SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
Download to read offline
Research Inventy: International Journal of Engineering And Science
Vol.4, Issue 6 (June 2014), PP 37-45
Issn (e): 2278-4721, Issn (p):2319-6483, www.researchinventy.com
37
Higher Separation Axioms via Semi*-open sets
S. Pious Missier1
, A. Robert2
1
Department of Mathematics, V.O.Chidambaram College, Thoothukudi, India-628008.
2
Department of Mathematics, Aditanar College, Tiruchendur, India-628216.
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to introduce new separation axioms semi*-regular, semi*-normal, s*-
regular, s**-normal using semi*-open sets and investigate their properties. We also study the relationships
among themselves and with known axioms regular, normal, semi-regular and semi-normal.
Mathematics Subject Classification 2010: 54D10, 54D15
Keywords and phrases: s**-normal, s*-regular, semi*-normal, semi*-regular.
I. INTRODUCTION
Separation axioms are useful in classifying topological spaces. Maheswari and Prasad [8, 9]
introduced the notion of s-regular and s-normal spaces using semi-open sets. Dorsett [3, 4] introduced the
concept of semi-regular and semi-normal spaces and investigate their properties.
In this paper, we define semi*-regular, semi*-normal, s*-regular and s**-normal spaces using semi*-
open sets and investigate their basic properties. We further study the relationships among themselves and with
known axioms regular, normal, semi-regular and semi-normal.
II. PRELIMINARIES
Throughout this paper (X, τ) will always denote a topological space on which no separation axioms are
assumed, unless explicitly stated. If A is a subset of the space (X, τ), Cl(A)
and Int(A) respectively denote the closure and the interior of A in X .
Definition 2.1[7]: A subset A of a topological space (X, τ) is called
(i) generalized closed (briefly g-closed) if Cl(A)⊆U whenever A⊆U and U is open in X.
(ii) generalized open (briefly g-open) if XA is g-closed in X.
Definition 2.2: Let A be a subset of X. Then
(i) generalized closure[5] of A is defined as the intersection of all g-closed sets
containing A and is denoted by Cl*(A).
(ii) generalized interior of A is defined as the union of all g-open subsets of A and is
denoted by Int*(A).
Definition 2.3: A subset A of a topological space (X, τ) is called
(i) semi-open [6] (resp. semi*-open[12]) if A⊆Cl(Int(A)) (resp. A⊆Cl*(Int(A)).
(ii) semi-closed [1] (resp. semi*-closed[13]) if Int(Cl(A))⊆A (resp. Int*(Cl(A))⊆A).
The class of all semi*-open (resp. semi*-closed) sets is denoted by S*O(X, τ) (resp. S*C(X,τ)).
The semi*-interior of A is defined as the union of all semi*-open sets of X contained in A. It is denoted
by s*Int(A).The semi*-closure of A is defined as the intersection of all semi*-closed sets in X containing A. It is
denoted by s*Cl(A).
Theorem 2.4[13]: Let AX and let xX. Then xs*Cl(A) if and only if every semi*-open set in X containing
x intersects A.
Higher Separation Axioms via…
38
Theorem 2.5[12]: (i) Every open set is semi*-open.
(ii) Every semi*-open set is semi-open.
Definition 2.6: A space X is said to be T1[17] if for every pair of distinct points x and y in X, there is an open
set U containing x but not y and an open set V containing y but not x.
Definition 2.7: A space X is R0 [16] if every open set contains the closure of each of its points.
Theorem 2.8: (i) X is R0 if and only if for every closed set F, Cl({x})F=ϕ, for all xXF.
(ii) X is semi*-R0 if and only if for every semi*-closed set F, s*Cl({x})F=ϕ, for all xXF.
Definition 2.9: A topological space X is said to be
(i) regular if for every pair consisting of a point x and a closed set B not containing x, there are
disjoint open sets U and V in X containing x and B respectively.[17]
(ii) s-regular if for every pair consisting of a point x and a closed set B not containing x, there are
disjoint semi-open sets U and V in X containing x and B respectively.[8]
(iii) semi-regular if for every pair consisting of a point x and a semi-closed set B not containing
x, there are disjoint semi-open sets U and V in X containing x and B respectively.[3]
Definition 2.10: A topological space X is said to be
(i) normal if for every pair of disjoint closed sets A and B in X, there are disjoint open sets U and
V in X containing A and B respectively.[17]
(ii) s-normal if for every pair of disjoint closed sets A and B in X, there are disjoint semi-open
sets U and V in X containing A and B respectively.[9]
(iii) semi-normal if for every pair of disjoint semi-closed sets A and B in X, there are disjoint
semi-open sets U and V in X containing A and B respectively.[4]
Definition 2.11: A function f :X⟶Y is said to be
(i) closed [17] if f (V) is closed in Y for every closed set V in X.
(ii) semi*-continuous [14] if f -1
(V) is semi*-open in X for every open set V in Y.
(iii) semi*-irresolute [15] if f -1
(V) is semi*-open in X for every semi*-open set V in Y.
(iv) contra-semi*-irresolute [15] if f -1
(V) is semi*-closed in X for every semi*-open set V in Y.
(v) semi*-open [14] if f (V) is semi*-open in Y for every open set V in X.
(vi) pre-semi*-open [14] if f(V) is semi*-open in Y for every semi*-open set V in X
(vii) contra-pre-semi*-open [14] if f(V) is semi*-closed in Y for every semi*-open set V in X.
(viii) pre-semi*-closed [14] if f(V) is semi*-closed in Y for every semi*-closed set V in X.
Lemma 2.12[10]: If A and B are subsets of X such that A∩B=ϕ and A is semi*-open in X, then
A∩s*Cl(B)=ϕ.
Theorem 2.13[15]: A function f :X⟶Y is semi*-irresolute if f -1
(F) is semi*-closed in X for every semi*-
closed set F in Y.
III. REGULAR SPACES ASSOCIATED WITH SEMI*-OPEN SETS.
In this section we introduce the concepts of semi*-regular and s*-regular spaces. Also we investigate
their basic properties and study their relationship with already existing concepts.
Definition 3.1: A space X is said to be semi*-regular if for every pair consisting of a point x and a semi*-closed
set B not containing x, there are disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing x and B respectively.
Higher Separation Axioms via…
39
Theorem 3.2: In a topological space X, the following are equivalent:
(i) X is semi*-regular.
(ii) For every xX and every semi*-open set U containing x, there exists a
semi*-open set V containing x such that s*Cl(V)U.
(iii) For every set A and a semi*-open set B such that ABϕ, there exists a semi*-
open set U such that AUϕ and s*Cl(U)B.
(iv) For every non-empty set A and semi*-closed set B such that AB=ϕ, there
exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V such that AUϕ and BV.
Proof: (i)(ii): Let U be a semi*-open set containing x. Then B=XU is a semi*-closed not containing x. Since
X is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets V and W containing x and B respectively. If y∈B, W is a
semi*-open set containing y that does not intersect V and hence by Theorem 2.4, y cannot belong to s*Cl(V).
Therefore s*Cl(V) is disjoint from B. Hence s*Cl(V)⊆U
(ii)(iii): Let ABϕ and B be semi*-open. Let xAB. Then by assumption, there exists a semi*-open set
U containing x such that s*Cl(U)B. Since xA, AUϕ. This proves (iii).
(iii)(iv): Suppose AB=ϕ, where A is non-empty and B is semi*-closed. Then XB is semi*-open and
A(XB)ϕ. By (iii), there exists a semi*-open set U such that AUϕ, and Us*Cl(U)XB. Put
V=Xs*Cl(U). Hence V is a semi*-open set containing B such that UV=U(Xs*Cl(U))U(XU)=ϕ. This
proves (iv).
(iv)(i). Let B be semi*-closed and xB. Take A={x}. Then AB=ϕ. By (iv), there exist disjoint semi*-open
sets U and V such that UAϕ and BV. Since UAϕ, xU. This proves that X is semi*-regular.
Theorem 3.3: Let X be a semi*-regular space.
(i) Every semi*-open set in X is a union of semi*-closed sets.
(ii) Every semi*-closed set in X is an intersection of semi*-open sets.
Proof: (i) Suppose X is s*-regular. Let G be a semi*-open set and xG. Then F=XG is semi*-closed and
x F. Since X is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets Ux and V in X such that xUx and F V.
Since Ux∩F Ux ∩V=ϕ, we have Ux XF=G. Take Vx=s*Cl(Ux). Then Vx is semi*-closed and by Lemma
2.12, Vx∩V=ϕ. Now FV implies that Vx∩F  Vx∩V=ϕ. It follows that x Vx  XF = G. This proves that G
=∪{Vx : xG}. Thus G is a union of semi*-closed sets.
(ii) Follows from (i) and set theoretic properties.
Theorem 3.4: If f is a semi*-irresolute and pre-semi*-closed injection of a topological space X into a semi*-
regular space Y, then X is semi*-regular.
Proof: Let xX and A be a semi*-closed set in X not containing x. Since f is pre-semi*-closed, f(A) is a semi*-
closed set in Y not containing f(x). Since Y is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets V1 and V2 in Y
such that f(x)V1 and f(A)⊆V2. Since f is semi*-irresolute, f -1
(V1) and f -1
(V2) are disjoint semi*-open sets in X
containing x and A respectively. Hence X is semi*-regular.
Theorem 3.5: If f is a semi*-continuous and closed injection of a topological space X into a regular space Y and
if every semi*-closed set in X is closed, then X is semi*-regular.
Higher Separation Axioms via…
40
Proof: Let xX and A be a semi*-closed set in X not containing x. Then by assumption, A is closed in X. Since
f is closed, f(A) is a closed set in Y not containing f(x). Since Y is regular, there exist disjoint open sets V1 and
V2 in Y such that f(x)V1 and f(A)⊆V2. Since f is semi*-continuous, f-1
(V1) and f-1
(V2) are disjoint semi*-open
sets in X containing x and A respectively. Hence X is semi*-regular.
Theorem 3.6: If f :X⟶Y is a semi*-irresolute bijection which is pre-semi*-open and X is semi*-regular. Then
Y is also semi*-regular.
Proof: Let f :X⟶Y be a semi*-irresolute bijection which is semi*-open and X be semi*-regular. Let y∈Y and
B be a semi*-closed set in Y not containing y. Since f is semi*-irresolute, by Theorem 2.13 f -1
(B) is a semi*-
closed set in X not containing f -1
(y). Since X is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U1 and U2
containing f -1
(y) and f -1
(B) respectively. Since f is pre-semi*-open, f(U1) and f(U2) are disjoint semi*-open sets
in Y containing y and B respectively. Hence Y is semi*-regular.
Theorem 3.7: If f is a continuous semi*-open bijection of a regular space X into a space Y and if every semi*-
closed set in Y is closed, then Y is semi*-regular.
Proof: Let y∈Y and B be a semi*-closed set in Y not containing y. Then by assumption, B is closed in Y. Since
f is a continuous bijection, f -1
(B) is a closed set in X not containing the point f -1
(y). Since X is regular, there
exist disjoint open sets U1 and U2 in X such that f -1
(y)∈U1 and f -1
(B)⊆U2. Since f is semi*-open, f( U1) and
f (U2) are disjoint semi*-open sets in Y containing x and B respectively. Hence Y is semi*-regular.
Theorem 3.8: If X is semi*-regular, then it is semi*-R0.
Proof: Suppose X is semi*-regular. Let U be a semi*-open set and xU. Take F = XU. Then F is a semi*-
closed set not containing x. By semi*-regularity of X, there are disjoint semi*-open sets V and W such that
xV, FW. If yF, then W is a semi*-open set containing y that does not intersect V. Therefore ys*Cl({V})
⇒ ys*Cl({x}). That is s*Cl({x})∩F=ϕ and hence s*Cl({x})XF= U. Hence X is semi*-R0.
Definition 3.9: A space X is said to be s*-regular if for every pair consisting of a point x and a closed set B not
containing x, there are disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing x and B respectively.
Theorem 3.10: (i) Every regular space is s*-regular.
(ii) Every s*-regular space is s-regular.
Proof: Suppose X is regular. Let F be a closed set and xF. Since X is regular, there exist disjoint open sets U
and V containing x and F respectively. Then by Theorem 2.5(i) U and V are semi*-open in X. This implies that
X is s*-regular. This proves (i).
Suppose X is s*-regular. Let F be a closed set and xF. Since X is s*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open
sets U and V containing x and F respectively. Then by Theorem 2.5(ii) U and V are semi-open in X. This
implies that X is s-regular. This proves (ii).
Remark 3.11: The reverse implications of the statements in the above theorem are not true as shown in the
following examples.
Example 3.12: Let X={a, b, c, d} with topology ={ϕ, {a}, {b}, {c}, {a, b}, {a, c}, {b, c},
{a, b, c}, X}. Clearly (X,) is s*-regular but not regular.
Example 3.13: Let X={a, b, c, d} with topology ={ϕ, {a}, {b}, {a, b}, {a, b, c}, X} Clearly (X,) is s-
regular not s*-regular.
Theorem 3.14: For a topological space X, the following are equivalent:
Higher Separation Axioms via…
41
(i) X is s*-regular.
(ii) For every xX and every open set U containing x, there exists a semi*-open set V containing x
such that s*Cl(V)U.
(iii) For every set A and an open set B such that ABϕ, there exists a semi*-open set U such that
AUϕ and s*Cl(U)B.
(iv) For every non-empty set A and closed set B such that AB=ϕ, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets
U and V such that AUϕ and BV.
Proof: (i)(ii): Let U be an open set containing x. Then B=XU is a closed set not containing x. Since X is s*-
regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets V and W containing x and B respectively. If y∈B, W is a semi*-
open set containing y that does not intersect V and hence by Theorem 2.4, y cannot belong to s*Cl(V).
Therefore s*Cl(V) is disjoint from B. Hence s*Cl(V)⊆U.
(ii)(iii): Let ABϕ and B be open. Let xAB. Then by assumption, there exists a semi*-open set U
containing x such that s*Cl(U)B. Since xA, AUϕ. This proves (iii).
(iii)(iv): Suppose AB=ϕ, where A is non-empty and B is closed. Then XB is open and A(XB)ϕ. By
(iii), there exists a semi*-open set U such that AUϕ, and Us*Cl(U)XB. Put V=Xs*Cl(U). Hence V is a
semi*-open set containing B such that UV=U(Xs*Cl(U)) U(XU)=ϕ. This proves (iv).
(iv)(i). Let B be closed and xB. Take A={x}. Then AB=ϕ. By (iv), there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U
and V such that UAϕ and BV. Since UAϕ, xU. This proves that X is s*-regular.
Theorem 3.15: If X is a regular T1 space, then for every pair of distinct points of X there exist semi*-open sets
containing them whose semi*-closures are disjoint.
Proof: Let x, y be two distinct points in the regular T1 space X. Since X is T1, {y} is closed. Since X is regular,
there exist disjoint open sets U1 and U2 containing x and {y} respectively. By Theorem 3.9(i), X is s*-regular
and hence by Theorem 3.13, there exist semi*-open sets V1 and V2 containing x, y such that s*Cl(V1)⊆U1 and
s*Cl(V2)⊆U2. Since U1 and U2 are disjoint, s*Cl(V1) and s*Cl(V2) are disjoint. This proves the theorem.
Theorem 3.16: Every semi*-regular space is s*-regular.
Proof: Suppose X is semi*-regular. Let F be a closed set and xF. Then by Theorem (i), F is semi*-closed in X.
Since X is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V containing x and F respectively. This
implies that X is s*-regular.
Theorem 3.17: (i) Every s*-regular T1 space is semi*-T2.
(ii) Every semi*-regular semi*-T1 space is semi*-T2.
Proof: Suppose X is s*-regular and T1. Let x and y be two distinct points in X. Since X is T1, {x} is closed and
y{x}. Since X is s*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing {x} and y
respectively. It follows that X is semi*-T2. This proves (i).
Suppose X is semi*-regular and semi*-T1. Let x and y be two distinct points in X. Since X is semi*-T1, {x} is
semi*-closed and y{x}. Since X is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing
{x} and y respectively. It follows that X is semi*-T2. This proves (ii).
Theorem 3.18: Let X be an s*-regular space.
i) Every open set in X is a union of semi*-closed sets.
Higher Separation Axioms via…
42
ii) Every closed set in X is an intersection of semi*-open sets.
Proof: (i) Suppose X is s*-regular. Let G be an open set and xG. Then F=XG is closed and
x F. Since X is s*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets Ux and U in X such that xUx and F U.
Since Ux∩F Ux ∩U=ϕ, we have Ux XF=G. Take Vx=s*Cl(Ux). Then Vx is semi*-closed. Now FU
implies that Vx∩F  Vx∩U=ϕ. It follows that x Vx  XF = G. This proves that G =∪{Vx : xG}. Thus G
is a union of semi*-closed sets.
(ii) Follows from (i) and set theoretic properties.
IV. NORMAL SPACES ASSOCIATED WITH SEMI*-OPEN SETS.
In this section we introduce variants of normal spaces namely semi*-normal spaces and s**-normal spaces and
investigate their basic properties. We also give characterizations for these spaces.
Definition 4.1: A space X is said to be semi*-normal if for every pair of disjoint semi*-closed sets A and B in
X, there are disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing A and B respectively.
Theorem 4.2: In a topological space X, the following are equivalent:
(i) X is semi*-normal.
(ii) For every semi*-closed set A in X and every semi*-open set U containing A, there exists a semi*-
open set V containing A such that s*Cl(V)U.
(iii) For each pair of disjoint semi*-closed sets A and B in X, there exists a semi*-open set U containing
A such that s*Cl(U)∩B=ϕ.
(iv) For each pair of disjoint semi*-closed sets A and B in X, there exist semi*-open sets U and V
containing A and B respectively such that s*Cl(U)∩s*Cl(V)=ϕ.
Proof: (i)(ii): Let U be a semi*-open set containing the semi*-closed set A. Then B=XU is a semi*-closed
set disjoint from A. Since X is semi*-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets V and W containing A and B
respectively. Then s*Cl(V) is disjoint from B, since if y∈B, the set W is a semi*-open set containing y disjoint
from V. Hence s*Cl(V)⊆U.
(ii)(iii): Let A and B be disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. Then XB is a semi*-open set containing A. By (ii),
there exists a semi*-open set U containing A such that s*Cl(U)  XB. Hence s*Cl(U)∩B=ϕ. This proves (iii).
(iii)(iv): Let A and B be disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. Then, by (iii), there exists a semi*-open set U
containing A such that s*Cl(U)∩B=ϕ. Since s*Cl(U) is semi*-closed, B and s*Cl(U) are disjoint semi*-closed
sets in X. Again by (iii), there exists a semi*-open set V containing B such that s*Cl(U)∩s*Cl(V)=ϕ. This
proves (iv).
(iv)(i): Let A and B be the disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. By (iv), there exist semi*-open sets U and V
containing A and B respectively such that s*Cl(U)∩s*Cl(V)=ϕ. Since U∩V s*Cl(U)∩s*Cl(V), U and V are
disjoint semi*-open sets containing A and B respectively. Thus X is semi*-normal.
Theorem 4.3: For a space X, then the following are equivalent:
(i) X is semi*-normal.
(ii) For any two semi*-open sets U and V whose union is X, there exist semi*-closed subsets A of U and
B of V whose union is also X.
Higher Separation Axioms via…
43
Proof: (i)(ii): Let U and V be two semi*-open sets in a semi*-normal space X such that X=U∪V. Then
XU, XV are disjoint semi*-closed sets. Since X is semi*-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets G1 and
G2 such that XUG1 and XVG2. Let A=XG1 and B=XG2. Then A and B are semi*-closed subsets of U
and V respectively such that A∪B=X. This proves (ii).
(ii)(i): Let A and B be disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. Then XA and XB are semi*-open sets whose union
is X. By (ii), there exists semi*-closed sets F1 and F2 such that F1⊆XA, F2⊆XB and F1∪F2 =X. Then XF1
and XF2 are disjoint semi*-open sets containing A and B respectively. Therefore X is semi*-normal.
Definition 4.4: A space X is said to be s**-normal if for every pair of disjoint closed sets A and B in X, there
are disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing A and B respectively.
Theorem 4.5: (i) Every normal space is s**-normal.
(ii) Every s**-normal space is s-normal.
(iii) Every semi*-normal space is s**-normal.
Proof: Suppose X is normal. Let A and B be disjoint closed sets in X. Since X is normal, there exist disjoint
open sets U and V containing A and B respectively. Then by Theorem 2.5(i), U and V are semi*-open in X.
This implies that X is s**-normal. This proves (i).
Suppose X is s**-normal. Let A and B be disjoint closed sets in X. Since X is s**-normal, there exist disjoint
semi*-open sets U and V containing A and B respectively. Then by Theorem 2.5(ii), U and V are semi-open in
X. This implies that X is s-normal. This proves (ii).
Suppose X is semi*-regular. Let A and B be disjoint closed sets in X. Then by Theorem 2.5(i), A and B are
disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. Since X is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V
containing A and B respectively. Therefore X is s**-normal. This proves (iii).
Theorem 4.6: In a topological space X, the following are equivalent:
(i) X is s**-normal.
(ii) For every closed set F in X and every open set U containing F, there exists a semi*-open set V
containing F such that s*Cl(V)U.
(iii) For each pair of disjoint closed sets A and B in X, there exists a semi*-open set U containing A such
that s*Cl(U)∩B=ϕ.
Proof: (i)(ii): Let U be a open set containing the closed set F. Then H=XU is a closed set disjoint from F.
Since X is s**-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets V and W containing F and H respectively. Then
s*Cl(V) is disjoint from H, since if y∈H, the set W is a semi*-open set containing y disjoint from V. Hence
s*Cl(V)⊆U.
(ii)(iii): Let A and B be disjoint closed sets in X. Then XB is an open set containing A. By (ii), there exists
a semi*-open set U containing A such that s*Cl(U)  XB. Hence s*Cl(U)∩B=ϕ. This proves (iii).
(iii)(i): Let A and B be the disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. By (iii), there exists a semi*-open set U
containing A such that s*Cl(U)∩B=ϕ. Take V=Xs*Cl(U). Then U and V are disjoint semi*-open sets
containing A and B respectively. Thus X is s**-normal.
Theorem 4.7: For a space X, then the following are equivalent:
(i) X is s**-normal.
Higher Separation Axioms via…
44
(ii) For any two open sets U and V whose union is X, there exist semi*-closed subsets A of U and B of V
whose union is also X.
Proof: (i)(ii): Let U and V be two open sets in an s**-normal space X such that X=U∪V. Then XU, XV
are disjoint closed sets. Since X is s**-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets G1 and G2 such that
XUG1 and XVG2. Let A=XG1 and B=XG2. Then A and B are semi*-closed subsets of U and V
respectively such that A∪B=X. This proves (ii).
(ii)(i): Let A and B be disjoint closed sets in X. Then XA and XB are open sets whose union is X. By (ii),
there exists semi*-closed sets F1 and F2 such that F1⊆XA, F2⊆XB and F1∪F2 =X. Then XF1 and XF2 are
disjoint semi*-open sets containing A and B respectively. Therefore X is s**-normal.
Remark 4.8: It is not always true that an s**-normal space X is s*-regular as shown in the following example.
However it is true if X is R0 as seen in Theorem 4.10.
Example 4.9: Let X={a, b, c, d} with topology ={ϕ, {a}, {b}, {a, b}, {a, b, c}, X}. Clearly (X,) is s**-
normal but not s*-regular.
Theorem 4.10: Every s**-normal R0 space is s*-regular.
Proof: Suppose X is s**-normal and R0. Let F be a closed set and xF. Since X is R0, by Theorem 2.8(i),
Cl({x})∩F=ϕ. Since X is s**-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing Cl({x}) and
F respectively. It follows that X is s*-regular.
Corollary 4.11: Every s**-normal T1 space is s*-regular.
Proof: Follows from the fact that every T1 space is R0 and Theorem 4.10.
Theorem 4.12: If f is an injective and semi*-irresolute and pre-semi*-closed mapping of a topological space X
into a semi*-normal space Y, then X is semi*-normal.
Proof: Let f be an injective and semi*-irresolute and pre-semi*-closed mapping of a topological space X into a
semi*-normal space Y. Let A and B be disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. Since f is a pre-semi*-closed function,
f(A) and f(B) are disjoint semi*-closed sets in Y. Since Y is semi*-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets
V1 and V2 in Y containing f(A) and f(B) respectively. Since f is semi*-irresolute, f -1
(V1) and f -1
(V2) are disjoint
semi*-open sets in X containing A and B respectively. Hence X is semi*-normal.
Theorem 4.13: If f is an injective and semi*-continuous and closed mapping of a topological space X into a
normal space Y and if every semi*-closed set in X is closed, then X is semi*- normal.
Proof: Let A and B be disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. By assumption, A and B are closed in X.
Then f(A) and f(B) are disjoint closed sets in Y. Since Y is normal, there exist disjoint open sets V1 and V2 in Y
such that f(A)⊆V1 and f(B)⊆V2.Then f -1
(V1) and f -1
(V2) are disjoint semi*-open sets in X containing A and B
respectively. Hence X is semi*- normal.
Theorem 4.14: If f :X⟶Y is a semi*-irresolute injection which is pre-semi*-open and X is semi*-normal, then
Y is alsosemi*-normal.
Proof: Let f :X⟶Y be a semi*-irresolute surjection which is semi*-open and X be semi*-normal. Let A and B
be disjoint semi*-closed sets in Y. Then f -1
(A) and f -1
(B) are disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. Since X is semi*-
normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U1 and U2 containing f -1
(A) and f -1
(B) respectively. Since f is pre-
semi*-open, f(U1) and f(U2) are disjoint semi*-open sets in Y containing A and B respectively. Hence Y is
semi*-normal.
Higher Separation Axioms via…
45
Remark 4.15: It is not always true that a semi*-normal space X is semi*-regular as shown in the following
example. However it is true if X is semi*-R0 as seen in Theorem 4.17.
Example 4.16: Let X={a, b, c, d} with topology ={ϕ, {a, b}, X}. Clearly (X,) is semi*-normal but not semi*-
regular.
Theorem 4.17: Every semi*-normal space that is semi*-R0 is semi*-regular.
Proof: Suppose X is semi*-normal that is semi*-R0. Let F be a semi*-closed set and xF. Since X is semi*-R0,
by Theorem 2.8(ii), s*Cl({x})∩F=ϕ. Since X is semi*-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X
containing s*Cl({x}) and F respectively. It follows that X is semi*-regular.
Corollary 4.18: Every semi*-normal semi*-T1 space is semi*-regular.
Proof: Follows from the fact that every semi*-T1 space is semi*-R0 and Theorem 4.13.
REFERENCES
[1] Biswas, N., On Characterization of semi-continuous functions, Atti. Accad. Naz. Lincei. Rend. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur.
48(8)1970, 399-402.
[2] Crossley, S.G and Hildebrand, S.K., Semi-topological properties, Fund. Math.74 (1972), 233-254.
[3] Dorsett, C., Semi –regular spaces, Soochow journal of Mathematics, 8 (1982), 45-53.
[4] Dorsett, C., Semi-Normal Spaces, Kyungpook Mathematical Journal, 25 (2)(1985), 173-180.
[5] Dunham, W., A new closure operator for Non-T1 topologies, Kyungpook Math. J. 22 (1982), 55-60.
[6] Levine,N., Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological space , Amer. Math. Monthly. 70 (1963), 36-41.
[7] Levine,N., Generalized closed sets in topology, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo. 19(2)(1970), 89-96.
[8] Maheswari, S.N., and Prasad, R., On s-regular spaces, Glansnik Mat.Ser.III 10 (30), 1975, 347-350.
[9] Maheswari, S.N., and Prasad, R., On s-normal spaces, Bull. Math. Soc. Sci Math. R. S. de Roumanie T22(70), 1978, 27-30.
[10] Pious Missier, S., and Robert, A., On Semi*-open Sets, International Journal of Mathematics and Soft Computing, 2(1) (2012),
95-102.
[11] Pious Missier, S. and Robert, A., Characterization of semi*-R0 and semi*-R1 spaces (communicated)
[12] Robert, A. and Pious Missier, S., A New Class of Nearly Open Sets, International Journal of Mathematical Archive, 3(7), 2012,
1-8.
[13] Robert, A. and Pious Missier, S., On Semi*-closed sets, Asian Journal Of Current Engineering And Maths.,1 (4) (2012),173-176.
[14] Robert, A. and Pious Missier, S., On Functions Associated with Semi*-open Sets, (communicated).
[15] Robert, A. and Pious Missier, S., More Functions Associated with Semi*-open Sets, (communicated).
[16] Shanin, N.A., On separation in topological spaces, C.R.(Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS(N.S.), 38(1943),110-113.
[17] Willard, S., General Topology, Addison – Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.(1970).

More Related Content

What's hot

On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological SpacesOn Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological SpacesIJMER
 
On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...
On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...
On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...BRNSS Publication Hub
 
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spacesSome forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spacesIOSR Journals
 
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open SetThe Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Setpaperpublications3
 
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological Spaces
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological SpacesSome Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological Spaces
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological SpacesIJERA Editor
 
D223034
D223034D223034
D223034irjes
 
On fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologyOn fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologybkrawat08
 
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff SpacesHausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spacesgizemk
 
Kundoc.com optimization and-differentiation-in-banach-spaces
Kundoc.com optimization and-differentiation-in-banach-spacesKundoc.com optimization and-differentiation-in-banach-spaces
Kundoc.com optimization and-differentiation-in-banach-spacesjuanpablo1382
 
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological Spaces
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological SpacesOn some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological Spaces
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological SpacesIJMER
 
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)inventionjournals
 
On Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some Generalizations
On Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some GeneralizationsOn Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some Generalizations
On Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some GeneralizationsBRNSS Publication Hub
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Scienceresearchinventy
 
Minimal M-gs Open and Maximal M-gs Closed Sets In Interior Minimal Space
Minimal M-gs Open and Maximal M-gs Closed Sets In Interior Minimal SpaceMinimal M-gs Open and Maximal M-gs Closed Sets In Interior Minimal Space
Minimal M-gs Open and Maximal M-gs Closed Sets In Interior Minimal Spaceinventionjournals
 

What's hot (17)

On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological SpacesOn Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
On Contra – RW Continuous Functions in Topological Spaces
 
C026014016
C026014016C026014016
C026014016
 
On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...
On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...
On Extendable Sets in the Reals (R) With Application to the Lyapunov Stabilit...
 
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spacesSome forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
Some forms of N-closed Maps in supra Topological spaces
 
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open SetThe Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
The Relationship between Kernel Set and Separation via ω-Open Set
 
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological Spaces
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological SpacesSome Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological Spaces
Some Results on Fuzzy Supra Topological Spaces
 
D223034
D223034D223034
D223034
 
On fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topologyOn fuzzy compact open topology
On fuzzy compact open topology
 
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff SpacesHausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
Hausdorff and Non-Hausdorff Spaces
 
Kundoc.com optimization and-differentiation-in-banach-spaces
Kundoc.com optimization and-differentiation-in-banach-spacesKundoc.com optimization and-differentiation-in-banach-spaces
Kundoc.com optimization and-differentiation-in-banach-spaces
 
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological Spaces
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological SpacesOn some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological Spaces
On some locally closed sets and spaces in Ideal Topological Spaces
 
Topology M.Sc. 2 semester Mathematics compactness, unit - 4
Topology M.Sc. 2 semester Mathematics compactness, unit - 4Topology M.Sc. 2 semester Mathematics compactness, unit - 4
Topology M.Sc. 2 semester Mathematics compactness, unit - 4
 
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
 
1 s2.0-s1574035804702117-main
1 s2.0-s1574035804702117-main1 s2.0-s1574035804702117-main
1 s2.0-s1574035804702117-main
 
On Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some Generalizations
On Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some GeneralizationsOn Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some Generalizations
On Analytic Review of Hahn–Banach Extension Results with Some Generalizations
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
 
Minimal M-gs Open and Maximal M-gs Closed Sets In Interior Minimal Space
Minimal M-gs Open and Maximal M-gs Closed Sets In Interior Minimal SpaceMinimal M-gs Open and Maximal M-gs Closed Sets In Interior Minimal Space
Minimal M-gs Open and Maximal M-gs Closed Sets In Interior Minimal Space
 

Viewers also liked

Non-vacuum solutions of five dimensional Bianchi type-I spacetime in f (R) th...
Non-vacuum solutions of five dimensional Bianchi type-I spacetime in f (R) th...Non-vacuum solutions of five dimensional Bianchi type-I spacetime in f (R) th...
Non-vacuum solutions of five dimensional Bianchi type-I spacetime in f (R) th...inventy
 
Convergence Theorems for Implicit Iteration Scheme With Errors For A Finite F...
Convergence Theorems for Implicit Iteration Scheme With Errors For A Finite F...Convergence Theorems for Implicit Iteration Scheme With Errors For A Finite F...
Convergence Theorems for Implicit Iteration Scheme With Errors For A Finite F...inventy
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Scienceinventy
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Scienceinventy
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Scienceinventy
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Scienceinventy
 
C047012020
C047012020C047012020
C047012020inventy
 
Characteristic comparison of TiO2 thin films with an inorganic and organic pr...
Characteristic comparison of TiO2 thin films with an inorganic and organic pr...Characteristic comparison of TiO2 thin films with an inorganic and organic pr...
Characteristic comparison of TiO2 thin films with an inorganic and organic pr...inventy
 
TQM: A Quality and Performance Enhancer
TQM: A Quality and Performance EnhancerTQM: A Quality and Performance Enhancer
TQM: A Quality and Performance Enhancerinventy
 
I047065076
I047065076I047065076
I047065076inventy
 
F043046054
F043046054F043046054
F043046054inventy
 
B047006011
B047006011B047006011
B047006011inventy
 
B043007014
B043007014B043007014
B043007014inventy
 
Alternative Electric Power Plant that Environmental Friendliness at Indonesia
Alternative Electric Power Plant that Environmental Friendliness at IndonesiaAlternative Electric Power Plant that Environmental Friendliness at Indonesia
Alternative Electric Power Plant that Environmental Friendliness at Indonesiainventy
 
Rigorous Pack Edge Detection Fuzzy System
Rigorous Pack Edge Detection Fuzzy SystemRigorous Pack Edge Detection Fuzzy System
Rigorous Pack Edge Detection Fuzzy Systeminventy
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Scienceinventy
 
GENERATION OF POWER THROUGH HYDROGEN – OXYGEN FUEL CELLS
GENERATION OF POWER THROUGH HYDROGEN – OXYGEN FUEL CELLSGENERATION OF POWER THROUGH HYDROGEN – OXYGEN FUEL CELLS
GENERATION OF POWER THROUGH HYDROGEN – OXYGEN FUEL CELLSinventy
 
B04206015
B04206015B04206015
B04206015inventy
 
Removal of Coke during Steam Reforming of Ethanol over La-CoOx Catalyst
Removal of Coke during Steam Reforming of Ethanol over La-CoOx CatalystRemoval of Coke during Steam Reforming of Ethanol over La-CoOx Catalyst
Removal of Coke during Steam Reforming of Ethanol over La-CoOx Catalystinventy
 

Viewers also liked (19)

Non-vacuum solutions of five dimensional Bianchi type-I spacetime in f (R) th...
Non-vacuum solutions of five dimensional Bianchi type-I spacetime in f (R) th...Non-vacuum solutions of five dimensional Bianchi type-I spacetime in f (R) th...
Non-vacuum solutions of five dimensional Bianchi type-I spacetime in f (R) th...
 
Convergence Theorems for Implicit Iteration Scheme With Errors For A Finite F...
Convergence Theorems for Implicit Iteration Scheme With Errors For A Finite F...Convergence Theorems for Implicit Iteration Scheme With Errors For A Finite F...
Convergence Theorems for Implicit Iteration Scheme With Errors For A Finite F...
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
 
C047012020
C047012020C047012020
C047012020
 
Characteristic comparison of TiO2 thin films with an inorganic and organic pr...
Characteristic comparison of TiO2 thin films with an inorganic and organic pr...Characteristic comparison of TiO2 thin films with an inorganic and organic pr...
Characteristic comparison of TiO2 thin films with an inorganic and organic pr...
 
TQM: A Quality and Performance Enhancer
TQM: A Quality and Performance EnhancerTQM: A Quality and Performance Enhancer
TQM: A Quality and Performance Enhancer
 
I047065076
I047065076I047065076
I047065076
 
F043046054
F043046054F043046054
F043046054
 
B047006011
B047006011B047006011
B047006011
 
B043007014
B043007014B043007014
B043007014
 
Alternative Electric Power Plant that Environmental Friendliness at Indonesia
Alternative Electric Power Plant that Environmental Friendliness at IndonesiaAlternative Electric Power Plant that Environmental Friendliness at Indonesia
Alternative Electric Power Plant that Environmental Friendliness at Indonesia
 
Rigorous Pack Edge Detection Fuzzy System
Rigorous Pack Edge Detection Fuzzy SystemRigorous Pack Edge Detection Fuzzy System
Rigorous Pack Edge Detection Fuzzy System
 
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and ScienceResearch Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science
 
GENERATION OF POWER THROUGH HYDROGEN – OXYGEN FUEL CELLS
GENERATION OF POWER THROUGH HYDROGEN – OXYGEN FUEL CELLSGENERATION OF POWER THROUGH HYDROGEN – OXYGEN FUEL CELLS
GENERATION OF POWER THROUGH HYDROGEN – OXYGEN FUEL CELLS
 
B04206015
B04206015B04206015
B04206015
 
Removal of Coke during Steam Reforming of Ethanol over La-CoOx Catalyst
Removal of Coke during Steam Reforming of Ethanol over La-CoOx CatalystRemoval of Coke during Steam Reforming of Ethanol over La-CoOx Catalyst
Removal of Coke during Steam Reforming of Ethanol over La-CoOx Catalyst
 

Similar to Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science

Nearly Normal Topological Spaces of the First Kind and the Second Kind
Nearly Normal Topological Spaces of the First Kind and the Second KindNearly Normal Topological Spaces of the First Kind and the Second Kind
Nearly Normal Topological Spaces of the First Kind and the Second Kindijtsrd
 
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functions
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute FunctionsTotally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functions
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functionsinventionjournals
 
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected SpacesIJMER
 
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spacesAlexander Decker
 
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spacesAlexander Decker
 
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spacesAlexander Decker
 
Fibrewise near compact and locally near compact spaces
Fibrewise near compact and locally near compact spacesFibrewise near compact and locally near compact spaces
Fibrewise near compact and locally near compact spacesAlexander Decker
 
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES mathsjournal
 
ON β-Normal Spaces
ON β-Normal SpacesON β-Normal Spaces
ON β-Normal Spacesmathsjournal
 
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES mathsjournal
 
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES mathsjournal
 
g∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
g∗S-closed sets in topological spacesg∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
g∗S-closed sets in topological spacesIJMER
 
D223034
D223034D223034
D223034irjes
 
International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES)
International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES)International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES)
International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES)irjes
 
𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spacesIJMER
 

Similar to Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science (20)

04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf
04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf
04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf
 
04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf
04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf
04_AJMS_210_19_RA.pdf
 
18MMA21C-U2.pdf
18MMA21C-U2.pdf18MMA21C-U2.pdf
18MMA21C-U2.pdf
 
Nearly Normal Topological Spaces of the First Kind and the Second Kind
Nearly Normal Topological Spaces of the First Kind and the Second KindNearly Normal Topological Spaces of the First Kind and the Second Kind
Nearly Normal Topological Spaces of the First Kind and the Second Kind
 
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functions
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute FunctionsTotally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functions
Totally R*-Continuous and Totally R*-Irresolute Functions
 
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Compact and 𝑺𝒈 ∗ -Connected Spaces
 
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
11. gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
Gamma sag semi ti spaces in topological spaces
 
Fibrewise near compact and locally near compact spaces
Fibrewise near compact and locally near compact spacesFibrewise near compact and locally near compact spaces
Fibrewise near compact and locally near compact spaces
 
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
 
ON β-Normal Spaces
ON β-Normal SpacesON β-Normal Spaces
ON β-Normal Spaces
 
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
 
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES ON β-NORMAL SPACES
ON β-NORMAL SPACES
 
g∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
g∗S-closed sets in topological spacesg∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
g∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
 
ON SEMI-  -CONTINUITY WHERE   {L, M, R, S}
ON SEMI-  -CONTINUITY WHERE   {L, M, R, S}ON SEMI-  -CONTINUITY WHERE   {L, M, R, S}
ON SEMI-  -CONTINUITY WHERE   {L, M, R, S}
 
D223034
D223034D223034
D223034
 
International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES)
International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES)International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES)
International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES)
 
𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
𝒈 ∗S-closed sets in topological spaces
 
01_AJMS_211_19_REV.pdf
01_AJMS_211_19_REV.pdf01_AJMS_211_19_REV.pdf
01_AJMS_211_19_REV.pdf
 

More from inventy

Experimental Investigation of a Household Refrigerator Using Evaporative-Cool...
Experimental Investigation of a Household Refrigerator Using Evaporative-Cool...Experimental Investigation of a Household Refrigerator Using Evaporative-Cool...
Experimental Investigation of a Household Refrigerator Using Evaporative-Cool...inventy
 
Copper Strip Corrossion Test in Various Aviation Fuels
Copper Strip Corrossion Test in Various Aviation FuelsCopper Strip Corrossion Test in Various Aviation Fuels
Copper Strip Corrossion Test in Various Aviation Fuelsinventy
 
Additional Conservation Laws for Two-Velocity Hydrodynamics Equations with th...
Additional Conservation Laws for Two-Velocity Hydrodynamics Equations with th...Additional Conservation Laws for Two-Velocity Hydrodynamics Equations with th...
Additional Conservation Laws for Two-Velocity Hydrodynamics Equations with th...inventy
 
Comparative Study of the Quality of Life, Quality of Work Life and Organisati...
Comparative Study of the Quality of Life, Quality of Work Life and Organisati...Comparative Study of the Quality of Life, Quality of Work Life and Organisati...
Comparative Study of the Quality of Life, Quality of Work Life and Organisati...inventy
 
A Study of Automated Decision Making Systems
A Study of Automated Decision Making SystemsA Study of Automated Decision Making Systems
A Study of Automated Decision Making Systemsinventy
 
Crystallization of L-Glutamic Acid: Mechanism of Heterogeneous β -Form Nuclea...
Crystallization of L-Glutamic Acid: Mechanism of Heterogeneous β -Form Nuclea...Crystallization of L-Glutamic Acid: Mechanism of Heterogeneous β -Form Nuclea...
Crystallization of L-Glutamic Acid: Mechanism of Heterogeneous β -Form Nuclea...inventy
 
Evaluation of Damage by the Reliability of the Traction Test on Polymer Test ...
Evaluation of Damage by the Reliability of the Traction Test on Polymer Test ...Evaluation of Damage by the Reliability of the Traction Test on Polymer Test ...
Evaluation of Damage by the Reliability of the Traction Test on Polymer Test ...inventy
 
Application of Kennelly’model of Running Performances to Elite Endurance Runn...
Application of Kennelly’model of Running Performances to Elite Endurance Runn...Application of Kennelly’model of Running Performances to Elite Endurance Runn...
Application of Kennelly’model of Running Performances to Elite Endurance Runn...inventy
 
Development and Application of a Failure Monitoring System by Using the Vibra...
Development and Application of a Failure Monitoring System by Using the Vibra...Development and Application of a Failure Monitoring System by Using the Vibra...
Development and Application of a Failure Monitoring System by Using the Vibra...inventy
 
The Management of Protected Areas in Serengeti Ecosystem: A Case Study of Iko...
The Management of Protected Areas in Serengeti Ecosystem: A Case Study of Iko...The Management of Protected Areas in Serengeti Ecosystem: A Case Study of Iko...
The Management of Protected Areas in Serengeti Ecosystem: A Case Study of Iko...inventy
 
Size distribution and biometric relationships of little tunny Euthynnus allet...
Size distribution and biometric relationships of little tunny Euthynnus allet...Size distribution and biometric relationships of little tunny Euthynnus allet...
Size distribution and biometric relationships of little tunny Euthynnus allet...inventy
 
Removal of Chromium (VI) From Aqueous Solutions Using Discarded Solanum Tuber...
Removal of Chromium (VI) From Aqueous Solutions Using Discarded Solanum Tuber...Removal of Chromium (VI) From Aqueous Solutions Using Discarded Solanum Tuber...
Removal of Chromium (VI) From Aqueous Solutions Using Discarded Solanum Tuber...inventy
 
Effect of Various External and Internal Factors on the Carrier Mobility in n-...
Effect of Various External and Internal Factors on the Carrier Mobility in n-...Effect of Various External and Internal Factors on the Carrier Mobility in n-...
Effect of Various External and Internal Factors on the Carrier Mobility in n-...inventy
 
Transient flow analysis for horizontal axial upper-wind turbine
Transient flow analysis for horizontal axial upper-wind turbineTransient flow analysis for horizontal axial upper-wind turbine
Transient flow analysis for horizontal axial upper-wind turbineinventy
 
Choice of Numerical Integration Method for Wind Time History Analysis of Tall...
Choice of Numerical Integration Method for Wind Time History Analysis of Tall...Choice of Numerical Integration Method for Wind Time History Analysis of Tall...
Choice of Numerical Integration Method for Wind Time History Analysis of Tall...inventy
 
Impacts of Demand Side Management on System Reliability Evaluation
Impacts of Demand Side Management on System Reliability EvaluationImpacts of Demand Side Management on System Reliability Evaluation
Impacts of Demand Side Management on System Reliability Evaluationinventy
 
Reliability Evaluation of Riyadh System Incorporating Renewable Generation
Reliability Evaluation of Riyadh System Incorporating Renewable GenerationReliability Evaluation of Riyadh System Incorporating Renewable Generation
Reliability Evaluation of Riyadh System Incorporating Renewable Generationinventy
 
The effect of reduced pressure acetylene plasma treatment on physical charact...
The effect of reduced pressure acetylene plasma treatment on physical charact...The effect of reduced pressure acetylene plasma treatment on physical charact...
The effect of reduced pressure acetylene plasma treatment on physical charact...inventy
 
Experimental Investigation of Mini Cooler cum Freezer
Experimental Investigation of Mini Cooler cum FreezerExperimental Investigation of Mini Cooler cum Freezer
Experimental Investigation of Mini Cooler cum Freezerinventy
 
Growth and Magnetic properties of MnGeP2 thin films
Growth and Magnetic properties of MnGeP2 thin filmsGrowth and Magnetic properties of MnGeP2 thin films
Growth and Magnetic properties of MnGeP2 thin filmsinventy
 

More from inventy (20)

Experimental Investigation of a Household Refrigerator Using Evaporative-Cool...
Experimental Investigation of a Household Refrigerator Using Evaporative-Cool...Experimental Investigation of a Household Refrigerator Using Evaporative-Cool...
Experimental Investigation of a Household Refrigerator Using Evaporative-Cool...
 
Copper Strip Corrossion Test in Various Aviation Fuels
Copper Strip Corrossion Test in Various Aviation FuelsCopper Strip Corrossion Test in Various Aviation Fuels
Copper Strip Corrossion Test in Various Aviation Fuels
 
Additional Conservation Laws for Two-Velocity Hydrodynamics Equations with th...
Additional Conservation Laws for Two-Velocity Hydrodynamics Equations with th...Additional Conservation Laws for Two-Velocity Hydrodynamics Equations with th...
Additional Conservation Laws for Two-Velocity Hydrodynamics Equations with th...
 
Comparative Study of the Quality of Life, Quality of Work Life and Organisati...
Comparative Study of the Quality of Life, Quality of Work Life and Organisati...Comparative Study of the Quality of Life, Quality of Work Life and Organisati...
Comparative Study of the Quality of Life, Quality of Work Life and Organisati...
 
A Study of Automated Decision Making Systems
A Study of Automated Decision Making SystemsA Study of Automated Decision Making Systems
A Study of Automated Decision Making Systems
 
Crystallization of L-Glutamic Acid: Mechanism of Heterogeneous β -Form Nuclea...
Crystallization of L-Glutamic Acid: Mechanism of Heterogeneous β -Form Nuclea...Crystallization of L-Glutamic Acid: Mechanism of Heterogeneous β -Form Nuclea...
Crystallization of L-Glutamic Acid: Mechanism of Heterogeneous β -Form Nuclea...
 
Evaluation of Damage by the Reliability of the Traction Test on Polymer Test ...
Evaluation of Damage by the Reliability of the Traction Test on Polymer Test ...Evaluation of Damage by the Reliability of the Traction Test on Polymer Test ...
Evaluation of Damage by the Reliability of the Traction Test on Polymer Test ...
 
Application of Kennelly’model of Running Performances to Elite Endurance Runn...
Application of Kennelly’model of Running Performances to Elite Endurance Runn...Application of Kennelly’model of Running Performances to Elite Endurance Runn...
Application of Kennelly’model of Running Performances to Elite Endurance Runn...
 
Development and Application of a Failure Monitoring System by Using the Vibra...
Development and Application of a Failure Monitoring System by Using the Vibra...Development and Application of a Failure Monitoring System by Using the Vibra...
Development and Application of a Failure Monitoring System by Using the Vibra...
 
The Management of Protected Areas in Serengeti Ecosystem: A Case Study of Iko...
The Management of Protected Areas in Serengeti Ecosystem: A Case Study of Iko...The Management of Protected Areas in Serengeti Ecosystem: A Case Study of Iko...
The Management of Protected Areas in Serengeti Ecosystem: A Case Study of Iko...
 
Size distribution and biometric relationships of little tunny Euthynnus allet...
Size distribution and biometric relationships of little tunny Euthynnus allet...Size distribution and biometric relationships of little tunny Euthynnus allet...
Size distribution and biometric relationships of little tunny Euthynnus allet...
 
Removal of Chromium (VI) From Aqueous Solutions Using Discarded Solanum Tuber...
Removal of Chromium (VI) From Aqueous Solutions Using Discarded Solanum Tuber...Removal of Chromium (VI) From Aqueous Solutions Using Discarded Solanum Tuber...
Removal of Chromium (VI) From Aqueous Solutions Using Discarded Solanum Tuber...
 
Effect of Various External and Internal Factors on the Carrier Mobility in n-...
Effect of Various External and Internal Factors on the Carrier Mobility in n-...Effect of Various External and Internal Factors on the Carrier Mobility in n-...
Effect of Various External and Internal Factors on the Carrier Mobility in n-...
 
Transient flow analysis for horizontal axial upper-wind turbine
Transient flow analysis for horizontal axial upper-wind turbineTransient flow analysis for horizontal axial upper-wind turbine
Transient flow analysis for horizontal axial upper-wind turbine
 
Choice of Numerical Integration Method for Wind Time History Analysis of Tall...
Choice of Numerical Integration Method for Wind Time History Analysis of Tall...Choice of Numerical Integration Method for Wind Time History Analysis of Tall...
Choice of Numerical Integration Method for Wind Time History Analysis of Tall...
 
Impacts of Demand Side Management on System Reliability Evaluation
Impacts of Demand Side Management on System Reliability EvaluationImpacts of Demand Side Management on System Reliability Evaluation
Impacts of Demand Side Management on System Reliability Evaluation
 
Reliability Evaluation of Riyadh System Incorporating Renewable Generation
Reliability Evaluation of Riyadh System Incorporating Renewable GenerationReliability Evaluation of Riyadh System Incorporating Renewable Generation
Reliability Evaluation of Riyadh System Incorporating Renewable Generation
 
The effect of reduced pressure acetylene plasma treatment on physical charact...
The effect of reduced pressure acetylene plasma treatment on physical charact...The effect of reduced pressure acetylene plasma treatment on physical charact...
The effect of reduced pressure acetylene plasma treatment on physical charact...
 
Experimental Investigation of Mini Cooler cum Freezer
Experimental Investigation of Mini Cooler cum FreezerExperimental Investigation of Mini Cooler cum Freezer
Experimental Investigation of Mini Cooler cum Freezer
 
Growth and Magnetic properties of MnGeP2 thin films
Growth and Magnetic properties of MnGeP2 thin filmsGrowth and Magnetic properties of MnGeP2 thin films
Growth and Magnetic properties of MnGeP2 thin films
 

Recently uploaded

System Simulation and Modelling with types and Event Scheduling
System Simulation and Modelling with types and Event SchedulingSystem Simulation and Modelling with types and Event Scheduling
System Simulation and Modelling with types and Event SchedulingBootNeck1
 
『澳洲文凭』买麦考瑞大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲Macquarie文凭学位证书
『澳洲文凭』买麦考瑞大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲Macquarie文凭学位证书『澳洲文凭』买麦考瑞大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲Macquarie文凭学位证书
『澳洲文凭』买麦考瑞大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲Macquarie文凭学位证书rnrncn29
 
2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.
2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.
2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.elesangwon
 
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptxMine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptxRomil Mishra
 
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionUS Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionMebane Rash
 
DEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS SERVICE MECHANISM.pdf
DEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS  SERVICE MECHANISM.pdfDEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS  SERVICE MECHANISM.pdf
DEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS SERVICE MECHANISM.pdfAkritiPradhan2
 
SOFTWARE ESTIMATION COCOMO AND FP CALCULATION
SOFTWARE ESTIMATION COCOMO AND FP CALCULATIONSOFTWARE ESTIMATION COCOMO AND FP CALCULATION
SOFTWARE ESTIMATION COCOMO AND FP CALCULATIONSneha Padhiar
 
Input Output Management in Operating System
Input Output Management in Operating SystemInput Output Management in Operating System
Input Output Management in Operating SystemRashmi Bhat
 
Earthing details of Electrical Substation
Earthing details of Electrical SubstationEarthing details of Electrical Substation
Earthing details of Electrical Substationstephanwindworld
 
Paper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdf
Paper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdfPaper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdf
Paper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdfNainaShrivastava14
 
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...Stork
 
Robotics Group 10 (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
Robotics Group 10  (Control Schemes) cse.pdfRobotics Group 10  (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
Robotics Group 10 (Control Schemes) cse.pdfsahilsajad201
 
Novel 3D-Printed Soft Linear and Bending Actuators
Novel 3D-Printed Soft Linear and Bending ActuatorsNovel 3D-Printed Soft Linear and Bending Actuators
Novel 3D-Printed Soft Linear and Bending ActuatorsResearcher Researcher
 
Levelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument method
Levelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument methodLevelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument method
Levelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument methodManicka Mamallan Andavar
 
TechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor Catchers
TechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor CatchersTechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor Catchers
TechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor Catcherssdickerson1
 
Katarzyna Lipka-Sidor - BIM School Course
Katarzyna Lipka-Sidor - BIM School CourseKatarzyna Lipka-Sidor - BIM School Course
Katarzyna Lipka-Sidor - BIM School Coursebim.edu.pl
 
Python Programming for basic beginners.pptx
Python Programming for basic beginners.pptxPython Programming for basic beginners.pptx
Python Programming for basic beginners.pptxmohitesoham12
 
Engineering Drawing section of solid
Engineering Drawing     section of solidEngineering Drawing     section of solid
Engineering Drawing section of solidnamansinghjarodiya
 
Immutable Image-Based Operating Systems - EW2024.pdf
Immutable Image-Based Operating Systems - EW2024.pdfImmutable Image-Based Operating Systems - EW2024.pdf
Immutable Image-Based Operating Systems - EW2024.pdfDrew Moseley
 

Recently uploaded (20)

System Simulation and Modelling with types and Event Scheduling
System Simulation and Modelling with types and Event SchedulingSystem Simulation and Modelling with types and Event Scheduling
System Simulation and Modelling with types and Event Scheduling
 
『澳洲文凭』买麦考瑞大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲Macquarie文凭学位证书
『澳洲文凭』买麦考瑞大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲Macquarie文凭学位证书『澳洲文凭』买麦考瑞大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲Macquarie文凭学位证书
『澳洲文凭』买麦考瑞大学毕业证书成绩单办理澳洲Macquarie文凭学位证书
 
2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.
2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.
2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.
 
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptxMine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
Mine Environment II Lab_MI10448MI__________.pptx
 
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionUS Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
 
DEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS SERVICE MECHANISM.pdf
DEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS  SERVICE MECHANISM.pdfDEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS  SERVICE MECHANISM.pdf
DEVICE DRIVERS AND INTERRUPTS SERVICE MECHANISM.pdf
 
SOFTWARE ESTIMATION COCOMO AND FP CALCULATION
SOFTWARE ESTIMATION COCOMO AND FP CALCULATIONSOFTWARE ESTIMATION COCOMO AND FP CALCULATION
SOFTWARE ESTIMATION COCOMO AND FP CALCULATION
 
Input Output Management in Operating System
Input Output Management in Operating SystemInput Output Management in Operating System
Input Output Management in Operating System
 
Earthing details of Electrical Substation
Earthing details of Electrical SubstationEarthing details of Electrical Substation
Earthing details of Electrical Substation
 
Paper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdf
Paper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdfPaper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdf
Paper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdf
 
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
 
Robotics Group 10 (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
Robotics Group 10  (Control Schemes) cse.pdfRobotics Group 10  (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
Robotics Group 10 (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
 
Novel 3D-Printed Soft Linear and Bending Actuators
Novel 3D-Printed Soft Linear and Bending ActuatorsNovel 3D-Printed Soft Linear and Bending Actuators
Novel 3D-Printed Soft Linear and Bending Actuators
 
Levelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument method
Levelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument methodLevelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument method
Levelling - Rise and fall - Height of instrument method
 
TechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor Catchers
TechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor CatchersTechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor Catchers
TechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor Catchers
 
Katarzyna Lipka-Sidor - BIM School Course
Katarzyna Lipka-Sidor - BIM School CourseKatarzyna Lipka-Sidor - BIM School Course
Katarzyna Lipka-Sidor - BIM School Course
 
Python Programming for basic beginners.pptx
Python Programming for basic beginners.pptxPython Programming for basic beginners.pptx
Python Programming for basic beginners.pptx
 
Designing pile caps according to ACI 318-19.pptx
Designing pile caps according to ACI 318-19.pptxDesigning pile caps according to ACI 318-19.pptx
Designing pile caps according to ACI 318-19.pptx
 
Engineering Drawing section of solid
Engineering Drawing     section of solidEngineering Drawing     section of solid
Engineering Drawing section of solid
 
Immutable Image-Based Operating Systems - EW2024.pdf
Immutable Image-Based Operating Systems - EW2024.pdfImmutable Image-Based Operating Systems - EW2024.pdf
Immutable Image-Based Operating Systems - EW2024.pdf
 

Research Inventy : International Journal of Engineering and Science

  • 1. Research Inventy: International Journal of Engineering And Science Vol.4, Issue 6 (June 2014), PP 37-45 Issn (e): 2278-4721, Issn (p):2319-6483, www.researchinventy.com 37 Higher Separation Axioms via Semi*-open sets S. Pious Missier1 , A. Robert2 1 Department of Mathematics, V.O.Chidambaram College, Thoothukudi, India-628008. 2 Department of Mathematics, Aditanar College, Tiruchendur, India-628216. Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to introduce new separation axioms semi*-regular, semi*-normal, s*- regular, s**-normal using semi*-open sets and investigate their properties. We also study the relationships among themselves and with known axioms regular, normal, semi-regular and semi-normal. Mathematics Subject Classification 2010: 54D10, 54D15 Keywords and phrases: s**-normal, s*-regular, semi*-normal, semi*-regular. I. INTRODUCTION Separation axioms are useful in classifying topological spaces. Maheswari and Prasad [8, 9] introduced the notion of s-regular and s-normal spaces using semi-open sets. Dorsett [3, 4] introduced the concept of semi-regular and semi-normal spaces and investigate their properties. In this paper, we define semi*-regular, semi*-normal, s*-regular and s**-normal spaces using semi*- open sets and investigate their basic properties. We further study the relationships among themselves and with known axioms regular, normal, semi-regular and semi-normal. II. PRELIMINARIES Throughout this paper (X, τ) will always denote a topological space on which no separation axioms are assumed, unless explicitly stated. If A is a subset of the space (X, τ), Cl(A) and Int(A) respectively denote the closure and the interior of A in X . Definition 2.1[7]: A subset A of a topological space (X, τ) is called (i) generalized closed (briefly g-closed) if Cl(A)⊆U whenever A⊆U and U is open in X. (ii) generalized open (briefly g-open) if XA is g-closed in X. Definition 2.2: Let A be a subset of X. Then (i) generalized closure[5] of A is defined as the intersection of all g-closed sets containing A and is denoted by Cl*(A). (ii) generalized interior of A is defined as the union of all g-open subsets of A and is denoted by Int*(A). Definition 2.3: A subset A of a topological space (X, τ) is called (i) semi-open [6] (resp. semi*-open[12]) if A⊆Cl(Int(A)) (resp. A⊆Cl*(Int(A)). (ii) semi-closed [1] (resp. semi*-closed[13]) if Int(Cl(A))⊆A (resp. Int*(Cl(A))⊆A). The class of all semi*-open (resp. semi*-closed) sets is denoted by S*O(X, τ) (resp. S*C(X,τ)). The semi*-interior of A is defined as the union of all semi*-open sets of X contained in A. It is denoted by s*Int(A).The semi*-closure of A is defined as the intersection of all semi*-closed sets in X containing A. It is denoted by s*Cl(A). Theorem 2.4[13]: Let AX and let xX. Then xs*Cl(A) if and only if every semi*-open set in X containing x intersects A.
  • 2. Higher Separation Axioms via… 38 Theorem 2.5[12]: (i) Every open set is semi*-open. (ii) Every semi*-open set is semi-open. Definition 2.6: A space X is said to be T1[17] if for every pair of distinct points x and y in X, there is an open set U containing x but not y and an open set V containing y but not x. Definition 2.7: A space X is R0 [16] if every open set contains the closure of each of its points. Theorem 2.8: (i) X is R0 if and only if for every closed set F, Cl({x})F=ϕ, for all xXF. (ii) X is semi*-R0 if and only if for every semi*-closed set F, s*Cl({x})F=ϕ, for all xXF. Definition 2.9: A topological space X is said to be (i) regular if for every pair consisting of a point x and a closed set B not containing x, there are disjoint open sets U and V in X containing x and B respectively.[17] (ii) s-regular if for every pair consisting of a point x and a closed set B not containing x, there are disjoint semi-open sets U and V in X containing x and B respectively.[8] (iii) semi-regular if for every pair consisting of a point x and a semi-closed set B not containing x, there are disjoint semi-open sets U and V in X containing x and B respectively.[3] Definition 2.10: A topological space X is said to be (i) normal if for every pair of disjoint closed sets A and B in X, there are disjoint open sets U and V in X containing A and B respectively.[17] (ii) s-normal if for every pair of disjoint closed sets A and B in X, there are disjoint semi-open sets U and V in X containing A and B respectively.[9] (iii) semi-normal if for every pair of disjoint semi-closed sets A and B in X, there are disjoint semi-open sets U and V in X containing A and B respectively.[4] Definition 2.11: A function f :X⟶Y is said to be (i) closed [17] if f (V) is closed in Y for every closed set V in X. (ii) semi*-continuous [14] if f -1 (V) is semi*-open in X for every open set V in Y. (iii) semi*-irresolute [15] if f -1 (V) is semi*-open in X for every semi*-open set V in Y. (iv) contra-semi*-irresolute [15] if f -1 (V) is semi*-closed in X for every semi*-open set V in Y. (v) semi*-open [14] if f (V) is semi*-open in Y for every open set V in X. (vi) pre-semi*-open [14] if f(V) is semi*-open in Y for every semi*-open set V in X (vii) contra-pre-semi*-open [14] if f(V) is semi*-closed in Y for every semi*-open set V in X. (viii) pre-semi*-closed [14] if f(V) is semi*-closed in Y for every semi*-closed set V in X. Lemma 2.12[10]: If A and B are subsets of X such that A∩B=ϕ and A is semi*-open in X, then A∩s*Cl(B)=ϕ. Theorem 2.13[15]: A function f :X⟶Y is semi*-irresolute if f -1 (F) is semi*-closed in X for every semi*- closed set F in Y. III. REGULAR SPACES ASSOCIATED WITH SEMI*-OPEN SETS. In this section we introduce the concepts of semi*-regular and s*-regular spaces. Also we investigate their basic properties and study their relationship with already existing concepts. Definition 3.1: A space X is said to be semi*-regular if for every pair consisting of a point x and a semi*-closed set B not containing x, there are disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing x and B respectively.
  • 3. Higher Separation Axioms via… 39 Theorem 3.2: In a topological space X, the following are equivalent: (i) X is semi*-regular. (ii) For every xX and every semi*-open set U containing x, there exists a semi*-open set V containing x such that s*Cl(V)U. (iii) For every set A and a semi*-open set B such that ABϕ, there exists a semi*- open set U such that AUϕ and s*Cl(U)B. (iv) For every non-empty set A and semi*-closed set B such that AB=ϕ, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V such that AUϕ and BV. Proof: (i)(ii): Let U be a semi*-open set containing x. Then B=XU is a semi*-closed not containing x. Since X is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets V and W containing x and B respectively. If y∈B, W is a semi*-open set containing y that does not intersect V and hence by Theorem 2.4, y cannot belong to s*Cl(V). Therefore s*Cl(V) is disjoint from B. Hence s*Cl(V)⊆U (ii)(iii): Let ABϕ and B be semi*-open. Let xAB. Then by assumption, there exists a semi*-open set U containing x such that s*Cl(U)B. Since xA, AUϕ. This proves (iii). (iii)(iv): Suppose AB=ϕ, where A is non-empty and B is semi*-closed. Then XB is semi*-open and A(XB)ϕ. By (iii), there exists a semi*-open set U such that AUϕ, and Us*Cl(U)XB. Put V=Xs*Cl(U). Hence V is a semi*-open set containing B such that UV=U(Xs*Cl(U))U(XU)=ϕ. This proves (iv). (iv)(i). Let B be semi*-closed and xB. Take A={x}. Then AB=ϕ. By (iv), there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V such that UAϕ and BV. Since UAϕ, xU. This proves that X is semi*-regular. Theorem 3.3: Let X be a semi*-regular space. (i) Every semi*-open set in X is a union of semi*-closed sets. (ii) Every semi*-closed set in X is an intersection of semi*-open sets. Proof: (i) Suppose X is s*-regular. Let G be a semi*-open set and xG. Then F=XG is semi*-closed and x F. Since X is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets Ux and V in X such that xUx and F V. Since Ux∩F Ux ∩V=ϕ, we have Ux XF=G. Take Vx=s*Cl(Ux). Then Vx is semi*-closed and by Lemma 2.12, Vx∩V=ϕ. Now FV implies that Vx∩F  Vx∩V=ϕ. It follows that x Vx  XF = G. This proves that G =∪{Vx : xG}. Thus G is a union of semi*-closed sets. (ii) Follows from (i) and set theoretic properties. Theorem 3.4: If f is a semi*-irresolute and pre-semi*-closed injection of a topological space X into a semi*- regular space Y, then X is semi*-regular. Proof: Let xX and A be a semi*-closed set in X not containing x. Since f is pre-semi*-closed, f(A) is a semi*- closed set in Y not containing f(x). Since Y is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets V1 and V2 in Y such that f(x)V1 and f(A)⊆V2. Since f is semi*-irresolute, f -1 (V1) and f -1 (V2) are disjoint semi*-open sets in X containing x and A respectively. Hence X is semi*-regular. Theorem 3.5: If f is a semi*-continuous and closed injection of a topological space X into a regular space Y and if every semi*-closed set in X is closed, then X is semi*-regular.
  • 4. Higher Separation Axioms via… 40 Proof: Let xX and A be a semi*-closed set in X not containing x. Then by assumption, A is closed in X. Since f is closed, f(A) is a closed set in Y not containing f(x). Since Y is regular, there exist disjoint open sets V1 and V2 in Y such that f(x)V1 and f(A)⊆V2. Since f is semi*-continuous, f-1 (V1) and f-1 (V2) are disjoint semi*-open sets in X containing x and A respectively. Hence X is semi*-regular. Theorem 3.6: If f :X⟶Y is a semi*-irresolute bijection which is pre-semi*-open and X is semi*-regular. Then Y is also semi*-regular. Proof: Let f :X⟶Y be a semi*-irresolute bijection which is semi*-open and X be semi*-regular. Let y∈Y and B be a semi*-closed set in Y not containing y. Since f is semi*-irresolute, by Theorem 2.13 f -1 (B) is a semi*- closed set in X not containing f -1 (y). Since X is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U1 and U2 containing f -1 (y) and f -1 (B) respectively. Since f is pre-semi*-open, f(U1) and f(U2) are disjoint semi*-open sets in Y containing y and B respectively. Hence Y is semi*-regular. Theorem 3.7: If f is a continuous semi*-open bijection of a regular space X into a space Y and if every semi*- closed set in Y is closed, then Y is semi*-regular. Proof: Let y∈Y and B be a semi*-closed set in Y not containing y. Then by assumption, B is closed in Y. Since f is a continuous bijection, f -1 (B) is a closed set in X not containing the point f -1 (y). Since X is regular, there exist disjoint open sets U1 and U2 in X such that f -1 (y)∈U1 and f -1 (B)⊆U2. Since f is semi*-open, f( U1) and f (U2) are disjoint semi*-open sets in Y containing x and B respectively. Hence Y is semi*-regular. Theorem 3.8: If X is semi*-regular, then it is semi*-R0. Proof: Suppose X is semi*-regular. Let U be a semi*-open set and xU. Take F = XU. Then F is a semi*- closed set not containing x. By semi*-regularity of X, there are disjoint semi*-open sets V and W such that xV, FW. If yF, then W is a semi*-open set containing y that does not intersect V. Therefore ys*Cl({V}) ⇒ ys*Cl({x}). That is s*Cl({x})∩F=ϕ and hence s*Cl({x})XF= U. Hence X is semi*-R0. Definition 3.9: A space X is said to be s*-regular if for every pair consisting of a point x and a closed set B not containing x, there are disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing x and B respectively. Theorem 3.10: (i) Every regular space is s*-regular. (ii) Every s*-regular space is s-regular. Proof: Suppose X is regular. Let F be a closed set and xF. Since X is regular, there exist disjoint open sets U and V containing x and F respectively. Then by Theorem 2.5(i) U and V are semi*-open in X. This implies that X is s*-regular. This proves (i). Suppose X is s*-regular. Let F be a closed set and xF. Since X is s*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V containing x and F respectively. Then by Theorem 2.5(ii) U and V are semi-open in X. This implies that X is s-regular. This proves (ii). Remark 3.11: The reverse implications of the statements in the above theorem are not true as shown in the following examples. Example 3.12: Let X={a, b, c, d} with topology ={ϕ, {a}, {b}, {c}, {a, b}, {a, c}, {b, c}, {a, b, c}, X}. Clearly (X,) is s*-regular but not regular. Example 3.13: Let X={a, b, c, d} with topology ={ϕ, {a}, {b}, {a, b}, {a, b, c}, X} Clearly (X,) is s- regular not s*-regular. Theorem 3.14: For a topological space X, the following are equivalent:
  • 5. Higher Separation Axioms via… 41 (i) X is s*-regular. (ii) For every xX and every open set U containing x, there exists a semi*-open set V containing x such that s*Cl(V)U. (iii) For every set A and an open set B such that ABϕ, there exists a semi*-open set U such that AUϕ and s*Cl(U)B. (iv) For every non-empty set A and closed set B such that AB=ϕ, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V such that AUϕ and BV. Proof: (i)(ii): Let U be an open set containing x. Then B=XU is a closed set not containing x. Since X is s*- regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets V and W containing x and B respectively. If y∈B, W is a semi*- open set containing y that does not intersect V and hence by Theorem 2.4, y cannot belong to s*Cl(V). Therefore s*Cl(V) is disjoint from B. Hence s*Cl(V)⊆U. (ii)(iii): Let ABϕ and B be open. Let xAB. Then by assumption, there exists a semi*-open set U containing x such that s*Cl(U)B. Since xA, AUϕ. This proves (iii). (iii)(iv): Suppose AB=ϕ, where A is non-empty and B is closed. Then XB is open and A(XB)ϕ. By (iii), there exists a semi*-open set U such that AUϕ, and Us*Cl(U)XB. Put V=Xs*Cl(U). Hence V is a semi*-open set containing B such that UV=U(Xs*Cl(U)) U(XU)=ϕ. This proves (iv). (iv)(i). Let B be closed and xB. Take A={x}. Then AB=ϕ. By (iv), there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V such that UAϕ and BV. Since UAϕ, xU. This proves that X is s*-regular. Theorem 3.15: If X is a regular T1 space, then for every pair of distinct points of X there exist semi*-open sets containing them whose semi*-closures are disjoint. Proof: Let x, y be two distinct points in the regular T1 space X. Since X is T1, {y} is closed. Since X is regular, there exist disjoint open sets U1 and U2 containing x and {y} respectively. By Theorem 3.9(i), X is s*-regular and hence by Theorem 3.13, there exist semi*-open sets V1 and V2 containing x, y such that s*Cl(V1)⊆U1 and s*Cl(V2)⊆U2. Since U1 and U2 are disjoint, s*Cl(V1) and s*Cl(V2) are disjoint. This proves the theorem. Theorem 3.16: Every semi*-regular space is s*-regular. Proof: Suppose X is semi*-regular. Let F be a closed set and xF. Then by Theorem (i), F is semi*-closed in X. Since X is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V containing x and F respectively. This implies that X is s*-regular. Theorem 3.17: (i) Every s*-regular T1 space is semi*-T2. (ii) Every semi*-regular semi*-T1 space is semi*-T2. Proof: Suppose X is s*-regular and T1. Let x and y be two distinct points in X. Since X is T1, {x} is closed and y{x}. Since X is s*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing {x} and y respectively. It follows that X is semi*-T2. This proves (i). Suppose X is semi*-regular and semi*-T1. Let x and y be two distinct points in X. Since X is semi*-T1, {x} is semi*-closed and y{x}. Since X is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing {x} and y respectively. It follows that X is semi*-T2. This proves (ii). Theorem 3.18: Let X be an s*-regular space. i) Every open set in X is a union of semi*-closed sets.
  • 6. Higher Separation Axioms via… 42 ii) Every closed set in X is an intersection of semi*-open sets. Proof: (i) Suppose X is s*-regular. Let G be an open set and xG. Then F=XG is closed and x F. Since X is s*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets Ux and U in X such that xUx and F U. Since Ux∩F Ux ∩U=ϕ, we have Ux XF=G. Take Vx=s*Cl(Ux). Then Vx is semi*-closed. Now FU implies that Vx∩F  Vx∩U=ϕ. It follows that x Vx  XF = G. This proves that G =∪{Vx : xG}. Thus G is a union of semi*-closed sets. (ii) Follows from (i) and set theoretic properties. IV. NORMAL SPACES ASSOCIATED WITH SEMI*-OPEN SETS. In this section we introduce variants of normal spaces namely semi*-normal spaces and s**-normal spaces and investigate their basic properties. We also give characterizations for these spaces. Definition 4.1: A space X is said to be semi*-normal if for every pair of disjoint semi*-closed sets A and B in X, there are disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing A and B respectively. Theorem 4.2: In a topological space X, the following are equivalent: (i) X is semi*-normal. (ii) For every semi*-closed set A in X and every semi*-open set U containing A, there exists a semi*- open set V containing A such that s*Cl(V)U. (iii) For each pair of disjoint semi*-closed sets A and B in X, there exists a semi*-open set U containing A such that s*Cl(U)∩B=ϕ. (iv) For each pair of disjoint semi*-closed sets A and B in X, there exist semi*-open sets U and V containing A and B respectively such that s*Cl(U)∩s*Cl(V)=ϕ. Proof: (i)(ii): Let U be a semi*-open set containing the semi*-closed set A. Then B=XU is a semi*-closed set disjoint from A. Since X is semi*-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets V and W containing A and B respectively. Then s*Cl(V) is disjoint from B, since if y∈B, the set W is a semi*-open set containing y disjoint from V. Hence s*Cl(V)⊆U. (ii)(iii): Let A and B be disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. Then XB is a semi*-open set containing A. By (ii), there exists a semi*-open set U containing A such that s*Cl(U)  XB. Hence s*Cl(U)∩B=ϕ. This proves (iii). (iii)(iv): Let A and B be disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. Then, by (iii), there exists a semi*-open set U containing A such that s*Cl(U)∩B=ϕ. Since s*Cl(U) is semi*-closed, B and s*Cl(U) are disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. Again by (iii), there exists a semi*-open set V containing B such that s*Cl(U)∩s*Cl(V)=ϕ. This proves (iv). (iv)(i): Let A and B be the disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. By (iv), there exist semi*-open sets U and V containing A and B respectively such that s*Cl(U)∩s*Cl(V)=ϕ. Since U∩V s*Cl(U)∩s*Cl(V), U and V are disjoint semi*-open sets containing A and B respectively. Thus X is semi*-normal. Theorem 4.3: For a space X, then the following are equivalent: (i) X is semi*-normal. (ii) For any two semi*-open sets U and V whose union is X, there exist semi*-closed subsets A of U and B of V whose union is also X.
  • 7. Higher Separation Axioms via… 43 Proof: (i)(ii): Let U and V be two semi*-open sets in a semi*-normal space X such that X=U∪V. Then XU, XV are disjoint semi*-closed sets. Since X is semi*-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets G1 and G2 such that XUG1 and XVG2. Let A=XG1 and B=XG2. Then A and B are semi*-closed subsets of U and V respectively such that A∪B=X. This proves (ii). (ii)(i): Let A and B be disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. Then XA and XB are semi*-open sets whose union is X. By (ii), there exists semi*-closed sets F1 and F2 such that F1⊆XA, F2⊆XB and F1∪F2 =X. Then XF1 and XF2 are disjoint semi*-open sets containing A and B respectively. Therefore X is semi*-normal. Definition 4.4: A space X is said to be s**-normal if for every pair of disjoint closed sets A and B in X, there are disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing A and B respectively. Theorem 4.5: (i) Every normal space is s**-normal. (ii) Every s**-normal space is s-normal. (iii) Every semi*-normal space is s**-normal. Proof: Suppose X is normal. Let A and B be disjoint closed sets in X. Since X is normal, there exist disjoint open sets U and V containing A and B respectively. Then by Theorem 2.5(i), U and V are semi*-open in X. This implies that X is s**-normal. This proves (i). Suppose X is s**-normal. Let A and B be disjoint closed sets in X. Since X is s**-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V containing A and B respectively. Then by Theorem 2.5(ii), U and V are semi-open in X. This implies that X is s-normal. This proves (ii). Suppose X is semi*-regular. Let A and B be disjoint closed sets in X. Then by Theorem 2.5(i), A and B are disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. Since X is semi*-regular, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V containing A and B respectively. Therefore X is s**-normal. This proves (iii). Theorem 4.6: In a topological space X, the following are equivalent: (i) X is s**-normal. (ii) For every closed set F in X and every open set U containing F, there exists a semi*-open set V containing F such that s*Cl(V)U. (iii) For each pair of disjoint closed sets A and B in X, there exists a semi*-open set U containing A such that s*Cl(U)∩B=ϕ. Proof: (i)(ii): Let U be a open set containing the closed set F. Then H=XU is a closed set disjoint from F. Since X is s**-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets V and W containing F and H respectively. Then s*Cl(V) is disjoint from H, since if y∈H, the set W is a semi*-open set containing y disjoint from V. Hence s*Cl(V)⊆U. (ii)(iii): Let A and B be disjoint closed sets in X. Then XB is an open set containing A. By (ii), there exists a semi*-open set U containing A such that s*Cl(U)  XB. Hence s*Cl(U)∩B=ϕ. This proves (iii). (iii)(i): Let A and B be the disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. By (iii), there exists a semi*-open set U containing A such that s*Cl(U)∩B=ϕ. Take V=Xs*Cl(U). Then U and V are disjoint semi*-open sets containing A and B respectively. Thus X is s**-normal. Theorem 4.7: For a space X, then the following are equivalent: (i) X is s**-normal.
  • 8. Higher Separation Axioms via… 44 (ii) For any two open sets U and V whose union is X, there exist semi*-closed subsets A of U and B of V whose union is also X. Proof: (i)(ii): Let U and V be two open sets in an s**-normal space X such that X=U∪V. Then XU, XV are disjoint closed sets. Since X is s**-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets G1 and G2 such that XUG1 and XVG2. Let A=XG1 and B=XG2. Then A and B are semi*-closed subsets of U and V respectively such that A∪B=X. This proves (ii). (ii)(i): Let A and B be disjoint closed sets in X. Then XA and XB are open sets whose union is X. By (ii), there exists semi*-closed sets F1 and F2 such that F1⊆XA, F2⊆XB and F1∪F2 =X. Then XF1 and XF2 are disjoint semi*-open sets containing A and B respectively. Therefore X is s**-normal. Remark 4.8: It is not always true that an s**-normal space X is s*-regular as shown in the following example. However it is true if X is R0 as seen in Theorem 4.10. Example 4.9: Let X={a, b, c, d} with topology ={ϕ, {a}, {b}, {a, b}, {a, b, c}, X}. Clearly (X,) is s**- normal but not s*-regular. Theorem 4.10: Every s**-normal R0 space is s*-regular. Proof: Suppose X is s**-normal and R0. Let F be a closed set and xF. Since X is R0, by Theorem 2.8(i), Cl({x})∩F=ϕ. Since X is s**-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing Cl({x}) and F respectively. It follows that X is s*-regular. Corollary 4.11: Every s**-normal T1 space is s*-regular. Proof: Follows from the fact that every T1 space is R0 and Theorem 4.10. Theorem 4.12: If f is an injective and semi*-irresolute and pre-semi*-closed mapping of a topological space X into a semi*-normal space Y, then X is semi*-normal. Proof: Let f be an injective and semi*-irresolute and pre-semi*-closed mapping of a topological space X into a semi*-normal space Y. Let A and B be disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. Since f is a pre-semi*-closed function, f(A) and f(B) are disjoint semi*-closed sets in Y. Since Y is semi*-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets V1 and V2 in Y containing f(A) and f(B) respectively. Since f is semi*-irresolute, f -1 (V1) and f -1 (V2) are disjoint semi*-open sets in X containing A and B respectively. Hence X is semi*-normal. Theorem 4.13: If f is an injective and semi*-continuous and closed mapping of a topological space X into a normal space Y and if every semi*-closed set in X is closed, then X is semi*- normal. Proof: Let A and B be disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. By assumption, A and B are closed in X. Then f(A) and f(B) are disjoint closed sets in Y. Since Y is normal, there exist disjoint open sets V1 and V2 in Y such that f(A)⊆V1 and f(B)⊆V2.Then f -1 (V1) and f -1 (V2) are disjoint semi*-open sets in X containing A and B respectively. Hence X is semi*- normal. Theorem 4.14: If f :X⟶Y is a semi*-irresolute injection which is pre-semi*-open and X is semi*-normal, then Y is alsosemi*-normal. Proof: Let f :X⟶Y be a semi*-irresolute surjection which is semi*-open and X be semi*-normal. Let A and B be disjoint semi*-closed sets in Y. Then f -1 (A) and f -1 (B) are disjoint semi*-closed sets in X. Since X is semi*- normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U1 and U2 containing f -1 (A) and f -1 (B) respectively. Since f is pre- semi*-open, f(U1) and f(U2) are disjoint semi*-open sets in Y containing A and B respectively. Hence Y is semi*-normal.
  • 9. Higher Separation Axioms via… 45 Remark 4.15: It is not always true that a semi*-normal space X is semi*-regular as shown in the following example. However it is true if X is semi*-R0 as seen in Theorem 4.17. Example 4.16: Let X={a, b, c, d} with topology ={ϕ, {a, b}, X}. Clearly (X,) is semi*-normal but not semi*- regular. Theorem 4.17: Every semi*-normal space that is semi*-R0 is semi*-regular. Proof: Suppose X is semi*-normal that is semi*-R0. Let F be a semi*-closed set and xF. Since X is semi*-R0, by Theorem 2.8(ii), s*Cl({x})∩F=ϕ. Since X is semi*-normal, there exist disjoint semi*-open sets U and V in X containing s*Cl({x}) and F respectively. It follows that X is semi*-regular. Corollary 4.18: Every semi*-normal semi*-T1 space is semi*-regular. Proof: Follows from the fact that every semi*-T1 space is semi*-R0 and Theorem 4.13. REFERENCES [1] Biswas, N., On Characterization of semi-continuous functions, Atti. Accad. Naz. Lincei. Rend. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur. 48(8)1970, 399-402. [2] Crossley, S.G and Hildebrand, S.K., Semi-topological properties, Fund. Math.74 (1972), 233-254. [3] Dorsett, C., Semi –regular spaces, Soochow journal of Mathematics, 8 (1982), 45-53. [4] Dorsett, C., Semi-Normal Spaces, Kyungpook Mathematical Journal, 25 (2)(1985), 173-180. [5] Dunham, W., A new closure operator for Non-T1 topologies, Kyungpook Math. J. 22 (1982), 55-60. [6] Levine,N., Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological space , Amer. Math. Monthly. 70 (1963), 36-41. [7] Levine,N., Generalized closed sets in topology, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo. 19(2)(1970), 89-96. [8] Maheswari, S.N., and Prasad, R., On s-regular spaces, Glansnik Mat.Ser.III 10 (30), 1975, 347-350. [9] Maheswari, S.N., and Prasad, R., On s-normal spaces, Bull. Math. Soc. Sci Math. R. S. de Roumanie T22(70), 1978, 27-30. [10] Pious Missier, S., and Robert, A., On Semi*-open Sets, International Journal of Mathematics and Soft Computing, 2(1) (2012), 95-102. [11] Pious Missier, S. and Robert, A., Characterization of semi*-R0 and semi*-R1 spaces (communicated) [12] Robert, A. and Pious Missier, S., A New Class of Nearly Open Sets, International Journal of Mathematical Archive, 3(7), 2012, 1-8. [13] Robert, A. and Pious Missier, S., On Semi*-closed sets, Asian Journal Of Current Engineering And Maths.,1 (4) (2012),173-176. [14] Robert, A. and Pious Missier, S., On Functions Associated with Semi*-open Sets, (communicated). [15] Robert, A. and Pious Missier, S., More Functions Associated with Semi*-open Sets, (communicated). [16] Shanin, N.A., On separation in topological spaces, C.R.(Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS(N.S.), 38(1943),110-113. [17] Willard, S., General Topology, Addison – Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.(1970).