing
 
Group dynamics mtcp 2009
Group dynamics mtcp 2009Group dynamics mtcp 2009
Group dynamics mtcp 2009Ira Tobing
 

More from Ira Tobing (20)

Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.
Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.
Integrating developing countries’ SMEs into Global Value Chain.
 
World Investment Report 2015 of UNITED NATIONS from UNCTAD
World Investment Report 2015 of UNITED NATIONS from UNCTADWorld Investment Report 2015 of UNITED NATIONS from UNCTAD
World Investment Report 2015 of UNITED NATIONS from UNCTAD
 
Regional and bilateral trade agreement
Regional and bilateral trade agreementRegional and bilateral trade agreement
Regional and bilateral trade agreement
 
Negotiations
NegotiationsNegotiations
Negotiations
 
The Doha Round
The Doha Round The Doha Round
The Doha Round
 
UNCTAD and the post 2015 agenda -
UNCTAD and the post 2015 agenda - UNCTAD and the post 2015 agenda -
UNCTAD and the post 2015 agenda -
 
Assessing the evolution of the international trading system and enhancing its...
Assessing the evolution of the international trading system and enhancing its...Assessing the evolution of the international trading system and enhancing its...
Assessing the evolution of the international trading system and enhancing its...
 
International cooperation and development: a conceptual overview
International cooperation and development: a conceptual overviewInternational cooperation and development: a conceptual overview
International cooperation and development: a conceptual overview
 
Supply Chain Perspectives and Issues: A Literature Review
Supply Chain Perspectives and Issues: A Literature ReviewSupply Chain Perspectives and Issues: A Literature Review
Supply Chain Perspectives and Issues: A Literature Review
 
Non-Tariff Measures - A Fresh Look at Trade Policy's New Frontier
 Non-Tariff Measures - A Fresh Look at Trade Policy's New Frontier Non-Tariff Measures - A Fresh Look at Trade Policy's New Frontier
Non-Tariff Measures - A Fresh Look at Trade Policy's New Frontier
 
FTA policy and strategy
FTA policy and strategyFTA policy and strategy
FTA policy and strategy
 
Beyond 2015
Beyond 2015Beyond 2015
Beyond 2015
 
Coalition proofness in a class of games with strategic substitutes
Coalition proofness in a class of games with strategic substitutesCoalition proofness in a class of games with strategic substitutes
Coalition proofness in a class of games with strategic substitutes
 
Patacconi perspectives from international organization and private sectors ...
Patacconi   perspectives from international organization and private sectors ...Patacconi   perspectives from international organization and private sectors ...
Patacconi perspectives from international organization and private sectors ...
 
Dr.Andrea Goldstein - Developing Industrial Cluster and The Role of Investment
Dr.Andrea Goldstein  - Developing Industrial Cluster and The Role of InvestmentDr.Andrea Goldstein  - Developing Industrial Cluster and The Role of Investment
Dr.Andrea Goldstein - Developing Industrial Cluster and The Role of Investment
 
Introduction to Climate Change
Introduction to Climate ChangeIntroduction to Climate Change
Introduction to Climate Change
 
Intoduction to E F F E C T
Intoduction to  E F F E C TIntoduction to  E F F E C T
Intoduction to E F F E C T
 
Negotiation
NegotiationNegotiation
Negotiation
 
Hr@nestle npc
Hr@nestle npcHr@nestle npc
Hr@nestle npc
 
Group dynamics mtcp 2009
Group dynamics mtcp 2009Group dynamics mtcp 2009
Group dynamics mtcp 2009
 

Mpc mtcp six sigma [compatibility mode]

  • 1. MTCP Program Six Sigma Introduction 15th June 2009 Topic: Six Sigma Introduction Malaysia Productivity Corporation (Statutory Body under MITI) P.O Box 64, Jalan Sultan, 46904 Petaling Jaya Website: www mpc gov my www.mpc.gov.my Consultant: Mohd Azlan Abas Tel: +6 012 308 7421 Email: Mohdazlan.abas@gmail.com 1 of 60 Why Does One Need a Quality Initiative?  Meet customer expectations for higher quality  Provide a competitive differentiator in the service market  Build greater pride and satisfaction in the team  Drive other key goals: productivity and growth Tangible Costs Intangible Costs - Inspection - Expediting - Scrap - Lost Customers - Rework - Longer Cycles - Warranty - Lower Morale Enormous opportunity 2 of 60 1
  • 2. Six Sigma Provides focus on Critical to Quality (CTQ) Metrics in businesses  Vital Few CTQs that apply to all Customers: – Responsiveness – Marketplace Competitiveness p p – On-time, Accurate and Complete Deliverables – Product/Service Technical Performance  Key CTQs for a company: – Post Sales Issue resolution – Service Delivery Span – Contract Fulfillment – Parts Fulfillment – Pricing – Customer Escalation Cycle Time 3 of 60 Six Sigma Provides focus on Critical to Quality (CTQ) Metrics in businesses Practical Traditional Problem Approach Define Measure D fi & M Statistical Problem Analyze Statistical Solution 6Quality Methodology Systematic Approach Focusing p Improve on Statistically Significant Root Practical Causes & Solutions Solution Driving Customer & Shareholder Benefits Control 4 of 60 2
  • 3. What is Six Sigma? Process to reduce defects per million opportunities B DPMO • From current levels to “Six Sigma” • “Sigma” is standard deviation from the ideal 2 308,537 • Can be applied to all business functions Can be applied to all business functions 3 66,807 66 807 » Manufacturing, Products, Transactions » Service, Sales Support 4 6,210 Quantitative methodology 5 233 • Uses measurements and scientific process 6 3.4 3 to 6 ... 20 000 times improvement ... 20,000 ... A true quantum leap 5 of 60 Process = Hose Four Important Properties: (1) Centering (2) Spread (3) Shape (4) Stability Over Time 10.5 10 9.5 Y axis = Weight (lbs) 6 of 60 3
  • 4. Six Sigma Concept Every Human Activity Has Variability... Mean Lower Upper Customer C t Customer C t Specification Specification 1 p(defect) Target Reducing variability is the essence of six sigma 7 of 60 Mean Specification What is Sigma?  Limit Some Chance of Failure 1 The hi h th Th higher the  3 number (Z) in front of the sigma symbol the lower the chance of producing a Much Less Chance of defect Failure 1 6 Reducing variation is the key to reducing defects 8 of 60 4
  • 5. Reducing Variation is the Key What GE sees Order by Order Delivery Times Starting Point After Project 28 29 (Days) 18 6 6 10 13 17 23 12 5 4 8 10 What Customers feel 16 13 Mean 19 10 Big Change h 33 20 11 13 30% improvement Variance Average 17 13 No Significant Change 9 of 60 Reference: Six Sigma Performance 3.8 Sigma Six Sigma 99% Good 99.99966% Good • 20,000 lost articles of mail per • Seven articles lost per hour hour • Unsafe drinking water for • One unsafe minute every almost 15 minutes each day seven months • 5,000 incorrect surgical • 1.7 incorrect operations per operations per week week • Two short or long landings at • One short or long landing most major airports each day every five years • 200,000 wrong drug • 68 wrong prescriptions per prescriptions each year year 10 of 60 5
  • 6. Key Terms: Process or Activity Process X’s or Factors Outputs X1 Y1 X2 X3 PROCESS Y2 Y3 X4 For any given product, procedure or transaction, there are inputs, a process, and outputs. You will need to measure the outputs to quantify how well you satisfy a CTQ requirement; the output measures are Ys To Ys. change the process performance however, you must find and change the critical Xs. Find and control the critical X’s 11 of 60 The People GM Global Quality Master Quality Leaders Q Black Belts Greenbelts Apply Six Sigma tools and methodology in Develop tools and Help choose projects, everyday work. teaching materials. interview Black Belt candidates, tie projects Conduct training and to business needs. communication Remove barriers and Six Sigma g sessions. Mentor drive Six Sigma into the Black Belts Black Belts and their culture of their functions. projects. Project leaders, change agents, expert application of tools, mentor Green Belts and their projects. 12 of 60 6
  • 7. DMAIC Objectives Step A • DEFINE Phase Purpose – Step A: Customer & Project CTQs – Step B: Team Charter (4‐Blocker) – St C Th Hi h L l P Step C: The High Level Process Map  M • Change Acceleration Process (CAP) – E = Q x A – The Model – Key CAP tools:  • ARMI • GRPI • Threat/Opportunity Matrix • In/Out of the Frame 13 of 60 DMAIC Customer & Project CTQs Step A CTQ Definition and CTQ Elements Product/ Cycle Time to Deliver Process Drawings Characteristic From Notice To Proceed To Customer Measure Delivery Time of Drawings (Weeks) Need CTQ On Time Target 13 Weeks Delivery Specification/ Tolerance 15 Weeks Limit(s) A performance standard translates customer needs into quantified requirements for our product or process 14 of 60 7
  • 8. A Project Team Charter DMAIC Step B Business Case (Problem statement) Potential Issues/ Speed Inhibitors •Multilin has a small market share in Indonesia  • Data collection  compared to the more established European relays  manufacturer. Need to improve our service to  Project Team customer and increase sales in Indonesia.   customer and increase sales in Indonesia Name Org. Role % Ded. Goal Statement Vince Tullo Manager         Champion Stuward Thompson Manager Champion •To increase sales figures in Indonesia in 2004 to   W.N. Yew          Sales                 Leader          70% $1.8M. Daniel Sutando Sales leader Member 10% W.Y. Tan Sr App Engr Member 10% • To ensure relevant projects are pursued and to  Steven Tao    BB                  Member         5% improve the market coverage for distributors, EPCs,  and end users. Milestones esto es Owner Date Scope Included: Project Charter Approved         YWN /Tao        Apr 30 • Multilin relays, Indonesia Market Measure /Baseline                      YWN/Tan          July 30 Analyze                                         WN/Tao Aug 30 Deliverables  Improve                                       YWN/Tao       Sept 30 Control                                          YWN/Tao   Oct 30 Order growth for 2004 Close                                              YWN/Tao   Nov 30 15 of 60 DMAIC WIRE MILL PROJECT Step C 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 correct wire on cold change wire correct wire on wire size pulley weld reel speed size pulley build stand # feet per on out of damaged spool out of damaged reel round pulley round pulley 1 measureme nt accuracy measureme nt accuracy Xs proper die Input Legend lubrication l b i ti direction of critical lubricant flow pH level controllabl e 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 noise correct accurat e fat level size tension setting pressure out of temperature round Legend 1) Start of shift 13) Wire size change 2) Change final capstan felt 14) Stop machine 3) Check for excessive 15) Replace dies (as required) slivers/fines 4) Check size 5) Check surface quality 16) 17) 18) ) Restring new setup Check wire size Attach wire to spool p CTQ’s A) Diameter B) Out-of-round ) Ys 6) Check stand supply 19) Set dancer air pressure C) Loops 7) Is reel spooled D) Tangles 8) Connect wire to new reel 20) Crack valve 21) Check lubricant flow E) Pinchouts 9) Check size 22) Start spooler F) Surface 10) Check surface quality quality 11) Check for acceptable spool23) Start capstan build 12) Store in enamel room 16 of 60 8
  • 9. Objectives DMAIC • Introduction to Measure - Measure Phase Deliverables - Using Statistics to Solve Problems • Measure Step 1: Select CTQs - Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Process Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Process - Process Mapping - Failure Modes & Effect Analysis (FMEA) - Pareto Chart - Cause & Effect Diagram • Measure Step 2: Define Performance Standards - Performance Standard / Defect / - Basic Nature of Data • Measure Step 3: Measurement System • Introduction to Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) 17 of 60 DMAIC The Statistical Problem Goal: Find the Relationship Process - A Y = f(X1, …, Xn) Process - B     Shape of the Curves CHARACTERIZES the Process p Process B is Better than Process A* * Assumes same scale 18 of 60 9
  • 10. DMAIC Select CTQ Characteristics Step 1 Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Process Mapping (Flow Chart) Functional Requirements (HOW’s) Requirements Customer (WHAT’s) Map Customer Needs to Potential Hows Identify Critical Few - Resource Planning Map “Information” Flow Identify All Touch Points 19 of 60 DMAIC Select CTQ Characteristics Step 1 Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (FMEA) Process Step Potential Potential SE Potential O Current D R Action Owner OR Failure Failure Effects V Causes C Controls E P Recommended Part Number Mode C T N Anticipate Potential Failures in Process / Products & Develop Proactive Mitigation Plans D e fe c ts b y O p e ra tio n 20% of causes account for 1 00 0 0 00 100 80% of the problem 80 Percent Count 60 50 0 0 00 40 20 0 0 W W PE LO P LO HA EF AT 1 INS 2 P H E3 RF D e fe c t CH .S ST AG CO HO LE X -R AY HO LE INS BE NC HO L LW A TE MA AL A FIN FIN C o unt 2 7 6 1 4 41 3 0 8 4 41 2 7 2 0 41 0 2 5 9 91 0 1 4 9 1 9 3 3 5 3 8 2 8 6 1 5 4 1 1 0 4 9 6 4 3 3 6 7 0 7 P erce nt 2 6 .2 1 2 .4 1 2 .1 9 .7 9 .6 8 .8 7 .9 5 .1 4 .7 3 .5 C um % 2 6 .2 3 8 .6 5 0 .6 6 0 .4 7 0 .0 7 8 .8 8 6 .7 9 1 .8 9 6 .5 1 0 0 .0 20 of 60 10
  • 11. Performance Standards Objectives DMAIC Step 2 • Determine the Performance Standard • Define a Defect - What are the customer’s acceptance criteria for the part/product or process? • Established How to Measure the Quality of the Part / Product or Process - Where are the data coming from? - How do you measure the process? - What are the units of measure? - Is it a discrete or continuous measure? • Gained Consensus On the Performance Standard 21 of 60 DMAIC What’s Performance Standards Step 2 • Are Requirement(s) or Specification(s) Imposed by the Customer on a Specific CTQ • Translate Customer Needs into Measurable Characteristic – Have Clear Operational Definition, i.e. Specifies What to Measure, How to Measure & Collect the Data – Specifies Target or Mean – Impose Specification Limits – Have Clear Defect Definition CTQs Quantified – Everybody on Same Page 22 of 60 11
  • 12. DMAIC More Performance Standards . . . Step 2 Target Good Product Defective Product Tolerance Defective Product = USL - LSL LSL USL Lower Spec Limit Upper Spec Limit Specification limits are set in order to divide customer satisfaction from customer disappointment. While the exact limits may not be explicitly stated by the customer (and captured in Step 1), their specific values come from what the customer defines as a defect. 23 of 60 DMAIC The Basic Nature of Data Step 2 • Continuous Data - Characterizes a product or process feature in terms of its size, weight, volts, time, or currency - The measurement scale can be meaningfully divided into finer and finer increments of precision - Distributions: To apply the normal distribution, one must necessarily use continuous data • Discrete Data - Counts the frequency of occurrence: e.g., the number of times something happens or fails to happen - Is not capable of being meaningfully subdivided into more precise increments - The validity of inferences made from discrete data are highly dependent upon the number of observations. The sample size required to characterize a discrete product or process feature is much larger than that required when continuous data is used. - Distributions: The Poisson and binomial models are used in connection with this type of data 24 of 60 12
  • 13. DMAIC Making Data Driven Decisions Step 3 • Six Sigma is all about reducing defects for the customer.  Fewer defect result in  a more satisfied customer. • The project team must decide what needs to be done to improve quality for  the customer based on actual data – measurements of the product or process. • The measurement system (gauge) used to collect the project data has to be The measurement system (gauge) used to collect the project data has to be  sufficiently good to allow the project team to make the correct decisions. • A measurement system must deliver data that accurately represents the  project or product. It is defective if it does not. • The Six Sigma project team becomes the customer for the measurement  process. There are many CTQs a project team must consider when evaluating  the quality of a gauge… If the gauge isn’t good enough for the needs of the project, th i ’t d h f th d f th j t you have to fix it (using DMAIC) before you can move on! 25 of 60 The Measurement Process DMAIC Step 3 In order to improve a product or process, we must measure it. We have submit the output from that process to a second measurement process. Parts (Example) As a result, all of our observations of the original Inputs Process ocess Outputs p process are distorted byy errors in our measurement Inputs system. We need to make sure these error don’t dominate our view of the process! • Observations Measurement Outputs • Measurements Process • Data 26 of 60 13
  • 14. DMAIC Accuracy (Bias) ‐ Shift in the Average Step 3 Inputs Process Outputs Inputs Measurement Outputs Process Actual(Part) + Meas. System = Observed(Total) True Avg Bias Obs. Avg Measurement System Bias – Determined through “Calibration Study” 27 of 60 DMAIC Measurement System Precision Step 3 Inputs Process Outputs Inputs Measurement Outputs Process Product Variability Measurement Total Variability (part) Variability (Observed total) actual(part) + meas. system = observed(total) Measurement System Variability – Investigated through “R&R Study” 28 of 60 14
  • 15. DMAIC Accuracy vs. Precision Step 3 x xx x xx x xx Accurate? Accurate? x Yes No Yes No x xx xx x xx Precise? Precise? x Yes No Yes No Measured Value The True Value x x x x Accurate? Accurate? x x x Yes Yes No x x x No x x x x x Precise? Precise? x x Yes No Yes No x x x x x Accuracy: the difference between the observed average and the truth. Precision: the amount of inconsistency between measurements. 29 of 60 Characteristics of a Measurement System DMAIC Step 3 • Accuracy : Differences between observed average measurement  and a standard. • Resolution : The smallest scale of the measurement. • Stability : Do measurements change with time? • Linearityy : Is the measurement proportional to the magnitude (size,  p p g ( , weight, etc) of the sample. • Precision : Noise of the measurements. – Repeatability: variation when one person repeatedly measures the  same unit with the same measuring equipment.  Also called Equipment  Variation (EV). – Reproducibility: variation when two or more people measure the same  unit with the same measuring equipment.  Also called Appraiser  Variation (AV). Variation (AV) 30 of 60 15
  • 16. WHAT IS MINITAB? • Statistical software package • Has many of the tools needed to successfully analyze data with rigor - Graphs - Statistical tools for data analysis - Six Sigma Reports • Descriptive Statistics • Gage R & R • Capability Analysis (ZST/ZLT) • Graphing - Many Types! (Try them all!) • Pareto, Fish bone • Hypothesis Testing • Product & Process Six Sigma Reports • Generation of Test Plans for Designed Experiments • Analysis of DOE results • Statistical Process Control A Great Toolbox for Six Sigma Projects! 31 of 60 What does Minitab Look Like? Menu Bars: For quick access to common commands. Session Window: Shows Minitab text output (One only is present) Worksheet Window: Kind of like an Excel worksheet (at least one is always present). A tool is available to manage multiple worksheets. 32 of 60 16
  • 17. Objectives DMAIC • Calculate baseline capability of the process using either  continuous or discrete data • Statistically define the improvement goals y p g • Generated a list of Statistically Significant Xs based on  analysis of historical data • Identified which Xs to further investigate in the Improve  phase • Gained consensus with the project team on the list of Xs for Gained consensus with the project team on the list of Xs for  investigation 33 of 60 DMAIC Step 4: Establish Process Capability Step 4 USL Y = f (X 1 . . . X n) The variation inherent to any dependent variable (Y) is determined by the variations inherent to each of the independent variables. (X) Poor Excellent Process Capability Process Capability Very High Very High Very Low Very Low Probability of Probability of Probability of Probability of Defects Defects Defects Defects LSL USL LSL USL Low Z High Z Z is a Measure of Process Capability 34 of 60 17
  • 18. Step 5: Define Performance Objective p(x) Benchmark Entitlement Baseline Defects Benchmark: World-Class performance Entitlement: The level of performance a business should be able to achieve given the investments already made Baseline: The current level of performance Benchmarking Sets the Ultimate Goal, while Baselining Takes Current Measurements to Monitor a Process 35 of 60 DMAIC Step 6: Identify Sources of Variation Step 6 Y= f (X) To get results, should we focus our behavior on the Y or X ? n Y n X1 . . . Xn n Dependent n Independent n Output n Input-Process n Effect n Cause n Symptom n Problem n Monitor n Control Historically the Y, … with Six Sigma the Xs 36 of 60 18
  • 19. Process Capability DMAIC Step 4 Determining Process Capability (Steps 1 – 4) 1. Identify Requirements on the Customer or Internal Y These are often expressed quantitatively as target values plus specification limits. - Anything “outside of the specification limits” is a defect. Target Value g (lower specification limit) LSL USL (upper specification limit) 90 100 110 Defects Defects Tolerance 2. Determine Process Distribution We expect variation in our process. Mean = 102 The Y’s measured on a large number Ys  = 5.0 of parts will form a distribution. For simplicity, we’ll assume that they form a normal distribution with a known mean and standard deviation. 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 37 of 60 Process Capability DMAIC Step 4 3. Superimpose your process distribution on to the target and specification limits. Target Mean = 102  = 5.0 LSL USL Probability of Probability of a Defect a Defect 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 4. Apply some Basic Statistics. 1. We can relate our distribution to the standardized normal distribution. • The total area under the standard curve = 1 (or 100%) 2. If we can determine the Z l corresponding to a specification li i 2 d i h Z-value di ifi i limit, then we can calculate the area beyond that limit (out of specification) • The area beyond a given specification limit is the fraction of the population that is defective wrt that limit. 38 of 60 19
  • 20. Process Capability DMAIC Step 4 Putting it all together (Steps 1 – 4) Total Area Outside of Specification Limits = (0.055 + 0.008) = 0.063 6.3% of what we produce is defective 90  102 Notice also that our 110  102 Z(LSL)   2.4 Z(USL)   1.6 5 process is not centered 5 Probability  0.008 on the target Probability  0.055 Target Mean = 102  = 5.0 LSL USL 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 39 of 60 Single- Single-Tail Z Table (values from 0.00 to 3.99) Z 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0 0.5000 0.4960 0.4920 0.4880 0.4840 0.4801 0.4761 0.4721 0.4681 0.4641 0.1 0.4602 0.4562 0.4522 0.4483 0.4443 0.4404 0.4364 0.4325 0.4286 0.4247 0.2 0.4207 0.4168 0.4129 0.4090 0.4052 0.4013 0.3974 0.3936 0.3897 0.3859 0.3 0.3821 0.3783 0.3745 0.3707 0.3669 0.3632 0.3594 0.3557 0.3520 0.3483 0.4 0.3446 0.3409 0.3372 0.3336 0.3300 0.3264 0.3228 0.3192 0.3156 0.3121 0.5 0.3085 0.3050 0.3015 0.2981 0.2946 0.2912 0.2877 0.2843 0.2810 0.2776 0.6 0.2743 0.2709 0.2676 0.2643 0.2611 0.2578 0.2546 0.2514 0.2483 0.2451 z 0.7 0.2420 0.2389 0.2358 0.2327 0.2296 0.2266 0.2236 0.2206 0.2177 0.2148 0.8 0.2119 0.2090 0.2061 0.2033 0.2005 0.1977 0.1949 0.1922 0.1894 0.1867 0.9 0.1841 0.1814 0.1788 0.1762 0.1736 0.1711 0.1685 0.1660 0.1635 0.1611 1 0.1587 0.1562 0.1539 0.1515 0.1492 0.1469 0.1446 0.1423 0.1401 0.1379 1.1 0.1357 0.1335 0.1314 0.1292 0.1271 0.1251 0.1230 0.1210 0.1190 0.1170 1.2 0.1151 0.1131 0.1112 0.1093 0.1075 0.1056 0.1038 0.1020 0.1003 0.0985 1.3 0.0968 0.0951 0.0934 0.0918 0.0901 0.0885 0.0869 0.0853 0.0838 0.0823 Calculates the 1.4 0.0808 0.0793 0.0778 0.0764 0.0749 0.0735 0.0721 0.0708 0.0694 0.0681 1.5 0.0668 0.0655 0.0643 0.0630 0.0618 0.0606 0.0594 0.0582 0.0571 0.0559 probability of a USL 1.6 0.0548 0.0537 0.0526 0.0516 0.0505 0.0495 0.0485 0.0475 0.0465 0.0455 1.7 0.0446 0.0436 0.0427 0.0418 0.0409 0.0401 0.0392 0.0384 0.0375 0.0367 defect above the 1.8 0.0359 0.0351 0.0344 0.0336 0.0329 0.0322 0.0314 0.0307 0.0301 0.0294 1.9 0.0287 0.0281 0.0274 0.0268 0.0262 0.0256 0.0250 0.0244 0.0239 0.0233 given value of z 2 0.0228 0.0222 0.0217 0.0212 0.0207 0.0202 0.0197 0.0192 0.0188 0.0183 2.1 0.0179 0.0174 0.0170 0.0166 0.0162 0.0158 0.0154 0.0150 0.0146 0.0143 2.2 0.0139 0.0136 0.0132 0.0129 0.0125 0.0122 0.0119 0.0116 0.0113 0.0110 2.3 0.0107 0.0104 0.0102 0.0099 0.0096 0.0094 0.0091 0.0089 0.0087 0.0084 2.4 0.0082 0.0080 0.0078 0.0075 0.0073 0.0071 0.0069 0.0068 0.0066 0.0064 2.5 0.0062 0.0060 0.0059 0.0057 0.0055 0.0054 0.0052 0.0051 0.0049 0.0048 2.6 0.0047 0.0045 0.0044 0.0043 0.0041 0.0040 0.0039 0.0038 0.0037 0.0036 2.7 0.0035 0.0034 0.0033 0.0032 0.0031 0.0030 0.0029 0.0028 0.0027 0.0026 2.8 0.0026 0.0025 0.0024 0.0023 0.0023 0.0022 0.0021 0.0021 0.0020 0.0019 2.9 29 0.0019 0 0019 0.0018 0 0018 0.0018 0 0018 0.0017 0 0017 0.0016 0 0016 0.0016 0 0016 0.0015 0 0015 0.0015 0 0015 0.0014 0 0014 0.0014 0 0014 3 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 0.0012 0.0012 0.0011 0.0011 0.0011 0.0010 0.0010 3.1 9.68E-04 9.36E-04 9.04E-04 8.74E-04 8.45E-04 8.16E-04 7.89E-04 7.62E-04 7.36E-04 7.11E-04 3.2 6.87E-04 6.64E-04 6.41E-04 6.19E-04 5.98E-04 5.77E-04 5.57E-04 5.38E-04 5.19E-04 5.01E-04 3.3 4.83E-04 4.67E-04 4.50E-04 4.34E-04 4.19E-04 4.04E-04 3.90E-04 3.76E-04 3.62E-04 3.50E-04 3.4 3.37E-04 3.25E-04 3.13E-04 3.02E-04 2.91E-04 2.80E-04 2.70E-04 2.60E-04 2.51E-04 2.42E-04 3.5 2.33E-04 2.24E-04 2.16E-04 2.08E-04 2.00E-04 1.93E-04 1.85E-04 1.79E-04 1.72E-04 1.65E-04 3.6 1.59E-04 1.53E-04 1.47E-04 1.42E-04 1.36E-04 1.31E-04 1.26E-04 1.21E-04 1.17E-04 1.12E-04 3.7 1.08E-04 1.04E-04 9.96E-05 9.58E-05 9.20E-05 8.84E-05 8.50E-05 8.16E-05 7.84E-05 7.53E-05 3.8 7.24E-05 6.95E-05 6.67E-05 6.41E-05 6.15E-05 5.91E-05 5.67E-05 5.44E-05 5.22E-05 5.01E-05 3.9 4.81E-05 4.62E-05 4.43E-05 4.25E-05 4.08E-05 3.91E-05 3.75E-05 3.60E-05 3.45E-05 3.31E-05 40 of 60 20
  • 21. Identify Variation Sources DMAIC Step 6 Goal: Process on Target with Minimum Spread Desired Problem with Spread Accurate but Current not Precise Situation LSL T USL Problem with Centering – Not on Target Current Desired Situation Precise but not Accurate LSL T USL  Is the Problem Centering, Spread, or Both? 41 of 60 DMAIC Continuous Data Analysis Road Map Step 6 One Sample Two Samples Multiple Samples Study Stability (Run Chart) Study Shape (Histogram, Dot Plot, Normality) Study Spread Data paired? (Chi Square-Test) Study Spread (Homogeneity of Variance) Study Spread Study Centering (F test) (F-test) (Paired t test) t-test) Study Centering Study Centering (1 sample t-test) (ANOVA) Study Centering (2 sample t-test) 42 of 60 21
  • 22. Descriptive Statistics DMAIC Step 6 Stat > Basic Statistics > Display Descriptive Statistics Provides summary report of basic statistical information p-value > .05 Cannot Histogram Reject H0 Minitab Output No evidence that data is non-normal Dot Plot Basic Statistical Information Confidence Intervals 43 of 60 DMAIC X and Y Data Correlation Step 6 25 Strong Positive Correlation 20 15 Y 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 X 25 No Correlation 20 15 Y 10 5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 X 44 of 60 22
  • 23. Improve Phase Objectives • The benefits of Design of Experiments (DOE’s) • Key concepts and terms associated with DOE’s • Performing a simple full factorial and fractional DOE’s and  interpreting the results • Awareness of screening designs and higher level response  surface designs 45 of 60 DMAIC What’s Improve Phase About. . . • Develop an Improvement Strategy • Determine which candidate x’s identified in the Analyze Phase are truly “critical X’s”. • If possible, determine a quantitative transfer function that relates your Y to these critical X’s • Identify Improvement Actions • Determine optimal settings for the X’s • Show the impact of the changes on meeting project or business objectives. Y = f(x) • Validate the Improvement • Demonstrate the validity of your identified improvement actions via additional experiments or a pilot study • Develop a Plan to Implement the Change It’s More than Just Designed Experiments 46 of 60 23
  • 24. DMAIC Common “Improve” Tools Basic Intermediate Advanced  Process Map  DOE  DOE  Fishbone  Full Factorial  Response Surface  Box Plot  Fractional  Taguchi (Inner / Factorial Outer Array)  Time Order Plots  Intro to  Simulation Models  Hypothesis Tests Response  Linear Regression Surface  Already Covered  Covered in Improve  Mistake Proofing  Multivariate  Covered in DFSS Regression  Adv. Level III e.g. ProModel LOW Problem Sophistication • Complexity • Risk HIGH Match the Tool to the • Business Impact Problem • Data Availability 47 of 60 DMAIC DOE – Design of Experiments Steps 7-8 Y = f (x1, x2, x3,……xn) Response (Y) Factors (x’s) (x s) • The measured outcome of an • The critical X’s which determine the experiment response,Y • The value observed for the CTQ • They can be categorical or being explored numerical Ranges Levels • The extreme values for each factor • In DOE’s we investigate the effect determines the range for that factor of each factor at more than one - the region of interest/investigation setting or value 48 of 60 24
  • 25. DMAIC Benefits of DOEs Steps 7-8 Classical Approach OFAT - One Factor at a Time • Change one variable, X2, 100 90 while holding all others constant. 80 • Find a maximum 70 • Hold X2 at the 60 “maximum effect” level and Factor X1 repeat the process for the other variables. OFAT • Requires more experiments than a DOE • Becomes unmanageable as the number of factors increases • Can be very expensive and time consuming – and may not work very well 49 of 60 Benefits of Design of Experiments DMAIC Steps 7-8 DOE Approach • Select factors and levels • Select mathematical model designed to obtain maximum information for the number 100 00 90 of factors/levels selected. • In your experiments change 80 the factor levels in a systematic 70 manner so that all coefficients in 60 the model can be uniquely computed. (Orthogonality) Factor X1 • Solve the resulting set of simultaneous equations to obtain the coefficients. coefficients • Use statistical tests to determine if the coefficients are statistically significant, and if the resulting model (transfer function) is adequate. • Use the results of your DOE to plan the next DOE (if needed). 50 of 60 25
  • 26. DMAIC Screening Designs Steps 7-8 The Team’s understanding at the beginning of the project What Mother Nature Knows The following 7 Factors may be critical X's Yield = 64.25 + A. Temperature (160C - 180C) 11.50*A B. Monomer Concentration (20% - 40%) - C. Catalyst Vendor (Sally - Ed) 2.50*B D. Stirring Speed ( 50 RPM - 100 RPM) + E. Monomer Purity ( 90% - 98%) 0.75*C F. Pressure ( 100 PSI - 500 PSI) + G. Acetone/Methanol Ratio - ( 0.25 - 0.50) 5.00*A*C We need an efficient method for screening these "candidate critical X's" so that we can identify the 'Vital Few" 51 of 60 DMAIC Objectives • In the physical world, the law of Entropy explains the gradual loss of  order in a system.  The same law applies to business processes.  • Unless we add “energy” (in the form of documentation and ongoing  process controls), processes will tend to degrade over time, losing the  gains achieved by design and improvement activities. • The quality plan is the structure through which we add this “energy”  to business processes.   This is Control and the main objectives: – To make sure that our process stays in control after the solution has been  implemented.  – To quickly detect the out of control state and determine the associated  special causes so that actions can be taken to correct the problem before  special causes so that actions can be taken to correct the problem before nonconformance are produced. 52 of 60 26
  • 27. DMAIC Control – Control – Keep It On Target • Focus on the Right CTQ • Quantify the Problem Define • Determine the Drivers Measure Y = f(X) Analyze • Identify Needed Change Improve • Implement the Change • Validate Measurement System (Xs) • Determine Process Capability • Develop/Modify Quality Plan Control > Process Documentation > Process Controls • Implement Process Controls • Audit Plan Established • Transition to Operating Owners 53 of 60 DMAIC On the Lookout for Special Cause • Common cause variation – Natural variability – Random – Inherent in the process • Special cause variation – May be caused by operator errors, adjusted machines, or  defective raw materials – Generally large when compared to the common cause variation – Considered an unacceptable level of process performance • Special causes tend to cause a process to shift out of  control where. The output does not meet the desired  specifications. 54 of 60 27
  • 28. DMAIC What is a Process Control System? • A Process Control System (PCS) – strategy for maintaining the improved process performance over time – identifies the specific actions and tools required for sustaining the  process improvements or gains  • A control system may incorporate y y p – Risk Management – Mistake‐proofing devices  – Statistical process control (SPC)  – Data collection plans  – Ongoing measurements  – Audit plans  – Response plans* Response plans – Product drawings  – Process documentation  – Process ownership 55 of 60 Statistical Process Control DMAIC Step 12 Statistical -- Probability based decision rules. Process -- Any repetitive task or steps. Control -- Monitoring of process performance. SPC will signal when the process is “out-of- control”. Your Mission is to find out why and take corrective action! 56 of 60 28
  • 29. Control Chart Components DMAIC Step 12 Average Chart Statis (mean/defects) 0.065 Upper Control Limit measured Grand Average 0.060 Central Line stic Lower Control Limit 0.055 0 5 Sample / Subgroup (time ordered) 10 15 20 25 Monitors Shift Variation Chart e/Sigma) 0.010 Upper Control Limit red Statistic (Range measur 0.005 0 005 Average Range/Sigma 0.000 Central Line Lower Control Limit Sample / Subgroup (time ordered) Monitors Drift 57 of 60 Significance of 3s limit DMAIC Step 12 A Control Chart is a graphic display of a continuing two tailed test with HO and HA defined as: Ho: iHa: i /2 /2 UCLx X LCLx /2 • For 3 limits,  = 0.00135. approximate confidence level is 99.7%. • 3  limits provide good sensitivity to change with low potential for over- reacting when the process is stable. 58 of 60 29
  • 30. Types of Control Chart DMAIC Step 12 Variable Chart (Continuous) Attribute Chart (Discrete) • Uses Measured Values • Defects: Number of non conformance in a part – Cycle Time, Lengths, • Defective: Pass/Fail, Diameters, Drops, etc. Good/Bad, Go/No-Go • Generally One Characteristic Per y Information Chart • Can Be Many Characteristics • More Expensive, But More Per Chart Information • Less Expensive, But Less Information High or Low Volume? Constant Variable Lot / Unit Size Lot / Unit Size Low L High Defects Poisson c u Individuals & X-Bar & Moving Range Defective np p Binomial Range 59 of 60 THANK YOU 60 of 60 30